| Literature DB >> 35681855 |
Nana Mikami1, Takahito Toyotome2,3,4, Masahiro Takaya5, Kenichi Tamura6.
Abstract
Here, we established a method to produce dry-aged beef (DAB) by rub inoculation with fungal flora on the prepared DAB surface. Portions of Holstein steers' rumps were prepared by direct rub inoculation of fungal flora or without treatment (conventional DAB) and dry-aged for 26 days in an aging room at 2.9 °C and 90% relative humidity. We compared the fungal covering and meat quality, including fatty acid composition and volatile aromatic compounds, of fungal-inoculated DAB with those of the conventional DAB. The fungal-inoculated DAB was almost entirely covered with white mold, in contrast to the conventional DAB. Moreover, the proportion of oleic acid and the concentration of nine volatile compounds significantly increased in the raw meat of fungal-inoculated DAB compared with those in the conventional DAB (p < 0.05). These results suggested that direct rub inoculation of fungal flora from prepared DAB may accelerate DAB production and efficiently enhance the "melt-in-the-mouth" feeling and flavors of DAB.Entities:
Keywords: Mucoraceae; direct rub inoculation; dry-aged beef; nutty flavor; oleic acid; volatile aromatic compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681855 PMCID: PMC9179644 DOI: 10.3390/ani12111391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1The appearance of dry-aged beef, with (+) and without (−) direct fungal-rub inoculation. (a) Cross-section of beef dry-aged for 7, 13, and 20 days. (b) Whole portion of beef dry-aged for 26 days.
Proximate composition, water-holding capacity, and tenderness of 26-day dry-aged beef with (+) and without (−) direct fungal adhesion.
| Characteristics | + | − |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 58.9 ± 1.5 ** | 63.9 ± 0.5 |
| Crude protein (%) | 20.8 ± 0.2 | 21.5 ± 0.7 |
| Crude fat (%) | 20.1 ± 1.0 ** | 13.4 ± 0.1 |
| Ash (%) | 1.03 ± 0.02 ** | 1.14 ± 0.04 |
| Expressible drip loss (%) | 31.2 ± 2.3 | 27.3 ± 0.9 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 26.0 ± 0.3 ** | 16.6 ± 2.2 |
| WBSF (kg/cm2) | 2.64 ± 0.32 * | 1.68 ± 0.17 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 vs. without (−); * p < 0.05 vs. without (−). WBSF, Warner–Bratzler shear force.
Fatty acid composition of 26-day dry-aged beef with (+) and without (−) direct fungal adhesion.
| FAME (%) | With (+) | Without (−) |
|---|---|---|
| 8:0 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| 12:0 | 0.04 ± 0.00 * | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| 13:0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
| 14:0 | 2.44 ± 0.01 * | 2.63 ± 0.08 |
| 14:1n-5 | 0.70 ± 0.02 * | 0.64 ± 0.02 |
| 15:0 | 0.44 ± 0.01 * | 0.47 ± 0.01 |
| 15:1n-5 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
| 16:0 | 24.25 ± 0.09 ** | 25.20 ± 0.24 |
| 16:1n-7 | 4.51 ± 0.04 ** | 4.21 ± 0.08 |
| 17:0 | 1.32 ± 0.02 ** | 1.40 ± 0.01 |
| 17:1n-7 | 1.25 ± 0.02 ** | 1.16 ± 0.02 |
| 18:0 | 11.09 ± 0.40 * | 11.97± 0.15 |
| 18:1n-9( | 47.21 ± 0.66 ** | 45.14 ± 0.24 |
| 18:2n-9 | 0.44 ± 0.00 ** | 0.47 ± 0.00 |
| 18:2n-6 | 2.65 ± 0.09 ** | 2.99 ± 0.06 |
| 18:3n-3 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.11± 0.00 |
| 20:0 | 0.35 ± 0.00 | 0.34 ± 0.00 |
| 20:4n-6 | 0.29 ± 0.03 ** | 0.40 ± 0.03 |
| SFA | 39.96 ± 0.49 ** | 42.09 ± 0.34 |
| MUFA | 53.79 ± 0.64 ** | 51.27 ± 0.16 |
| PUFA | 3.49 ± 0.12 ** | 3.98 ± 0.09 |
| 16:1/16:0 ratio | 0.19 ± 0.00 *** | 0.17 ± 0.00 |
| 18:1/18:0 ratio | 4.26 ± 0.21 * | 3.77 ± 0.05 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 vs. without (−); ** p < 0.01 vs. without (−); * p < 0.05 vs. without (−). SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Figure 2Area count of volatile aromatic compounds produced by raw meat of dry-aged beef, with (+) or without (−) direct fungal-rub inoculation, after 26 days. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. The following literature was used as reference for aroma descriptions: a [37]; b [25]; c [26]; d [38]; e [39]; f [29]; g [27]; h [28]; i [30]; j [31]; k [32]; l [40]; and m [41].