| Literature DB >> 35681301 |
Weiling Guo1,2, Bingyong Mao1,2,3, Shumao Cui1,2,3, Xin Tang1,2, Qiuxiang Zhang1,2, Jianxin Zhao1,2, Hao Zhang1,2,4.
Abstract
Colitis has become a major health concern worldwide. The objective of the present study was to determine the probiotic influence of different strains of B. pseudolongum (Bp7 and Bp8) on alleviating colitis and to explore its possible potential mechanisms. Our results displayed that Bp7 and Bp8 intervention effectively reduced dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-caused body weight loss and the release of several pro-inflammatory factors (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) and increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes (T-AOC, SOD, and GSH) and the concentrations of tight junction proteins (occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1). Moreover, Bp7 and Bp8 intervention drastically down-regulated the expression of colonic MyD88, NF-κB, iNOS and COX2 and drastically elevated the expression of colonic STAT3, Nrf2, and PPARγ. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results revealed that the cecal levels of isobutyric, butyric, and isovaleric acids were drastically increased in colitis mice intervened with Bp7 and Bp8. Moreover, 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that Bp7 and Bp8 intervention modulated the intestinal microbiota structure, particularly by enhancing the proportion of Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group, Marvinbryantia, Enterorhabdus, Faecalibaculum, Coriobacteriaceae UCG 002, Alistipes, and Bifidobacterium, which are relevant to the levels of cecal isobutyric acid, butyric acid, isovaleric acid, and inflammatory cytokines. Collectively, these findings suggest that Bp7 and Bp8 intervention alleviates the intestinal barrier function, possibly by blocking the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, maintaining the intestinal physical barrier integrity, activating the PPARγ/STAT3 pathway, and modulating intestinal microbiota composition. Our study also suggested that B. pseudolongum is a promising probiotic for colitis treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Bifidobacterium pseudolongum; PPARγ/STAT3 pathway; intestinal barrier; intestinal microbiota
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681301 PMCID: PMC9180506 DOI: 10.3390/foods11111551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on body weight (A), disease activity index (DAI) (B), colon length (C), and representative pictures of colons in colitis mice (D) (n = 8). The different letters represent significant differences between different experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Influences of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the colonic inflammatory cytokines (n = 8). The different letters represent significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the activity of antioxidant-related parameters and the histological injury in the colon. The activities of MPO, MDA, T-AOC, SOD, GSH and histological score (n = 8) (A); Histological analysis of colon tissue (the red arrows show inflammatory cell infiltration; blue frame show crypts) (B). The different letters represent significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the foundation barrier. Alcuin blue staining of colon (A); PAS staining of colon (B); Muc2 concentration in the colon (n = 8) (C); Goblet cell number in the colon (n = 8) (D). The different letters represent significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the tight junction protein in the colon. The mRNA expression of colonic occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 (n = 8) (A); the mean density of colonic occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 (n = 8) (B); immunohistochemical staining for occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 (C). The different letters represent significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the mRNA transcription of gene-related NF-κB pathway (n = 8). The different letters represent significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Influence of Bp7 and Bp8 intervention on the intestinal microbiota structure. PCA (A); HCA (B).
Figure 8LEfSe analysis and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for taxa differing between Bp7 and DSS groups (A); Bp8 and DSS groups (B).
Figure 9Association analysis between the key phylotypes of intestinal microbiota and colitis−related parameters. Heatmap of Spearman’s correlation (A) and network of Spearman’s correlation (B).