| Literature DB >> 35681175 |
Thomas Köhnke1,2, Xilong Liu2, Sascha Haubner1,2, Veit Bücklein1,2, Gerulf Hänel1,2, Christina Krupka2, Victor Solis-Mezarino3, Franz Herzog3, Marion Subklewe4,5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia has experienced considerable advances, however novel target antigens continue to be sought after. To this end, unbiased approaches for surface protein detection are limited and integration with other data types, such as gene expression and somatic mutational burden, are poorly utilized. The Cell Surface Capture technology provides an unbiased, discovery-driven approach to map the surface proteins on cells of interest. Yet, direct utilization of primary patient samples has been limited by the considerable number of viable cells needed.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Immunology; Leukemia; Proteomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681175 PMCID: PMC9185890 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-022-00390-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Res ISSN: 2050-7771
Fig. 1Outline of Glyco-Cell Surface Capture (CSC) and its variants Cys-Glyco-CSC and Lys-CSC. The workflows adapted from the protocols by Wollscheid et al. as well as Bausch-Fluck et al. [14, 15] and are comprised of labeling, digestion, affinity capture, peptide release and peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry
Fig. 2Protocol Optimization Steps using OCI-AML3 cells. A Protocol optimization steps for Glyco-CSC examined. B Bar graph of number of deamidation sites from the OCI-AML3 cell line according to our improved protocol versions. No. 6 yielded > 500 deamidation sites, representing 252 proteins. C & D Probability of N-glycosylation events being localized at the expected position of identified peptides in each group (Loc. Prob., threshold ≥ 0.75) for CD proteins (C) and Non-CD proteins (D). E Comparison of detected proteins between Glyco-CSC, Lys-CSC and Cys-Glyco-CSC. Numbers refer to detected proteins. F Detailed view of detected proteins in comparison experiment summarized in (E). Nodes representing CD proteins (black) and non-CD proteins (red). Thickness of connecting lines is proportional to the number of peptides identified for the associated protein and size of the node indicates the number of transmembrane domains (TMs). Proteins with ≥ 10 TMs were limited to 10
Fig. 3Modified CSC-workflow allows for the interrogation of the AML surfaceome in primary patient samples. A 621 surface proteins identified with our modified CSC technology 7 clinical samples and 1 AML cell line (OCI-AML3), separated into CD proteins (black, 163) and non-CD proteins (red, 458). B Expression levels of CD proteins identified by CSC. Heatmap intensity indicates the log10 average of iBAQ. C Overview of filtering strategy to eliminate targets with abundant expression on normal healthy tissue using publicly available gene expression databases. Furthermore, only proteins that were detected in at least half of the primary patient samples were considered. As a result, 76 proteins remain as potential candidates for manual evaluation. D Protein expression of 5 new putative targets (top, in green) and 6 markers currently being investigated (bottom, in grey) as immunotherapeutic targets in AML samples
Fig. 4Candidate antigens display low frequency of non-synonymous mutations, suggesting their functional relevance in hematologic malignancies. A Ratio of Non-synonymous to synonymous mutations in hematologic malignancies found in genome-wide screens in the COSMIC database in genes represented in our surfaceome dataset. Genes are sorted by rank of dN/dS ratio. Selected immunotherapy targets are highlighted. B Ratio of Non-synonymous to synonymous mutations in Non-hematologic malignancies in the COSMIC database. Genes are the same as in A. C Pairwise comparison of relative Non-synonymous mutation rates amongst surfaceome genes between Hematologic and Non-Hematologic malignancies
Fig. 5Validation of putative targets in independent samples by flow cytometry. A Expression of potential targets on independent patient samples and healthy donor bone marrow specimens by FACS, showing significant expression on healthy mature monocytes and granulocytes for CD148 or HSPCs for ITGA4. *p < 0.05 B Distribution of Integrin beta-7 on healthy donors showing favorable (low) expression on healthy hematopoietic tissues