| Literature DB >> 25793878 |
Binje Vick1, Maja Rothenberg2, Nadine Sandhöfer3, Michela Carlet4, Cornelia Finkenzeller4, Christina Krupka5, Michaela Grunert4, Andreas Trumpp6, Selim Corbacioglu7, Martin Ebinger8, Maya C André9, Wolfgang Hiddemann3, Stephanie Schneider2, Marion Subklewe10, Klaus H Metzeler11, Karsten Spiekermann3, Irmela Jeremias12.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease with poor outcome. Adequate model systems are required for preclinical studies to improve understanding of AML biology and to develop novel, rational treatment approaches. Xenografts in immunodeficient mice allow performing functional studies on patient-derived AML cells. We have established an improved model system that integrates serial retransplantation of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cells in mice, genetic manipulation by lentiviral transduction, and essential quality controls by immunophenotyping and targeted resequencing of driver genes. 17/29 samples showed primary engraftment, 10/17 samples could be retransplanted and some of them allowed virtually indefinite serial transplantation. 5/6 samples were successfully transduced using lentiviruses. Neither serial transplantation nor genetic engineering markedly altered sample characteristics analyzed. Transgene expression was stable in PDX AML cells. Example given, recombinant luciferase enabled bioluminescence in vivo imaging and highly sensitive and reliable disease monitoring; imaging visualized minimal disease at 1 PDX cell in 10000 mouse bone marrow cells and facilitated quantifying leukemia initiating cells. We conclude that serial expansion, genetic engineering and imaging represent valuable tools to improve the individualized xenograft mouse model of AML. Prospectively, these advancements enable repetitive, clinically relevant studies on AML biology and preclinical treatment trials on genetically defined and heterogeneous subgroups.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25793878 PMCID: PMC4368518 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients’ clinical characteristics.
| Sample | Tx | Re- | FAB | Disease | Cytogenetics | NPM1 | FLT3 | ELN | Sex | Age | PB/ | Blasts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tx | stage | [y] | BM | [%] | ||||||||
|
| AML | 5 | M4 | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | F | 40 | PB | 42 |
|
| AML | 6 | M0 | Relapse | Complex, | WT | WT | Adv | M | 42 | PB | 67 |
| after SCT | Including −17 | |||||||||||
|
| AML | 1 | M2 | Initial | Normal | WT | WT | Int I | F | 79 | PB | NA |
|
| AML | 3 | M4 | Initial | ND | WT | WT | NA | F | 62 | BM | 70 |
|
| AML | 5 | M4 | Relapse | 46,XX, | WT | WT | Adv | F | 47 | BM | 54 |
| after SCT | ins(10;11) | |||||||||||
| (p12;q23q23) | ||||||||||||
|
| AML | 1 | M0 | Relapse | 47,XX,t(4;8) | WT | WT | Adv | F | 58 | PB | 34 |
| after SCT | (p15;q22),+12 | |||||||||||
|
| AML | 4 | M1 | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | F | 65 | BM | 96 |
|
| AML | 2 | NA | Relapse | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | F | 68 | BM | NA |
|
| AML | 1 | M4 | Initial | 47,XY,+8 | WT | ITD | Adv | M | 25 | PB | 83 |
|
| AML | 3 | NA | Relapse | Aberrant | WT | WT | Adv | F | 53 | PB | 44 |
|
| AML | 0 | NA | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | M | 79 | PB | NA |
|
| AML | 0 | M4 | Initial | Normal | Mut | WT | Fav | M | 71 | BM | 60 |
|
| AML | 0 | M2 | Initial | NA | WT | ITD | NA | F | 65 | BM | 25 |
|
| AML | 0 | M4 | Initial | Aberrant | WT | WT | Adv | M | 73 | BM | 42 |
|
| AML | 0 | M1 | Initial | 46,XX, | WT | WT | Adv | F | 33 | BM | 80 |
| del(12)(p13)/ | ||||||||||||
| 48,XX,+3,+18 | ||||||||||||
|
| AML | 0 | NA | Relapse | Normal | WT | ITD | Int I | F | 55 | PB | 29 |
|
| AML | 0 | M1 | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | F | 82 | PB | 93 |
|
| B | NA | M5A | Initial | Complex | Mut | WT | Adv | M | 74 | PB | 46 |
|
| B | NA | M1 | Initial | NA | Mut | ITD | NA | M | 51 | PB | 89 |
|
| T | NA | M4 | Initial | Normal | Mut | WT | Fav | M | 35 | BM | 47 |
|
| T | NA | NA | Initial | 47,XY,+8 | WT | WT | Adv | M | 73 | PB | 42 |
|
| None | NA | M1 | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | F | 82 | PB | 69 |
|
| None | NA | M1 | Initial | Normal | WT | ITD | Int I | F | 54 | PB | 90 |
|
| None | NA | M4 | Initial | Normal | Mut | ITD | Int I | M | 58 | BM | 60 |
|
| None | NA | NA | Initial | 47,XY,+13 | WT | WT | Adv | M | 62 | BM | 46 |
|
| None | NA | M1 | Initial | 46,XY,t(11;14) | Mut | WT | Adv | M | 73 | PB | 78 |
| (q13;q32) | ||||||||||||
|
| None | NA | M1 | Initial | Normal | Mut | WT | Fav | F | 47 | BM | 67 |
|
| None | NA | NA | Initial | Normal | Mut | WT | Fav | F | 48 | BM | 67 |
|
| None | NA | NA | Relapse | Complex | WT | WT | Adv | M | 43 | BM | 78 |
Tx (nature of human cells isolated after initial transplantation); Re-Tx (amount of passages of successful re-transplantation)
* (next passage in progress during manuscript preparation); T (T cells); B (B cells); FAB (French–American–British classification system); SCT (stem cell transplantation); NPM1 (nucleophosmin-1); WT (wildtype); Mut (mutated); FLT3 (Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3); ITD (internal tandem duplication); ELN (European LeukemiaNet classification system); Fav (favorable); Int I (intermediate I); Adv (adverse); F (female); M (male); PB (peripheral blood); BM (bone marrow); NA (not available); ND (not determined).
Fig 1Engraftment of primary AML cells in NSG mice predicts reengraftment capacity.
107 fresh primary AML cells were injected and successfully engrafted in NSG mice; shown are characteristics of the first engraftment regarding passaging time (time period from cell injection until clinical signs of leukemia or latest between 20 and 25 weeks) (A); percentage of cells positive for both hCD45 and hCD33 at time of sacrifice within mouse PB (B) and within BM (black cubes) or spleen (grey circles) (C). Each mark visualizes data obtained from a single mouse. Open cubes indicate 0% human cells. Dotted line discriminates samples that reengrafted in secondary recipients from samples that did not. Please refer to S1A Fig. for exemplary FACS plots.
Fig 2Engraftment and retransplantation of AML cells in NSG mice conserves genetic alterations of the primary sample.
Primary AML patient samples and matched PDX cells, reisolated out of the BM (CD45 chimerism 80–99%) after first passage in NSG mice (PDX-0) or after 1 or 2 re-transplantation cycles (PDX-1/-2), were characterized by targeted resequencing of 43 AML-related genes (S1 Table). Plots depict variant allele frequencies for each driver gene mutation found within the sample. a/b/c/d/f: PDX cells of three to five mice injected in parallel were analyzed. *: primary cells were frozen and thawed before injection. BCOR (BCL-6 corepressor); CEBPA (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha); DNMT3A (DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3 alpha); FLT3 (Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3); ITD (internal tandem duplication); KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog); NPM1 (nucleophosmin-1); NRAS (neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog); SRSF2 (serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2); TET2 (tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2); TP53 (tumor protein p53). Raw data is depicted in S2 Table.
Fig 3PDX AML cells allow genetic engineering without altering molecular sample characteristics.
(A) Scheme of the process of generating transgenic PDX (t-PDX) AML cells. PDX cells were transduced after first or second retransplantation cycle. (B) Scheme of the vector constructs. (C) Transduction rate in t-PDX AML cells after lentiviral transduction and cell amplification in mice was measured by FACS analysis of fluorochrome or NGFR expression. Each mark visualizes data obtained from a single transduction. Open mark: no transgenic cells were detectable. (D) Enrichment of transgenic cells using flow cytometry was measured using mCherry expression after cell amplification in mice. (E) Genetic engineering does not alter immunophenotype; primary cells, untransduced PDX cells after fourth retransplantation and enriched transgenic t-PDX cells were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry; specific fluorescence intensity is depicted. See also S3C Fig. for exemplary FACS plots of AML-372. Raw data is depicted in S3 Table. (F) Genetic engineering does not markedly alter AML-specific mutations; genomic DNA was isolated out of primary cells, untransduced PDX cells and enriched transgenic t-PDX cells; VAF of mutations was profiled by targeted resequencing. BCOR (BCL-6 corepressor); KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog); NRAS (neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog); TP53 (tumor protein p53). Raw data is depicted in S2 Table.
Fig 4BLI is highly sensitive and reliable in single mice.
(A) 1x105 t-PDX AML-372 cells were injected into two mice. At indicated days after cell injection, mice were monitored by BLI. Images of one representative mouse are shown. See S5A Fig. for further images. (B) BLI signals from the kinetic in A were quantified in both animals (diamonds); cells positive for both hCD45 and hCD33 in PB were analyzed in parallel (circles). (C) t-PDX AML-372 cells were injected into three mice per group at absolute numbers indicated; 1 and 8 days after cell injection, mice were monitored by BLI; images are shown of one representative mouse per group.
Fig 5BLI facilitates quantifying leukemia stem cell surrogates.
After limiting dilution of t-PDX AML-372 (98% hCD45+ hCD33+ mCherry+), cells were injected into three mice per group (12 mice total) at absolute cell numbers indicated; leukemia development was monitored by BLI over time. (A) Images of one representative mouse per group. See S5B Fig. for further images. (B) BLI signals from the kinetic in A were quantified. Shown are mean values plus/minus standard deviation. (C) LIC frequency was calculated at each time point using ELDA software. Raw data is depicted in S5 Table.