Literature DB >> 35680761

Eye-specific attentional bias driven by selection history.

Eunhye Choe1, Min-Shik Kim2.   

Abstract

Attention helps in selection among competing stimuli, but attentional selection also biases subsequent information processing as a prior experience. Previous studies have demonstrated that intertrial repetition of target features or locations facilitates perceptual processing as selection history guides attention. In the current study, we found that eye selection history in binocular rivalry induces eye-specific attentional bias. In four experiments, participants responded to the target presented at one of the locations on either eye. The results showed that the target was detected faster when presented to the same eye as in the previous trial under binocular rivalry. However, the effect of eye repetition was not observed when the interocular conflict was reduced by presenting stimuli to only one eye on each trial. Our result indicates that eye selection history can affect eye dominance during binocular rivalry as attention amplifies selected information among competing inputs. These findings suggest that prior experience of attentional deployment modulates subsequent information processing owing to the residual effect of attentional amplification.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular rivalry; Repetition priming; Selection history; Selective attention

Year:  2022        PMID: 35680761     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  36 in total

1.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: perceptual evidence.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-28

5.  Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  A Burkhalter; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stereo-deficients and stereoblinds cannot make utrocular discriminations.

Authors:  R Barbeito; D Levi; S Klein; D Loshin; H Ono
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Predictive Context Influences Perceptual Selection during Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Elise A Piazza; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Development and Validation of the Yonsei Face Database (YFace DB).

Authors:  Kyong-Mee Chung; Soojin Kim; Woo Hyun Jung; Yeunjoo Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-03

10.  Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.

Authors:  Liana Amunts; Amit Yashar; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.