Sofia Hussaini1, Dan Nayot2, Michael Hartman3, Michael H Dahan4. 1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada. Sofia.hussaini@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. The Reproductive Care Center Clinic, and Medical Director, The Fertility Partners, Vaughan, ON, Canada. 3. Generation Fertility Clinic, Vaughan, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different measurements of endometrial thickness pre-IVF cycle and during the IVF cycles as measured by transvaginal ultrasound are associated with the absence or presence of endometrial polyps. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility center. Patients were women who underwent two embryo transfer cycles and failed to conceive. INTERVENTIONS: hysteroscopic evaluation and resection of any masses. RESULTS: There was no difference on comparing the groups with and without polyps in the mean endometrial thicknesses at baseline scans pre-treatment or during IVF cycle. For women who failed two embryo transfer cycles, at any given endometrial thickness the probability of the presence of a polyp was 30-40%. ROC curves failed to detect an actionable relationship with different endometrial thicknesses and the relationship with an endometrial polyp, with most areas under the curve being just above 0.5. However, once the maximum stimulated endometrial thickness was ≥ 13 mm, there was a 70% chance of a polyp being noted at hysteroscopy. This was a statistical difference in the probability of a polyp being present as compared to the lesser thicknesses (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Baseline or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness at IVF fails to predict with accuracy the presence of a polyp. However, if the maximum stimulated thickness was at least 13 mm, there was a higher probability of a uterine polyp being present. Such a cutoff would nevertheless miss most polyps. At any baseline thickness on CD 2-5, a polyp has a 30-40% probability of being present in women who failed two embryo transfers. ROC curves suggest that at baseline, or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness, the ability to predict a polyp is no better than flipping a coin. As such, endometrial cavity evaluation for polyps is legitimate in women with two embryo transfers irrelevant of the baseline or stimulated thickness.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different measurements of endometrial thickness pre-IVF cycle and during the IVF cycles as measured by transvaginal ultrasound are associated with the absence or presence of endometrial polyps. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility center. Patients were women who underwent two embryo transfer cycles and failed to conceive. INTERVENTIONS: hysteroscopic evaluation and resection of any masses. RESULTS: There was no difference on comparing the groups with and without polyps in the mean endometrial thicknesses at baseline scans pre-treatment or during IVF cycle. For women who failed two embryo transfer cycles, at any given endometrial thickness the probability of the presence of a polyp was 30-40%. ROC curves failed to detect an actionable relationship with different endometrial thicknesses and the relationship with an endometrial polyp, with most areas under the curve being just above 0.5. However, once the maximum stimulated endometrial thickness was ≥ 13 mm, there was a 70% chance of a polyp being noted at hysteroscopy. This was a statistical difference in the probability of a polyp being present as compared to the lesser thicknesses (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Baseline or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness at IVF fails to predict with accuracy the presence of a polyp. However, if the maximum stimulated thickness was at least 13 mm, there was a higher probability of a uterine polyp being present. Such a cutoff would nevertheless miss most polyps. At any baseline thickness on CD 2-5, a polyp has a 30-40% probability of being present in women who failed two embryo transfers. ROC curves suggest that at baseline, or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness, the ability to predict a polyp is no better than flipping a coin. As such, endometrial cavity evaluation for polyps is legitimate in women with two embryo transfers irrelevant of the baseline or stimulated thickness.
Authors: H M Fatemi; J C Kasius; A Timmermans; J van Disseldorp; B C Fauser; P Devroey; F J Broekmans Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Jan Bosteels; Jenneke Kasius; Steven Weyers; Frank J Broekmans; Ben Willem J Mol; Thomas M D'Hooghe Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-01-31