Mary T Rosedale1,2, Shiela M Strauss1,2, Navjot Kaur1, Ann Danoff2, Dolores Malaspina3. 1. New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, NY, NY. 2. NYU Langone Medical Center, NY, NY. 3. Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, NY, NY.
Abstract
The risk for diabetes risk is significantly elevated in persons who are older, overweight and have serious mental illness. However, primary care practitioners (PCP) tend to underestimate this risk. Although there are few opportunities for early detection of diabetes, blood exuded during routine oral exams in dental settings can be used to assess glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. The current study sought to understand how primary care practitioners would react to patients who screened positive for elevated HbA1c, how they estimated risk, and whether they provided treatment recommendations or counseling. Method: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted on 61 subjects three months after demonstrating elevated HbA1c levels from dental screenings. Data were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Qualitative analyses revealed four themes according to patients: (1) "Being told I needed to make lifestyle changes" (41%); (2) Realizing I needed a new health care provider or medication change" (10%); (3) "Being told of the need for monitoring but no counseling/treatment change" (16%); and (4) "Being told everything is fine and there is nothing to worry about" (31%). Conclusions: Only half of the 61 cases reporting elevated HbA1C levels at screening experienced their PCP's as responding with counseling or medication changes. Almost a third of cases perceived that their PCP's dismissed the results, making no recommendations, and the rest perceived no counseling or interventions being proposed. Based on subjects' perceptions of their PCP's responses to their elevated HbA1c values, the impact of this intervention is substantially reduced over expectations.
The risk for diabetes risk is significantly elevated in persons who are older, overweight and have serious mental illness. However, primary care practitioners (PCP) tend to underestimate this risk. Although there are few opportunities for early detection of diabetes, blood exuded during routine oral exams in dental settings can be used to assess glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. The current study sought to understand how primary care practitioners would react to patients who screened positive for elevated HbA1c, how they estimated risk, and whether they provided treatment recommendations or counseling. Method: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted on 61 subjects three months after demonstrating elevated HbA1c levels from dental screenings. Data were transcribed and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Qualitative analyses revealed four themes according to patients: (1) "Being told I needed to make lifestyle changes" (41%); (2) Realizing I needed a new health care provider or medication change" (10%); (3) "Being told of the need for monitoring but no counseling/treatment change" (16%); and (4) "Being told everything is fine and there is nothing to worry about" (31%). Conclusions: Only half of the 61 cases reporting elevated HbA1C levels at screening experienced their PCP's as responding with counseling or medication changes. Almost a third of cases perceived that their PCP's dismissed the results, making no recommendations, and the rest perceived no counseling or interventions being proposed. Based on subjects' perceptions of their PCP's responses to their elevated HbA1c values, the impact of this intervention is substantially reduced over expectations.
Authors: Marc De Hert; Dan Cohen; Julio Bobes; Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas; Stefan Leucht; David M Ndetei; John W Newcomer; Richard Uwakwe; Itsuo Asai; Hans-Jurgen Möller; Shiv Gautam; Johan Detraux; Christoph U Correll Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Evanthia Lalla; Bin Cheng; Carol Kunzel; Sandra Burkett; Andrew Ferraro; Ira B Lamster Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward W Gregg; Yanfeng Li; Jing Wang; Nilka Rios Burrows; Mohammed K Ali; Deborah Rolka; Desmond E Williams; Linda Geiss Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245