Mohammad S Kuchay1, Narendra S Choudhary2, Deepak Sharma2, Sonal Krishan3, Sunil K Mishra1, Jasjeet S Wasir1, Manish K Singh4, Neeraj Saraf2, Swapnil Dhampalwar2, Randhir Sud2. 1. Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Medanta The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India. 2. Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta The Medicity hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India. 3. Department of Radiology, Medanta The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India. 4. Department of Clinical Research and Studies, Medanta The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
Abstract
Background and aims: Ultrasound of the liver is not good to pick up mild steatosis. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) evaluated in transient elastography (FibroScan) is widely available in India. However, data regarding the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing hepatic steatosis are scarce in Indian population. MRI-PDFF is an accurate technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis. Thus, this study examined the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing steatosis with MRI-PDFF as reference standard. Methods: A total of 137 adults underwent CAP and MRI-PDFF measurements prospectively. A subset of participants (n = 23) underwent liver biopsy as part of liver transplantation evaluation. The optimal cut-off values, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for CAP in detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5% and ≥10% were assessed. Results: The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 44.2 ±10.4 years and 28.3 ±3.9 kg/m2, respectively. The mean hepatic steatosis was 13.0 ±7.7% by MRI-PDFF and 303 ±54 dB/m by CAP. The AUROC of CAP for detecting hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) at the cut-off of 262 dB/m, and of MRI-PDFF ≥10% was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94) at the cut-off of 295 dB/m. The CAP of 262 dB/m had 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5%, while the CAP of 295 dB/m had 86% sensitivity and 77% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥10%. Conclusions: The optimal cut-off of CAP for the presence of liver steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 262 dB/m in Indian individuals. This CAP cut-off was associated with good sensitivity and specificity to pick up mild steatosis.
Background and aims: Ultrasound of the liver is not good to pick up mild steatosis. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) evaluated in transient elastography (FibroScan) is widely available in India. However, data regarding the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing hepatic steatosis are scarce in Indian population. MRI-PDFF is an accurate technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis. Thus, this study examined the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off values of CAP for diagnosing steatosis with MRI-PDFF as reference standard. Methods: A total of 137 adults underwent CAP and MRI-PDFF measurements prospectively. A subset of participants (n = 23) underwent liver biopsy as part of liver transplantation evaluation. The optimal cut-off values, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity for CAP in detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5% and ≥10% were assessed. Results: The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 44.2 ±10.4 years and 28.3 ±3.9 kg/m2, respectively. The mean hepatic steatosis was 13.0 ±7.7% by MRI-PDFF and 303 ±54 dB/m by CAP. The AUROC of CAP for detecting hepatic steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) at the cut-off of 262 dB/m, and of MRI-PDFF ≥10% was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94) at the cut-off of 295 dB/m. The CAP of 262 dB/m had 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥5%, while the CAP of 295 dB/m had 86% sensitivity and 77% specificity for detecting MRI-PDFF ≥10%. Conclusions: The optimal cut-off of CAP for the presence of liver steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 262 dB/m in Indian individuals. This CAP cut-off was associated with good sensitivity and specificity to pick up mild steatosis.
Authors: Young Eun Chon; Kyu Sik Jung; Seung Up Kim; Jun Yong Park; Young Nyun Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Chae Yoon Chon; Hye Won Lee; Yehyun Park; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: Liver Int Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Z Permutt; T-A Le; M R Peterson; E Seki; D A Brenner; C Sirlin; R Loomba Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Robert P Myers; Gilles Pomier-Layrargues; Richard Kirsch; Aaron Pollett; Andres Duarte-Rojo; David Wong; Melanie Beaton; Mark Levstik; Pam Crotty; Magdy Elkashab Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 17.425