Ramesh Kumar1, Gyanranjan Rout2, Rahul Kumar3, Rajini Yadav4, Prasenjit Das4, Sandeep Aggarwal5, Deepak Gunjan2, Anoop Saraya2, Baibaswata Nayak2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, 801 507, India. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New, Delhi, 110 029, India. 3. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India. 4. Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India. 5. Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In patients with liver disease, etiology and body mass index (BMI) affects controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) assessment using FibroScan. We aimed to assess the performance characteristics of CAP for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) stratified into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) subgroups. METHODS: In this prospective study, 219 consecutive adult NAFLD patients, with an available FibroScan value (liver stiffness measurement-[LSM] and CAP) and liver biopsy, were included. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for assessment of the CAP cut-off values predicting different stages of hepatic steatosis. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 39.7 ± 10.5 years, 116 (53%) were males, and median (interquartile range) BMI was 31.8 (25.7-43.8) kg/m2. One hundred (45.7%) and 119 (54.3%) patients were non-obese and obese, respectively. The median values of CAP and LSM were significantly higher among obese patients as compared with the non-obese ones: 333 (304-368) vs. 320 (296-345) dB/m, p = 0.002 and 8.3 (6.1-11.4) vs. 6.6 (5.7-10.3) kPa, p = 0.012, respectively. Among non-obese NAFLD, optimal CAP cut-off values for steatosis (S) ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and ≥ S3 were 275 dB/m, 319 dB/m, and 337 dB/m, respectively. The corresponding CAP values among obese patients were higher as 285 dB/m, 340 dB/m, and 355 dB/m, respectively. BMI independently predicted CAP on multivariate analysis. The discordance of 2-grades between CAP and biopsy measured steatosis was seen in 13% in non-obese and 19.3% in obese NAFLD. CAP overestimated steatosis more often than underestimating it, with a higher proportion in obese NAFLD. CONCLUSION: In patients with NAFLD, interpretation of CAP requires consideration of BMI.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In patients with liver disease, etiology and body mass index (BMI) affects controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) assessment using FibroScan. We aimed to assess the performance characteristics of CAP for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) stratified into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) subgroups. METHODS: In this prospective study, 219 consecutive adult NAFLDpatients, with an available FibroScan value (liver stiffness measurement-[LSM] and CAP) and liver biopsy, were included. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for assessment of the CAP cut-off values predicting different stages of hepatic steatosis. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 39.7 ± 10.5 years, 116 (53%) were males, and median (interquartile range) BMI was 31.8 (25.7-43.8) kg/m2. One hundred (45.7%) and 119 (54.3%) patients were non-obese and obese, respectively. The median values of CAP and LSM were significantly higher among obesepatients as compared with the non-obese ones: 333 (304-368) vs. 320 (296-345) dB/m, p = 0.002 and 8.3 (6.1-11.4) vs. 6.6 (5.7-10.3) kPa, p = 0.012, respectively. Among non-obese NAFLD, optimal CAP cut-off values for steatosis (S) ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and ≥ S3 were 275 dB/m, 319 dB/m, and 337 dB/m, respectively. The corresponding CAP values among obesepatients were higher as 285 dB/m, 340 dB/m, and 355 dB/m, respectively. BMI independently predicted CAP on multivariate analysis. The discordance of 2-grades between CAP and biopsy measured steatosis was seen in 13% in non-obese and 19.3% in obese NAFLD. CAP overestimated steatosis more often than underestimating it, with a higher proportion in obese NAFLD. CONCLUSION: In patients with NAFLD, interpretation of CAP requires consideration of BMI.
Authors: Mohammad S Kuchay; Narendra S Choudhary; Deepak Sharma; Sonal Krishan; Sunil K Mishra; Jasjeet S Wasir; Manish K Singh; Neeraj Saraf; Swapnil Dhampalwar; Randhir Sud Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2021-10-13
Authors: Max M Puthenpura; Vishal Patel; John Fam; Leon Katz; David S Tichansky; Stephan Myers Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Vanessa Stadlbauer; Iohanes Negrean; Andreas Posch; Andrea Streit; Nicole Feldbacher; Rudolf E Stauber; Angela Horvath Journal: JGH Open Date: 2021-05-26