Literature DB >> 35677492

Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons.

Sara Forootan1, Sakineh Hajebrahimi2, Ali Janati1, Behzad Najafi3, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi4.   

Abstract

Objectives: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons' reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons. Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon's work. Therefore, the current study attempted to develop a local model to measure surgeons' work. Material and
Methods: This study was conducted in two main phases of determining the metrics and model development using quantitative and qualitative approaches from December 2019 to April 2021. Literature review, focused group discussions, and interviews were used to collect data. Con- tent analysis and Exploratory Data Analysis techniques were applied to analyze data.
Results: The findings demonstrated that patient's conditions (age, severity of disease at referring time, and comorbidities), disease specifications (time, complexity, physical effort, and risk), and provider characteristic (surgeon's willingness, imposed stress, and surgeon's skill) were important by 17, 51, and 32%, respectively, in determining surgeons' work.
Conclusion: Determining a fixed value for each procedure does not accurately estimate the amount of required surgeon's work for any procedure. Many factors, such as the patient's condition, surgeon's characteristics, and disease specification affect surgeons' work in the operation room. Proper measurement of the surgeon's work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.
Copyright © 2021, Turkish Surgical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Relative value unit; measurement; surgeon’s work; work relative value unit

Year:  2021        PMID: 35677492      PMCID: PMC9130942          DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  35 in total

1.  Effects of compensation method on physician behaviors.

Authors:  J Tufano; D A Conrad; A Sales; C Maynard; J Noren; E Kezirian; K G Schellhase; S Y Liang
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Results and impacts of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; E R Becker; D L Dunn; N Kelly; N Causino; M D McCabe; E Rodriguez
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Issues in the application of the resource-based relative value scale system to pediatrics: a subject review. American Academy of Pediatrics. Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Project Advisory Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  How Is Physician Work Valued?

Authors:  Jeffrey P Jacobs; Stephen J Lahey; Francis C Nichols; James M Levett; George Gilbert Johnston; Richard K Freeman; James D St Louis; Julie Painter; Courtney Yohe; Cameron D Wright; Kirk R Kanter; John E Mayer; Keith S Naunheim; Jeffrey B Rich; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Development of a Model for the Validation of Work Relative Value Units for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

Authors:  Barbara O Wynn; Lane F Burgette; Andrew W Mulcahy; Edward N Okeke; Ian Brantley; Neema Iyer; Teague Ruder; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Capture of complexity of specialty care in pediatric cardiology by work RVU measures.

Authors:  Lisa Bergersen; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Doff McElhinney; Sandra Fenwick; David Kirshner; Julie Harding; Patricia Hickey; John Mayer; Audrey Marshall
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Pediatric Echocardiography by Work Relative Value Units: Is Study Complexity Adequately Captured?

Authors:  Sowmya Balasubramanian; Alaina K Kipps; Shea N Smith; Theresa A Tacy; Elif Seda Selamet Tierney
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer Peterson; Nipun Sodhi; Anton Khlopas; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Jared M Newman; Assem A Sultan; Kim L Stearns; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Estimating physicians' work for a resource-based relative-value scale.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Yntema; E R Becker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  The Relative Value Unit in academic geriatrics: incentive or impediment?

Authors:  Neil M Resnick; Nichole Radulovich
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.