Literature DB >> 28109347

How Is Physician Work Valued?

Jeffrey P Jacobs1, Stephen J Lahey2, Francis C Nichols3, James M Levett4, George Gilbert Johnston5, Richard K Freeman6, James D St Louis7, Julie Painter8, Courtney Yohe9, Cameron D Wright10, Kirk R Kanter11, John E Mayer12, Keith S Naunheim13, Jeffrey B Rich14, Joseph E Bavaria15.   

Abstract

Strategies to value physician work continue to evolve. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database have an increasingly important role in this evolution. An understanding of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system (American Medical Association [AMA], Chicago, IL) and the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) is necessary to comprehend how physician work is valued. In 1965, with the dawn of increasingly complex medical care, immense innovation, and the rollout of Medicare, the need for a common language describing medical services and procedures was recognized as being of critical importance. In 1966, the AMA, in cooperation with multiple major medical specialty societies, developed the CPT system, which is a coding system for the description of medical procedures and medical services. The RUC was created by the AMA in response to the passage of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, legislation of the United States of America Federal government that mandated that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services adopt a relative value methodology for Medicare physician payment. The role of the RUC is to develop relative value recommendations for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. These recommendations include relative value recommendations for new procedures or services and also updates to relative value recommendations for previously valued procedures or services. These recommendations pertain to all physician work delivered to Medicare beneficiaries and propose relative values for all physician services, including updates to those based on the original resource-based relative value scale developed by Hsaio and colleagues. In so doing, widely differing work and services provided can be reviewed and comparisons of their relative value (to each other) can be established. The resource-based relative value scale assigns value to physician services using relative value units (RVUs), which consist of three components: work RVU, practice expense RVU, and malpractice RVU, also known as professional liability insurance RVU. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services retains the final decision-making authority on the RVUs associated with each procedure or service. The purpose of this article is to discuss the role that the CPT codes and the RUC play in the valuation of physician work and to provide an example of how the methodology for valuation of physician work continues to evolve.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28109347     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Insights in Public Health: Community Health Workers Are the Future of Health Care: How Can We Fund These Positions?

Authors:  Joseph Humphry; Jasmin Kiernan
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-12

2.  Comparing Relative Value Units among Shoulder Arthroplasty, Hemiarthroplasty, and ORIF for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Which is Most Worth Your Time?

Authors:  Marine Coste; Vineet Aggarwal; Neil V Shah; David Kim; Omar K Hariri; Louis M Day; Scott C Pascal; Jaydev B Mistry; William P Urban; William R Aibinder; Arvind G Von Keudell; Nishant Suneja
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-07

3.  It's a Win-Win: The Effect of Medical Students on Clinic Productivity.

Authors:  Stephanie W Zuo; Nancy A Hueppchen; Rachel Marie E Salas; Charlene E Gamaldo; Silka Patel
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2022-07-25

4.  Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons.

Authors:  Sara Forootan; Sakineh Hajebrahimi; Ali Janati; Behzad Najafi; Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Current Relative Value Unit Scale Does Not Appropriately Compensate for Longer Orthopedic Sports Surgeries.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Jason Kreinces; Daniel Tarazona; Ioannis Zouzias; Mark Grossman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-30

6.  Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units.

Authors:  Tam Ramsey; Tyler Ostrowski; Kent Curran; Jason Mouzakes; Neil Gildener-Leapman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2021

Review 7.  Moving the Needle Toward Fair Compensation in Pediatric Nephrology.

Authors:  Darcy K Weidemann; I A Ashoor; D E Soranno; R Sheth; C Carter; P D Brophy
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Work relative value units and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Robert B Kim; Jonathan P Scoville; Michael Karsy; Seokchun Lim; Randy L Jensen; Sarah T Menacho
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.042

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.