Camila Sanz1, Federico Cavanna2,3, Stephanie Muller2, Laura de la Fuente2,4, Federico Zamberlan2,5, Matías Palmucci2, Lucie Janeckova6, Martin Kuchar6,7, Facundo Carrillo8, Adolfo M García9,10,11,12,13, Carla Pallavicini2,3, Enzo Tagliazucchi14,15. 1. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. camilasanz@gmail.com. 2. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. Fundación Para La Lucha Contra Las Enfermedades Neurológicas de La Infancia (FLENI), Montañeses 2325, C1428 CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience, INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. 6. Forensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. 7. Department of Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic. 8. Applied Artificial Intelligence Lab (ICC-CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 9. Cognitive Neuroscience Center (1644), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 10. National Scientific and Technical Research Council (1425), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 11. Global Brain Health Institute (94143), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 12. Global Brain Health Institute (94143), Trinity College Dublin (D02), Dublin, Ireland. 13. Departamento de Lingüística Y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades (9160000), Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 14. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. tagliazucchi.enzo@googlemail.com. 15. Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago, Chile. tagliazucchi.enzo@googlemail.com.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Serotonergic psychedelics are being studied as novel treatments for mental health disorders and as facilitators of improved well-being, mental function, and creativity. Recent studies have found mixed results concerning the effects of low doses of psychedelics ("microdosing") on these domains. However, microdosing is generally investigated using instruments designed to assess larger doses of psychedelics, which might lack sensitivity and specificity for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: Determine whether unconstrained speech contains signatures capable of identifying the acute effects of psilocybin microdoses. METHODS: Natural speech under psilocybin microdoses (0.5 g of psilocybin mushrooms) was acquired from thirty-four healthy adult volunteers (11 females: 32.09 ± 3.53 years; 23 males: 30.87 ± 4.64 years) following a double-blind and placebo-controlled experimental design with two measurement weeks per participant. On Wednesdays and Fridays of each week, participants consumed either the active dose (psilocybin) or the placebo (edible mushrooms). Features of interest were defined based on variables known to be affected by higher doses: verbosity, semantic variability, and sentiment scores. Machine learning models were used to discriminate between conditions. Classifiers were trained and tested using stratified cross-validation to compute the AUC and p-values. RESULTS: Except for semantic variability, these metrics presented significant differences between a typical active microdose and the inactive placebo condition. Machine learning classifiers were capable of distinguishing between conditions with high accuracy (AUC [Formula: see text] 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: These results constitute first evidence that low doses of serotonergic psychedelics can be identified from unconstrained natural speech, with potential for widely applicable, affordable, and ecologically valid monitoring of microdosing schedules.
RATIONALE: Serotonergic psychedelics are being studied as novel treatments for mental health disorders and as facilitators of improved well-being, mental function, and creativity. Recent studies have found mixed results concerning the effects of low doses of psychedelics ("microdosing") on these domains. However, microdosing is generally investigated using instruments designed to assess larger doses of psychedelics, which might lack sensitivity and specificity for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: Determine whether unconstrained speech contains signatures capable of identifying the acute effects of psilocybin microdoses. METHODS: Natural speech under psilocybin microdoses (0.5 g of psilocybin mushrooms) was acquired from thirty-four healthy adult volunteers (11 females: 32.09 ± 3.53 years; 23 males: 30.87 ± 4.64 years) following a double-blind and placebo-controlled experimental design with two measurement weeks per participant. On Wednesdays and Fridays of each week, participants consumed either the active dose (psilocybin) or the placebo (edible mushrooms). Features of interest were defined based on variables known to be affected by higher doses: verbosity, semantic variability, and sentiment scores. Machine learning models were used to discriminate between conditions. Classifiers were trained and tested using stratified cross-validation to compute the AUC and p-values. RESULTS: Except for semantic variability, these metrics presented significant differences between a typical active microdose and the inactive placebo condition. Machine learning classifiers were capable of distinguishing between conditions with high accuracy (AUC [Formula: see text] 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: These results constitute first evidence that low doses of serotonergic psychedelics can be identified from unconstrained natural speech, with potential for widely applicable, affordable, and ecologically valid monitoring of microdosing schedules.
Authors: Thomas Anderson; Rotem Petranker; Daniel Rosenbaum; Cory R Weissman; Le-Anh Dinh-Williams; Katrina Hui; Emma Hapke; Norman A S Farb Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Cheryl M Corcoran; Facundo Carrillo; Diego Fernández-Slezak; Gillinder Bedi; Casimir Klim; Daniel C Javitt; Carrie E Bearden; Guillermo A Cecchi Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Anya K Bershad; Scott T Schepers; Michael P Bremmer; Royce Lee; Harriet de Wit Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Robin L Carhart-Harris; Robert Leech; Peter J Hellyer; Murray Shanahan; Amanda Feilding; Enzo Tagliazucchi; Dante R Chialvo; David Nutt Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Carla Agurto; Guillermo A Cecchi; Raquel Norel; Rachel Ostrand; Matthew Kirkpatrick; Matthew J Baggott; Margaret C Wardle; Harriet de Wit; Gillinder Bedi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 7.853