Literature DB >> 29352548

Prediction of psychosis across protocols and risk cohorts using automated language analysis.

Cheryl M Corcoran1,2, Facundo Carrillo3,4, Diego Fernández-Slezak3,4, Gillinder Bedi2,5,6, Casimir Klim2,5, Daniel C Javitt2,5, Carrie E Bearden7, Guillermo A Cecchi8.   

Abstract

Language and speech are the primary source of data for psychiatrists to diagnose and treat mental disorders. In psychosis, the very structure of language can be disturbed, including semantic coherence (e.g., derailment and tangentiality) and syntactic complexity (e.g., concreteness). Subtle disturbances in language are evident in schizophrenia even prior to first psychosis onset, during prodromal stages. Using computer-based natural language processing analyses, we previously showed that, among English-speaking clinical (e.g., ultra) high-risk youths, baseline reduction in semantic coherence (the flow of meaning in speech) and in syntactic complexity could predict subsequent psychosis onset with high accuracy. Herein, we aimed to cross-validate these automated linguistic analytic methods in a second larger risk cohort, also English-speaking, and to discriminate speech in psychosis from normal speech. We identified an automated machine-learning speech classifier - comprising decreased semantic coherence, greater variance in that coherence, and reduced usage of possessive pronouns - that had an 83% accuracy in predicting psychosis onset (intra-protocol), a cross-validated accuracy of 79% of psychosis onset prediction in the original risk cohort (cross-protocol), and a 72% accuracy in discriminating the speech of recent-onset psychosis patients from that of healthy individuals. The classifier was highly correlated with previously identified manual linguistic predictors. Our findings support the utility and validity of automated natural language processing methods to characterize disturbances in semantics and syntax across stages of psychotic disorder. The next steps will be to apply these methods in larger risk cohorts to further test reproducibility, also in languages other than English, and identify sources of variability. This technology has the potential to improve prediction of psychosis outcome among at-risk youths and identify linguistic targets for remediation and preventive intervention. More broadly, automated linguistic analysis can be a powerful tool for diagnosis and treatment across neuropsychiatry.
© 2018 World Psychiatric Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated language analysis; high-risk youths; machine learning; prediction of psychosis; semantic coherence; syntactic complexity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29352548      PMCID: PMC5775133          DOI: 10.1002/wps.20491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Psychiatry        ISSN: 1723-8617            Impact factor:   49.548


  30 in total

1.  How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?

Authors:  Paweł Mandera; Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Thought disorder in mid-childhood as a predictor of adulthood diagnostic outcome: findings from the New York High-Risk Project.

Authors:  D C Gooding; S L Ott; S A Roberts; L Erlenmeyer-Kimling
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Thought disorder and communication deviance as predictors of outcome in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Carrie E Bearden; Keng Nei Wu; Rochelle Caplan; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 4.  The Epidemiology and Associated Phenomenology of Formal Thought Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eric Roche; Lisa Creed; Donagh MacMahon; Daria Brennan; Mary Clarke
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Thought, language, and communication disorders. II. Diagnostic significance.

Authors:  N C Andreasen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1979-11

6.  Language in schizophrenia Part 2: What can psycholinguistics bring to the study of schizophrenia...and vice versa?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2010-08-01

7.  A new approach to discourse analysis in psychiatry, applied to a schizophrenic patient's speech.

Authors:  M C Noël-Jorand; M Reinert; S Giudicelli; D Dassa
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1997-06-20       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Symptom trajectories and psychosis onset in a clinical high-risk cohort: the relevance of subthreshold thought disorder.

Authors:  Jordan E DeVylder; Felix M Muchomba; Kelly E Gill; Shelly Ben-David; Deborah J Walder; Dolores Malaspina; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  A window into the intoxicated mind? Speech as an index of psychoactive drug effects.

Authors:  Gillinder Bedi; Guillermo A Cecchi; Diego F Slezak; Facundo Carrillo; Mariano Sigman; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Speech graphs provide a quantitative measure of thought disorder in psychosis.

Authors:  Natalia B Mota; Nivaldo A P Vasconcelos; Nathalia Lemos; Ana C Pieretti; Osame Kinouchi; Guillermo A Cecchi; Mauro Copelli; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  67 in total

1.  Early language measures associated with later psychosis features in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Cynthia B Solot; Tyler M Moore; Terrence Blaine Crowley; Marsha Gerdes; Edward Moss; Daniel E McGinn; Beverly S Emanuel; Elaine H Zackai; Sean Gallagher; Monica E Calkins; Kosha Ruparel; Ruben C Gur; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.568

2.  The Centroid Cannot Hold: Comparing Sequential and Global Estimates of Coherence as Indicators of Formal Thought Disorder.

Authors:  Weizhe Xu; Jake Portanova; Ayesha Chander; Dror Ben-Zeev; Trevor Cohen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Current goals of neuroimaging for mental disorders: a report by the WPA Section on Neuroimaging in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Giulia Maria Giordano; Stefan Borgwardt
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Digital devices and continuous telemetry: opportunities for aligning psychiatry and neuroscience.

Authors:  Justin T Baker; Laura T Germine; Kerry J Ressler; Scott L Rauch; William A Carlezon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Language as a biomarker for psychosis: A natural language processing approach.

Authors:  Cheryl M Corcoran; Vijay A Mittal; Carrie E Bearden; Raquel E Gur; Kasia Hitczenko; Zarina Bilgrami; Aleksandar Savic; Guillermo A Cecchi; Phillip Wolff
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A new hope for early psychosis care: the evolving landscape of digital care tools.

Authors:  John Torous; Jessica Woodyatt; Matcheri Keshavan; Laura M Tully
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Sentiment Analysis in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders in an Ingroup/Outgroup Setting.

Authors:  E Vaucheret Paz; M Martino; M Hyland; M Corletto; C Puga; M Peralta; N Deltetto; T Kuhlmann; D Cavalié; M Leist; B Duarte; I Lascombes
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

8.  Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness.

Authors:  Chelsea Chandler; Peter W Foltz; Brita Elvevåg
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  A Review of Automated Speech and Language Features for Assessment of Cognitive and Thought Disorders.

Authors:  Rohit Voleti; Julie M Liss; Visar Berisha
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.856

10.  Using Natural Language Processing on Electronic Health Records to Enhance Detection and Prediction of Psychosis Risk.

Authors:  Jessica Irving; Rashmi Patel; Dominic Oliver; Craig Colling; Megan Pritchard; Matthew Broadbent; Helen Baldwin; Daniel Stahl; Robert Stewart; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.