| Literature DB >> 35676397 |
Sharika Nuzhat1, Parag Palit2, Mustafa Mahfuz2,3, Md Ridwan Islam2, S M Tafsir Hasan2, M Munirul Islam2, Shafiqul A Sarker2, David J Kyle4, Robin L Flannery4, Anita Vinjamuri5, Carlito B Lebrilla5, Tahmeed Ahmed2,6,7,8.
Abstract
Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) support the development of a healthy gut microbiome and the growth of infants. We aimed to determine the association of different HMOs with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among Bangladeshi young infants. This study was nested within a single-blind, randomized, pilot clinical trial (NCT0366657). A total of 45 breastmilk samples from mothers of < 6 months old infants who had SAM (n = 26) or were non-malnourished (n = 19) and were analyzed for constituent HMOs. Of the infants with SAM, 14 (53.85%) had secretor mothers, and 11 (57.89%) of the non-malnourished infants had secretor mothers. A one-unit increase in the relative abundance of sialylated HMOs was associated with higher odds of SAM in age and sex adjusted model (aOR = 2.00, 90% CI 1.30, 3.06), in age, sex, and secretor status adjusted model (aOR = 1.96, 90% CI 1.29, 2.98), and also in age and sex adjusted model among non-secretor mothers (aOR = 2.86, 90% CI 1.07, 7.62). In adjusted models, there was no evidence of a statistically significant association between SAM and fucosylated or undecorated HMOs. Our study demonstrates that a higher relative abundance of sialylated HMOs in mothers' breastmilk may have a negative impact on young infants' nutritional status.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35676397 PMCID: PMC9177541 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13296-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
The baseline characteristics of SAM and non-malnourished young infants and their mothers.
| Characteristics | SAM (n = 26) | Non-malnourished (n = 19) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age in years (mean, SD) | 23.42 ± 5.32 | 25.89 ± 5.43 | 0.135 |
| Maternal education (less than 5 years) (n, %) | 10 (38.46%) | 4 (21.05%) | 0.213 |
| Gestational age (in weeks) (mean, SD) | 37.35 ± 2.24 | 38.53 ± 1.93 | 0.071 |
| Term infant (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks) (n, %) | 17 (65.38%) | 17 (89.47%) | 0.063 |
| Mode of delivery- by C-section (n, %) | 13 (50%) | 4 (21.05%) | 0.048 |
| Birth weight in kg (mean, SD) | 2.76 ± 0.68/17 | 3.04 ± 0.54/14 | 0.229 |
| Male infant (n, %) | 16 (61.54%) | 13 (68.42%) | 0.634 |
| Age on admission (in days) (mean, SD) | 103.58 ± 35.09 | 131.74 ± 29.30 | 0.007 |
| Edematous infant (n, %) | 17 (65.38%) | NA | NA |
| WAZ of infant on admission (mean, SD) | -3.41 ± 0.63/9 | − 0.70 ± 1.03/19 | < 0.001 |
| WLZ of infant on admission (mean, SD) | − 3.80 ± 0.33)/9 | 0.23 ± 0.79/19 | < 0.001 |
| LAZ of infant on admission (mean, SD) | − 1.31 ± 1.25 | − 1.17 ± 1.08 | 0.699 |
| Diarrheal duration of infant on admission (in days) (mean, SD) | 4.46 ± 7.01 | 7.26 ± 6.68 | 0.184 |
| Volume of breast milk intake in percentage/day feed (mean, SD) | 19.85 ± 14.43 | 97.74 ± 9.86 | < 0.001 |
| Use of antibiotic prior to admission (n, %) | 8 (34.78%) | 17 (94.44%) | < 0.001 |
Admission (mean, SD) (Log10 CFU/µg of DNA) | 6.00 ± 2.27/23 | 4.88 ± 3.56/19 | 0.225 |
| Secretor mothers (n, %) | 14 (53.85%) | 11 (57.89%) | 0.78 |
Sialylated HMOs (% of relative abundance) (mean, SD) | 6.18 ± 2.21 | 3.88 ± 0.99 | < 0.001 |
Fucosylated HMOs (% of relative abundance) (mean, SD) | 54.38 ± 9.41 | 59.45 ± 7.04 | 0.055 |
Undecorated HMOs (% of relative abundance) (mean, SD) | 39.44 ± 8.34 | 36.67 ± 6.93 | 0.244 |
HMOs, human milk oligosaccharides; WAZ, weight for age z score; WLZ, weight for length z score; LAZ, length for age z score.
Figure 1Distribution of different HMOs in mothers of different secretor status and having infants with different nutritional status. [6′SL, 6′-Sialyllactose; 3′SL, 3′-Sialyllactose; 3′FL, 3′-Fucosyllactose; 2′FL, 2′-Fucosyllactose; LDFT, lactodifucosyllactose; LNT&LnNT, lacto-N-tetraose& lacto-N-neotetraose; LNFP II, Lacto-N-fucosylpentose-II; LNFP III, Lacto-N-fucosylpentose-III; LNFP I, Lacto-N-fucosylpentose-I; LNDFH I,lacto-N-difucosylhexose-I; LNDFH II, lacto-N-difucosylhexose-II; LNH, lacto-N-hexaose; LNnH, lacto-N-neohexaose; MFLNH I, monofucosyllacto-N-hexaose I; MFLNH III, monofucosyllacto-N-hexaose III; IFLNH III, isomer 3 fucosyl-paralacto-Nhexaose; IFLNH I, isomer 1 fucosyl-paralacto-N-hexaose; P-LNH, para-lacto-N-hexaose; SLNH, Monosialyllacto-N-hexaose; a+S-LNnH II, No literature name + sialyllacto-N-neohexaose II; MFpLNH IV, Monofucosyl-paralacto-N-hexaose; DFLNHb, Difucosyllacto-Nhexaose b; DFLNHa, Difucosyllacto-Nhexaose a; DFS-LNH, Difucosylmonosialyllacto-N-neohexaose; DFS-LNHnH, Difucosylmonosialyllacto-N-neohexaose; TFLNH, Trifucosyllacto-N-hexaose.]
Association of sialylated, fucosylated, and undecorated HMOs with severe acute malnutrition among young infants using firth logistic regression.
| Sialylated HMOs | Fucosylated HMOs | Undecorated HMOs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR | 90% CI | aOR | 90% CI | aOR | 90% CI | ||||
| Model 1 | 2.00 | 1.30–3.06 | 0.008 | 0.95 | 0.89–1.02 | 0.224 | 1.03 | 0.96–1.10 | 0.486 |
| Model 2 | 1.96 | 1.29–2.98 | 0.008 | 0.95 | 0.88–1.02 | 0.242 | 1.03 | 0.95–1.10 | 0.570 |
| Model 3 | 1.52 | 0.90–2.57 | 0.192 | 0.98 | 0.88–1.08 | 0.710 | 1.00 | 0.90–1.12 | 0.944 |
| Model 4 | 2.86 | 1.07–7.62 | 0.078 | 0.94 | 0.85–1.04 | 0.285 | 1.03 | 0.94–1.14 | 0.557 |
For model 1: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (90% CI) was adjusted for age and sex.
For model 2: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (90% CI) was adjusted for age and sex and secretor status.
For model 3: it was for secretor mothers only and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (90% CI) was adjusted for age and sex.
For model 4: it was for non-secretor mothers only and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (90% CI) was adjusted for age and sex.
Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval, HMO, human milk oligosaccharide.