| Literature DB >> 35675063 |
Xiumei Zheng1,2, Shengfang Wang3, Lan Xiao2,3, Pingping Han2,4, Kunke Xie5, Saso Ivanovski2,4, Yin Xiao2,3,5, Yinghong Zhou2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that excessive inflammation hampers the regenerative capacity of periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs) and that activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is crucial in suppressing immune dysregulation.Entities:
Keywords: immunomodulation; inflammation; macrophages; periodontal regeneration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35675063 PMCID: PMC9541255 DOI: 10.1111/jre.13022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Periodontal Res ISSN: 0022-3484 Impact factor: 3.946
Primer sequences used for RT‐qPCR
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CAGAAGTGCAAAGTCTCAGACAT‐3′ |
|---|---|
| Rev_ | 5′‐GTCATCTTGTATTGTTGGGCT‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CTGAACTTCGGGGTGATCGG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐GGCTTGTCACTCGAATTTTGAGA‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CTCTTGGCAGCCTTCCTGATTT‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐CTCTTGGCAGCCTTCCTGATTT‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐GGTGGTGGCTCTCCTTGTCA‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐CGTGGTATTCTCGCCGATGT‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CTGACCTATGTGTCATTTGG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐CATCTGGGAACTTTCCTTTC‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CAGGACTTTAAGGGTTACTTG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐ATTTTCACAGGGGAGAAATC‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐GGCCCAGCATCTGCAAAG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐GGTCCTTGCGGAAGTCAATG‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐AAATGATGAGCTGTGGATTG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐CCATCCTTGCCTTTCATAAC‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐AGTCTGCTCACGATACATAG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐TCCTTCTGGAATAGATTGGG‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐AGGGACTATGGCGTCAAACA‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐GGCTCACGTCGCTCATCTT‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐ACCTAGCAGACACCATGAGGAC‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐RGGGGACTGAGGCTCCAAG‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CTGCGCGCTGCACATGG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐GCGATGTCGTAGAAGGTGAGCC‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐GGGCACATCAAGCACTGACAG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐CCCTTAGGAAGTGGCTGTCCAG‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐TCAGCAATGCCTCCTGCAC‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐TCTGGGTGGCAGTGATGGC‐3′ |
| Fwd_ | 5′‐CACCCGAGATTGAGCAATAACAGG‐3′ |
| Rev_ | 5′‐ATCACGAATGGGGTTCAACGG‐3′ |
FIGURE 1LiCl‐induced periodontal regeneration was associated with M2 polarization. Representative images from μCT, AZAN staining, and H&E staining showed that LiCl administration significantly induced periodontal tissue repair compared with the PBS‐administration controls. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated the successful activation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling induced by LiCl administration, which further led to the infiltration of macrophages (CD68+ cells) where the major components were of Arginase+ M2 phenotype and the iNOS+ M1 phenotype was obviously suppressed, at both 1 and 2 weeks as compared to the PBS‐treatment group. AB, alveolar bone; D, dentin; PDL, periodontal ligament
FIGURE 2LiCl activated Wnt/β‐catenin signaling and M2 polarization in vitro. (A) RT‐qPCR analysis showed that the increasing concentrations of LiCl led to significantly reduced M1 marker expressions and increased M2 marker expressions dose‐dependently. (B) Western blot analysis demonstrated a LiCl‐induced Wnt/β‐catenin signaling activation along with a down‐regulation of the M1 (iNOS) and an upregulation of the M2 (Arginase) marker. The protein levels of β‐catenin were also significantly increased after the LiCl treatment. Asterisk indicates significant difference (*p < .05; ***p < .001)
FIGURE 3Immune response of macrophages to various concentrations of LiCl and β‐catenin nuclear translocation. (A and B) Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that the exposure to LiCl in a dose‐dependent manner led to a reduction in the expression of pro‐inflammatory M1 marker iNOS along with a distinct increase in the anti‐inflammatory M2 marker Arginase expression. (C) In response to the Wnt stimulus, β‐catenin was stabilized and translocated to the nucleus, where it exerted its function
FIGURE 4Suppressing the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling with the supplementation of Wnt inhibitor (10 μM cardamonin) led to (A) markedly increased M1 marker expressions along with decreased M2 marker expressions, and (B) a significant reduction in β‐catenin protein expression. Asterisk indicates significant difference (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; ****p < .0001)
FIGURE 5LiCl induced autophagic activity in macrophages. (A and B) LiCl treatment induced the mRNA and protein levels of essential autophagy markers. (C) LiCl application led to increased autophagosome formation in macrophages as indicated by MDC‐positive sphere‐like structures. Asterisk indicates significant difference (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; ****p < .0001)
FIGURE 6Application of Wnt inhibitor diminished the LiCl‐induced autophagic activity as demonstrated in the significantly lower (A) mRNA and (B) protein expression levels of autophagy markers. Asterisk indicates significant difference (*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; ****p < .0001)
FIGURE 7Li‐activated macrophages mediated osteogenic/cementogenic differentiation of PDLCs. (A) RT‐qPCR analysis showed upregulated gene expression levels of osteogenic markers (Runx2 and OCN) and cementogenic markers (CAP and CEMP1) in PDLCs on day 3 and day 7 of stimulation with conditioned medium derived from LiCl‐activated macrophages. (B) Western blot analysis demonstrated a significant increase in osteogenic markers at the protein levels. (C) Alizarin Red S staining revealed significantly increased mineral depositions in PDLCs stimulated with conditioned medium derived from LiCl‐activated macrophages in a dose‐dependent manner. MLi0, MLi2.5, and MLi5: conditioned medium derived from macrophages stimulated with LiCl at a concentration of 0, 2.5, and 5 mM, respectively. Asterisk indicates significant difference (*p < .05)