Literature DB >> 35673871

The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive effort in lizards.

Dylan J Padilla Perez1, Dale F DeNardo1, Michael J Angilletta1.   

Abstract

Life-history theory suggests that the optimal reproductive effort of an organism is affected by factors such as energy acquisition and predation risk. The observation that some organisms actively search for their prey and others ambush them creates the expectation of different energy needs and predation risk associated with each foraging behaviour, the so-called 'foraging-mode paradigm'. Although this paradigm has been around for decades, the empirical evidence consists of conflicting results derived from competing models based on different mechanisms. For instance, models within the foraging-mode paradigm suggest that widely foraging females have evolved low reproductive effort, because a heavy reproductive load decreases their ability to escape from predators. By contrast, a long-standing prediction of evolutionary theory indicates that organisms subject to high extrinsic mortality, should invest more in reproduction. Here, we present the first partial evidence that widely foraging species have evolved greater reproductive effort than have sit-and-wait species, which we attribute to a larger body size and greater mortality among mobile foragers. According to our findings, we propose a theoretical model that could explain the observed pattern in lizards, suggesting ways for evolutionary ecologists to test mechanistic hypotheses at the intraspecific level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clutch size; fecundity; maternal size; offspring size; phenotypic plasticity; predation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35673871      PMCID: PMC9174732          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  24 in total

1.  Stochastic mapping of morphological characters.

Authors:  John P Huelsenbeck; Rasmus Nielsen; Jonathan P Bollback
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species.

Authors:  Yuchi Zheng; John J Wiens
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  Why do colder mothers produce larger eggs? An optimality approach.

Authors:  Celeste Bownds; Robbie Wilson; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Foraging mode, relative prey size and diet breadth: A phylogenetically explicit analysis of snake feeding ecology.

Authors:  Xavier Glaudas; Kelsey L Glennon; Marcio Martins; Luca Luiselli; Simon Fearn; Dane F Trembath; Dušan Jelić; Graham J Alexander
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  "Costs" of reproduction in reptiles.

Authors:  Richard Shine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  THE IMPACT OF PREDATION ON LIFE HISTORY EVOLUTION IN TRINIDADIAN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA).

Authors:  David Reznick; John A Endler
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution.

Authors:  Jonathan L Richardson; Mark C Urban; Daniel I Bolnick; David K Skelly
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size.

Authors:  Diego R Barneche; D Ross Robertson; Craig R White; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive effort in lizards.

Authors:  Dylan J Padilla Perez; Dale F DeNardo; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.530

View more
  1 in total

1.  The correlated evolution of foraging mode and reproductive effort in lizards.

Authors:  Dylan J Padilla Perez; Dale F DeNardo; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.