Literature DB >> 35671336

Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming.

Kyewon Kang1, Hyunjin Cho1, Sinyong Jeong1, Seoyoung Jeon1, Mingyung Lee1, Seul Lee2, Yulchang Baek2, Joonpyo Oh3, Seongwon Seo1.   

Abstract

The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; eructation; forage-to-concentrate ratio; laser methane detector; methane emission; respiration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35671336      PMCID: PMC9387598          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  16 in total

1.  Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep.

Authors:  R M Murray; A M Bryant; R A Leng
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Application of the laser methane detector for measurements in freely grazing goats: impact on animals' behaviour and methane emissions.

Authors:  R Roessler; E Schlecht
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Accuracy of methane emissions predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra and measured by laser methane detectors in Brown Swiss dairy cows.

Authors:  T M Denninger; A Schwarm; F Dohme-Meier; A Münger; B Bapst; S Wegmann; F Grandl; A Vanlierde; D Sorg; S Ortmann; M Clauss; M Kreuzer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 4.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions.

Authors:  J R Knapp; G L Laur; P A Vadas; W P Weiss; J M Tricarico
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Metabolism of the lactating cow. II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model.

Authors:  R L Baldwin; J H Thornley; D E Beever
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Fujiang Hou; Atsushi Tsunekawa; Tianhai Yan; Firew Tegegne; Asaminew Tassew; Yeshambel Mekuriaw; Shigdaf Mekuriaw; Beyadglign Hunegnaw; Wondimeneh Mekonnen; Toshiyoshi Ichinohe
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  - Editorial - Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.

Authors:  Seongwon Seo; Seoyoung Jeon; Jong K Ha
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Assessment of methane emission traits in ewes using a laser methane detector: genetic parameters and impact on lamb weaning performance.

Authors:  Jessica Reintke; Kerstin Brügemann; Tong Yin; Petra Engel; Henrik Wagner; Axel Wehrend; Sven König
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2020-04-16

10.  Evaluation of feed value of a by-product of pickled radish for ruminants: analyses of nutrient composition, storage stability, and in vitro ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  Seoyoung Jeon; Keun-Nam Sohn; Seongwon Seo
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.