Magnitude of job satisfaction and intention to leave their present job among nurses in selected federal hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Job dissatisfaction issues and health workers' intention to leave is an increasing problem that threatens the function of the health care sector worldwide, especially in developing countries, including Ethiopia. As part of future evidence, this study was intended to assess nurses' job satisfaction and intention to leave their current work and its associated factors in federal public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
METHOD: An institutional based cross-sectional study design was used to conduct the study. A simple random sampling technique was employed to select 408 nurses from selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia. Self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. Logistic regression was employed to identify the predictor variables with consideration of statistical significance at P <0.05 adjusted odds ratios calculated at 95% CIs. RESULT: The magnitudes of job satisfaction and intention to leave their current job among nurses in this study were 47.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Salary is imbalanced with demands [AOR = 2.85 (1.24, 6.57)], managers who have no personal plan for developing skills [AOR = 3.74 (1.58, 8.87)], stressful jobs [AOR = 0.28 (0.11, 0.71)], health problems are a reason for having thoughts about changing jobs [AOR = 3.02 (1.17, 7.79)], and a lack of development [AOR = 4.13 (1.51, 11.3)] were identified as determinant factors for intention to leave.
CONCLUSION: The overall intention to leave their current job among nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia was high. The government of Ethiopia should balance the salary of nurses with the current market level. Hospital leaders should plan the way nurses develop their educational and job carrier levels.

Introduction

Intention to leave is defined as an employee’s plan to quit the present job and look forward to finding another job in the near future [1-3]. The widespread nursing shortage and nurses’ high turnover rate have become the global issues [4] and have an adverse impact on health systems around the world [2, 5]. Losing a strong employee who has invested time and money in recruiting and training can cost a lot [2]. Job satisfaction is the most consistent predictor of nurses’ intention to leave and has been reported to explain most of the variance in intention to leave [6-8]. Employee job satisfaction is the fulfillment, gratification, and enjoyment that come from work. It is not just the money or the fringe benefits but the feelings employees receive from the work itself [9].

Globally, the shortage of nurses is a challenging issue among the health sectors [3, 10]. The negative consequence of high turnover includes costs associated with recruitment and orientation of new health professionals, loss of experienced one, and potential for increasing an adverse patient outcome and reduced organizational performance [11-13], which impacts the capacity to meet patient needs and provide quality care [9].

Health worker turnover is an increasing problem that threatens the function of the health care sector worldwide, especially in developing countries [11]. Asian countries show a high level of intention to leave their current jobs. A study performed in China Shangie showed that 50.2% of nurses were dissatisfied, and 40% of nurses had an intention to leave their current employment [4]. A study performed in Riyad, Saudi Arabia, showed that almost 94% indicated turnover intention from their current hospital [14]. A similar study performed in Iran showed that 69.3% of nurses were dissatisfied with their work life [15].

The magnitude of intention to leave across African countries ranged from 18.8 to 41.4% [5, 16], and in Ethiopia, it ranged between 50 and 83.7% [1, 12, 17–20]. While Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is home to 12% of the global population, it only employs 3.5% of the global health workforce, which is disproportionate to 27% of the global burden of disease on the continent [21]. Although the WHO recommends 2.5 health care workers per 1000 people [21], in Ethiopia, there are only 0.84 per 1,000 people [22].

Although factors affecting intention to leave one’s current job among health professionals vary over time, many studies have identified age, sex, marital status, level of education, satisfaction with autonomy and professional opportunities, scheduling, pay and benefits, workload, working environment, opportunity for professional growth, development staff relationship, supportive supervision, high continuance commitment and high normative commitment as significant predictors of intent to stay in the nursing profession standard of care and workload [2, 6, 8, 9, 14, 18, 23]. In general, work satisfaction comprises intrinsic and extrinsic factors [9]. Intrinsic factors are internally derived and include personal achievement, sense of accomplishment, and prestige [20, 23]. Extrinsic factors are those derived from factors related to pay and benefits, working conditions, and resources [9, 15, 24].

However, the problem of intention to leave the current job among health care professionals is high worldwide, especially in developing countries, including our country, and there are limited and updated studies done in Ethiopia. To reduce the problem, individual and group efforts should be supported with evidence. As such, continuous studies should be performed to generate strong evidence that supports tackling the problem. As part of future evidence, this study intends to assess nurses’ job satisfaction and intention to leave their work and the associated factors in federal public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Method and material

Study design and settings

An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was used to conduct the study among nurses at St. Paul’s and St. Peter‘s hospitals. They built and started giving services in 1977 and 1971, respectively. According to their official page, St. Paul’s Hospital and Millennium Medical College currently has more than 2,500 clinical, academic and administrative staff members. Among the total nurses in the hospital, 170 were diploma nurses, and 511 were BSc nurses. The current St. Peter’s Hospital was established in 1971 as a TB treatment center. The hospital has a total of 500 staff members, of which 250 are health care professionals. The study was conducted from October 21, 2020, to November 10, 2020.

Population and eligibility criteria

All nurses working in federal hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, were considered the source population. Nurses working at St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College and St. Peter specialized hospitals were considered the study population. All nurses with a qualification level of diploma or above who were currently working in the hospitals were included in the study. Those who were seriously ill during the data collection period were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling strategy

The required sample size for the study was calculated using a single population proportion formula with assumptions of 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error and a proportion of 59.4% from a study done in Ethiopia to explore the intention to turnover of nurses working in governmental health care institutions in East Gojjam [25]. Therefore, based on this information, the calculated sample size was 371. By considering a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample size for this study was considered to be 408.

From each selected federal hospital, the number of nurses was obtained from monthly payrolls. Then, based on the number of nurses in each hospital, the sample size was proportionally allocated to the hospitals. Finally, a simple random sampling method was carried out to select the study participants from all categories of nurses in each hospital.

Dependent Variable: Intention to leave

Independent Variables: Socio-demographic characteristics such as age, sex, marital status, education status, years of experience at work, role or position in the health care facility and primary work area in the hospital were included. Organizational career-related characteristics such as job satisfaction, cause of turnover intention, working experience, compensation, salary, working hours, support from management, communication and personal plan were also included. Work environment-related characteristics such as payment, staffing, nursing education, stressful job, schedule/working hours, career, health, development, support from coworkers, organizational policies, work condition, and supervision were also included in these independent variables.

Data collection tools and quality control

A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. The tool was developed after reviewing similar studies and modified in line with the objective of this study. Prior to actual data collection, the questionnaire was adjusted and corrected based on the pretest result, and the final questionnaire was translated to Amharic and then back to English to ensure consistency. In the process of data collection, six diploma holder data collectors and two degree holder supervisors were used. The completeness of the collected data was checked by the supervisor and principal investigator on a daily basis. The checking system of data was on a daily basis for completeness.

Data management and analysis

The data were entered into Epi-Data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 22 for data management and analysis. The general characteristics of the study population and the magnitude of intention to leave were described by using descriptive summary statistics such as frequencies, standard deviations, means, percentages and texts. Hence, logistic regression was employed to identify the predictor variables. Statistical significance was considered at P <0.05 with adjusted odds ratios calculated at 95% CIs.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before conducting the study, ethical clearance was obtained from St. Paul’s Hospital and St. Peter’s Hospital ethical review board. Participants’ right to self-determination and autonomy was respected, and study participants were given any information they needed verbally and in written prior to being involved in the study. The rights of each respondent refusing to answer a few or all questions were respected. Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw from the study at any time without explanation.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

A total of 392 nurses participated in the study, for a response rate of 96.1%. The majority (69.1%) of the respondents were females. The mean age of the respondents was 29.8±4.7 years. Nearly half (49.2%) of the participants were married. More than three-fourths (81.6%) of the participants were BSc nurses. Nearly half (45.2%) of the participants had three to five years of work experience. Six out of ten participants were staff nurses in their role, and 72 (18.4%) of the participants’ primary working areas in the study area were operating rooms (Table 1).

Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 392).

Variables	Category	Frequency (n = 392)	Percent
Sex	Male	121	30.9
	Female	271	69.1
Age	20–29	215	54.8
	30–39	161	41.1
	≥ 40	16	4.1
Marital status	Single	148	37.8
	Married	193	49.2
	Divorced	29	7.4
	Widowed	22	5.6
Educational status	Diploma	12	3.1
	Bachelor degree	320	81.6
	Master degree	60	15.3
Work experience	≤2 years	35	8.9
	3–5 years	177	45.2
	≥6 years	179	45.7
Role or position	Staff nurse	241	61.5
	Head nurse	121	30.9
	Other	30	7.7
Primary work area	Medical ward	55	14.0
	Surgical ward	45	11.5
	ICU	63	16.1
	Emergency	58	14.8
	OR	72	18.4
	Other	99	25.3

Organizational and career related characteristics

Nearly nine out of ten (88.5%) participants rated that the cause of turnover intention of their organization was high. Approximately 319 (81.4%) nurses agreed that their work experience possessed their personal skills and helped them stay in their organization. More than half (59.7%) of the study participants responded that being dissatisfied with the amount of compensation paid by their organization was one of the reasons for which they intended to leave their current job. Approximately 239 (61%) of the participants raised that, as it interferes with social life, long working hours were also another cause for their intention to leave. Lack of support from managers (67.3%) and unclear interpersonal communication with their managers (57.1%) were also among reasons for their intention to leave the current job (Table 2).

Table 2

Organizational and career-related characteristics among nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 392).

Variables	Category	Frequency	Percent
The cause of turnover intention of the organization	High	346	88.5
	Low	45	11.5
The working experience did possess personal skill that helps to stay in the Organization	High	319	81.4
	Low	73	18.6
The satisfaction level with the amount of compensation paid by the current organization	Satisfied	158	40.3
	Dissatisfied	234	59.7
Male workers leave organization more than female workers	Yes	208	53.1
	No	184	46.9
Feel that chosen the wrong career	Yes	226	57.7
	No	166	42.3
Actively looking for jobs that will help to better career	Yes	64	16.3
	No	328	83.7
Salary is in balance to the demands employer places as an employee	Yes	219	55.9
	No	173	44.1
Working hours are hindrance for social life	Yes	153	39.0
	No	239	61.0
Experience lack of support from management	Yes	128	32.7
	No	264	67.3
Find support from the manager	Yes	150	38.3
	No	242	61.7
The communication from the manager is clear (instructions, tasks, goals and feedback)	Yes	224	57.1
	No	168	42.9
Feel that manager has a personal plan for developing skills/competence/qualifications	Yes	207	52.8
	No	185	47.2
When negative incidents occur, experience that the managers feedback strengthens for the future	Yes	154	39.3
	No	238	60.7

Work environment-related characteristics

Regarding work environment-related factors, the majority (60.5%) of study participants were found their job stressful; however, most (83.2%) of them replied that they had support from coworkers. More than two-thirds and one-half of the study participants had thoughts about leaving an organization and leaving the profession, respectively. In addition, more than half (51.0%) and approximately two-thirds (65.3%) of study participants applied for a new job during the last year, and schedule/working hours were reasons why they had thoughts about quitting their current job, respectively. Approximately 201 (51.3%), 301 (76.8%), 241 (61.5%), 203 (51.8%), 246 (62.8%) and 283 (72.2%) respondents reason for having thoughts about quitting and changing the job were manager, organizational factors, career, health, lack of development and salary, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3

Work environment characteristics among nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 392).

Variables	Category	Frequency	Percent
Staffing is correct in ratio to the workload experiencing	Yes	209	53.3
	No	183	46.7
Feel that nursing education matches the practical work	Yes	324	82.7
	No	68	17.3
Have support from coworkers	Yes	326	83.2
	No	66	16.8
Find the job stressful	Yes	237	60.5
	No	155	39.5
Have thoughts about leaving an organization	Yes	267	68.1
	No	125	31.9
Have thoughts about leaving the profession	Yes	198	50.5
	No	194	49.5
Applied for a new job during the last year	Yes	200	51.0
	No	192	49.0
Salary is the reason thinking about changing the job	Yes	283	72.2
	No	109	27.8
Schedule/working hours are reason why have thoughts about quitting the current job	Yes	256	.3
	No	136	34.765
Manager is the reason for thoughts about leaving job	Yes	201	51.3
	No	191	48.7
Organizational factors are reason for having thoughts about quitting the job	Yes	301	76.8
	No	91	23.2
Career is a factor for thinking thoughts about changing the job	Yes	241	61.5
	No	151	38.5
Health is a reason for having thoughts about changing the job	Yes	203	51.8
	No	189	48.2
Lack of development is a reason for thinking thoughts about changing the job	Yes	146	62.8
	No	246	37.2

Magnitude of job satisfaction and intention to leave

Approximately 47.7% of respondents were satisfied with their current job. Among the 392 study participants, 316 (80.6%) had the intention to leave their current health institution (Fig 1).

Fig 1

Job satisfaction and intention to leave among nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 392).

Factors associated with intention to leave

Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association of one independent variable with the dependent variables. Variables with P < 0.25 during the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the association of independent variables with intention to leave the current job by controlling for confounding variables. After computing multivariate analysis, managers had personal plans for developing skills and stressful jobs. Salary is the reason for changing jobs, health is the reason for changing job conditions, and lack of development was significantly associated with intention to leave the current job by controlling for confounding variables in the regression model (Table 4).

Table 4

Factors associated with intention to leave their current job among nurses working in selected federal hospitals in Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 392).

Variables	Responses	Intention to leave		COR (95%CI)	AOR (95%CI)
		YesN (%)	NoN (%)
Satisfied with the amount of compensation paid	Yes	120 (75.9)	38 (24.1)	0.61 (0.37, 1.01)	0.58 (0.25, 1.37)
	No	196 (83.8)	38 (16.2)	1.00	1.00
Feeling of wrong career	Yes	141 (84.9)	25 (15.1)	1.64 (0.97, 2.79)	0.55 (0.20, 1.47)
	No	175 (77.4)	51 (22.6)	1.00	1.00
Salary is imbalance to the demands	Yes	155 (89.6)	18 (10.4)	3.10 (1.75, 5.50)	2.85 (1.24, 6.57)*
	No	161 (73.5)	58 (26.5)	1.00	1.00
Experience lack of support from management	Yes	219 (83.0)	45 (17.0)	1.56 (0.93, 2.61)	2.00 (0.87, 4.62)
	No	97 (75.8)	31 (24.2)	1.00	1.00
Clear communication from the manager	Yes	145 (86.3)	23 (13.7)	1.95 (1.14, 3.34)	1.10 (0.50, 2.41)
	No	171 (76.3)	53 (23.7)	1.00	1.00
Manager has a personal plan for developing skill/competence/	Yes	168 (90.8)	17 (9.2)	1.00	1.00
	No	148 (71.5)	59 (28.5)	3.94 (2.20, 7.06)	3.74 (1.58, 8.87)*
Support from co-workers	Yes	254 (77.9)	72 (22.1)	0.23 (0.08, 0.65)	0.31 (0.09, 1.08)
	No	62 (93.9)	4 (6.1)	1.00	1.00
Stressful job	Yes	186 (78.5)	51 (21.5)	1.00	1.00
	No	130 (83.9)	25 (16.1)	0.70 (0.41, 1.19)	0.28 (0.11, 0.71)*
Schedule/working hours is a reason for changing the job	Yes	229 (89.5)	27 (10.5)	4.77 (2.81, 8.12)	0.72 (0.29, 1.79)
	No	87 (64.0)	49 (36.0)	1.00	1.00
Manager is the reason for thoughts about leaving the job	Yes	185 (92.0)	16 (8.0)	5.30 (2.92, 9.60)	1.33 (0.55, 3.21)
	No	131 (68.6)	60 (31.4)	1.00	1.00
Organizational factors are reason for having thoughts about leaving the job	Yes	271 (90.0)	30 (10.0)	9.23 (5.29, 16.1)	1.01 (0.36, 2.83)
	No	45 (49.5)	46 (50.5)	1.00	1.00
Career is a factor for thoughts about changing the job	Yes	218 (90.5	23 (9.5)	5.13 (2.97, 8.84)	0.72 (0.28, 1.91)
	No	98 (64.9)	53 (35.1)	1.00	1.00
Health problem is a reason for having thoughts about changing the job	Yes	185 (91.1)	18 (8.9)	4.55 (2.56, 8.08)	3.02 (1.17, 7.79)*
	No	131 (69.3)	58 (30.7)	1.00	1.00
Lack of development is a reason for thoughts about changing the job	Yes	225 (91.5)	21 (8.5)	6.48 (3.70, 11.3)	4.13 (1.51, 11.3)*
	No	91 (62.3)	55 (37.7)	1.00	1.00

*P value<0.05

**p value <0.01, CI: confidence interval, COR: crude odds ratio, AOR: adjusted odds ratio

Discussion

The health workforce is the most imperative building block of the health system [26], without which the other five building blocks, such as service delivery, health information system leadership and governance, and access to essential medicine, cannot realize quality public health services [27, 28]. In relation to this, widespread nursing shortages and nurses’ high turnover rates have become global issues [4]. To bring the solution for this devastating issue, identifying the magnitude of the problem is the core. As part of future evidence and solutions, this study intends to assess nurses’ job satisfaction and intention to leave their current job and the associated factors in federal public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Job satisfaction is an essential factor that affects employees’ initiative and enthusiasm [29]. The relationship between job satisfaction and employee intention to leave their job is well explained in different studies [7, 30, 31]. This literature shows that one of the major reasons for workers to leave their job is dissatisfaction with their current job for different reasons [1, 6]. According to the results of this study, the magnitude of satisfaction of their current job among nurses in the selected hospitals was only 47.6%. This finding is almost consistent with a pooled prevalence of job satisfaction among health professionals in Ethiopia [12]. Conversely, the result is much lower than the result of a study performed in a tertiary center in Keno, Northwest Nigeria, in which the magnitude of satisfaction of nurses with their jobs was 90.4% [30]. The result is also lower than the result of a study performed in Turkey among nurses [31]. The difference might be due to variation in the data collection tools, use of different cutoff points, sample size, sampling methods, study setting and study participant variation.

Different studies show that the intention to leave a job is the most important and immediate antecedent of turnover decisions [1, 28]. When health workers leave their current jobs, it can negatively affect organizational performance and contribute to the shortage of the health work force [1, 11, 19]. According to the results of this study, approximately 80.6% of the study population intended to leave their current job. This result is almost consistent with the findings of a study performed in a health institution in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [20]. However, it is much higher than the finding of a study performed in a public health center in the Jimma Zone of southwestern Ethiopia, which found 63.7% intention to leave their current job among health care professionals. This finding is also higher than the results of studies performed in China [4] and Addis Ababa [19].

When talent employees leave their jobs, the organizations will lose their experience and may face a problem with the additional costs spent recruiting, training and developing new candidates [32, 33]. To retain experienced employees, organizational managers need to have a strong plan for developing skills/competence/qualification for their own and employees [33]. As such, this study also shows a strong relationship between the availability of manager plans to develop their competence and intention to leave. The intention to leave the current job of those who responded that the manager had no personal plan to develop his/her skill/competence/qualification was 3.74 times higher.

Different studies have identified a direct relationship between job stress and intention to leave [32, 34]. Stress is a component of every human existence, and a human faces a sequence of stress in his everyday life. It becomes a threat when a person faces it at work; thus, it becomes an essential concern for the employer and the employees as well [35]. The results of this study also support this reality by indicating a strong relationship between the two. Those respondents who said the job was stressful had a 28% higher rate of intention to leave their current job. This suggests that the organization should identify the major causes of stress at the workplace and plan and implement the possible mitigation systems.

Salary is one of the basic issues in organizations for employees to work hard and stay in the organizations for a long period of time [2, 36]. Employees will be much more invested in their jobs and in the company if they feel valued by that organization. A higher salary is a way to show employees that they are valued. Companies can also demand higher quality work and higher levels of productivity and services in exchange for that higher salary. According to this study, salary is among the significant determining factors for employees to leave or stay at their current job. Accordingly, those who said salary is not in balance with the demands of employees had a 2.85 times higher rate of intention to leave their current jobs. This study is supported by many studies [19, 21, 26]. Therefore, this confirms that salary is one of the best ways to compensate for employees’ time and efforts invested in the organization.

Different evidence shows that, with established and effective training and education programs, an institution can improve retention and increase staff morale by creating a positive, motivated, and competent workforce [37, 38]. This, in turn, improves patient satisfaction and profitability of the organization [2, 6]. Similar to this evidence, the results of this study also show that there is a strong relationship between intentions to leave one’s current job and a lack of personal development opportunities. This result is supported by numerous research findings [12, 20, 35].

Conclusion and recommendation

The overall intention to leave a current job among nurses working in selected federal hospitals was high. The salary being imbalanced with the demands, managers having a personal plan for developing skills/competence/qualifications, stressfulness of the jobs, health problems and lack of development were the determinant factors for nurses’ intention to leave their current job. The government of Ethiopia should balance salaries of nurses with the current market level. Hospitals leaders should plan the way nurses develop their educational and job carrier levels. Effective measures should be taken to improve hospital nurses’ accomplishment, professional status, and career development to minimize their current intention to leave. In general, the organization should plan the way to retain their experienced workers for a long period of time to reach the planned vision. Future researchers should conduct longitudinal and interventional studies to assess the definite intention to leave.

(SAV)

Click here for additional data file.

24 Jan 2022

MAGNITUDE OF JOB SATISFACTION AND INTENTION TO LEAVE PRESENT JOB AMONG NURSES IN SELECTED FEDERAL HOSPITALS IN ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Woldekiros,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The revised version should address all comments.

There is a substantial body of literature on quit intentions that is not covered in the manuscript (see https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00546.x). This should be stated in the paper.  

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 07 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Petri Böckerman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

7. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

8. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

9. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

- https://www.science.gov/topicpages/s/satisfaction+turnover+intentions.html

- https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/4194

- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/7092964/

The text that needs to be addressed involves the Introduction.

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: There is substantial literature published on the area present by the manuscript. Examples of recent published literature on this area of research include:

Worku N, Feleke A, Debie A, Nigusie A. Magnitude of Intention to Leave and Associated Factors among Health Workers Working at Primary Hospitals of North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: Mixed Methods. BioMed research international. 2019 Jul 16;2019.

Worku N, Feleke A, Debie A, Nigusie A. Magnitude of Intention to Leave and Associated Factors among Health Workers Working at Primary Hospitals of North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: Mixed Methods. BioMed research international. 2019 Jul 16;2019.

Dado WM, Mekonnen W, Aragw MD, Desta BF, Desal AY. Turnover intention of health workers in public-private mix partnership health facilities: A case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2019 Jun 7;9(2):374.

There is very little that the findings of the study at to the existing database. No cause-effect relation can be established due to study design limitations.

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting paper depicting the loss of health care workers and the reasons for mass resignation. It is a relevant topic which must be brought to the attention of management and like minded individuals. While the technicalities of the paper were simple, the underlying message is clear. For the paper to be accepted, a native English speaker should review the paper to improve the language. I also highly recommend a thorough formatting of the paper for publication in the journal. There is also a missed opportunity to discuss further the sort of interventions that might allow for prevention of loss of nurses.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

5 Mar 2022

1. Comments from reviewer 1:

Comment 1: There is substantial literature published on the area present by the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your valuable comment. We agree that there are some literatures done in this area previously. However, the literatures published are not enough to show this sound problem in the country, specifically study area. Addis Ababa is a place where huge and complex health problems are screened and treated. This needs an adequate number of well experienced health care professionals to appropriately respond those public health problems. As such, hospitals need to retain experienced health care professionals including nurses. To make this practical, additional evidences are needed to know the overall prevalence of the problem (Pooled prevalence), and suggest to policy makers for interventions.

Comment 2: There is very little that the findings of the study at to the existing database.

Response: Thank you again for the comment: We disagree with the comment. We belief that the finding of this study will provided additional input to the existing literature to show the overall magnitude of the problem.

Comment 3: No cause-effect relation can be established due to study design limitations

Response: Thank you again for additional input: We agreed with the comment. Due to design limitation, the study do not established cause-effect relationship; however, we recommended longitudinal and interventional study for future researches to fill this drawback.

2. Comment from reviewer 2:

Comment 1: This is an interesting paper depicting the loss of health care workers and the reasons for mass resignation. It is a relevant topic which must be brought to the attention of management and likeminded individuals. While the technicalities of the paper were simple, the underlying message is clear.

Response: Thank you for the interesting understanding and explanation of the problem.

Comment 2: For the paper to be accepted, a native English speaker should review the paper to improve the language.

Response: We have used experienced professionals to edit the paper from both English language and content point of view.

Comment 3: I also highly recommend a thorough formatting of the paper for publication in the journal.

Response: We have tried to format the paper according to the journal formatting style.

Comment 4: There is also a missed opportunity to discuss further the sort of interventions that might allow for prevention of loss of nurses.

Response: Thank you for interesting point. We have tried to discuss possible sort of interventions in both discussion and recommendation parts.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

28 Mar 2022

9 May 2022

Comment from reviewer #2

• While the authors have tried to address most of the queries from the editor and the reviewers, the quality of language is still poor in the manuscript. Authors are advised to check on acronyms, capitalization, tense and sentence structure to be published in a international journal. Again I advise a professional English service for this.

Response to reviewer #2

• As the comments of reviewer #2, we tried to improve the quality of the manuscript’s language. We check all the acronyms, capitalization, tense and sentence structure as the quality of publication permits. Furthermore, we tried to get professional English language support from American Journal Experts.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

24 May 2022

Magnitude of job satisfaction and intention to leave their present job among nurses in selected Federal Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

PONE-D-21-26236R2

Dear Dr. Woldekiros,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Petri Böckerman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

30 May 2022

PONE-D-21-26236R2

Magnitude of job satisfaction and intention to leave their present job among nurses in selected Federal Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Woldekiros:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Petri Böckerman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE