Enhanced Attachment and Collagen Type I Deposition of MC3T3-E1 Cells via Electrohydrodynamic Printed Sub-Microscale Fibrous Architectures.

Micro/sub-microscale fibrillar architectures of extracellular matrix play important roles in regulating cellular behaviors such as attachment, migration, and differentiation. However, the interactions between cells and organized micro/sub-microscale fibers have not been fully clarified yet. Here, the responses of MC3T3-E1 cells to electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printed scaffolds with microscale and/or sub-microscale fibrillar architectures were investigated to demonstrate their potential for bone tissue regeneration. Fibrillar scaffolds were EHD-fabricated with microscale (20.51 ± 1.70 μm) and/or sub-microscale (0.58 ± 0.51 μm) fibers in a controlled manner. The in vitro results showed that cells exhibited a 1.25-fold increase in initial attached cell number and 1.17-fold increase in vinculin expression on scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers than that on scaffolds with pure microscale fibers. After 14 days of culture, the cells expressed 1.23 folds increase in collagen type I (COL-I) deposition compared with that on scaffolds with pure microscale fibers. These findings indicated that the EHD printed sub-microscale fibrous architectures can facilitate attachment and COL I secretion of MC3T3-E1 cells, which may provide a new insight to the design and fabrication of fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Copyright:

1. Introduction

The extracellular matrix (ECM) of native bone exhibits filamentous nature, which consists of highly organized micro/nanoscale collagen fibers with hydroxyapatite and serves as crucial biophysical cues in regulating cellular behaviors for bone homeostasis[1-3]. Mimicking such fibrillar architectures in artificial implants is of great importance to restoring the biological functions of damaged bone tissues in vitro[4]. In this aspect, electrospinning technique has been widely utilized as a promising approach for the construction of bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to its unique capability in fabricating ECM-mimetic ultrafine fibers[5-7]. For example, Yao et al.[8] developed polycaprolactone (PCL) and polylactic acid composite fibrous scaffolds with the fiber diameter ranging from 250 nm to 1 μm using electrospinning, which were found to facilitate attachment and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in vitro. Ren et al.[9] fabricated electrospinning nanofibers membranes with different ratios of PCL/gelatin for guided bone regeneration. They found the fibrous membranes prompted calcium deposition of MC3T3-E1 cells both in growth media and osteogenic media. Nevertheless, the random deposition of the micro/sub-microscale fibers increases the complexity of the fibrous structures, which makes it difficult to decouple and decipher the interactions between the cells and the ECM-mimetic fibers[10-12].

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) printing is a newly emerging method for fabricating fibrous scaffolds with ultrafine fibers and user-defined organizations[13]. Due to its capability of depositing every single fiber in a highly controlled manner, there has been an increasing interest in the investigation of cell-scaffold interactions using EHD printing[14-16]. For example, Brennan et al.[17] EHD-printed PCL microscale fibrous scaffolds with a fiber diameter of 4.01 μm and a fiber space ranging from 100 μm to 300 μm, and they found the scaffolds with the fiber space of 100 μm enhanced collagen and mineral deposition of hMSCs. Eichholz et al.[18] proposed microscale fibrous scaffolds (fiber diameter of 10.4 μm) with four types of fiber orientation angles (90°, 45°, 10°, and random) using EHD printing, which were further used to culture human skeletal stem cells (hSSCs). Their results indicated that scaffolds with orthogonal architectures enhanced osteogenesis of hSSCs via prompting yes-associated protein nuclear translocation. Xie et al.[19] investigated the effect of fiber diameter (3 – 22 μm) on the spreading behaviors of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. They found that the BMSCs (with a size of 200 μm) preferred to adhere and bridge between thick fibers, while HUVECs (with a size of 100 μm) can only adhere to the microfibers and form a circle to gradually fill the pore space. However, the existing EHD-printed fibers are usually in microscale, and few studies have been conducted to investigate the response of cells on EHD-printed sub-microscale ECM-mimetic fibers.

We previously developed a solution-based EHD printing method for the fabrication of sub-microscale fibrous architectures[20]. The effect of sub-microscale fibers (about 0.5 μm) on rat myocardial cells was preliminarily investigated, with the results indicating that sub-microscale fibers could enhance cellular adhesion and orientation, whereas the effect of EHD-printed sub-microscale fibrillar architectures on bone cells’ adhesion patterns, spreading morphologies, growth, migration, and osteogenic differentiation was not clear. Furthermore, solution-based EHD printing also provides an unprecedented opportunity to incorporate functional nanomaterials into the organized fibrous architectures for enhanced bioactivity[21,22]. Especially for osteogenic differentiation, nano hydroxyapatite (nHA) exhibits a strong componential similarity to native bones, which has been proven to be good osteoconductive and osteoinductive material[23,24]. Many existing studies have demonstrated that fibrous architectures with nHA can facilitate osteogenic differentiation[25,26]. For example, Li et al.[27] fabricated nHA/methacrylate gelatin/poly (l-lactic acid) electrospinning membranes with nHA concentration of 1% (nHA/solvent, w/v), which showed superior osteoinductivity compared to the membranes without nHA. However, few studies have realized organized sub-microscale fibrous architectures with nHA. In this study, we investigated the effect of the scaffolds with microscale and/or sub-microscale fibers on behaviors of MC3T3-E1 in vitro. The cellular attachment and spreading patterns were investigated by staining with vinculin and F-action. The osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 on scaffolds with microscale and/or sub-microscale fibers, and sub-microscale fibers with nHA was evaluated by detecting collagen type I (COL-I) deposition and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after 14 days of culture.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Medical-grade PCL was bought from Jinan Daigang Biomaterial Co., Ltd (Mw = 80,000 g/mol, China). Polyethylene oxide (PEO) was bought from Aladdin Co. Ltd (Mw = 300,000 g/mol, Italy). nHA was bought from Aladdin Reagent Co., LTD (China). For solution-based EHD printing of the sub-microscale fibrous architectures, PCL-PEO or PCL-PEO-nHA were dissolved or dispersed in acetic acid solution, and the content of which was set as 5% (w/v) for PCL, 6% (w/v) for PEO, and 0.5% (w/v) for nHA, respectively.

2.2. Design and EHD printing of fibrous scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

Three types of scaffolds with different structural and compositional organizations were designed and fabricated using EHD printing techniques (). The microscale fibrous scaffold (M) was designed with a fiber spacing of 300 μm, a cross angle at 90°, and a fiber offset of 150 μm (). The micro/sub-microscale fibrous scaffold (MS) was designed based on the M scaffolds, which contained sub-microscale fibers with a spacing of 100 μm. For fabrication, a total of five layers’ microscale fibers and five layers’ sub-microscale fibers were alternately stacked in a layer-by-layer manner (). The sub-microscale fibrous scaffold with nHA (MSN) shares the same structural organizations with MS scaffolds and contains 0.5% nHA in the sub-microscale fibers ().

Schematic diagram for the fabrication and cellular responses on the fibrous scaffolds with different structural and componential organizations. Electrohydrodynamic printing of M scaffolds with microfibers (A), MS scaffolds with microscale and sub-microscale fibers (B), and MSN scaffolds with microscale and sub-microscale fibers containing nano hydroxyapatite (C). Illustration of cell morphology and COL-I secretion pattern on M (D), MS (E), and MSN (F) scaffolds are shown.

To fabricate PCL microfibers, PCL raw materials were melted at 80°C in a glass syringe, and an ITO glass was used as the collecting substrate. The nozzle gauge was 20G and the nozzle to collector distance was set as 5 mm. The voltage, feeding rate, and stage moving speed were fixed at 4.6 kV, 30 µl/h, and 35 mm/s, respectively. To fabricate the sub-microscale fibrous architectures, solution-based EHD printing process was employed[20]. The nozzle gauge was 34G and the nozzle to collector distance was set as 2 mm. The voltage, feeding rate, and stage moving speed were fixed at 0.8 kV, 50 nl/min, and 150 mm/s, respectively.

After fabrication, the morphology of the micro/sub-microscale fibrous scaffolds was characterized by emission scanning electronic microscopy (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan). The fiber diameter was further measured by ImageJ software from the SEM images. The existence of nHA in the sub-microfibers was characterized by an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry with an elemental analyzer (EDS, Vario EL cube, ELEMENT, Germany).

2.3. MC3T3-E1 cell culture on fibrous scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

To investigate the responses of cells on the fibrous scaffolds with different fiber diameters for potential bone regeneration applications, the mouse pre-osteoblast cell line, MC3T3-E1 (Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) was used. The cells were cultured in an alpha-minimum essential media (α-MEM, Biological Industries, Israel) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Israel) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biological Industries, Israel). Before cell seeding, the scaffolds were punched to have a round shape with a diameter of 15 mm and placed into a 24-well culture plate, which were then fixed by glass rings and sterilized using 75% alcohol aqueous solution. Cells were then seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells per scaffold and cultured in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

2.4. Initial adhesion behaviors of MC3T3-E1 on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

To investigate the effect of scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers on the initial adhesion numbers of MC3T3-E1 cells, a live/dead viability/cytotoxicity kit (Invitrogen, USA) was used for staining the attached cells after 4 h of culture. Cell-scaffold constructs were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 3 times and then incubated in staining solutions for 30 min. An inverted laser confocal microscope (A1, Nikon, Japan) was employed to measure the living cell numbers attached on the scaffolds, which were further standardized by the image area to calculate the initial adhesion density of the fibrous scaffolds.

To further evaluate the MC3T3-E1 adhesion patterns on micro/sub-microscale fibers, the cell-scaffold constructs were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and then triple-stained with vinculin, F-actin, and nuclear after 24 h of culture. After permeabilized by 0.3% Triton X-100 and blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), the cell-scaffold constructs were incubated with primary antibodies (Recombinant Anti-Vinculin antibody, ab129002, Abcam, USA) overnight at 4°C. Then the constructs were further incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (ab150077, Abcam, USA) secondary antibodies for 60 min. Finally, F-actin was stained with Alexa Fluor 594 phalloidin for 30 min and cell nuclear was stained with DAPI for 5 min. Cells were visualized by laser confocal fluorescence microscope. For each sample, the fluorescence images were captured with a total thickness of 60 μm and a z-step of 5 μm. The fluorescence intensity was then measured on the maximum projection stacks of the vinculin channel by Image J software[7].

2.5. MC3T3-E1 morphology, migration on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

Cell morphology and migration were visualized by staining cellular F-actin and nucleus with phalloidin and DAPI after 4 h, 24 h, 4 days, and 7 days of culture using previously described methods. The fluorescence images of the cells on the scaffolds were captured with a total thickness of 25 μm and a z-step of 5 μm. Cell projection area and cell aspect ratio were defined as critical parameters for the evaluation of cellular morphology. Cell projection area was measured by manually drawing the outlines of F-actin on the maximum projection stacks of the F-actin channel and cell aspect ratio was obtained by calculating the ratio of the major to minor axis of the cells[18]. The cell-scaffold constructs were gradually dehydrated by ethyl alcohol and the cellular morphology was further observed with SEM[28].

2.6. Osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

The osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers was analyzed by COL-I immunofluorescence staining, ALP staining, and ALP activity. Cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells per scaffold and cultured for 14 days. Osteoblastic phenotypic maturation of MC3T3-E1 cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining of COL-I. After being fixed with 4% formaldehyde, followed by permeabilized by 0.3% Triton X-100 and blocked by 5% BSA, the cell-scaffold constructs were incubated with primary antibodies (COL1A1 (E8F4L) XP Rabbit mAb, 72026, and Cell Signaling Technology, USA) overnight at 4°C. Next, the samples were incubated with Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG H&L (4413, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) secondary antibodies for 60 min. Cell nucleus was stained with DAPI for 5 min. The COL-I was viewed using the confocal laser scanning microscope, and the amount of the deposited COL-I was quantified using Image J software[29].

ALP was stained using BCIP/NBT ALP color development kit (Beyotime, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the cell-scaffold constructs were washed with PBS for 3 times and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 30 min. Then the constructs were incubated in BCIP/NBT solutions for 60 min. For measuring the ALP activity, the cell-scaffold constructs were washed with cold PBS (4°C) for 3 times and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (strong, without inhibitors, Beyotime, China). After centrifugation at 11,000 relative centrifugal force (rcf) for 20 min, the supernatant was collected and the amount of converted p-nitrophenol was measured using the p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP) assay. The total amount of protein was evaluated by a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (BCA, Beyotime, China) with BSA serving as standard protein samples. The ALP activities of MC3T3-E1 cells were finally quantified by standardization of the amount of converted p-nitrophenol with the corresponding reaction time and the total amount of proteins.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The quantified and semi-quantified data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc test with GraphPad software. P < 0.05 (*) was considered as statistical difference.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization of micro/sub-microscale fibrous scaffolds

shows the SEM images of EHD-printed M, MS, and MSN scaffolds with orthogonal microfibers (), microscale and sub-microscale fibers () as well as microscale and sub-microscale fibers containing nHA (), respectively. It can be observed that the microfibers can be regularly deposited according to the designed trajectory with a smooth surface morphology in each type of scaffold. In contrast, the deposited sub-microscale fibers exhibited a less regular organization, as the ultrafine fibers are very tiny and extremely susceptible to electrostatic repulsion and attraction force derived from previously deposited fibers. Besides, the sub-microscale fibers with nHA possessed a larger diameter compared to PCL-PEO sub-microscale fibers (). The diameters of EHD-printed microfibers, sub-microscale fibers, and sub-microscale fibers with nHA were measured as 20.51 ± 1.70 μm, 0.58 ± 0.13 μm, and 0.62 ± 0.11 μm, respectively (). The size of the sub-microscale fibers with or without nHA showed no statistical differences and was close to the scale of collagen fibrils (<500 nm)[30]. The presence of nHA in sub-microscale fibers was further verified using EDS profiles. Calcium and phosphorus elements were detected in sub-microscale fibers with nHA (), which were absent in microscale fibrous PCL architectures ().

Characterization of the structure and component of scaffolds with microscale and sub-microscale fibers. (A–C) Scanning electronic microscopy images of M, MS, and MSN scaffolds, respectively. (D) Diameters of the electrohydrodynamic-printed microscale and sub-microscale fibers. (E) EDS spectrum of pure polycaprolactone sub-microscale fiber. (F) Sub-microscale fiber with nano hydroxyapatite. *P < 0.05.

We also tried to print sub-microscale PCL fibers with a higher nHA concentration (e.g., 1%, 2%, and 4%). As shown in , nHA nanoparticles were found to sparely decorate in the sub-micron PCL fibers when the nHA concentration was 0.5%. The resultant fibers were continuous and showed smooth surface. By contrast, obvious nHA aggregates appeared in the fibers with the increase of the nHA concentration to 1%, 2%, and 4% (). These uneven distribution of nHA within PCL solutions resulted in non-uniform Coulomb force between the nHA aggregates in the polymer jet, which thus affected the stability of EHD printing. Meanwhile, the printed fibers exhibited a ribbon-like morphology with a larger feature size of 1.10 ± 0.31, 1.33 ± 0.45, and 2.16 ± 0.80 mm as the nHA concentration increased from 1% to 4%, respectively.

More importantly, we found that a higher concentration of nHA over 0.5% inside the PCL solution disturbed the stability of EHD printing process, causing fracture of ultrafine fibers at the intersection site of sub-microscale fibers and microfibers, as shown in the SEM images of . This will further cause the instability and floating of tiny fibers during cell culture period. Therefore, the cell culture experiment was only conducted for the EHD-printed architectures with a nHA concentration of 0.5%.

3.2. MC3T3-E1 initial adhesion behaviors on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

present the live/dead staining of the cells attached on the porous scaffolds after 4 h of culture. The attached MT3T3-E1 cell showed high viability on each type of scaffold, indicating good biocompatibility of the fibrous architectures. The cells were found to uniformly distribute on M scaffolds with only a few cells decorated on the microfibers (). By contrast, the cells can adhere on both microscale and sub-microscale fibers of MS and MSN scaffolds, resulting in a relatively high cellular density (). The numbers of attached living cells were then counted using ImageJ software and standardized by image area. As shown in , M, MS, and MSN scaffolds possessed a cellular density of 96.31 ± 18.58, 120.70 ± 5.62, and 122.80 ± 11.15 cells/mm2, respectively. The cell numbers were almost the same on MS and MSN scaffolds, which were 1.25- and 1.28-fold higher than that on M scaffolds. This phenomenon is in good agreement with previous literature, which reported a higher number of attached cells on scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers than that on scaffolds with pure microfibers[31,32].

Effect of scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers on MC3T3-E1 initial adhesion behaviors. (A–C) Live/dead staining of cells on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds, respectively. (D–F) Vinculin immunofluorescence staining of cells on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds, respectively. (G) Average living cell numbers on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds. (H) Semi-quantified results of vinculin fluorescence intensity. *P < 0.05.

Focal adhesions are believed to be positively associated with cell attachment, morphology, migration, and mechanosensory[33,34]. In our study, vinculin, an intracellular component of focal adhesion that mediates the interaction between integrins and actin[35] was detected to investigate the adhesion patterns of cells on scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers. As showed in , vinculin, F-actin and nuclei of the MT3T3-E1 cells were represented with green, red, and blue fluorescence, respectively. The confluence of vinculin and F-actin confirmed the cytoplasm localization of vinculin, which were partially adhered on the microfibers () and completely wrap the sub-microscale fibers (). This finding demonstrated that the cell exhibited a firm interaction with sub-microscale fibers. Semi-quantification of vinculin expression through measuring fluorescence intensity was further shown in . The fluorescence intensity of vinculin on MS and MSN scaffolds was 21.22 ± 0.90 and 22.47 ± 1.77, which were 1.17- and 1.24-fold higher than that on M scaffolds. However, no significant difference was observed between the mean fluorescence intensity on MS and MSN scaffolds. The improved cellular adhesion behaviors on the sub-microscale fibrous architectures can be attributed to the morphology of the ultrafine fibers, which provide unique contact cues for cell membrane to warp[31].

3.3. Cell spreading morphology on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

We further analyzed the cell morphology on porous scaffolds with different fiber sizes and organizations. shows fluorescent and SEM images of the cytoskeleton of the seeded MC3T3-E1 cells. After 4 h of culture, cells remained a round shape morphology on microfibers of M scaffolds (). By contrast, the cells were found to spread on sub-microscale fibers of MS () and MSN scaffolds (). After cultured for 24 h, cells spread along both micro and sub-microfibers with an elongated morphology (). It is interesting to note that the cells exhibited different morphologies depending on fiber size and structural locations. At the intersection of sub-microfibers, cells were polygonal and showed a large cell projection area (). When the cells spread on a single sub-microfiber, they were fusiform with a high cell aspect ratio (). Similar phenomenon has also been observed when culturing mouse C2C12 cells on polystyrene nanofibers[36]. On the other hand, the cells exhibited oval shape on microfibers regardless of the location, which showed a relatively large projection area and small aspect ratio ().

Cell spreading morphology on scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers. F-actin staining of cells on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds after 4- (A–C) and 24- (G–I) hour of culture. SEM images of cells on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds after 4- (D–F) and 24- (J–L) hour of culture. Quantitative cell projection area (M) and aspect ratio (N) after 24 h of culture. CLSF, cells located at single fiber; CLIF, cells located at intersection of fibers. *P < 0.05.

3.4. MC3T3-E1 cells growth and migration on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

Bone-related cells are recruited to the injured region during the tissue regeneration process[37], which requires the scaffolds to be well osteoconductive[38]. F-actin staining was used to track the distribution and migration of MC3T3-E1 cells on the scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers (). As shown in , MC3T3-E1 cells were found to spread on microfibers of the M scaffolds after 1 day of culture, which gradually proliferated and migrated along the microfibers on day 4 (). Some pores between the microfibers were found to be bridged and filled with cells on day 7 (). In contrast, cells on MS scaffolds can attach and spread on both microscale and sub-microscale fibers after cultured for 1 day (). With the guidance of sub-microscale fibers, the cells quickly migrated into the spacing between fibers on day 4 () and finally formed interconnected cellular networks on day 7 (). Similar phenomena were also observed in MSN scaffolds (). These results evidenced that the scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers can facilitate the spreading and migration of cells to cover the whole scaffold, which resulted in a more uniform cellular distribution. In addition, these findings provide an innovative approach to designing tissue analogs with desirable cellular morphologies and distributions. For example, heterogeneous scaffolds with variable fiber size and controlled fibrous organizations can be fabricated for directing the cellular morphology, migration, and distribution to meet specific tissue demands.

Effect of scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers on MC3T3-E1 cells migration. Migration and distribution of cells on M, MS, and MSN scaffolds on day 1 (A–C), 4 (D–F), and 7 (G–I), respectively.

3.5. Osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 on scaffolds with micro/sub-microfibers

As a major organic component of bone matrices, COL-1 is directly synthesized and secreted by bone cells during bone regeneration process[38]. In addition, ALP degrades phosphate-containing compounds to produce phosphate ions, which plays an essential role in the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals of bone matrices[39]. In this study, COL-I immunofluorescence staining, ALP staining, and ALP activity measurement were conducted on day 14 to evaluate the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. As shown in , COL-I was found around the MC3T3-E1 cells in all scaffolds. Obviously denser secretion of COL-I was observed on MS and MSN scaffolds, with the semi-quantified results showing 1.23- and 1.25-fold higher COL-I fluorescence intensity than that on M scaffolds ().

Effects of scaffolds with micro/sub-microscale fibers on MC3T3-E1 cells’ osteogenic differentiation. (A–C) COL-I immunofluorescence staining of M, MS, and MSN scaffolds, respectively. (D–F) ALP staining of M, MS, and MSN scaffolds, respectively. Semi-quantified results of COL-1 fluorescence intensity (G) and normalized ALP activity (H) are shown. *P < 0.05.

ALP staining of different scaffolds exhibited very similar trends (), which was further quantitatively analyzed in . It was found that the ALP activity increased to 8.68 ± 1.68 nmol/min/mg protein compared to that of M and MS scaffolds, which were 7.34 ± 1.34 and 6.89 ± 0.67 nmol/min/mg protein. However, the result showed no statistical difference. On the basis of these findings, the EHD-printed PCL scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers can direct the osteogenic differentiation through prompting organic component deposition (COL-I), while the sub-microscale fibrillar architectures have little effect on ironic component formation.

A series of life activity of bone-related cells was involved during the regeneration of bone tissues. Namely, cells are recruited to the defect areas and then proliferate and differentiate to specific functional cell lines[40,41]. Here, we fabricated scaffolds with microscale and/or sub-microscale fibrillar architectures, and mouse pre-osteoblast cell line MC3T-E1 was used to demonstrate their potential for bone tissue regeneration. Cells initial adhesion behaviors on scaffolds were investigated since cellular migration is largely dependent on focal adhesion[34]. Our results showed that cells on scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers expressed more focal adhesion and can quickly spread and migrated into the spacing between fibers with the guidance of sub-microfibers. The differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells were evaluated by ALP activity and COL-I expression, with the results showing that scaffolds with sub-microfibers prompted COL-I deposition while have little effect on ALP activities.

It should be noted that there are several limitations in this study. About 0.5% nHA was added to sub-microscale fibrous architectures successfully and we found that the ALP activity did increase to 8.68 ± 1.68 nmol/min/mg protein compared to that of micro/sub-microscale fibrous architecture without nHA (6.89 ± 0.67 nmol/min/mg protein). However, due to the small size of nHA (about 50 nm), most nHA particles were entrapped inside the sub-microscale PCL fibers (>500 nm), which might be the main reason for no significant statistical difference in the ALP results. One promising solution to improve bioactivity of the MS scaffolds in the future is to coat or self-assemble functional nanomaterials on the surface of micro/sub-microscale fibrous architectures. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the sub-microscale fibrous architectures to promote bone regeneration should be further evaluated in vivo for future clinical applications.

4. Conclusion

In the present study, we fabricated ECM-mimetic scaffolds with microscale and/or sub-microscale fibrillar architectures. The average diameter of microfibers and sub-microscale fibers is 20.51 ± 1.70 μm and 0.58 ± 0.51 μm, respectively. We found that the scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers could enhance MC3T3-E1 cell’s initial attachment, regulate cell spreading morphology, facilitate cell migration, and prompt COL-I deposition in vitro compared to the scaffolds with pure microfibers. These results primarily demonstrated the potential capability of scaffolds with sub-microscale fibers for bone tissue engineering.

Click here for additional data file.