| Literature DB >> 35668388 |
Sarah Saget1,2, Laurent Kappeler1,2, Valérie Grandjean3, Patricia Leneuve1,2, Isabelle Berthaut1,4, Céline Faure4, Sébastien Czernichow5, Chrystèle Racine1,2, Rachel Lévy1,2,4, Charlotte Dupont6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excess weight and metabolic disorders have a negative impact on male reproductive functions. The mechanisms involved are numerous and complex and epigenetic mechanisms may also be involved, notably through the small non-coding RNAs. Among them, microRNAs (miRNAs) are of particular interest. This preliminary study aimed to identify the miRNAs differentially enriched in seminal plasma related to metabolic disorders and if some are also associated with spermatic parameters alterations. One hundred and sixty men between 18 to 45 years, partners of infertile couple, were included in this cohort. The miRNAs associated with metabolism were selected from the literature and assayed by quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan gene expression assays. A subset of those with an interesting profile in seminal plasma were secondarily tested in blood.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometric parameters; Metabolic disorders; Metabolic syndrome; MiRNA; Seminal plasma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35668388 PMCID: PMC9171949 DOI: 10.1186/s12610-022-00159-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Clin Androl ISSN: 2051-4190
Anthropometric. metabolic and spermatic characteristics of patients included in the study. Patients were allocated in two groups: the metabolic syndrome group (with MS) and the non-metabolic syndrome (no MS) group. P value corresponds to the difference between the metabolic and non-metabolic syndrome groups. Qualitative variables were analyzed using chi-square test. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test
| Age (year) | 37.1 ± 0.4 | 32.2 ± 0.4 | 39.1 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg.m.−2) | 26.4 ± 0.3 | 25.2 ± 1.1 | 29.3 ± 0.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 92.9 ± 0.9 | 89.3 ± 1.0 | 101.3 ± 1.4 | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 125.6 ± 1.0 | 123.4 ± 0.9 | 130.7 ± 2 | < 0.001 |
| Glycaemia (mmol/l) | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 0.05 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 3.28 ± 0.07 | 3.23 ± 0.09 | 3.41 ± 0.14 | 0.18 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.23 ± 0.03 | 1.32 ± 0.03 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | < 0.0001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Ejaculate volume (ml) | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 0.49 |
| Sperm concentration (10.6/ml) | 50.3 ± 3.8 | 47.1 ± 4.3 | 59.2 ± 7.8 | 0.09 |
| Total sperm count (10.6/ejaculate) | 179 ± 17 | 173 ± 22 | 192 ± 29 | 0.16 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 39.9 ± 1.4 | 40.1 ± 1.6 | 39.5 ± 2.7 | 0.89 |
| Sperm vitality (%) | 71.6 ± 1.3 | 72.0 ± 1.5 | 70.7 ± 2.5 | 0.72 |
| Sperm morphology (%) | 16.0 ± 1.1 | 15.5 ± 1.4 | 15.3 ± 2.0 | 0.58 |
| Sperm DNA fragmentation (%) | 8.4 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 8.7 ± 0.8 | 0.33 |
CRP C-reactive protein, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, FSH Follicle-stimulating hormone, LH Luteinizing hormone, SBP Systolic blood pressure, WC Waist circumference
Fig. 1Relative miRNAs levels in patients with or without metabolic syndrome. Among the eleven miRNAs tested, seven miRNAs have been detected in seminal plasma by RT-qPCR, normalized against the miR195a-5p as endogenous control: A miR19a; B miR19b; C miR10b; D miR34c; E mir34b; F miR133b; G let7c. Comparisons of miRNAs levels between men with no metabolic syndrome (noSMet) and with metabolic syndrome (SMet) indicate 5 miRNAs with statistical difference with a nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, with *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001
Correlation between seminal miRNA and anthropometric and metabolic parameters
| Anthropometric and metabolic parameters | miR 19a seminal | miR 19b seminal | miR 34b seminal | miR 34c | miR 133b | miR 10b | miR let-7c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metabolic syndrome r p | -0.138 NS | -0.151 0.096 | -0.077 NS | 0.012 NS | -0.101 NS | ||
BMI r p | -0.155 0,089 | -0,153 0.075 | -0,085 NS | 0.030 NS | -0.068 NS | ||
Waist circumference r p | -0.158 0.079 | -0.166 0.051 | -0.149 0.084 | -0.032 NS | -0.104 NS | ||
Glycaemia r p | -0.131 NS (0.12) | -0.078 NS | -0.098 NS | 0.072 NS | -0.004 NS | -0.134 NS | |
Total cholesterol r p | -0.039 NS | -0.113 NS | -0.035 NS | -0.033 NS | -0.041 NS | -0.046 NS | > -0.001 NS |
LDL cholesterol r p | -0.031 NS | -0.081 NS | -0.037 NS | -0.025 NS | -0.031 NS | -0.002 NS | -0.021 NS |
HDL cholesterol r p | -0.154 0.079 | -0.086 NS | -0.139 NS | -0.074 NS | -0.078 NS | -0.097 NS | -0.079 NS |
Triglycerides r p | -0.157 0.079 | -0.161 0.056 | -0.109 NS | -0.096 NS | -0.067 NS | -0.024 NS | -0.111 NS |
Insuline r p | -0.154 0.09 | -0.083 NS | -0.069 NS | -0.108 NS | -0.022 NS | 0.135 NS | -0.057 NS |
C-peptide r p | -0.100 NS | -0.091 NS | -0.114 NS | -0.090 NS | 0.129 NS | -0.131 NS |
To make reading the table easier, the significant values are indicated in bold characters
BMI Body mass index
r Pearson coefficient correlation, p < 0,05: significant
Correlation between blood miRNA and anthropometric and metabolic parameters
| Anthropometric and metabolic parameters | miR 19a blood | miR 19b blood | miR 34c | miR 10b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total cholesterol r p | -0.18 NS | -0.005 NS | ||
LDL cholesterol r p | -0.16 NS | -0.10 NS | -0.04 NS |
To make reading the table easier, the significant values are indicated in bold characters
Other anthropometric and metabolic parameters were tested at the same time, but were not significant, therefore not added to the table
r Pearson coefficient correlation, p < 0,05: significant