| Literature DB >> 35668380 |
Marcia Domênica Cunico Barancelli1,2,3, Marcio Gazolla4,5, Sergio Schneider6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/Entities:
Keywords: Excess weight; Food; Food and Nutrition Surveillance
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35668380 PMCID: PMC9169593 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13462-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of children aged 0 to < 2 years by Brazilian region, from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Marked thinness | 5.6 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 4.3 | -0.165 | 0.001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 0.010 | 0.674 | ||
| Eutrophy | 47.5 | 48.3 | 48.7 | 49.1 | 49.7 | 47.1 | 45.0 | 49.2 | 51.7 | 50.2 | 50.1 | 53.1 | 0.338 | 0.049 | ||
| Excess of weight | 43.9 | 43.7 | 43.1 | 43.6 | 43.1 | 45.5 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 41.6 | 43.1 | 44.4 | 38.9 | -0.183 | 0.328 | ||
| Northeast | Marked thinness | 6.6 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 4.4 | -0.281 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.5 | -0.015 | 0.452 | ||
| Eutrophy | 42.9 | 43.3 | 44.1 | 43.9 | 45.9 | 44.8 | 43.4 | 47.9 | 49.2 | 47.9 | 49.0 | 50.9 | 0.689 | 0.000 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 47.3 | 47.1 | 46.8 | 47.2 | 46.2 | 47.2 | 48.6 | 45.5 | 43.7 | 45.7 | 45.0 | 41.1 | -0.393 | 0.009 | Decrease | |
| Midwest | Marked thinness | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 4.4 | -0.192 | 0.001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 4.1 | -0.017 | 0.633 | ||
| Eutrophy | 52.9 | 55.1 | 53.5 | 56.1 | 56.7 | 54.3 | 52.8 | 55.9 | 58.1 | 56.6 | 56.1 | 58.6 | 0.348 | 0.018 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 38.0 | 36.2 | 38.0 | 35.8 | 36.0 | 38.4 | 39.4 | 37.5 | 35.4 | 37.2 | 38.1 | 32.9 | -0.139 | 0.367 | ||
| Southeast | Marked thinness | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.3 | -0.147 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 0.015 | 0.375 | ||
| Eutrophy | 54.1 | 56.1 | 54.9 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 54.0 | 54.3 | 57.6 | 59.1 | 58.4 | 58.3 | 60.1 | 0.435 | 0.004 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 38.6 | 37.1 | 38.3 | 37.7 | 36.2 | 39.8 | 39.2 | 36.8 | 35.4 | 36.2 | 36.7 | 33.3 | -0.303 | 0.032 | ||
| South | Marked thinness | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | -0.127 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | -0.019 | 0.111 | ||
| Eutrophy | 57.9 | 59.1 | 57.8 | 59.3 | 60.9 | 57.2 | 57.7 | 59.6 | 61.6 | 60.0 | 59.6 | 60.4 | 0.195 | 0.089 | ||
| Excess of weight | 36.6 | 35.7 | 37.4 | 36.1 | 34.6 | 38.4 | 37.9 | 36.5 | 34.5 | 36.3 | 36.9 | 35.3 | -0.050 | 0.642 | ||
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of children aged 2 to < 5 years by Brazilian region, from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Marked thinness | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.3 | -0.142 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 4.1 | -0.015 | 0.475 | ||
| Eutrophy | 63.3 | 63.0 | 63.5 | 62.8 | 65.0 | 63.3 | 63.5 | 65.4 | 64.3 | 66.3 | 66.8 | 67.8 | 0.391 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 28.4 | 29.2 | 28.5 | 29.3 | 27.5 | 29.0 | 29.5 | 27.9 | 28.8 | 27.0 | 27.5 | 24.7 | -0.233 | 0.028 | ||
| Northeast | Marked thinness | 5.3 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.8 | -0.180 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | -0.033 | 0.043 | ||
| Eutrophy | 58.9 | 58.6 | 58.5 | 58.1 | 59.3 | 59.0 | 57.7 | 59.4 | 58.2 | 59.9 | 60.4 | 61.6 | 0.194 | 0.024 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 31.7 | 32.3 | 32.0 | 32.8 | 32.0 | 32.5 | 34.2 | 33.1 | 33.7 | 32.7 | 32.8 | 30.5 | 0.019 | 0.822 | ||
| Midwest | Marked thinness | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.9 | -0.199 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | -0.049 | 0.030 | ||
| Eutrophy | 61.8 | 61.6 | 61.6 | 61.4 | 61.9 | 62.0 | 60.8 | 62.4 | 62.3 | 64.6 | 64.7 | 66.7 | 0.382 | 0.003 | Increase | |
| Excess of weight | 29.9 | 30.5 | 30.4 | 30.7 | 30.5 | 30.7 | 31.7 | 31.4 | 31.3 | 29.5 | 30.1 | 26.7 | -0.134 | 0.228 | ||
| Southeast | Marked thinness | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.9 | -0.066 | 0.001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 0.005 | 0.737 | ||
| Eutrophy | 62.5 | 62.5 | 62.1 | 61.1 | 61.5 | 60.1 | 60.3 | 61.1 | 61.3 | 62.4 | 62.4 | 64.3 | 0.079 | 0.435 | ||
| Excess of weight | 31.3 | 31.4 | 31.5 | 33.0 | 32.5 | 33.9 | 33.6 | 33.4 | 33.0 | 32.2 | 32.2 | 29.5 | -0.018 | 0.872 | ||
| South | Marked thinness | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | -0.101 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.1 | -0.025 | 0.004 | Decrease | |
| Eutrophy | 61.0 | 60.8 | 60.8 | 60.5 | 60.7 | 58.8 | 58.7 | 59.2 | 60.2 | 61.2 | 61.4 | 63.6 | 0.106 | 0.368 | ||
| Excess of weight | 34.2 | 34.7 | 34.6 | 35.2 | 35.0 | 36.9 | 37.0 | 37.2 | 35.8 | 35.1 | 35.4 | 32.9 | 0.020 | 0.863 | ||
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of children aged 5 to < 10 years by Brazilian region, from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Marked thinness | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.8 | -0.148 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.8 | -0.030 | 0.110 | ||
| Eutrophy | 72.2 | 72.0 | 72.7 | 72.5 | 72.9 | 72.0 | 72.4 | 72.4 | 71.5 | 72.0 | 72.4 | 72.5 | -0.017 | 0.604 | ||
| Excess of weight | 20.3 | 20.4 | 19.8 | 19.9 | 20.0 | 20.5 | 20.8 | 21.5 | 22.3 | 22.1 | 22.3 | 20.9 | 0.195 | 0.004 | increase | |
| Northeast | Marked thinness | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.7 | -0.182 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 4.0 | -0.052 | 0.006 | Decrease | |
| Eutrophy | 67.9 | 67.2 | 66.3 | 65.4 | 65.7 | 65.5 | 64.9 | 65.0 | 64.0 | 64.8 | 64.8 | 65.3 | -0.248 | 0.001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 23.8 | 24.4 | 25.1 | 26.4 | 26.6 | 26.8 | 28.1 | 28.5 | 29.2 | 28.7 | 29.3 | 28.0 | 0.483 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Midwest | Marked thinness | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 | -0.158 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.3 | -0.055 | 0.009 | Decrease | |
| Eutrophy | 68.3 | 68.1 | 67.7 | 67.7 | 67.5 | 67.3 | 65.9 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 67.4 | 67.1 | 67.5 | -0.117 | 0.065 | ||
| Excess of weight | 24.7 | 25.3 | 25.5 | 25.9 | 26.2 | 26.6 | 27.8 | 28.7 | 28.7 | 27.7 | 28.5 | 27.2 | 0.332 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Southeast | Marked thinness | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | -0.092 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | -0.002 | 0.852 | ||
| Eutrophy | 69.8 | 68.9 | 68.4 | 67.0 | 66.7 | 65.9 | 65.7 | 64.5 | 64.4 | 64.5 | 64.5 | 65.2 | -0.481 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 24.9 | 25.6 | 26.1 | 27.9 | 28.3 | 29.1 | 29.4 | 31.0 | 31.1 | 31.0 | 31.2 | 29.9 | 0.576 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| South | Marked thinness | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -0.099 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | -0.032 | 0.002 | Decrease | |
| Eutrophy | 67.8 | 67.2 | 66.3 | 65.9 | 64.8 | 63.4 | 63.2 | 62.2 | 62.3 | 62.4 | 62.3 | 63.3 | -0.514 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 28.22 | 28.72 | 29.67 | 30.52 | 31.51 | 33.01 | 33.25 | 34.9 | 34.65 | 34.69 | 35.07 | 33.79 | 0.646 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of adolescents (10 to < 20 years) by Brazilian region, 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Marked thinness | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | -0.049 | 0.070 | |
| Thinness | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 0.022 | 0.283 | ||
| Eutrophy | 78.9 | 80.7 | 80.5 | 79.9 | 77.7 | 76.7 | 75.7 | 73.9 | 73.6 | 73.4 | 72.1 | 72.1 | -0.862 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 15.9 | 15.7 | 15.9 | 16.8 | 18.2 | 19.1 | 20.1 | 22.2 | 22.4 | 22.7 | 24.4 | 23.8 | 0.889 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Northeast | Marked thinness | 2.6 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | -0.051 | 0.153 | |
| Thinness | 3.6 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 0.053 | 0.058 | ||
| Eutrophy | 78.1 | 81.4 | 79.8 | 79.1 | 76.7 | 75.5 | 74.2 | 73.1 | 72.4 | 72.1 | 70.1 | 69.6 | -1.031 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 15.7 | 14.7 | 15.8 | 17.2 | 18.9 | 19.7 | 21.0 | 22.3 | 22.8 | 23.2 | 25.5 | 25.3 | 1.029 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Midwest | Marked thinness | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | -0.050 | 0.075 | |
| Thinness | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 0.029 | 0.100 | ||
| Eutrophy | 74.9 | 76.7 | 76.8 | 74.9 | 72.1 | 71.3 | 70.4 | 68.6 | 67.8 | 67.9 | 66.5 | 65.8 | -1.051 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 20.0 | 19.8 | 19.7 | 21.7 | 24.1 | 24.7 | 25.5 | 27.4 | 28.2 | 28.2 | 30.0 | 30.2 | 1.073 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Southeast | Marked thinness | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | -0.050 | 0.015 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 0.021 | 0.217 | ||
| Eutrophy | 75.4 | 76.5 | 75.5 | 74.3 | 72.3 | 71.2 | 70.4 | 68.2 | 67.3 | 67.2 | 65.8 | 65.0 | -1.109 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 19.7 | 19.7 | 20.9 | 22.3 | 24.2 | 25.0 | 25.7 | 28.2 | 29.0 | 29.0 | 30.6 | 31.1 | 1.137 | < 0,001 | Increaseo | |
| South | Marked thinness | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | -0.061 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Thinness | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.022 | 0.170 | ||
| Eutrophy | 72.2 | 72.6 | 71.3 | 70.0 | 68.6 | 67.4 | 66.6 | 64.5 | 63.9 | 63.3 | 62.3 | 61.6 | -1.082 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 24.3 | 24.8 | 26.2 | 27.7 | 28.9 | 30.0 | 30.6 | 33.0 | 33.6 | 34.2 | 35.4 | 35.8 | 1.122 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of adult nutritional status by Brazilian region from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Low weight | 5.5 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | -0.254 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 53.1 | 52.7 | 52.1 | 50.6 | 47.4 | 46.1 | 44.2 | 40.7 | 41.0 | 40.1 | 37.9 | 36.9 | -1.625 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 41.4 | 43.0 | 43.3 | 45.4 | 49.1 | 50.2 | 52.1 | 56.5 | 56.1 | 57.3 | 59.7 | 60.6 | 1.879 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Northeast | Low weight | 6.4 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.9 | -0.289 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 54.4 | 54.2 | 52.5 | 50.8 | 47.6 | 45.7 | 43.3 | 41.2 | 40.9 | 39.7 | 37.9 | 36.9 | -1.747 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 39.2 | 41.0 | 42.4 | 45.1 | 48.6 | 50.5 | 53.2 | 55.9 | 56.0 | 57.5 | 59.5 | 60.2 | 2.037 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Midwest | Low weight | 5.4 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | -0.217 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 49.1 | 48.2 | 48.3 | 45.8 | 42.2 | 41.0 | 39.5 | 36.2 | 35.7 | 34.7 | 33.7 | 32.4 | -1.680 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 45.5 | 47.8 | 47.8 | 50.7 | 54.6 | 55.7 | 57.2 | 60.8 | 61.6 | 62.7 | 64.0 | 65.2 | 1.897 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Southeast | Low weight | 5.1 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | -0.210 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 47.3 | 46.4 | 44.8 | 43.0 | 40.2 | 38.7 | 37.5 | 35.4 | 34.9 | 34.8 | 33.7 | 32.7 | -1.395 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 47.7 | 49.5 | 51.3 | 53.6 | 56.6 | 58.0 | 59.3 | 61.9 | 62.3 | 62.6 | 63.9 | 64.8 | 1.605 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| South | Low weight | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | -0.235 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 44.0 | 43.2 | 42.0 | 40.0 | 37.9 | 36.2 | 35.1 | 32.3 | 32.4 | 31.1 | 30.0 | 29.3 | -1.444 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 52.2 | 52.8 | 54.2 | 56.7 | 59.5 | 61.1 | 62.1 | 65.8 | 65.6 | 67.1 | 68.3 | 69.1 | 1.679 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of elderly people by Brazilian region from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Low weight | 20.1 | 20.3 | 18.5 | 18.8 | 19.0 | 17.2 | 17.5 | 13.8 | 14.0 | 13.4 | 12.7 | 12.5 | -0.795 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 43.0 | 42.9 | 42.2 | 41.6 | 41.2 | 40.5 | 39.9 | 38.5 | 38.7 | 38.5 | 38.1 | 38.0 | -0.510 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 36.9 | 36.8 | 39.3 | 39.6 | 39.9 | 42.2 | 42.6 | 47.7 | 47.3 | 48.0 | 49.2 | 49.5 | 1.305 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Northeast | Low weight | 20.4 | 21.6 | 19.5 | 18.6 | 17.7 | 19.8 | 17.5 | 15.6 | 15.4 | 14.8 | 13.9 | 13.9 | -0.694 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 40.7 | 41.7 | 40.4 | 41.1 | 41.0 | 41.5 | 40.0 | 40.3 | 40.5 | 40.2 | 39.6 | 39.8 | -0.132 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 38.9 | 36.6 | 40.1 | 40.3 | 41.3 | 38.7 | 42.5 | 44.1 | 44.1 | 45.0 | 46.6 | 46.3 | 0.826 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Midwest | Low weight | 19.2 | 17.4 | 17.4 | 15.6 | 14.7 | 15.5 | 15.2 | 13.0 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 12.2 | 11.6 | -0.634 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 39.9 | 39.7 | 39.5 | 39.3 | 37.9 | 38.0 | 36.5 | 34.3 | 35.1 | 35.9 | 35.6 | 35.5 | -0.500 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 40.9 | 43.0 | 43.1 | 45.1 | 47.4 | 46.5 | 48.3 | 52.8 | 52.1 | 51.3 | 52.2 | 52.9 | 1.135 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Southeast | Low weight | 19.6 | 20.0 | 18.2 | 17.4 | 16.4 | 17.4 | 17.0 | 14.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 | 13.5 | 13.0 | -0.639 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 38.3 | 39.5 | 38.8 | 38.5 | 38.2 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 37.3 | 37.1 | 37.2 | 36.8 | 36.5 | -0.227 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 42.1 | 40.5 | 43.0 | 44.1 | 45.4 | 44.0 | 44.4 | 48.3 | 49.0 | 48.7 | 49.7 | 50.5 | 0.866 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| South | Low weight | 13.1 | 13.7 | 12.6 | 10.9 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 11.3 | 9.6 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 8.9 | 8.9 | -0.397 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 36.4 | 36.5 | 36.8 | 35.0 | 34.3 | 33.2 | 32.5 | 32.8 | 33.8 | 33.2 | 32.6 | 32.5 | -0.402 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 50.5 | 49.8 | 50.6 | 54.2 | 55.1 | 56.2 | 56.2 | 57.6 | 55.7 | 57.1 | 58.5 | 58.6 | 0.799 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test
Prevalence and annual time trend of nutritional status of pregnant by Brazilian region from 2008 to 2019. There is a 95% confidence level
| Regions | Nutritional status | Ano | *Annual average variation | ** | Trend | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Low weight | 27.6 | 27.7 | 27.4 | 25.1 | 24.2 | 24.3 | 23.2 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 19.6 | 18.5 | 18.3 | -0.949 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 46.2 | 47.0 | 46.6 | 45.9 | 45.1 | 44.0 | 43.6 | 42.7 | 42.4 | 42.2 | 40.8 | 39.2 | -0.657 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 26.3 | 25.3 | 26.0 | 29.0 | 30.7 | 31.8 | 33.1 | 36.3 | 36.7 | 38.2 | 40.6 | 42.5 | 1.605 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Northeast | Low weight | 26.3 | 25.4 | 23.6 | 22.2 | 21.4 | 21.7 | 20.7 | 18.8 | 18.9 | 18.4 | 17.1 | 16.8 | -0.841 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 44.7 | 44.6 | 44.5 | 43.0 | 42.2 | 41.4 | 40.7 | 40.3 | 39.7 | 38.9 | 37.5 | 36.3 | -0.762 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 29.0 | 30.1 | 32.0 | 34.8 | 36.4 | 36.9 | 38.5 | 40.9 | 41.4 | 42.7 | 45.4 | 46.9 | 1.604 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Midwest | Low weight | 25.3 | 22.9 | 22.4 | 21.1 | 19.6 | 19.7 | 20.3 | 18.1 | 17.4 | 18.3 | 17.3 | 17.2 | -0.670 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 41.4 | 42.3 | 42.1 | 40.7 | 40.7 | 39.4 | 38.0 | 37.0 | 37.5 | 37.2 | 36.2 | 35.2 | -0.644 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 33.3 | 34.8 | 35.5 | 38.2 | 39.8 | 40.9 | 41.8 | 44.9 | 45.1 | 44.5 | 46.5 | 47.6 | 1.314 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| Southeast | Low weight | 23.3 | 22.6 | 20.5 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 19.4 | 18.9 | 17.8 | 17.6 | 16.3 | 15.4 | 15.4 | -0.673 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 41.4 | 40.3 | 40.3 | 39.4 | 39.2 | 38.7 | 37.8 | 37.2 | 36.6 | 35.8 | 34.6 | 33.8 | -0.654 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 35.3 | 37.1 | 39.2 | 41.6 | 41.8 | 42.0 | 43.3 | 45.0 | 45.7 | 47.9 | 50.0 | 50.8 | 1.327 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
| South | Low weight | 18.1 | 17.9 | 17.3 | 16.6 | 16.0 | 15.9 | 16.0 | 15.0 | 14.4 | 13.7 | 12.6 | 12.6 | -0.515 | < 0,001 | Decrease |
| Eutrophy | 43.4 | 42.2 | 42.0 | 40.4 | 39.5 | 38.7 | 37.6 | 37.0 | 37.0 | 36.0 | 34.6 | 33.9 | -0.846 | < 0,001 | Decrease | |
| Excess of weight | 38.5 | 39.9 | 40.7 | 43.0 | 44.5 | 45.3 | 46.4 | 48.0 | 48.6 | 50.3 | 52.8 | 53.5 | 1.361 | < 0,001 | Increase | |
Note: * Annual average variation is calculated by the linear regression method; **P value indicates the results of the two-sided t test