Riboswitches are structural RNA elements that control gene expression. These naturally occurring RNA sensors are of continued interest as antibiotic targets, molecular sensors, and functional elements of synthetic circuits. Here, we describe affinity-based profiling of the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) riboswitch to characterize ligand binding and structural folding. We designed and synthesized photoreactive ligands and used them for photoaffinity labeling. We showed selective labeling of the FMN riboswitch and used this covalent interaction to quantitatively measure ligand binding, which we demonstrate with the naturally occurring antibiotic roseoflavin. We measured conditional riboswitch folding as a function of temperature and cation concentration. Furthermore, combining photoaffinity labeling with reverse transcription revealed ligand binding sites within the aptamer domain with single-nucleotide resolution. The photoaffinity probe was applied to cellular extracts of Bacillus subtilis to demonstrate conditional folding of the endogenous low-abundant ribD FMN riboswitch in biologically derived samples using quantitative PCR. Lastly, binding of the riboswitch-targeting antibiotic roseoflavin to the FMN riboswitch was measured in live bacteria using the photoaffinity probe.
Riboswitches are structural RNA elements that control gene expression. These naturally occurring RNA sensors are of continued interest as antibiotic targets, molecular sensors, and functional elements of synthetic circuits. Here, we describe affinity-based profiling of the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) riboswitch to characterize ligand binding and structural folding. We designed and synthesized photoreactive ligands and used them for photoaffinity labeling. We showed selective labeling of the FMN riboswitch and used this covalent interaction to quantitatively measure ligand binding, which we demonstrate with the naturally occurring antibiotic roseoflavin. We measured conditional riboswitch folding as a function of temperature and cation concentration. Furthermore, combining photoaffinity labeling with reverse transcription revealed ligand binding sites within the aptamer domain with single-nucleotide resolution. The photoaffinity probe was applied to cellular extracts of Bacillus subtilis to demonstrate conditional folding of the endogenous low-abundant ribD FMN riboswitch in biologically derived samples using quantitative PCR. Lastly, binding of the riboswitch-targeting antibiotic roseoflavin to the FMN riboswitch was measured in live bacteria using the photoaffinity probe.
RNA is a multifaceted
biomolecule that exhibits many crucial cellular
functions ranging from architectural to catalytic.[1−3] These functions
go far beyond the initially proposed role of RNA as information carrier.
Recent discoveries have revealed the role of RNA in chromatin regulation,[4] post-transcriptional regulation,[5] gene silencing[6] and enhancing,[7] and transcription and translational control through
riboswitches,[8−14] among other functions. The newly appreciated importance of RNA in
pathological processes has sparked interest in the development of
selective small-molecule drugs that can modulate cellular RNA activity.[15−18] To study the diverse functions, structure, and druggability of RNA,
there is a need for new chemical tools.[3,19−23]Early pioneering studies demonstrated the broad potential
of (photo)chemical
methods to investigate nucleic acid structure and function.[24−28] An emerging approach to study RNA is applying small chemical probes
that bind RNA with high affinity and that form covalent bonds between
the probe and RNA of interest. The covalently bound small-molecule
probe can be subsequently modified for analysis. Recent reports have
employed this concept to investigate small-molecule binding to pre-mRNAs[29] and microRNAs[30,31] (CHEM-Clip)
and artificial synthetic aptamers (PEARL-seq).[32] Here, we explore if we can apply similar principles to
characterize ligand binding and structural folding of bacterial riboswitches
(Figure A).
Figure 1
Schematic overview
of affinity-based profiling of riboswitches.
(A) Schematic illustration of the photoaffinity labeling workflow.
Cross-linking is achieved through light activation of the photoreactive
group, and the alkyne ligation handle enables downstream analysis.
(B) Molecular structure of the natural ligand flavin mononucleotide
(FMN). (C) Structures of the three designed and synthesized bifunctional
photoaffinity probes 1, 2, and 3. The orange parts represent the RNA-binding moiety, the blue parts
the photoactivatable groups, and the green parts the attached alkyne
ligation handle.
Schematic overview
of affinity-based profiling of riboswitches.
(A) Schematic illustration of the photoaffinity labeling workflow.
Cross-linking is achieved through light activation of the photoreactive
group, and the alkyne ligation handle enables downstream analysis.
(B) Molecular structure of the natural ligand flavin mononucleotide
(FMN). (C) Structures of the three designed and synthesized bifunctional
photoaffinity probes 1, 2, and 3. The orange parts represent the RNA-binding moiety, the blue parts
the photoactivatable groups, and the green parts the attached alkyne
ligation handle.Riboswitches are cis-regulatory structural RNA
elements that are found in the 5′ untranslated region of mRNAs.
They control gene expression in several organisms and are broadly
distributed across bacteria.[10,11,33,34] They consist of an aptamer domain
and an expression platform. Binding of the cognate ligand to the aptamer
induces a conformational change in the expression platform, thereby
altering the expression of the downstream gene.[10,35] The aptamer is highly conserved and serves as a sensor for its target
metabolite. These sensors must be sufficiently dynamic to respond
and adapt precisely to specific signals, to rapidly produce the intended
effect for cell survival.One widely distributed class of RNA
regulatory elements in bacteria
is the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) riboswitch with FMN (Figure B) as primary regulatory ligand.[8,36] This riboswitch controls expression of genes required for biosynthesis
and transport of riboflavin, an important vitamin for both bacteria
and humans.[37] FMN regulates the expression
of these downstream genes upon binding to
the aptamer.[8]Mechanistic data of
riboswitches are often obtained with synthetic
RNA, using a combination of physical methods, such as nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) studies,[38−40] X-ray diffraction crystallography,[36,41] fluorescence spectroscopy,[42,43]in vitro profiling methods,[8,41,44,45] and genetic approaches.[46,47] Though biologically vital, the structural features of riboswitches
can prove challenging to study and remain of continued interest.[11,33]Chemical methods that covalently capture the interaction between
a riboswitch and its ligand could further assist in elucidating riboswitch
properties and druggability.Here, we set out to develop chemical
photoaffinity probes to study
the interactions between the FMN riboswitch and its ligands on purified
RNA, as well as in bacterial extracts and live bacteria. Inspired
by activity-based protein profiling[48,49] and recent
reports of photoaffinity labeling of RNA,[29,32,50−52] we designed three photoreactive
FMN ligands (Figure C). Labeling of the FMN riboswitch was observed for two of three
synthesized probes. Competition experiments with its cognate ligand
FMN and the naturally occurring antibiotic roseoflavin demonstrate
the potential use of photoaffinity probes to screen for riboswitch
inhibitors. Conditional riboswitch folding, controlled by temperature
and cation concentration, was analyzed with the probe. Furthermore,
photo-cross-linking sites could be identified with single-nucleotide
resolution, potentially helping to pinpoint the binding site within
the riboswitch aptamer domain. Finally, quantification of probe binding
in bacterial extracts and live bacteria was achieved using bead enrichment
and RT-qPCR, demonstrating the potential use of photoaffinity labeling
to measure riboswitch inhibitor binding in vivo.
Results
and Discussion
Design and Synthesis of FMN Riboswitch Photoaffinity
Probes
To measure the interactions between the FMN riboswitch
and its
ligand, we designed and synthesized photoreactive derivatives of FMN
that can covalently label RNA when bound in the aptamer region of
the riboswitch and exposed to UV light (Figure A and C). Seminal work by Vicens, Batey,
and co-workers[53] provided a set of principles
to ensure specific and productive binding of FMN analogues to the
FMN riboswitch that we followed.[53] Importantly,
they showed that the ribityl-phosphate chain attached to position
10 of the isoalloxazine ring of FMN (Figure B) can be modified without perturbing the
interactions between the FMN riboswitch and its ligand. Additionally,
it was found that the hydroxyl groups of the ribityl chain could be
removed without losing affinity for the riboswitch.[53] Lastly, it was shown that the terminal phosphate group
can be replaced with a carboxylic anion moiety.[53] On the basis of these structural constraints, we designed
probes 1, 2, and 3, which all
contain the isoalloxazine core that is crucial for binding (Figure C).[53] The ribityl chain was replaced with a linker containing
a terminal carboxylate and tertiary amine to which a photoreactive
group and alkyne are appended. The tertiary amine was also found to
be beneficial for enhanced affinity for the FMN riboswitch and bacterial
uptake.[53] Three photoaffinity probes were
designed and synthesized, containing the frequently used diazirine,
aryl azide, and benzophenone photoreactive groups (Figure C).[54] When the probes bind in the FMN riboswitch aptamer domain, activation
of the photoreactive groups can induce the formation of a covalent
bond with the FMN RNA. For convenient downstream analysis of these
probe–RNA complexes, an alkyne ligation handle was included
in the designs of probes 1, 2, and 3 (Figure C).
Performance of Photoaffinity Probes
The performance
of photoaffinity probes 1, 2, and 3 was examined by measuring probe binding to an in
vitro transcribed FMN riboswitch (see the SI for details) upon UV irradiation. After ligating a Cy5
fluorophore to the probe–RNA complexes using copper(I)-catalyzed
azide–alkyne cycloaddition, the fluorescence intensity was
measured to examine probe binding at concentrations ranging 2–100
μM (Figures A and S1). At a concentration of 10 μM,
diazirine probe 1 efficiently labeled the riboswitch,
as was apparent from a significant fluorescent signal (Figures A and S1).
Figure 2
Efficiency and selectivity of FMN probes 1, 2, and 3. (A) Fluorescence intensity
measurements
after labeling FMN riboswitch aptamer with 10 μM 1, 2, or 3 and subsequent “click”
reaction with Cy5-azide. (B) Denaturing RNA gel showing selective
binding of probe 1 to the FMN RNA aptamer. (C). Quantification
of band intensities of the PAGE experiment in B in triplicate. “Competition”
is labeling in the presence of 10 μM FMN natural ligand. “Selectivity”
is labeling on the adenine riboswitch. Error bars represent standard
deviations based on three technical replicates. Statistical significance
was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (*p < 0.05).
Efficiency and selectivity of FMN probes 1, 2, and 3. (A) Fluorescence intensity
measurements
after labeling FMN riboswitch aptamer with 10 μM 1, 2, or 3 and subsequent “click”
reaction with Cy5-azide. (B) Denaturing RNA gel showing selective
binding of probe 1 to the FMN RNA aptamer. (C). Quantification
of band intensities of the PAGE experiment in B in triplicate. “Competition”
is labeling in the presence of 10 μM FMN natural ligand. “Selectivity”
is labeling on the adenine riboswitch. Error bars represent standard
deviations based on three technical replicates. Statistical significance
was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (*p < 0.05).Aryl azide probe 2 displayed efficient labeling as
well, whereas benzophenone probe 3 showed only minor
fluorescence. A potential explanation is that the size of the photo-cross-linking
group is crucial for optimal probe binding, with the bulky benzophenone
group being too sterically hindered to effectuate labeling.[54] Moreover, it is possible that the “click”
reaction works less efficiently for ligated probe 3,
which would result in lower fluorescence. Because of the superior
performance of probe 1 compared to probe 3 and slightly better performance than probe 2, we decided
to use probe 1 for all further experiments.To
test the selectivity of probe 1 for the FMN riboswitch,
labeling was analyzed with denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(PAGE) (Figures B,C
and S2). Both UV irradiation and fluorophore
ligation were required to observe labeling of the FMN riboswitch by
probe 1. To show that probe 1 selectively
bound to the FMN riboswitch, 10 μM FMN natural ligand was incubated
as a competitor for the probe to bind to the riboswitch aptamer. The
observed labeling signal disappeared, indicating that the probe was
competed out of the aptamer domain (Figures B,C and S2). This
might imply a selective interaction between probe 1 and
the FMN riboswitch. To further demonstrate selectivity, probe 1 was incubated with the adenine riboswitch, instead of the
FMN riboswitch. No labeling of the adenine riboswitch was detected,
underlining the selectivity of probe 1 for the FMN riboswitch
aptamer (Figures B,C
and S2).
Structure Probing of the
Riboswitch–Probe Interaction
To study the binding
interaction between probe 1 and
the FMN riboswitch, SHAPE analysis[3,55,56] was performed (see the SI for details). For SHAPE, FMN and probe 1 were separately
incubated at 100 μM with the riboswitch at 37 °C for 30
min, after which 50 mM 2-methylnicotinic acid imidazolide (NAI)[57] was added to each sample. The samples were incubated
at 37 °C for 10 min, and RNA was isolated using precipitation.
Reverse transcription (RT) was performed and analyzed using PAGE (Figures and S3). Increased reactivity at U153 was observed
for both FMN and probe 1. This is believed to be typical
for ligand binding to the aptamer and caused by an altered conformation
in which U153 is bulged out and exposed to solvent;[44] it might indicate that probe 1 displays similarity
in binding to the aptamer as compared to FMN. Slight differences in
SHAPE profile were observed as well at nucleotides U42, U74, and U102,
which are located in L2, L3, and L4, respectively, and may be caused
by differences in structure of the side-chain. Increased reactivity
in these loop regions was observed previously for FMN structural analogues
on which probe 1 was based.[53] This was further analyzed by molecular docking of probe 1 to the FMN aptamer (Figure S4), which
showed similar binding of the isoalloxazine core to FMN and no noticeable
differences at nucleotide U42.
Figure 3
SHAPE analysis of interaction of probe 1 with the
FMN riboswitch. (A) Secondary structure of the FMN riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis, with loop regions annotated in color.
(B) PAGE of the SHAPE experiment with probe 1 and the
FMN ligand. The boxed area shows the area of the gel where characteristic
changes in the SHAPE profile are observed for ligand binding. For
triplicate experiments and quantification of band intensities see Figure S3.
SHAPE analysis of interaction of probe 1 with the
FMN riboswitch. (A) Secondary structure of the FMN riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis, with loop regions annotated in color.
(B) PAGE of the SHAPE experiment with probe 1 and the
FMN ligand. The boxed area shows the area of the gel where characteristic
changes in the SHAPE profile are observed for ligand binding. For
triplicate experiments and quantification of band intensities see Figure S3.Together, these results imply that the isoalloxazine core of photoreactive
probe 1 likely interacts with the FMN riboswitch in a
similar manner to the natural ligand and that the diazirine group
in the side-chain might cause slight changes in structure.
Competitive
Photoaffinity Labeling of the FMN Riboswitch
To show that
the photoaffinity labeling approach can be used to study
the interactions of small molecules with a riboswitch aptamer, a competition
experiment was performed. To this end, a series of concentrations
of the natural ligand FMN and the FMN riboswitch targeting bacterial
antibiotic roseoflavin[58] were preincubated
with the FMN riboswitch. Subsequently, probe 1 (10 μM)
was added, cross-linked, modified with fluorescein-azide, and finally
analyzed using PAGE, and band intensities were quantified to determine
the dose-dependent inhibition of labeling. IC50 values
were calculated using a sigmoidal fit (see the SI for details). Both FMN and roseoflavin were capable of
fully outcompeting probe 1, with an apparent IC50 of 0.4 ± 0.01 and 7.0 ± 0.18 μM, respectively (Figures A, S5, and S6). This observed ∼20-fold difference is in
accordance with earlier observed dissociation constants (KD) of FMN and roseoflavin for the ribD riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis).[58]
Figure 4
Competitive photoaffinity labeling. (A)
Dose-dependent inhibition
of labeling with the FMN ligand and roseoflavin. After photolabeling,
the probe is modified with a fluorescein fluorophore and binding is
determined by PAGE and subsequently quantified by measuring band intensity
in triplicates (see Figures S5 and S6).
(B) Competitive photoaffinity labeling with the FMN ligand quantified
using a microplate reader. Error bars represent standard deviations
based on three technical replicates.
Competitive photoaffinity labeling. (A)
Dose-dependent inhibition
of labeling with the FMN ligand and roseoflavin. After photolabeling,
the probe is modified with a fluorescein fluorophore and binding is
determined by PAGE and subsequently quantified by measuring band intensity
in triplicates (see Figures S5 and S6).
(B) Competitive photoaffinity labeling with the FMN ligand quantified
using a microplate reader. Error bars represent standard deviations
based on three technical replicates.To further improve the utility of this approach, a fluorescently
labeled FMN riboswitch was quantified on a microplate reader, yielding
similar results with an apparent IC50 of 0.4 ± 0.01
μM for FMN and avoiding the need for PAGE (Figure B). We expect that this feature
will be found useful for screening for new small-molecule riboswitch
binders.[59,60]
Conditional Aptamer Folding
Riboswitch
conformations
are conditional and depend on temperature and ion concentrations.[34] When the riboswitch unfolds at increased temperature
or low cation concentration, the interaction between RNA and ligand
is lost.[61] Bacteria are suggested to exploit
these phenomena to fine-tune their gene regulation.[14]Since probe 1 exclusively reports on
the riboswitch bound state, we aimed to exploit this feature to study
folding of the riboswitch aptamer. To examine if probe 1 can measure changes in riboswitch conformations, we applied the
probe to the FMN riboswitch under varied temperature and cation conditions.
Probe 1 was incubated with the FMN riboswitch at temperatures
in the range 4–72 °C and exposed to UV light to initiate
photo-cross-linking. The amount of captured riboswitch was quantified
using a click reaction with fluorescein azide and subsequent PAGE
analysis (Figure S7 and see the SI for details). At increased temperature the
amount of captured riboswitch decreased, which might be attributed
to unfolding of the aptamer domain, with the corresponding midpoint
at 46 ± 0.4 °C, using a sigmoidal fit (see the SI for details) (Figure A). The interaction between RNA and probe
decreased above 37 °C (Figure A), and no significant interaction between the probe
and riboswitch was observed above 62 °C, which might imply that
the riboswitch was fully unfolded at this temperature (Figure A).[61] These observations are in line with previously reported data.[44] These experiments are conducted well below the
reported activation temperature of diazirine photoreactive groups,[62] yet slight differences in photochemistry cannot
be excluded and should be taken into consideration.
Figure 5
Measurements of FMN riboswitch
folding with probe 1. (A) A decrease in FMN riboswitch
labeling is observed at increased
temperatures. (B) FMN riboswitch labeling is highly dependent on cation
concentration, which is attributed to potential (un)folding of the
aptamer domain. Error bars represent standard deviations based on
three technical replicates.
Measurements of FMN riboswitch
folding with probe 1. (A) A decrease in FMN riboswitch
labeling is observed at increased
temperatures. (B) FMN riboswitch labeling is highly dependent on cation
concentration, which is attributed to potential (un)folding of the
aptamer domain. Error bars represent standard deviations based on
three technical replicates.To further explore structural changes with probe 1,
we focused on the influence of cation concentrations, which is
known to affect riboswitch conformations.[61] First, the MgCl2 concentration was reduced from 15 mM
to 0 mM, resulting in an apparent decrease of fluorescently labeled
riboswitch as observed by PAGE (Figures B and S8). A sharp
decrease in labeled riboswitch was observed below 2 mM of MgCl2, with a [Mg2+]1/2 of 0.7 ± 0.06
mM calculated using a sigmoidal fit, which is in accordance with the
literature value of 0.8 ± 0.1 mM.[44] The presence of monovalent cations such as potassium can partially
compensate for a lack of magnesium.[63] To
study this, we repeated the prior experiment in the presence of 100
mM KCl. We found increased riboswitch labeling compared to low magnesium
concentrations with a [Mg2+]1/2 of 0.3 ±
0.02 mM, which could signal that potassium can partially assist riboswitch
folding in the absence of magnesium (Figures B and S8). These
experiments demonstrate the potential utility of directly measuring
conditional riboswitch folding using photoaffinity probes.[44]
Primer Extension of Labeled Transcripts
We postulated
that transforming transient binding interactions into covalent interactions
could enable the identification of the binding site of the probe within
the riboswitch with single-nucleotide resolution. After photo-cross-linking,
primer extension can be performed with reverse transcriptase and a
fluorescently labeled primer, which stops at the covalent bond of
the probe to the riboswitch (Figure A).[55] The exact nucleotide
to which the probe is photo-cross-linked can then be deduced by performing
sequence analysis using electrophoresis. To this end, 10 μM
of probe 1 was incubated with 2 μM FMN riboswitch
RNA in folding buffer at 37 °C for 30 min, after which UV irradiation
was performed to photo-cross-link the probe to RNA. The RNA was purified
and reverse transcription was performed (see the SI for further details).
Figure 6
Structural insights in binding of probe 1 to the FMN
riboswitch aptamer domain. (A). Schematic illustration of the reverse
transcription (RT) termination assay. (B) PAGE gel after performing
the RT termination assay. Boxed bands show termination sites only
observed with probe treatment. (C) Docking of probe 1 in the FMN riboswitch aptamer of Fusobacterium nucleatum (PDB: 3F2Q)[36] with observed labeled nucleotides
annotated according to B. subtilis numbering. (D)
PAGE analysis of the RT termination assay at increased temperature.
Sequencing lanes were obtained by incorporating dideoxynucleotides.
The “+UV” lane shows results with photo-cross-linking
and “–UV” shows the control without photo-cross-linking.
“RNA” is the control with untreated RNA. The “1 + FMN” lane shows results of the termination assay
in the presence of the competing FMN ligand. For triplicate experiments
and quantification of band intensities see Figure S9.
Structural insights in binding of probe 1 to the FMN
riboswitch aptamer domain. (A). Schematic illustration of the reverse
transcription (RT) termination assay. (B) PAGE gel after performing
the RT termination assay. Boxed bands show termination sites only
observed with probe treatment. (C) Docking of probe 1 in the FMN riboswitch aptamer of Fusobacterium nucleatum (PDB: 3F2Q)[36] with observed labeled nucleotides
annotated according to B. subtilis numbering. (D)
PAGE analysis of the RT termination assay at increased temperature.
Sequencing lanes were obtained by incorporating dideoxynucleotides.
The “+UV” lane shows results with photo-cross-linking
and “–UV” shows the control without photo-cross-linking.
“RNA” is the control with untreated RNA. The “1 + FMN” lane shows results of the termination assay
in the presence of the competing FMN ligand. For triplicate experiments
and quantification of band intensities see Figure S9.New stops were observed at G35-C37,
A91, G154, and G156 after photo-cross-linking
of the probe to the FMN riboswitch (Figures B,C and S9). These
stops were only observed after UV irradiation and are located in the
aptamer domain of the FMN riboswitch.[36] When the experiment was repeated in the presence of competing concentrations
of natural ligand FMN, the RT stops disappeared, indicating that the
observed interactions are specific (Figure B).Nucleotides G35 and G36 are known
to interact with the ribityl
chain of FMN[36] and are therefore expected
to be in close proximity to the photoreactive diazirine group, explaining
stops observed at G35-C37. Nucleotides G154 and G156 are positioned
around the isoalloxazine ring of FMN in the ligand-bound state.[36] The flexibility of the diazirine linker could
potentially explain the appearance of stops at these positions. Interestingly,
nucleotide A91 is reported to base-stack with A115, and the isoalloxazine
ring of FMN intercalates between these two nucleotides.[36] The stop observed at A91 is possibly a result
of this interaction. Molecular docking of probe 1 into
the FMN riboswitch showed that the probe is centered within a cluster
of nucleotides at which the RT stops are observed (Figures C and S10).To elucidate temperature-dependent changes in
conformation, we
repeated the experiment at 51 °C. Two additional stops were observed
at A143 and A152 (Figures D and S9C). The uracil-like edge
of the isoalloxazine ring system of the ligand forms specific Watson–Crick
hydrogen bonds with the highly conserved nucleotide A152.[36] No stop was observed at this position at 37
°C, which could mean that the elevated temperature is weakening
this base-pair interaction. Interestingly, slight differences in SHAPE
reactivity at this nucleotide have been previously observed at elevated
temperature, but not below 65 °C.[44] The additional stops observed at positions A143 and A152 could be
the result of differences in flexibility of the ligand and FMN as
well, positioning probe 1 and L6 (Figure A) of the riboswitch in closer proximity
at elevated temperatures.
Photoaffinity Labeling in Bacterial Extracts
and Live Bacteria
To show that we can determine ligand binding
to the FMN riboswitch
in endogenous samples, we first performed photoaffinity labeling on
cell extracts from B. subtilis (see the SI for details). Extracts were incubated at 37
°C with 100 μM probe 1 and exposed to 365
nm light to initiate covalent labeling. Samples were incubated with
biotin azide and a click mixture. Biotinylated RNA was isolated with
Streptavidin magnetic beads and reverse transcribed. Using PCR with
gene-specific primers for the ribD gene that is under
control of the FMN riboswitch,[64] successful
labeling was demonstrated (Figure A). The amount of captured RNA was quantified using
qPCR. Employing probe 1, we found a 10-fold enrichment
compared to a DMSO control, showing that we can selectively capture
the ribD FMN riboswitch in bacterial extracts. When
using control linker 4 (Figure B and C) instead of probe 1,
significantly lower amounts of ribD were enriched,
indicating a high degree of selectivity provided by the flavin scaffold
of probe 1. To further demonstrate the selectivity and
show the potential to measure binding of RNA modulators in cell extracts,
we repeated the experiment in the presence of 100 μM competing
FMN ligand. As expected, a significant decrease in enrichment compared
to probe 1 alone was observed (Figure C). To investigate if we can potentially
measure conditional folding of the FMN riboswitch in endogenous samples,
we repeated the experiment at 46 and 72 °C. A temperature-dependent
decrease in enriched ribD RNA when using probe 1 was observed compared to a negative control of DMSO only,
which might potentially be explained by partial unfolding of the FMN
riboswitch at higher temperatures (Figure D).
Figure 7
Photoaffinity labeling of ribD FMN riboswitch
in B. subtilis extracts. (A) Agarose gel analysis
of RT-PCR of enriched ribD mRNA using probe 1. Amplification is observed only when probe 1 is activated by UV (+) and not without UV (−). (B) Molecular
structure of control diazirine linker 4. (C) Relative
enrichment of ribD mRNA compared to the control (DMSO),
in the presence of competing FMN, and with control diazirine linker 4. (D) Enrichment of ribD mRNA at increasing
temperatures. Error bars represent standard errors based on three
biological replicates, each consisting of two technical replicates.
Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed
Student’s t test (*p <
0.05).
Photoaffinity labeling of ribD FMN riboswitch
in B. subtilis extracts. (A) Agarose gel analysis
of RT-PCR of enriched ribD mRNA using probe 1. Amplification is observed only when probe 1 is activated by UV (+) and not without UV (−). (B) Molecular
structure of control diazirine linker 4. (C) Relative
enrichment of ribD mRNA compared to the control (DMSO),
in the presence of competing FMN, and with control diazirine linker 4. (D) Enrichment of ribD mRNA at increasing
temperatures. Error bars represent standard errors based on three
biological replicates, each consisting of two technical replicates.
Statistical significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed
Student’s t test (*p <
0.05).To assess the potential utility
of photoaffinity labeling for measuring
riboswitch binding in vivo, probe 1 was
incubated with live Escherichia coli (E.
coli) CS1562 containing a plasmid carrying the E.
coli ribB riboswitch (pTXTL-sroGp2eGFP, see Figure S11 and the SI for details).
This strain is efflux impaired to secure a sufficient intracellular
probe concentration (Figure S12).[46]In an initial experiment, 25 μM
probe 1 was
incubated for 30 min with bacteria and then irradiated to initiate
cross-linking. Bacteria were lysed, and extracted RNA was exposed
to biotin azide and a click mixture. After Streptavidin pulldown,
enriched ribB riboswitch RNA was quantified by qPCR.
A ∼5-fold enrichment compared to a DMSO control was observed
(Figure A). To further
analyze the selectivity of labeling and potential of measuring inhibitor
binding in vivo with photoaffinity labeling, competition
experiments with roseoflavin were performed. Bacteria were preincubated
with increasing concentrations of roseoflavin, after which photoaffinity
labeling was performed with probe 1. A dose-dependent
effect on enrichment was observed with an apparent IC50 of 5 ± 0.64 μM (Figure B). No decrease in enriched housekeeping gene (cysG) was observed at high concentrations of roseoflavin
(Table. S1), supporting that the decrease
in enrichment might be attributed to competitive binding to the riboswitch
aptamer.
Figure 8
Photoaffinity labeling of ribB riboswitch in live E. coli CS1562 pTXTL-sroGp2eGFP. (A) Relative enrichment
of ribB riboswitch RNA with probe 1 compared
to the control (DMSO) and in the presence of competing roseoflavin
(100 μM). (B) Dose-dependent inhibition of enrichment with roseoflavin
in live E. coli CS1562 pTXTL-sroGp2eGFP. Error bars
represent standard deviations based on three biological replicates,
each consisting of two technical replicates. Statistical significance
was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (*p < 0.05).
Photoaffinity labeling of ribB riboswitch in live E. coli CS1562 pTXTL-sroGp2eGFP. (A) Relative enrichment
of ribB riboswitch RNA with probe 1 compared
to the control (DMSO) and in the presence of competing roseoflavin
(100 μM). (B) Dose-dependent inhibition of enrichment with roseoflavin
in live E. coli CS1562 pTXTL-sroGp2eGFP. Error bars
represent standard deviations based on three biological replicates,
each consisting of two technical replicates. Statistical significance
was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (*p < 0.05).Together, these experiments demonstrate the possibility to measure
riboswitch binding in biologically derived samples and could further
assist in elucidating riboswitch properties and druggability.
Conclusion
In summary, we have prepared photoaffinity probes to study the
interaction between small-molecule ligands and riboswitches. We have
applied our photoaffinity probe 1 to the FMN riboswitch
and were able to selectively label the aptamer region of the riboswitch.
The utility of the photoaffinity probe was demonstrated by quantitatively
measuring the interaction between the riboswitch and small-molecule
ligands, which we think might find applicability in drug discovery,
as riboswitches make attractive antibiotic targets.[46,59,60] By measuring riboswitch–ligand interactions
at varied temperatures and cation concentrations, we showed the potential
use of photoaffinity labeling for determining conditional riboswitch
folding. Photoaffinity labeling yields a new addition to the riboswitch
profiling toolbox, as it directly measures the interaction between
ligand and RNA, unlike other profiling methods that indirectly observe
altered RNA reactivity.[3,33,65] Using reverse transcription and gel electrophoresis, we were able
to determine the RNA binding site with single-nucleotide resolution.
Interestingly, by conducting the experiment under elevated temperature
conditions we observed altered ligand binding interactions that, to
the best of our knowledge, have not been reported before using traditional
RNA profiling methods. Lastly, by applying the photoaffinity probe
to bacterial extracts and live bacteria, we were able to competitively
measure ligand binding using bead enrichment and qPCR. We believe
these experiments demonstrate the applicability of photoaffinity labeling
to investigate riboswitch properties in vitro and
in complex biological samples.[66]
Authors: John A Howe; Hao Wang; Thierry O Fischmann; Carl J Balibar; Li Xiao; Andrew M Galgoci; Juliana C Malinverni; Todd Mayhood; Artjohn Villafania; Ali Nahvi; Nicholas Murgolo; Christopher M Barbieri; Paul A Mann; Donna Carr; Ellen Xia; Paul Zuck; Dan Riley; Ronald E Painter; Scott S Walker; Brad Sherborne; Reynalda de Jesus; Weidong Pan; Michael A Plotkin; Jin Wu; Diane Rindgen; John Cummings; Charles G Garlisi; Rumin Zhang; Payal R Sheth; Charles J Gill; Haifeng Tang; Terry Roemer Journal: Nature Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christina Helmling; Dean-Paulos Klötzner; Florian Sochor; Rachel Anne Mooney; Anna Wacker; Robert Landick; Boris Fürtig; Alexander Heckel; Harald Schwalbe Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 14.919