Samuel Debono1, Jennifer Nash2, Alexander J Fletcher2, Maaz B J Syed2, Scott I Semple2, Edwin J R van Beek2,3, Alison Fletcher3, Sebastien Cadet4, Michelle C Williams2, Damini Dey4, Piotr J Slomka4, Rachael O Forsythe2, Marc R Dweck2, David E Newby2. 1. The University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Chancellor's Building, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK. samuel.debono@ed.ac.uk. 2. The University of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Chancellor's Building, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK. 3. Edinburgh Imaging Facility, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Division of Artificial Intelligence, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Los Angeles, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aortic microcalcification activity is a recently described method of measuring aortic sodium [18F]fluoride uptake in the thoracic aorta on positron emission tomography. In this study, we aimed to compare and to modify this method for use within the infrarenal aorta of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent an sodium [18F]fluoride positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan. Maximum and mean tissue-to-background ratios (TBR) and abdominal aortic microcalcification activity were determined following application of a thresholding and variable radius method to correct for vertebral sodium [18F]fluoride signal spill-over and the nonlinear changes in aortic diameter, respectively. Agreement between the methods, and repeatability of these approaches were assessed. RESULTS: The aortic microcalcification activity method was much quicker to perform than the TBR method (14 versus 40 min, p < 0.001). There was moderate-to-good agreement between TBR and aortic microcalcification activity measurements for maximum (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.67) and mean (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.88) values. These correlations sequentially improved with the application of thresholding (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.95) and variable diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99) techniques. The optimised method had good intra-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.36 and limits of agreement - 0.43 to 0.43) and inter-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.47 and limits of agreement - 0.53 to 0.53) repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic microcalcification activity is a quick and simple method which demonstrates good intra-observer and inter-observer repeatabilities and provides measures of sodium [18F]fluoride uptake that are comparable to established methods.
BACKGROUND: Aortic microcalcification activity is a recently described method of measuring aortic sodium [18F]fluoride uptake in the thoracic aorta on positron emission tomography. In this study, we aimed to compare and to modify this method for use within the infrarenal aorta of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent an sodium [18F]fluoride positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan. Maximum and mean tissue-to-background ratios (TBR) and abdominal aortic microcalcification activity were determined following application of a thresholding and variable radius method to correct for vertebral sodium [18F]fluoride signal spill-over and the nonlinear changes in aortic diameter, respectively. Agreement between the methods, and repeatability of these approaches were assessed. RESULTS: The aortic microcalcification activity method was much quicker to perform than the TBR method (14 versus 40 min, p < 0.001). There was moderate-to-good agreement between TBR and aortic microcalcification activity measurements for maximum (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.67) and mean (interclass correlation co-efficient, 0.88) values. These correlations sequentially improved with the application of thresholding (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.95) and variable diameter (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99) techniques. The optimised method had good intra-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.36 and limits of agreement - 0.43 to 0.43) and inter-observer (mean 1.57 ± 0.42, bias 0.08, co-efficient of repeatability 0.47 and limits of agreement - 0.53 to 0.53) repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic microcalcification activity is a quick and simple method which demonstrates good intra-observer and inter-observer repeatabilities and provides measures of sodium [18F]fluoride uptake that are comparable to established methods.
Authors: Elena Aikawa; Matthias Nahrendorf; David Sosnovik; Vincent M Lok; Farouc A Jaffer; Masanori Aikawa; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Zahi A Fayad; Venkatesh Mani; Mark Woodward; David Kallend; Markus Abt; Tracy Burgess; Valentin Fuster; Christie M Ballantyne; Evan A Stein; Jean-Claude Tardif; James H F Rudd; Michael E Farkouh; Ahmed Tawakol Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rachael O Forsythe; Marc R Dweck; Olivia M B McBride; Alex T Vesey; Scott I Semple; Anoop S V Shah; Philip D Adamson; William A Wallace; Jakub Kaczynski; Weiyang Ho; Edwin J R van Beek; Calum D Gray; Alison Fletcher; Christophe Lucatelli; Aleksander Marin; Paul Burns; Andrew Tambyraja; Roderick T A Chalmers; Graeme Weir; Neil Mitchard; Adriana Tavares; Jennifer M J Robson; David E Newby Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nikhil V Joshi; Iqbal Toor; Anoop S V Shah; Kathryn Carruthers; Alex T Vesey; Shirjel R Alam; Andrew Sills; Teng Y Hoo; Adam J Melville; Sarah P Langlands; William S A Jenkins; Neal G Uren; Nicholas L Mills; Alison M Fletcher; Edwin J R van Beek; James H F Rudd; Keith A A Fox; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Agnese Irkle; Alex T Vesey; David Y Lewis; Jeremy N Skepper; Joseph L E Bird; Marc R Dweck; Francis R Joshi; Ferdia A Gallagher; Elizabeth A Warburton; Martin R Bennett; Kevin M Brindle; David E Newby; James H Rudd; Anthony P Davenport Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Sharmila Vaz; Torbjörn Falkmer; Anne Elizabeth Passmore; Richard Parsons; Pantelis Andreou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maaz Bj Syed; Alexander J Fletcher; Rachael O Forsythe; Jakub Kaczynski; David E Newby; Marc R Dweck; Edwin Jr van Beek Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 3.039