Aseel Alhendi, Rita Khounganian, Abdulazez Almudhi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of multiple clear aligner systems (Invisalign, Eon, SureSmile, and Clarity).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cytotoxicity assessment was carried out by immersing three sets of aligners from the included four systems in normal saline for 1 month at 37°C. The solutions were then diluted to three different concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20% volume/volume). Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the solution after being seeded to 96-well microplates for 48 hours, and the medium was substituted with an MTT solution (MTT: 3-[4,5-dime- thylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide). Optical density was then measured to determine cell viability and evaluate cytotoxicity subsequently.
RESULTS: Cytotoxicity comparison showed no statistically significant difference among the four included systems. However, when cell viability of each system was compared with the control, a significant difference was reported at the 10% and 20% solution concentrations. The Clarity system had the lowest toxicity across all solution concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The thermoplastic materials used by all tested systems (Invisalign, Eon, SureSmile, and Clarity) presented some degree of toxicity (slight to moderate), with statistically significant mean differences compared with the control. © 0000 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of multiple clear aligner systems (Invisalign, Eon, SureSmile, and Clarity).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cytotoxicity assessment was carried out by immersing three sets of aligners from the included four systems in normal saline for 1 month at 37°C. The solutions were then diluted to three different concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20% volume/volume). Gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the solution after being seeded to 96-well microplates for 48 hours, and the medium was substituted with an MTT solution (MTT: 3-[4,5-dime- thylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide). Optical density was then measured to determine cell viability and evaluate cytotoxicity subsequently.
RESULTS: Cytotoxicity comparison showed no statistically significant difference among the four included systems. However, when cell viability of each system was compared with the control, a significant difference was reported at the 10% and 20% solution concentrations. The Clarity system had the lowest toxicity across all solution concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The thermoplastic materials used by all tested systems (Invisalign, Eon, SureSmile, and Clarity) presented some degree of toxicity (slight to moderate), with statistically significant mean differences compared with the control. © 0000 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cell viability; Clear aligners; Cytotoxicity; Gingival fibroblast; Thermoplastic
Year: 2022
PMID: 35666210 PMCID: PMC9374349 DOI: 10.2319/121621-919.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angle Orthod ISSN: 0003-3219 Impact factor: 2.684