| Literature DB >> 35665740 |
Pei Shang1,2, Ada Man-Choi Ho3, Maximilian Tufvesson-Alm4, Daniel R Lindberg5,6, Caroline W Grant1, Funda Orhan4, Feride Eren4, Maria Bhat7, Göran Engberg4, Lilly Schwieler4, Helena Fatouros-Bergman8, Sophie Imbeault4, Ryan M Iverson9, Surendra Dasari9, Fredrik Piehl10, Simon Cervenka8,11, Carl M Sellgren4,8, Sophie Erhardt12, Doo-Sup Choi13,14,15.
Abstract
Psychotic disorders are currently diagnosed by examining the patient's mental state and medical history. Identifying reliable diagnostic, monitoring, predictive, or prognostic biomarkers would be useful in clinical settings and help to understand the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Here, we performed an untargeted metabolomics analysis using ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectroscopy on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples of 25 patients at their first-episode psychosis (FEP) manifestation (baseline) and after 18 months (follow-up). CSF and serum samples of 21 healthy control (HC) subjects were also analyzed. By comparing FEP and HC groups at baseline, we found eight CSF and 32 serum psychosis-associated metabolites with non-redundant identifications. Most remarkable was the finding of increased CSF serotonin (5-HT) levels. Most metabolites identified at baseline did not differ between groups at 18-month follow-up with significant improvement of positive symptoms and cognitive functions. Comparing FEP patients at baseline and 18-month follow-up, we identified 20 CSF metabolites and 90 serum metabolites that changed at follow-up. We further utilized Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and identified candidate signaling pathways involved in psychosis pathogenesis and progression. In an extended cohort, we validated that CSF 5-HT levels were higher in FEP patients than in HC at baseline by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. To conclude, these findings provide insights into the pathophysiology of psychosis and identify potential psychosis-associated biomarkers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35665740 PMCID: PMC9166796 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02000-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 7.989
Baseline subject demographics and clinical characteristics for untargeted metabolomics.
| Characteristics | Healthy controls (HC) | First-episode Psychosis (FEP) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 25 | - | |
| Gender (male/female) | 8/13 | 13/12 | 0.387 |
| BMI (mean ± SEM) | 22.84 ± 0.61a | 23.00 ± 0.66 | 0.886 |
| Age (mean ± SEM) | 25.81 ± 1.34 | 31.40 ± 1.96 | 0.028 |
| Nicotine ( | 1 (5.0%)b | 5 (22.7%)b | 0.187 |
| DUP (months; mean ± SEM) | 0 | 16.45 ± 4.54c | - |
| PANSS (mean ± SD) | |||
| Positive Symptoms | - | 19.72 ± 6.18 | - |
| Negative Symptoms | - | 17.48 ± 8.50 | - |
| General | - | 38.04 ± 11.61 | - |
| Total | - | 75.24 ± 23.25 | - |
| Levels of Functioning | |||
| CGI Score (mean ± SD) | - | 4.48 ± 1.16 | - |
p-values between gender and nicotine difference are calculated with Fisher’s exact test. p-values between age and BMI are calculated with binomial logistic regression.
BMI body mass index, DUP duration of untreated psychosis, PANSS positive and negative syndrome scale.
aBased on 19 HC subjects.
bBased on 20 HC subjects and 22 FEP subjects.
cBased on 22 FEP subjects.
Fig. 1Volcano plots of psychosis-associated metabolites by detection modes.
Each sample was subjected to all combinations of liquid chromatography (C18 or HILIC columns) and electrospray ionization (positive or negative) to maximize metabolite detection. Data for serum subjected to HILIC+ detection were discarded due to heterogeneities after normalization. A CSF metabolite changes in C18+, C18−, and HILIC− modes (from left to right). B Serum metabolite changes in C18+, C18−, and HILIC− modes (from left to right). Statistical significance was set at FDR < 0.15 (vertical gray lines) with a fold change threshold which was set at the top 5% of most variable metabolites comparing between baseline and follow-up in healthy controls for each mode (horizontal gray lines; Supplementary Table 3 and 4). Significantly down-regulated metabolites are colored in blue while significantly up-regulated metabolites are colored in red. (Abbreviations: C18, C18 column; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HILIC, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column; +, positive electron ionization; −, negative electron ionization).
List of identified cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum metabolites differed between first-episode psychosis patients (FEP) and healthy controls (HC) at baseline, i.e., psychosis-associated metabolites.
| Sample | MS-mode | Metabolites | Log2FC (FEP/HC) | FDR-adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSF | HILIC+ | Acanthicifoline | 1.660 | 2.87 × 10–5 | 2.82 × 10−2 |
| Guvacoline | 1.595 | 2.42 × 10−4 | 4.76 × 10−2 | ||
| 5-HT | 1.592 | 5.54 × 10−4 | 6.06 × 10−2 | ||
| Pyriculol | 1.270 | 3.03 × 10−3 | 1.30 × 10−1 | ||
| Athamantin | −0.542 | 5.17 × 10−4 | 6.06 × 10−2 | ||
| HILIC− | Citric acid | 1.255 | 3.59 × 10−3 | 1.11 × 10−1 | |
| Acetylene dicarboxylate | 0.073 | 1.05 × 10−3 | 5.67 × 10−2 | ||
| Pyriculol | 0.061 | 2.39 × 10−5 | 7.78 × 10−3 | ||
| RRG | −1.231 | 1.29 × 10−3 | 6.00 × 10−2 | ||
| C18+ | 5-HT | 1.738 | 1.78 × 10−5 | 1.77 × 10−2 | |
| Serum | HILIC− | NDI | −0.478 | 1.41 × 10−3 | 8.15 × 10−2 |
| Norathyriol | −1.613 | 2.12 × 10−4 | 3.28 × 10−2 | ||
| C18+ | Myxalamid A | 1.134 | 1.25 × 10−3 | 5.88 × 10−3 | |
| N-oleoyl methionine | 0.951 | 1.09 × 10−2 | 2.86 × 10−2 | ||
| Val Val | 0.802 | 1.60 × 10−2 | 3.75 × 10−2 | ||
| PE | 0.758 | 1.90 × 10−2 | 4.29 × 10−2 | ||
| MND | 0.737 | 3.59 × 10−2 | 7.00 × 10−2 | ||
| N-docosahexaenoyl GABA | 0.653 | 4.52 × 10−2 | 8.41 × 10−2 | ||
| Trans-2,3,4-Trimethoxycinnamate | 0.604 | 2.79 × 10−2 | 5.80 × 10−2 | ||
| S-Farnesyl Thioacetic Acid | 0.594 | 8.38 × 10−2 | 1.36 × 10−1 | ||
| MG(0:0/18:0/0:0) | 0.560 | 5.31 × 10−2 | 9.51 × 10−2 | ||
| Hexazinone | 0.363 | 7.24 × 10−2 | 1.20 × 10−1 | ||
| estrone 3-sulfate | −0.402 | 9.53 × 10−3 | 2.63 × 10−2 | ||
| Nalorphine | −0.479 | 9.30 × 10−2 | 1.47 × 10−1 | ||
| GGC | −0.565 | 6.72 × 10−2 | 1.13 × 10−1 | ||
| Theobromine | −0.613 | 8.29 × 10−2 | 1.35 × 10−1 | ||
| (3Z)-Phytochromobilin | −0.799 | 2.30 × 10−2 | 4.97 × 10−2 | ||
| Tetracaine | −0.998 | 3.96 × 10−3 | 1.35 × 10−2 | ||
| Serratanidine | −1.027 | 1.16 × 10−3 | 5.56 × 10−3 | ||
| N-acetyl-S-farnesyl-L-Cysteine | −1.042 | 1.01 × 10−3 | 5.18 × 10−3 | ||
| Iodoform | −1.062 | 6.07 × 10−4 | 4.12 × 10−3 | ||
| Pseudopelletierine | −1.079 | 7.25 × 10−4 | 4.54 × 10−3 | ||
| Asp Lys Lys | −1.094 | 8.69 × 10−4 | 4.86 × 10−3 | ||
| Lysyl-Tyrosyl-Lysine | −1.106 | 5.34 × 10−4 | 3.84 × 10−3 | ||
| Pseudoargiopinin III | −1.132 | 4.86 × 10−4 | 3.73 × 10−3 | ||
| Arg Gln Ile | −1.139 | 4.86 × 10−4 | 3.73 × 10−3 | ||
| Thr Lys Lys | −1.161 | 2.85 × 10−4 | 3.09 × 10−3 | ||
| Cadiamine | −1.172 | 4.87 × 10−4 | 3.73 × 10−3 | ||
| Gabapentin | −1.236 | 1.96 × 10−4 | 2.40 × 10−3 | ||
| C18− | 2-Thiopheneacrylic acid | 0.560 | 3.17 × 10−3 | 1.29 × 10−1 | |
| PS (13:0/12:0) | −0.870 | 3.36 × 10−3 | 1.29 × 10−1 | ||
| HDD | −1.510 | 3.69 × 10−4 | 6.54 × 10−2 |
Metabolites which showed the same directional changes in the healthy controls from baseline to follow-up were excluded due to potential aging factors.
5-HT serotonin, RRG Rhamnetin 3-(3”“-p-coumaryl-rhamnosyl)(1–3)-rhamnosyl-(1–6)-galactoside, NDI N-depyridomethyl-Indinavir, PE PE(20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)/0:0), MND 17-Methyl-18-norandrosta-4,13(17)-dien-3-one, GGC Galalpha1-4Galbeta-Cer(d18:1/16:0); HDD 10-hydroxy-2E,8E-Decadiene-4,6-diynoic acid.
List of identified follow-up-associated CSF and serum metabolites.
| Sample | Comparisona | Mode | Metabolites | Log2FC | FDR-adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSF | FEPFU/FEPBb | HILIC+ | Deoxymiroestrol | 0.220 | 1.30 × 10−11 | 6.38 × 10−9 |
| TAC | −0.556 | 6.25 × 10−3 | 6.40 × 10−2 | |||
| HILIC− | Lasiocarpine | −0.062 | 4.34 × 10−13 | 2.83 × 10−10 | ||
| FEPB/HCB | HILIC+ | Acanthicifoline | 1.660 | 2.87 × 10−5 | 2.82 × 10-2 | |
| Guvacoline | 1.595 | 2.42 × 10−4 | 4.76 × 10−2 | |||
| Athamantin | −0.542 | 5.17 × 10−4 | 6.06 × 10−2 | |||
| HILIC− | Pyriculol | 0.061 | 2.39 × 10−5 | 7.78 × 10−3 | ||
| RRG | −1.231 | 1.29 × 10−3 | 6.00 × 10−2 | |||
| C18+ | 5-HT | 1.738 | 1.78 × 10−5 | 1.77 × 10−2 | ||
| FEPFU/HCFU | HILIC− | Phenolphthalein | 1.145 | 3.26 × 10−3 | 1.05 × 10−1 | |
| DDQ | 1.100 | 4.39 × 10−3 | 1.12 × 10−1 | |||
| Serum | FEPFU/FEPBb | HILIC− | MPIE | 0.579 | 9.65 × 10−3 | 6.72 × 10−2 |
| 13-eicosenoic acid | 0.540 | 2.07 × 10−2 | 1.02 × 10−1 | |||
| Nocodazole | −0.300 | 3.83 × 10−2 | 1.46 × 10−1 | |||
| TCA | −0.645 | 1.76 × 10−2 | 9.19 × 10−2 | |||
| C18+ | ME | 0.354 | 7.68 × 10−3 | 2.62 × 10−2 | ||
| Myxalamid A | −0.807 | 7.48 × 10−4 | 5.93 × 10−3 | |||
| FEPB/HCB | HILIC− | DMI | −0.478 | 1.41 × 10−3 | 8.15 × 10−2 | |
| C18+ | Myxalamid A | 1.134 | 1.25 × 10−3 | 5.88 × 10−3 | ||
| Val Val | 0.802 | 1.60 × 10−2 | 3.75 × 10−2 | |||
| PE | 0.758 | 1.90 × 10−2 | 4.29 × 10−2 | |||
| MNDO | 0.737 | 3.59 × 10−2 | 7.00 × 10−2 | |||
| DH-GABA | 0.653 | 4.52 × 10−2 | 8.41 × 10−2 | |||
| TTMC | 0.604 | 2.79 × 10−2 | 5.80 × 10−2 | |||
| MG(0:0/18:0/0:0) | 0.560 | 5.31 × 10−2 | 9.51 × 10−2 | |||
| Hexazinone | 0.363 | 7.24 × 10−2 | 1.20 × 10−1 | |||
| Nalorphine | −0.479 | 9.30 × 10−2 | 1.47 × 10−1 | |||
| GGC | −0.565 | 6.72 × 10−2 | 1.13 × 10−1 | |||
| Phytochromobilin | −0.799 | 2.30 × 10−2 | 4.97 × 10−2 | |||
| C18− | TPAA | 0.560 | 3.17 × 10−3 | 1.29 × 10−1 | ||
| PS(13:0/12:0) | −0.870 | 3.36 × 10−3 | 1.29 × 10−1 | |||
| HDD | −1.510 | 3.69 × 10−4 | 6.54 × 10−2 | |||
| FEPFU/HCFU | HILIC− | AG-041R | 0.469 | 1.15 × 10−3 | 5.33 × 10−2 | |
| Urocanic acid | −0.629 | 2.08 × 10−3 | 7.42 × 10−2 | |||
| C18+ | BHA | 0.658 | 5.22 × 10−2 | 8.09 × 10−2 | ||
| Poloxalene | 0.362 | 3.33 × 10−3 | 7.65 × 10−3 | |||
| IBGME | −0.392 | 2.40 × 10−2 | 4.19 × 10−2 | |||
| Mesuagin | −0.400 | 3.30 × 10−3 | 7.61 × 10−3 | |||
| PC(20:2(11Z,14Z)/0:0) | −0.457 | 6.89 × 10−3 | 1.42 × 10−2 | |||
| Lys Met Lys | −0.484 | 3.71 × 10−2 | 6.12 × 10−2 | |||
| DIQ | −0.560 | 1.00 × 10−1 | 1.42 × 10−1 | |||
| Theophylline | −0.580 | 3.84 × 10−3 | 8.53 × 10−3 | |||
| Hypoxanthine | −0.660 | 8.81 × 10−2 | 1.27 × 10−1 | |||
| Kurilensoside G | −0.693 | 1.12 × 10−2 | 2.17 × 10−2 | |||
| Myxalamid A | −0.721 | 5.15 × 10−2 | 8.03 × 10−2 |
aB baseline, FEP first-episode psychosis patients, FU follow-up; HC healthy controls.
bMetabolites which showed the same directional changes in the healthy controls from baseline to follow-up (HCFU vs. HCB) were excluded due to potential aging factors.
TAC Trans-3-Aminocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid, RRG Rhamnetin 3-(3”“-p-coumaryl-rhamnosyl)(1–3)-rhamnosyl-(1–6)-galactoside, 5-HT serotonin, DDQ 2,4-Diamino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline, MPIE15(S)-15-methyl PGF2α isopropyl ester, TCA Taurochenodeoxycholic acid, ME N-methylundec-10- enamide, DMI N-depyridomethyl-Indinavir, PE PE(20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)/0:0), MNDO 17-Methyl-18-norandrosta-4,13(17)-dien-3-one, DH-GABA N-docosahexaenoyl GABA, TTMC Trans-2,3,4− Trimethoxycinnamate, GGC Galalpha1-4Galbeta-Cer(d18:1/16:0), TPAA 2-Thiopheneacrylic acid, HDD 10- hydroxy-2E,8E-Decadiene-4,6-diynoic acid, BHA Bis (2-hydroxypropyl) amine, IBGME Isobutyrylglycine methyl ester, DIQ 1,3-Dimethyl-6,8-isoquinolinediol.
Fig. 2Serotonin and related metabolite levels in the baseline CSF samples of first-episode psychosis (FEP; n = 47) patients and healthy controls (HC; n = 21) identified by HPLC and LC-MS/MS.
Tryptophan was detected in 68 samples (47 FEP and 21 HC), serotonin was detected in 15 samples (8 FEP and 7 HC), while 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) was detected in 67 samples (47 FEP and 20 HC). A Serotonin synthesis pathway and enzymes involved are illustrated. Metabolites measured in the validation experiment are highlighted in green. Mean levels ± SD of (B) tryptophan, (C) serotonin-to-tryptophan ratio, (D) serotonin, (E) 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid-to-serotonin ratio, and (F) 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid are shown. Asterisks (*) represent differences between the FEP patients and HC after adjusting for age, antidepressant use, and nicotine use at p < 0.05. Standardized residuals are shown in Supplementary Fig. S8.