| Literature DB >> 25136293 |
Siham Raboune1, Jordyn M Stuart1, Emma Leishman1, Sara M Takacs1, Brandon Rhodes1, Arjun Basnet2, Evan Jameyfield1, Douglas McHugh1, Theodore Widlanski2, Heather B Bradshaw1.
Abstract
A family of endogenous lipids, structurally analogous to the endogenous cannabinoid, N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (Anandamide), and called N-acyl amides have emerged as a family of biologically active compounds at TRP receptors. N-acyl amides are constructed from an acyl group and an amine via an amide bond. This same structure can be modified by changing either the fatty acid or the amide to form potentially hundreds of lipids. More than 70 N-acyl amides have been identified in nature. We have ongoing studies aimed at isolating and characterizing additional members of the family of N-acyl amides in both central and peripheral tissues in mammalian systems. Here, using a unique in-house library of over 70 N-acyl amides we tested the following three hypotheses: (1) Additional N-acyl amides will have activity at TRPV1-4, (2) Acute peripheral injury will drive changes in CNS levels of N-acyl amides, and (3) N-acyl amides will regulate calcium in CNS-derived microglia. Through these studies, we have identified 20 novel N-acyl amides that collectively activate (stimulating or inhibiting) TRPV1-4. Using lipid extraction and HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry we showed that levels of at least 10 of these N-acyl amides that activate TRPVs are regulated in brain after intraplantar carrageenan injection. We then screened the BV2 microglial cell line for activity with this N-acyl amide library and found overlap with TRPV receptor activity as well as additional activators of calcium mobilization from these lipids. Together these data provide new insight into the family of N-acyl amides and their roles as signaling molecules at ion channels, in microglia, and in the brain in the context of inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: N-acyl amides; TRP receptors; endocannabinoids; lipid signaling; microglia
Year: 2014 PMID: 25136293 PMCID: PMC4118021 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5102 Impact factor: 5.505
Figure 1Structure of . N-acyl amides studied here have a structure that consists of an acyl group (denoted as R) and an amide bond to an amine (denoted as R1) and this is depicted as a cartoon structure here (far left). 4 examples of N-acyl amide bioactive molecules are also depicted: N-arachidonoyl ethanolamide (Anandamide; AEA); N-arachidonoy glycine (NAGly); N-palmitoyl ethanolamide (PEA); and N-palmitoyl glycine (PalGly). These 4 N-acyl amide species illustrate that the molecules can differ by changing the acyl group (AEA and PEA) or the amide (AEA and NAGly).
Agonist activity of .
| 7.88 ± 3.50 | 16.71 ± 0.81 | 45.74 ± 5.58 | 14.89 ± 2.19 | 30.13 ± 3.94 | |
| 11.97 ± 4.60 | 6.41 ± 0.79 | 26.72 ± 4.11 | 25.58 ± 6.19 | ||
| N-acyl beta-alanine | 5.16 ± 3.76 | 22.78 ± 1.34 | 23.88 ± 5.21 | 21.18 ± 1.71 | 9.35 ± 3.29 |
| N-acyl GABA | −8.15 ± 4.21 | 23.58 ± 5.13 | 20.24 ± 2.76 | 16.00 ± 2.97 | |
| N-acyl glycine | −20.47 ± 8.29 | 22.10 ± 5.43 | 12.14 ± 2.98 | 32.03 ± 4.23 | |
| N-acyl isoleucine | −9.52 ± 3.25 | 20.20 ± 2.71 | 31.16 ± 7.62 | 9.83 ± 2.23 | 17.37 ± 4.39 |
| N-acyl leucine | 2.78 ± 1.79 | 10.00 ± 1.92 | 16.99 ± 2.19 | −2.00 ± 0.32 | 4.20 ± 1.83 |
| N-acyl methionine | −10.34 ± 4.65 | 17.02 ± 2.04 | 30.67 ± 5.03 | 28.65 ± 4.82 | 30.46 ± 4.97 |
| N-acyl phenylalanine | −15.04 ± 3.00 | 0.68 ± 1.75 | −5.90 ± 1.45 | −7.55 ± 1.22 | 24.13 ± 3.54 |
| N-acyl proline | −8.21 ± 2.41 | 28.34 ± 5.73 | 23.92 ± 3.72 | 23.84 ± 4.95 | |
| N-acyl serine | −9.98 ± 6.27 | 2.87 ± 2.46 | 20.56 ± 1.96 | 6.28 ± 1.76 | |
| N-acyl threonine | −0.47 ± 2.52 | 19.40 ± 1.01 | 1.57 ± 1.37 | 12.66 ± 1.05 | 20.40 ± 2.27 |
| N-acyl tryptophan | 11.39 ± 2.55 | 19.33 ± 2.81 | 3.94 ± 1.18 | 13.46 ± 1.49 | |
| N-acyl tyrosine | −13.72 ± 5.83 | 39.05 ± 2.61 | |||
| N-acyl valine | −5.14 ± 4.69 | 26.63 ± 3.63 | 9.01 ± 1.70 | 13.42 ± 3.79 | 23.86 ± 4.27 |
| DMSO | −5.46 ± 2.93 | 8.10 ± 0.75 | −1.59 ± 1.68 | −0.78 ± 1.36 | 2.14 ± 0.98 |
| Capsaicin (10 μM) | |||||
| NADA (10 μM) | −11.92 ± 2.74 | ||||
| 2-APB | |||||
| 4α-PDD | |||||
Far left column lists the N-acyl amide family or control compound that was used as the challenge compounds for each screen. Subsequent columns contain the data from each individual TRPV-HEK expression system as well as the untransfected HEK cells. Values shown are the change in relative fluorescence units of Fura2AM from the 30 s baseline and represent the area of the curve of analysis of 190 s post injection (see example on Figure 2). The overwhelming majority of N-acyl amide mixtures caused significant increases in baseline calcium at p = 0.05 levels over that of the DMSO controls, which were the equivalent to zero. In order to streamline the screening process, we chose to focus on those differences that were only p ≤ 0.01. Those values in bold black are significantly different from those of the vehicle injection at p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 2Individual . (A) Concentration curves of individual N-acyl GABA: N-docosahexaenoyl GABA (D-GABA), N-arachidonoyl GABA (A GABA), N-linoleoyl GABA (L GABA), N-oleoyl GABA (O GABA), N-palmitoyl GABA (P GABA) and N-stearoyl GABA (S GABA) compared to the potent TRPV1 agonist, N-arachidonoyl dopamine (NADA). (B) Flourescence intensity that is an indication of calcium mobilization as measured by the ratiometric calcium-sensitive dye FURA2am in response to D-GABA, A GABA, L GABA, NADA, and the vehicle, DMSO. Data were generated in a Flexstation II (Molecular Devices).
Figure 3Composite for all individual . This cartoon illustrates N-acyl amides that were shown to be active as agonists (Bold Black; arrow) and antagonists (Bold Gray; bar) in each of the TRPV1-4 expression systems, which are represented simply as the individual receptor. Agonists at TRPV1: N-docosahexaenoyl GABA (DGABA), N-arachidonoyl GABA (AGABA), N-linoleoyl GABA (LGABA); N-docosahexaenoyl serine (DSer), N-docosahexaenoyl glycine (DGly), N-docosahexaenoyl aspartic acid (DAsA), N-docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (DEA), N-linoleoyl ethanolamide (LEA); Antagonists at TRPV1: N-docosahexaenoyl proline (DPro); Agonists at TRPV2: N-palmitoyl tyrosine (PTyr); Antagonists at TRPV3: N-docosahexaenoyl valine (DVal), N-linoleoyl valine (LVal), N-oleoyl valine (Oval), N-stearoyl valine (SVal); Agonists at TRPV4: N-arachidonoyl tyrosine (ATyr), N-linoleoyl tyrosine (LTyr); PTyr; N-docosahexaenoyl tryptophan (DTryp), N-arachidonoyl tryptophan (ATryp), N-linoleoyl tryptophan (LTryp).
Antagonist activity of .
| N-acyl alanine | 155.12 ± 10.33 | 267.43 ± 14.53 | 74.55 ± 4.34 | 87.46 ± 8.03 |
| N-acyl aspartic acid | 187.20 ± 11.78 | 251.09 ± 12.01 | 65.74 ± 13.38 | 83.25 ± 8.34 |
| N-acyl beta-alanine | 166.84 ± 13.52 | 239.05 ± 25.01 | 92.69 ± 9.95 | 91.59 ± 5.26 |
| N-acyl GABA | 277.24 ± 22.89 | 163.03 ± 15.23 | 94.24 ± 5.71 | |
| N-acyl glycine | 151.43 ± 10.3 | 255.01 ± 16.16 | 123.01 ± 10.80 | 85.11 ± 7.15 |
| N-acyl isoleucine | 185.08 ± 5.76 | 285.96 ± 30.44 | 62.73 ± 3.80 | 97.22 ± 5.46 |
| N-acyl leucine | 179.18 ± 13.56 | 235.66 ± 22.26 | 80.25 ± 6.18 | |
| N-acyl methionine | 158.93 ± 14.24 | 237.28 ± 18.32 | 65.15 ± 5.74 | 91.50 ± 9.87 |
| N-acyl phenylalanine | 180.70 ± 10.01 | 260.15 ± 28.61 | 75.64 ± 22.64 | 81.56 ± 4.54 |
| N-acyl proline | 142.49 ± 6.48 | 94.16 ± 11.34 | ||
| N-acyl serine | 196.28 ± 6.53 | 234.06 ± 22.36 | 69.65 ± 5.10 | 94.83 ± 5.23 |
| N-acyl threonine | 197.53 ± 7.51 | 210.15 ± 17.10 | 81.18 ± 5.96 | 83.89 ± 7.96 |
| N-acyl tryptophan | 201.35 ± 3.26 | 263.71 ± 24.69 | 61.91 ± 6.13 | |
| N-acyl tyrosine | 156.56 ± 15.15 | 58.78 ± 5.40 | ||
| N-acyl valine | 174.62 ± 11.94 | 240.61 ± 26.79 | 37.05 ± 7.37 | |
| DMSO | 195.69 ± 16.42 | 253.67 ± 39.42 | 95.73 ± 7.01 | 93.92 ± 11.55 |
| I-RTX (20 nM) | ||||
| Rethenium red (30 μM) | ||||
Far left column lists the N-acyl amide family or control compound that was used as the pre-incubated compounds for each screen. Challenge compounds are listed under the title of the TRPV-HEK expression system. Values shown are the data from the change in relative fluorescence units of Fura2AM from the 30 s baseline and represent the area of the curve of analysis of 190 s post injection of the positive control challenge compound. Those values in bold black are significantly different from those of the vehicle injection p ≤ 0.01.
Effects on .
These are the summary data of those N-acyl amides that were significantly modified (increased or decreased) from the levels measured in the vehicle control and do not represent all lipids tested. All averaged values for all lipids tested are shown in Supplemental Table .
Agonist effects of .
| N-acyl alanine | |
| N-acyl aspartic acid | 12.73 ± 0.82 |
| N- acyl beta-alanine | 15.33 ± 1.16 |
| N- acyl GABA | |
| N- acyl glycine | 22.91 ± 1.32 |
| N-acyl isoleucine | 8.31 ± 1.17 |
| N-acyl leucine | 56.47 ± 1.62 |
| N-acyl methionine | 33.00 ± 1.84 |
| N-acyl phenylalanine | |
| N-acyl proline | |
| N-acyl serine | 12.41 ± 1.35 |
| N-acyl threonine | 12.27 ± 1.00 |
| N-acyl tryptophan | 4.83 ± 1.04 |
| N-acyl tyrosine | 19.74 ± 1.24 |
| N-acyl valine | |
| DMSO | 9.09 ± 0.84 |
| Capsaicin (500 nM) | 9.60 ± 2.54 |
| PAF | |
| Inonomycin |
Far left column lists the N-acyl amide family or control compound that was used as the challenge compounds for each screen. Values shown are the change in relative fluorescence units of Fura2AM from the 30 s baseline and represent the area of the curve of analysis of 190 s post injection (see example on Figure 2. Those values in bold black are significantly higher from those of the vehicle injection, whereas those in bold gray are significantly lower p ≤ 0.01.