Literature DB >> 35665527

Net-benefit regression with censored cost-effectiveness data from randomized or observational studies.

Shuai Chen1, Jeffrey S Hoch2,3.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis is an essential part of the evaluation of new medical interventions. While in many studies both costs and effectiveness (eg, survival time) are censored, standard survival analysis techniques are often invalid due to the induced dependent censoring problem. We propose methods for censored cost-effectiveness data using the net-benefit regression framework, which allow covariate-adjustment and subgroup identification when comparing two intervention groups. The methods provide a straightforward way to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves with censored data. We also propose a more efficient doubly robust estimator of average causal incremental net benefit, which increases the likelihood that the results will represent a valid inference in observational studies. Lastly, we conduct extensive numerical studies to examine the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods, and illustrate the proposed methods with a real data example using both survival time and quality-adjusted survival time as the measures of effectiveness.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  censored data; cost-effectiveness analysis; double robustness; inverse-probability weighting; net-benefit regression

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35665527      PMCID: PMC9427707          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  33 in total

1.  Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  M Löthgren; N Zethraeus
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Hoch; Andrew H Briggs; Andrew R Willan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Regression analysis of incomplete medical cost data.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Linear regression analysis of censored medical costs.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Double robust estimator of average causal treatment effect for censored medical cost data.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Lauren A Beste; Marissa M Maier; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

7.  A note on confidence intervals in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M Tambour; N Zethraeus; M Johannesson
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Estimating medical costs from incomplete follow-up data.

Authors:  D Y Lin; E J Feuer; R Etzioni; Y Wax
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Quality adjusted survival analysis.

Authors:  P P Glasziou; R J Simes; R D Gelber
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Costs and benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a quality-adjusted survival analysis.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; R J Simes; P Glasziou; A S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.