| Literature DB >> 35664906 |
Anju Maharjan1, Ravi Gautam1, JiHun Jo1, Manju Acharya1, DaEun Lee1, Pramod Bahadur K C2, Jin Gim3, Sojung Sin4, Hyocher Kim4, ChangYul Kim2, SooYeon Lee5, SooJin Lee6, Yong Heo1,2, HyoungAh Kim7.
Abstract
Background: Occupational hazards in crop farms vary diversely based on different field operations as soil management, harvesting processes, pesticide, or fertilizer application. We aimed at evaluating the immunological status of crop farmers, as limited systematic investigations on immune alteration involved with crop farming have been reported yet.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural workers; Cytokines; Immunity; Immunoglobulins; Natural killer cell
Year: 2021 PMID: 35664906 PMCID: PMC9142355 DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saf Health Work ISSN: 2093-7911
Demographic information on study subjects
| Occupation | Location | Gender | No. subjects | Age (year) | Working duration (year) | No. smokers (smoking year) | No. subjects with respiratory illness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onion farmers | Naju | Women | 10 | 63.5 ± 10.2 | 24.2 ± 15.3 | 0 | 1 |
| Men | 10 | 68.1 ± 9.6 | 49.8 ± 16.8 | 6 (36.0 ± 5.5) | 1 | ||
| Grape farmers | Damyang | Women | 4 | 56.5 ± 3.5 | 15.3 ± 13.3 | 0 | 1 |
| Men | 15 | 67.3 ± 7.1 | 26.4 ± 21.5 | 10 (25.5 ± 14.5) | 2 | ||
| Rose farmers | Gangjin | Women | 11 | 54.4 ± 7.9 | 14.7 ± 9.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Men | 10 | 59.3 ± 5.8 | 19.2 ± 9.4 | 8 (17.3 ± 9.7) | 1 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
No significant difference in gender distribution among the farming groups.
No significant differences in mean age and working duration among the farming groups within same gender.
Significant difference (p < 0.05) between onion and rose farmers.
Diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or allergic rhinitis at hospital in the past.
Comparison of hematologic parameters among onion, grape, and rose farmers
| Parameters | Onion farmers | Grape farmers | Rose farmers |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (103/μL) | 3.7 ± 2.1 | 6.9 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.7 |
| RBC (106/μL) | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 |
| Platelet (103/μL) | 89.7 ± 35.3 | 231.7 ± 70.5 | 233.0 ± 59.1 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 57.6 ± 10.8 | 56.4 ± 9.9 | 50.5 ± 9.3 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 31.9 ± 9.9 | 31.1 ± 7.4 | 36.7 ± 9.6 |
| Monocyte (%) | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 6.4 ± 1.6 | 5.5 ± 1.7 |
| Eosinophil (%) | 3.4 ± 2.6 | 3.8 ± 2.5 | 4.5 ± 1.9 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.85 ± 0.39 | 0.54 ± 0.23 | 0.91 ± 0.50 |
RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell. Data expressed as mean ± SD.
Significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared with grape farmers.
Significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared with onion farmers.
Proportion (%) of lymphocyte subsets among onion, grape, and rose farmers
| Immune cell (%) | Gender | Onion farmers | Grape farmers | Rose farmers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKT cell | Female | 2.7 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7 |
| Male | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | |
| Subtotal | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | |
| NK cell | Female | 22.1 ± 4.2 | 6.1 ± 2.7 | 28.8 ± 3.4 |
| Male | 30.7 ± 4.2 | 23.4 ± 3.6 | 24.8 ± 4.1 | |
| Subtotal | 26.4 ± 3.1 | 19.8 ± 3.3 | 26.9 ± 2.6 | |
| CD8+ cell | Female | 14.6 ± 1.4 | 13.7 ± 4.3 | 20.5 ± 2.7 |
| Male | 16.0 ± 2.7 | 18.1 ± 2.6 | 20.2 ± 2.4 | |
| Subtotal | 15.3 ± 1.5 | 17.2 ± 2.2 | 20.4 ± 1.8 | |
| CD4+ cell | Female | 34.0 ± 2.8 | 35.0 ± 6.9 | 34.0 ± 2.1 |
| Male | 30.1 ± 2.6 | 31.6 ± 1.7 | 36.0 ± 2.2 | |
| Subtotal | 32.3 ± 1.9 | 32.3 ± 1.9 | 35.0 ± 1.5 | |
| B cell | Female | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| Male | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | |
| Subtotal | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.4 |
NK, natural killer; NKT, natural killer T. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared with grape farmers.
Significant differences (p < 0.05) when compared with onion farmers.
Fig. 1Levels of cytokines produced in culture supernatants of ex vivo stimulated peripheral mononuclear cells from onion, grape, and rose farmers. The IFN-γ/IL-13 ratio was calculated by dividing the amount of IFN-γ by the amount of IL-13 in the same culture supernatant. Data are expressed as means ± SEMs. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with ∗grape farmers (A); ∗∗onion, and rose farmers (B & C); #onion farmers (C); ##onion farmers (D).
Fig. 2Levels of plasma immunoglobulins in onion, grape, and rose farmers. Data represented as means ± SEMs. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with ∗onion farmers (A,D); ∗∗grape farmers (A).