| Literature DB >> 35664382 |
Cimmy Augustine1, Anil K Gujjari2, Nayana Paul3, Sowmya Neelan2, Raghavendra Swamy2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Edentulism is a debilitating and irreversible condition. It is often accompanied by compromises in the surrounding joint's range of motion and changes in the posture of the head. The natural head position is maintained by a balanced tension between cranio-cervical bones, myofacial structures and the dental occlusion. Loss of teeth may cause changes in the head posture that may disturb the patency of the spinal cord and lead to the loss of postural balance. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the head posture in the edentulous subjects before and after prosthetic rehabilitation.Entities:
Keywords: complete dentures; edentulism; edentulousness; head posture; natural head position; postural stability; prosthetic rehabilitation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664382 PMCID: PMC9152161 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Posture analysis grid chart and plumb line
Figure 2Digital photograph
Figure 3Software analysis of the photograph
Figure 4Determination of the cranio-vertical angle using the software
Repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc comparison of edentulous subjects at different time intervals pre- and post-rehabilitation
The results were found to be statistically significant between the groups (p≤0.05). The results were even significant when a comparison was made between all possible pairs (p≤0.05) except between 2 days post-rehabilitation vs 30 days post-rehabilitation where the result was found to be non-significant (p>0.05).
ANOVA, analysis of variance
| Group | Time intervals | Statistical inference | |||
| Pre-rehabilitation | 30 mins post-rehabilitation | 2 days post-rehabilitation | 30 days post-rehabilitation | ||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| N = 16 | N = 16 | N = 16 | N = 16 | ||
| Edentulous participants | 85.69 ± 2.36 | 89.37 ± 2.99 | 88.50 ± 3.08 | 88.12 ± 3.16 | F value: 32.01 |
| df: 3 | |||||
| p value: 0.00 | |||||
| Post hoc comparison | Pre-rehabilitation vs 30 minutes post-rehabilitation = 0.00 | ||||
| Pre-rehabilitation vs 2 days post-rehabilitation = 0.00 | |||||
| Pre-rehabilitation vs 30 days post-rehabilitation = 0.02 | |||||
| 30 minutes post-rehabilitation vs 2 days post-rehabilitation = 0.01 | |||||
| 30 minutes post-rehabilitation vs 30 days post-rehabilitation = 0.02 | |||||
| 2 days post-rehabilitation vs 30 days post-rehabilitation = 0.98 | |||||
Comparison of cranio-vertical angles between different possible edentulous groups
*Paired t-test
Pair 1 refers to pre-rehabilitation (Group 1) and 30 minutes after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2A); pair 2 refers to pre-rehabilitation (Group 1) and 2 days after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2B); pair 3 refers to pre-rehabilitation (Group 1) and 30 days after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2C); pair 4 refers to 30 minutes after (Group 2A) and 2 days after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2B); pair 5 refers to 30 minutes (Group 2A) and 30 days after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2C); pair 6 refers to 2 days (Group 2B) and 30 days after rehabilitation with complete dentures (Group 2C).
| Group | Mean ± SD | Statistical inference* | |||
| Pair 1 | Group 1 | 85.69 ± 2.36 | t value: 7.96 | df: 15 | p value: 0.00 |
| Group 2A | 89.38 ± 2.99 | ||||
| Pair 2 | Group 1 | 85.69 ± 2.36 | t value: 5.51 | df: 15 | p value: 0.00 |
| Group 2B | 88.50 ± 3.08 | ||||
| Pair 3 | Group 1 | 85.69 ± 2.36 | t value: 4.72 | df: 15 | p value 0.00 |
| Group 2C | 88.13 ± 3.16 | ||||
| Pair 4 | Group 2A | 89.38 ± 2.99 | t value: 3.66 | df: 15 | p value: 0.02 |
| Group 2B | 88.50 ± 3.08 | ||||
| Pair 5 | Group 2A | 89.38 ± 2.99 | t value: 4.70 | df: 15 | p value: 0.00 |
| Group 2C | 88.13 ± 3.16 | ||||
| Pair 6 | Group 2B | 88.50 ± 3.08 | t value: 1.46 | df: 15 | p value: 0.16 |
| Group 2C | 88.13 ± 3.16 | ||||
Figure 5Change in the cranio-vertical angulation among edentulous study participants’ pre- and post-rehabilitation at different time intervals