| Literature DB >> 29519234 |
Kohei Yamaguchi1, Haruka Tohara2, Koji Hara1, Ayako Nakane1, Eriko Kajisa1, Kanako Yoshimi1, Shunsuke Minakuchi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported a relationship between masseter muscle thickness and tooth loss or limb muscle thickness. However, it is not yet known whether masseter muscle thickness is related to appendicular skeletal muscle mass, and grip strength. The purpose of this study was to determine which of the two variables-tooth loss or appendicular skeletal muscle mass index-is more strongly related to masseter muscle thickness, and to identify a suitable indicator of decreasing masseter muscle thickness in healthy elderly individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Elderly; Masseter muscle; Skeletal muscle; Tooth loss
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29519234 PMCID: PMC5844127 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0753-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Masseter muscle thickness measurements. a Position of the probe during measurement. b Masseter muscle imaging with an ultrasonic diagnostic equipment. Upper edge of the tragus (B) Point under the nasal wing (C) Camper’s plane (D) Masseter muscle surface (E) Mandibular ramus (F) Masseter muscle thickness
Intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of the masseter muscle (N = 97)
| At rest | During contraction | |
|---|---|---|
| ICC (1, 1) | 0.83 | 0.86 |
| 95%CI | 0.76–0.89 | 0.80–0.90 |
| ICC (1,2) | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| 95%CI | 0.86–0.94 | 0.89–0.95 |
ICC Intra-class correlation coefficient
95%CI 95% confidence interval
Subject Characteristics (N = 97)
| Eichner A | Eichner B | Eichner C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | ||||
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 68 (67.0_71.5) | 77 (74.5_84.5) | 74.5 (71.0_85.0) | < .01a |
| SMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD | 7.5 ± 0.8 | 7.7 ± 0.9 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | .49 |
| Weight, kg, mean ± SD | 61.2 ± 9.6 | 62.0 ± 10.8 | 66 ± 3.5 | .60 |
| Grip strength, kg, mean ± SD | 35.2 ± 5.2 | 31.4 ± 6.3 | 36.2 ± 5.8 | .09 |
| Walking speed, m/s, median (IQR) | 1.3 (1.2_1.5) | 1.3 (1.1_1.4) | 1.3 (1.2_1.5) | .30 |
| MMT at rest, mm, mean ± SD | 10.7 ± 2.0 | 9.6 ± 1.9 | 9.9 ± 1.6 | .25 |
| MMT during contraction, mm, mean ± SD | 14.5 ± 2.3 | 12.7 ± 2.1 | 11.9 ± 1.4 | < .05b |
| Women | ||||
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 70 (67.3_72.8) | 73 (68.3_75.0) | 78 (75.5_82.0) | < .01a |
| SMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | .84 |
| Weight, kg, mean ± SD | 53.0 ± 8.7 | 54.5 ± 7.1 | 48.6 ± 9.0 | .36 |
| Grip strength, kg, mean ± SD | 23.8 ± 4.3 | 23.0 ± 3.8 | 22.1 ± 5.9 | .65 |
| Walking speed, m/s, median (IQR) | 1.5 (1.3_1.6) | 1.4 (0.9_1.4) | 1.1 (0.8_1.5) | < .05a |
| MMT at rest, mm, mean ± SD | 8.7 ± 1.5 | 8.0 ± 1.8 | 7.0 ± 1.2 | < .05b |
| MMT during contraction, mm, mean ± SD | 11.3 ± 1.7 | 10.4 ± 1.9 | 9.7 ± 1.8 | .09 |
MMT masseter muscle thickness
aKruskal-Wallis test, bOne-way analysis of variance, SMI skeletal muscle mass index,
Fig. 2Statistical difference between masseter muscle thickness (MMT) during contraction in men in Tukey’s honest significant difference test
Correlation matrix table of parameters
| MMT | MMT | Age | Body | GS | SMI | Tooth loss: Eichner classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | |||||||
| MMT during contraction | 1.00 | −0.31* | 0.14 | 0.34* | 0.22 | −0.41 * | |
| MMT at rest | 1.00 | −0.30* | 0.10 | 0.33* | 0.25 | −0.18 | |
| Age | 1.00 | −0.20 | −0.52* | − 0.17 | 0.49* | ||
| Body Weight | 1.00 | 0.32* | 0.74* | 0.14 | |||
| GS | 1.00 | 0.27* | − 0.05 | ||||
| SMI | 1.00 | 0.17 | |||||
| Women | |||||||
| MMT during contraction | 1.00 | −0.21 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.10 | −0.31* | |
| MMT at rest | 1.00 | −0.25 | 0.30 * | −0.08 | 0.21 | −0.34* | |
| Age | 1.00 | −0.27 | −0.21 | − 0.24 | 0.44* | ||
| Body weight | 1.00 | 0.38* | 0.73* | − 0.07 | |||
| GS | 1.00 | 0.38* | − 0.13 | ||||
| SMI | 1.00 | −0.03 | |||||
*p-value < 0.05, MMT Masseter muscle thickness, GS Grip strength SMI Skeletal muscle mass index
Multiple regression analysis values with masseter muscle thickness at rest and during contraction as the dependent variables
| Dependent Variable: MMT | Independent Variable | Standard Partial Regression coefficient | 95% CI | R | Adjusted R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At rest | Men | |||||
| Grip strength | 0.33 | 0.030 | 0.011–0.20 | 0.33 | 0.09 | |
| Women | ||||||
| Tooth loss | −0.35 | < .01 | −1.48—0.24 | 0.50 | 0.21 | |
| Grip strength | −0.27 | 0.050 | −0.21-0.00 | |||
| Body Weight | 0.38 | < .01 | 0.022–0.13 | |||
| During Contraction | Men | |||||
| Tooth loss | −0.39 | < .01 | −2.32–0.43 | 0.52 | 0.24 | |
| Grip strength | 0.32 | 0.030 | 0.020–0.22 | |||
| Women | ||||||
| Tooth loss | −0.31 | 0.027 | −1.6—0.10 | 0.31 | 0.075 | |
95%CI 95% confidence interval, MMT Masseter muscle thickness