| Literature DB >> 35664375 |
Abstract
An intercalated degree offers medical students an avenue to explore their interests and become competent in scientific literacy. Although intercalating can pose a financial burden and time commitment, they do provide competitive academic and speciality training applications. The aim of this review was to explore academic development and subsequent outcomes of career progression. Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched using keywords. After the removal of duplicates, the studies were screened against the inclusion criteria. For the five studies included in this review, a narrative synthesis was performed. The two main themes were academic development and career progression. All studies showed a plethora of academic achievements during and after intercalation. Two studies showed that students are more likely to enter a career in academic medicine. A further two studies have shown that the transferable skills of academia have allowed alumni to make more competitive applications for foundation year and speciality training. The results have shown a correlation between academic achievements and an increase in competitiveness in foundation programmes and speciality applications. There are clear discrepancies in the success of academic careers depending on the institution and type of intercalated degree. Current literature suggests a master's degree results in more academic success compared to a bachelor's degree. Due to the sheer diversity of intercalated degrees offered to medical students in the UK, there is limited literature on post-graduate career progression. More research should be undertaken to look at the implications of intercalation on post-graduate career progression.Entities:
Keywords: academic achievements; career progression; intercalated degree; medical students; post-graduate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664375 PMCID: PMC9148273 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Search terms used
| Terms searched | |
| 1 | 'medic* student*'.ti,ab. |
| 2 | 'student doctor*'.ti,ab. |
| 3 | intercalat*.ti,ab. |
| 4 | msc.ti,ab. |
| 5 | bsc.ti,ab. |
| 6 | progress.ti,ab. |
| 7 | career.ti,ab. |
| 8 | training.ti,ab. |
| 9 | research.ti,ab. |
| 10 | outcome.ti,ab. |
| 11 | postgraduat*.ti,ab. |
| 12 | 1 or 2 |
| 13 | 3 or 4 or 5 |
| 14 | 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 |
| 15 | 12 and 13 and 14 |
Figure 1PRISMA flowchart
Data extraction form
| Content extracted from studies | |
| 1 | Title |
| 2 | Author(s) & year published |
| 3 | Journal |
| 4 | Aim of study |
| 5 | Study design |
| 6 | Country study carried out in |
| 7 | Type of participants (i.e. role) |
| 8 | Number of participants |
| 9 | Response rate |
| 10 | Number of years since intercalation (*alumni only) |
| 12 | Brief description of participant demographics |
| 12 | Criteria being assessed/reviewed |
| 13 | Results |
| 14 | Conclusions |
| 15 | Related references that could be useful |
| 16 | Other comments |
| 17 | MERSQI/CASP (quality appraisal) |
Overview of the studies used
BMSc - Bachelor of Medical Sciences, BSc - Bachelor of Sciences, MRes - Master of Research, CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, MERSQI - Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument
| Author(s) and year published | Number of participants | Type of intercalating degree and medical school | Response rate | Career status A = Intercalating B = Intercalated (but still in medical school) C = Alumni | Study Design A - single group cross-sectional B - single group post-test only C - exploratory case study | Outcomes measured A - academic development B - career progression | Key findings | Quality assessment |
| Graham et al., 2019 [ | 37 | BSc in Urgent and Emergency Care - Plymouth | 80% | B + C | A | A + B | Students involved in research had high publication rates. Academic, clinical, and inter-professional skills developed | MERSQI (9/18) |
| Sorial et al., 2021 [ | 52 | Master of Research (MRes) - Manchester | 68% | C | B | A + B | 73% of alumni career progression had taken minimum number of years Majority completed academic posts | MERSQI (12/18) |
| Stubbs et al., 2012 [ | 166 - Bristol 94 - Sheffield | Not specified - Bristol and Sheffield | 52.5% - Bristol 58.7% -Sheffield | B | A | A | Sheffield intercalators had more successful academic outcomes. Intercalation was perceived to increase chances of an academic job. | MERSQI (12/18) |
| Muir et al., 2020 [ | 10 | BMSc Medical Education - Dundee | 23.8% | B + C | C | A + B | Significant improvement in critical appraisal, reflection, and independent organisation. | CASP 1-9: YES 10: Moderate |
| Muir et al., 2014 [ | 13 | BMSc Medical Education - Dundee | 100% | B | C | A | Personal development. Students valued the application that intercalating had on their future practice and career development. | CASP 1-3, 5, 9: YES 4,8: NO 10: Moderate |