| Literature DB >> 35664316 |
Xiao Chen1,2,3, Chengfei Sun1, Junjian Dong1, Wuhui Li1, Yuanyuan Tian1, Jie Hu1, Xing Ye1.
Abstract
Siniperca chuatsi feeds on live fry throughout their life. The sustainable development of its farming industry has urgently necessitated the development of artificial diets to substitute live baits. It has been demonstrated that gut microbiota assists in feed adaptation and improves the feed conversion rate in fish. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the potential role of intestinal microorganisms in the domestication of S. chuatsi with a compound diet. Accordingly, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing of the gut microbial communities in S. chuatsi groups that were fed a compound diet (including large and small individuals) and live baits. A total of 2,471 OTUs were identified, and the large individual group possessed the highest number of unique OTUs. The α-diversity index of the gut microbiota in groups that were fed a compound diet was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the live bait group. There were no significant differences in the α-diversity between the large and small individual groups. However, relatively higher numbers of Lactococcus, Klebsiella, and Woeseia were observed in the intestines of the large individual group. Prediction of the metabolic function of the microbiota among these three fish groups by Tax4Fun revealed that most metabolic pathways, such as glycan metabolism and amino acid metabolism, were typically more enriched for the larger individuals. The results indicated that certain taxa mentioned above exist in large individuals and may be closely related to the digestion and absorption of compound diets. The present study provides a basis for understanding the utilization mechanism of artificial feed by S. chuatsi.Entities:
Keywords: 16SrRNA sequencing; Siniperca chuatsi; bait; compound diet; growth rate; gut microbial communities
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664316 PMCID: PMC9158118 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.797420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Body weights of adult large individuals (Fl), small individuals (Fs) and bait groups (B) of S. chuatsi.
| Number | Culture-cycle | Weight | Feed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fl1 | 9 months | 767 | Compound diet |
| Fl2 | 806 | ||
| Fl3 | 822 | ||
| Fl4 | 719 | ||
| Fl5 | 835 | ||
| Fl6 | 825 | ||
| Fs1 | 349 | ||
| Fs2 | 345 | ||
| Fs3 | 316 | ||
| Fs4 | 336 | ||
| Fs5 | 334 | ||
| Fs6 | 348 | ||
| B1 | 7 months | 246 | Live |
| B2 | 538 | ||
| B3 | 537 | ||
| B4 | 563 | ||
| B5 | 255 | ||
| B6 | 500 |
Effective Tags, abundance, and alpha diversity index of the gut microbiota in each Siniperca chuatsi group. ACE: estimated number of OTUs contained in the microbiota; Chao1: estimated total number of species contained in the microbiota samples; Simpson’s index: characterize the diversity and homogeneity of species distribution within the microbiota, this study used Simpson’s index of diversity (1–D).
| Group | Total effective Tags | OTUs | ACE | Chao1 | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fl | 387,396 | 1,260 | 440.04 ± 50.35 | 416.03 ± 52.53 | 0.70 ± 0.05 |
| Fs | 365,122 | 708 | 362.89 ± 35.60 | 373.57 ± 29.40 | 0.82 ± 0.09 |
| B | 387,509 | 503 | 313.38 ± 30.87 | 305.55 ± 30.80 | 0.54 ± 0.09 |
| WF | 185,900 | 1,411 | 926.07 ± 116.18 | 913.12 ± 116.36 | 0.97 ± 0.01 |
| WB | 192,001 | 1,817 | 1196.81 ± 4.12 | 1178.72 ± 10.55 | 0.97 ± 0.01 |
p > 0.05, no significant difference
p < 0.05, significant difference.
Fl and Fs, large individuals and small individuals feeding on the compound diets, respectively; B, S. chuatsi feeding on baits; WF, the water samples from the compound feed group; WB, the water samples from the bait group (same as below).
FIGURE 1Rarefaction curves of microbial communities sampled from the gastrointestinal tract of Siniperca chuatsi.
FIGURE 2Venn diagram comparing the observed OTU of intestinal bacterial communities from shared and unique to each S. chuatsi group.
Relative abundance of microflora at the phylum level in the gut samples and water environment of each S. chuatsi group.
| The relative abundance of the microbial community in the intestinal tract of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Fl | Fs | B | WF | WB |
| phylum | |||||
| Proteobacteria | 57.81 | 49.28 | 69.45 | 52.36 | 52.28 |
| Fusobacteriota | 24.17 | 27.58 | 18.7 | 1.71 | 0.38 |
| Firmicutes | 13.25 | 9.77 | 5.26 | 3.14 | 1.22 |
| Bacteroidota | 0.74 | 6.17 | 0.42 | 7.98 | 8.05 |
| Actinobacteriota | 0.38 | 2.21 | 2.44 | 11.68 | 14.94 |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.3 | 0.28 | 1.42 | 3.2 | 4.46 |
| Verrucomicrobiota | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 3.14 | 2.18 |
| Chloroflexi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.72 | 0.42 |
| kapabacteria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.79 | 1.28 |
Microbial with differences in abundance at the genus level between groups (%).
| Genus | Fl | Fs | B |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.32 | 0.18 | 0.28 |
|
| 3.3 | 0.09 | 0 |
|
| 0.21 | 2.51 | 0.21 |
|
| 0.26 | 2.54 | 0.11 |
|
| 1.64 | 0 | 0.09 |
FIGURE 3PCoA analysis of microorganisms in the gut and water environment of each S. chuatsi group based on unweighted-UniFrac. Individual samples from different S. chuatsi groups and aquatic environments are shown as squares of different colors in the coordinate system, with similar samples showing a clustering trend.
FIGURE 4Top 10 metabolic pathway sub-functions of the KEGG signaling pathway at the level 1 (A) and level 2 (B).
FIGURE 5Tax4Fun functional annotation clustering heat map at the level 2 (A) and level 3 (B). The color of the bars indicates the relative abundance of microorganisms in each function for each group of samples; red and blue indicate the amount of that function present in the sample, respectively.