Literature DB >> 35664261

Obtaining the potential number of object models/atlases needed in medical image analysis.

Ze Jin1, Jayaram K Udupa2, Drew A Torigian2.   

Abstract

Medical image processing and analysis operations, particularly segmentation, can benefit a great deal from prior information encoded to capture variations over a population in form, shape, anatomic layout, and image appearance of objects. Model/atlas-based methods are extant in medical image segmentation. Although multi-atlas/ multi-model methods have shown improved accuracy for image segmentation, if the atlases/models do not cover representatively the distinct groups, then the methods may not be generalizable to new populations. In a previous study, we have given an answer to address the following problem at image level: How many models/ atlases are needed for optimally encoding prior information to address the differing body habitus factor in a population? However, the number of models for different objects may be different, and at the image level, it may not be possible to infer the number of models needed for each object. So, the modified question to which we are now seeking an answer to in this paper is: How many models/ atlases are needed for optimally encoding prior information to address the differing body habitus factor for each object in a body region? To answer this question, we modified our method in the previous study for seeking the optimum grouping for a given population of images but focusing on the individual objects. We present our results on head and neck computed tomography (CT) scans of 298 patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck CT; hierarchical agglomerative clustering; image grouping; model/ atlas-based methods

Year:  2020        PMID: 35664261      PMCID: PMC9164934          DOI: 10.1117/12.2549827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  10 in total

1.  Computing average shaped tissue probability templates.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Ryan P Burke; Christopher P Lee; Rebeccah B Baucom; Benjamin K Poulose; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Multi-atlas segmentation without registration: a supervoxel-based approach.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

4.  Multi-atlas segmentation with augmented features for cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Wenjia Bai; Wenzhe Shi; Christian Ledig; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Low-rank and sparse decomposition based shape model and probabilistic atlas for automatic pathological organ segmentation.

Authors:  Changfa Shi; Yuanzhi Cheng; Jinke Wang; Yadong Wang; Kensaku Mori; Shinichi Tamura
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  How many models/atlases are needed as priors for capturing anatomic population variations?

Authors:  Ze Jin; Jayaram K Udupa; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Hierarchical multi-atlas label fusion with multi-scale feature representation and label-specific patch partition.

Authors:  Guorong Wu; Minjeong Kim; Gerard Sanroma; Qian Wang; Brent C Munsell; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases.

Authors:  Xingyu Wu; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; Dewey Odhner; Gargi V Pednekar; Charles B Simone; David McLaughlin; Chavanon Apinorasethkul; Ontida Apinorasethkul; John Lukens; Dimitris Mihailidis; Geraldine Shammo; Paul James; Akhil Tiwari; Lisa Wojtowicz; Joseph Camaratta; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Automatic coronary calcium scoring in low-dose chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Ivana Isgum; Mathias Prokop; Meindert Niemeijer; Max A Viergever; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Body-wide hierarchical fuzzy modeling, recognition, and delineation of anatomy in medical images.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Liming Zhao; Yubing Tong; Monica M S Matsumoto; Krzysztof C Ciesielski; Alexandre X Falcao; Pavithra Vaideeswaran; Victoria Ciesielski; Babak Saboury; Syedmehrdad Mohammadianrasanani; Sanghun Sin; Raanan Arens; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.545

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.