| Literature DB >> 35664180 |
Songbo Yu1, Jaffar Abbas2, Anca Draghici3, Oriana Helena Negulescu4, Noor Ul Ain5.
Abstract
Business firms and the public have encountered massive consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has become the most significant challenge and influenced all communities. This research study focuses on exploring the relationship between COVID-19 knowledge, social distancing, individuals' attitudes toward social media use, and practices of using social media amid the COVID-19 crisis. This study examines how attitudes toward social media use mediate the linkage between COVID-19 knowledge, social distancing, and practices for social media use. This survey uses a non-probability convenience sampling approach to collect samples and recruit willing respondents with their consent for data collection. This study recorded the feedback from 348 participants who encountered the indirect/direct effects of nationwide lockdowns, restrictions on social gatherings, and COVID-19 infection. The findings validate the proposed hypotheses for their direct effects and indicate significant β-values, t-statistics, and the p-values at p <0.001. The results validate a relationship between the COVID-19 knowledge of and social distancing practices. Similarly, the results approved a positive link between social distancing and attitudes toward social media use amid COVID-19. The findings validate the relation between social distancing and attitudes toward social media use during COVID-19 challenges (β-value = 0.22 and t-statistics = 3.078). The results show the linkage between attitudes toward social media use and practices of using social media (β-value = 0.41, and t-statistics = 7.175). Individuals' attitude toward social media use during COVID-19 mediates the connection between COVID-19 knowledge and COVID-19 practices of using social media use. The results validate the first mediation at β-value = 0.21 and t-statistic = 5.327. Similarly, the findings approve that attitudes toward social media use in the pandemic have positively mediated the relation between distancing and practices for social media use amid the crisis of COVID-19 (β-value = 0.09 and t-statistic = 2.633). The findings indicate how people have been indulged in social media to pave their business communication needs. The results provide valuable insights for the global business community. This study provides a systematic and holistic research model that helps in exploring the consequences of COVID-19. The generalizability of the findings provides valuable directions for future research related to the current pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 knowledge; business network; social distancing; social media use
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664180 PMCID: PMC9160995 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical framework. The proposed research framework shows selected variables; COVID-19 knowledge, social distancing, individuals' attitudes toward social media use in COVID-19, and practices for social media use amid the COVID-19 crisis.
Demographic analysis.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Male | 209 | 60.05% |
| Female | 139 | 39.9% |
|
| ||
| 15–20 | 103 | 29.59% |
| 21–25 | 101 | 29.02% |
| 26–30 | 72 | 20.68% |
| 31 and above | 72 | 20.68% |
|
| ||
| Bachelors | 142 | 40.80% |
| Masters | 115 | 33.04% |
| Ph.D. and others | 91 | 26.14% |
|
| ||
| Single | 167 | 47.98% |
| Married | 108 | 31.03% |
| Divorced | 42 | 12.06% |
| Widow | 31 | 8.90% |
|
| ||
| Contract | 78 | 22.41% |
|
| 102 | 29.31% |
| Permanent | 64 | 18.39% |
| Unemployed | 104 | 29.88% |
n = 348.
Mean, standard deviation (SD), excess kurtosis, and skewness analysis (n = 348).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude toward social media | AttSM1 | 3.828 | 1.014 | −0.378 | −0.596 |
| use amid COVID-19 | AttSM2 | 3.675 | 1.029 | 0.132 | −0.732 |
| AttSM3 | 3.583 | 1.065 | −0.188 | −0.628 | |
| AttSM4 | 3.632 | 1.128 | −0.532 | −0.555 | |
| AttSM5 | 3.764 | 1.051 | −0.397 | −0.635 | |
| AttSM6 | 3.664 | 1.064 | −0.125 | −0.693 | |
| AttSM7 | 3.773 | 1.013 | 0.183 | −0.749 | |
| AttSM8 | 3.98 | 1.143 | 0.475 | −1.108 | |
| AttSM9 | 3.764 | 1.049 | −0.068 | −0.718 | |
| AttSM10 | 3.678 | 1.069 | 0.059 | −0.746 | |
| Knowledge about COVID-19 | KN1 | 4.006 | 1 | 1.481 | −1.276 |
| KN2 | 3.911 | 1.08 | 0.66 | −1.071 | |
| KN3 | 3.908 | 0.999 | 0.545 | −0.962 | |
| KN4 | 4.049 | 1.127 | 1.048 | −1.318 | |
| KN5 | 3.816 | 1.048 | −0.082 | −0.77 | |
| KN6 | 3.853 | 1.058 | 0.31 | −0.918 | |
| KN7 | 3.922 | 1.063 | 0.856 | −1.144 | |
| KN8 | 3.813 | 1.084 | 0.46 | −0.996 | |
| KN9 | 3.807 | 1.142 | 0.416 | −1.023 | |
| KN10 | 3.724 | 1.063 | −0.096 | −0.698 | |
| KN11 | 3.911 | 1.227 | 0.255 | −1.103 | |
| Social distancing | SD1 | 0.859 | 0.098 | −0.69 | 3.773 |
| SD2 | 1.055 | 0.281 | −0.88 | 3.802 | |
| SD3 | 1.041 | 0.559 | −0.972 | 3.813 | |
| SD4 | 1.095 | 0.309 | −0.94 | 3.845 | |
| Practices for social media | SMB1 | 1.035 | 0.908 | −1.149 | 3.943 |
| use amid COVID-19 | SMB2 | 1.1 | 0.653 | −1.067 | 3.856 |
| SMB3 | 1.047 | 0.617 | −1.05 | 3.899 | |
| SMB4 | 1.048 | 0.468 | −0.966 | 3.882 |
Figure 2Measurement model algorithm.
It shows factor loadings, composite reliabilities, and average variance extracted (AVE) and convergent validity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude toward Social media | AttSM1 | 0.736 | 0.922 | 0.934 | 0.588 | Yes |
| use amid COVID-19 | AttSM2 | 0.849 | ||||
| AttSM3 | 0.808 | |||||
| AttSM4 | 0.728 | |||||
| AttSM5 | 0.736 | |||||
| AttSM6 | 0.746 | |||||
| AttSM7 | 0.745 | |||||
| AttSM8 | 0.694 | |||||
| AttSM9 | 0.775 | |||||
| AttSM10 | 0.849 | |||||
| Knowledge about COVID-19 | KN1 | 0.827 | 0.940 | 0.949 | 0.628 | Yes |
| KN10 | 0.818 | |||||
| KN11 | 0.813 | |||||
| KN2 | 0.830 | |||||
| KN3 | 0.821 | |||||
| KN4 | 0.843 | |||||
| KN5 | 0.707 | |||||
| KN6 | 0.731 | |||||
| KN7 | 0.651 | |||||
| KN8 | 0.820 | |||||
| KN9 | 0.828 | |||||
| Social distancing | SD1 | 0.841 | 0.941 | 0.958 | 0.851 | Yes |
| SD2 | 0.947 | |||||
| SD3 | 0.949 | |||||
| SD4 | 0.949 | |||||
| Practices for social media | SMB1 | 0.934 | 0.930 | 0.950 | 0.826 | Yes |
| use amid COVID-19 | SMB2 | 0.880 | ||||
| SMB3 | 0.904 | |||||
| SMB4 | 0.917 | |||||
n = 348.
Cross-loadings of the items based on the study variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude toward social media | AttSM1 |
| 0.341 | 0.345 | 0.269 |
| use amid COVID-19 | AttSM2 |
| 0.530 | 0.455 | 0.313 |
| AttSM3 |
| 0.436 | 0.393 | 0.303 | |
| AttSM4 |
| 0.431 | 0.378 | 0.193 | |
| AttSM5 |
| 0.524 | 0.589 | 0.384 | |
| AttSM6 |
| 0.670 | 0.646 | 0.449 | |
| AttSM7 |
| 0.557 | 0.402 | 0.250 | |
| AttSM8 |
| 0.518 | 0.360 | 0.228 | |
| AttSM9 |
| 0.358 | 0.315 | 0.266 | |
| AttSM10 |
| 0.519 | 0.435 | 0.320 | |
| Knowledge about COVID-19 | KN1 | 0.535 |
| 0.626 | 0.492 |
| KN10 | 0.558 |
| 0.551 | 0.431 | |
| KN11 | 0.497 |
| 0.540 | 0.471 | |
| KN2 | 0.594 |
| 0.612 | 0.414 | |
| KN3 | 0.601 |
| 0.658 | 0.452 | |
| KN4 | 0.594 |
| 0.652 | 0.455 | |
| KN5 | 0.491 |
| 0.521 | 0.460 | |
| KN6 | 0.555 |
| 0.513 | 0.405 | |
| KN7 | 0.482 |
| 0.499 | 0.365 | |
| KN8 | 0.493 |
| 0.594 | 0.499 | |
| KN9 | 0.522 |
| 0.559 | 0.435 | |
| Social distancing | SD1 | 0.639 | 0.512 |
| 0.512 |
| SD2 | 0.543 | 0.597 |
| 0.493 | |
| SD3 | 0.547 | 0.631 |
| 0.496 | |
| SD4 | 0.526 | 0.678 |
| 0.470 | |
| Practices for social media | SMB1 | 0.410 | 0.568 | 0.544 |
|
| use amid COVID-19 | SMB2 | 0.365 | 0.496 | 0.453 |
|
| SMB3 | 0.325 | 0.477 | 0.479 |
| |
| SMB4 | 0.392 | 0.491 | 0.468 |
|
n = 348. The bold values indicate a decent score of the study items.
Fornell and Larcker criteria.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att |
| |||
| KN | 0.661 |
| ||
| SD | 0.590 | 0.767 |
| |
| SMB | 0.405 | 0.561 | 0.536 |
|
n = 348, Att, attitude toward social media use amid COVID-19; KN, knowledge about COVID-19; SD, social distancing; SMB, practices for social media use amid COVID-19. The bold values indicate a decent score of the study items.
Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att | ||||
| KN | 0.682 | |||
| SD | 0.601 | 0.809 | ||
| SMB | 0.416 | 0.598 | 0.570 |
n = 348, Att, attitude toward social media use amid COVID-19; KN, knowledge about COVID-19; SD, social distancing; SMB, practices for social media use amid COVID-19.
Figure 3Structural model algorithm.
Hypothesis testing shows direct effects of the study variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KN → SD | H1 | 0.766 | 0.766 | 0.027 | 27.891 | 0.000*** | Accepted |
| KN → Att | H2 | 0.506 | 0.508 | 0.059 | 8.649 | 0.000** | Accepted |
| SD → Att | H3 | 0.203 | 0.205 | 0.066 | 3.078 | 0.000*** | Accepted |
| Att → SMB | H4 | 0.406 | 0.412 | 0.057 | 7.175 | 0.000*** | Accepted |
n = 348,
***p < 0.001,
**p < 0.005,
*p < 0.05;
H, hypothesis; O, original sample; M, sample mean; SD, standard deviation; Att, attitude toward social media use amid COVID-19; KN, knowledge about COVID-19; SD, social distancing; SMB, practices for social media use amid COVID-19.
Indirect effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KN → Atti → SMB | H5 | 0.205 | 0.209 | 0.039 | 5.327 | 0.000*** | Accepted |
| SD → Att → SMB | H6 | 0.082 | 0.085 | 0.031 | 2.633 | 0.009** | Accepted |
n = 348, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05; H, hypothesis; O, original sample; M, sample mean; SD, standard deviation; Att, attitude toward social media use amid COVID-19; KN, knowledge about COVID-19; SD, social distancing; SMB, practices for social media use amid COVID-19.