Literature DB >> 35663206

Pitfalls in Genetic Testing for Consanguineous Pediatric Populations.

Maha Saleh1,2, Samantha Colaiacovo1, Melanie P Napier1, Asuri N Prasad2,3, C Anthony Rupar1,2,4, Chitra Prasad1,2.   

Abstract

We describe the diagnostic odyssey of an eight-year-old female born to consanguineous parents. Our patient presented with global developmental delay, regression, microcephaly, spastic diplegia, and leukodystrophy confirmed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). She was found on whole exome sequencing (WES) to have dual genetic diagnoses. The first was a homozygous pathogenic HERC2 gene partial deletion of exons 43-45 that causes HERC2-related disorder. The second was a homozygous pathogenic variant (c.836 C > T, p.A279 V) in the SUMF1 gene responsible for multiple sulfatase deficiency. This case highlights some of the challenges in diagnosing consanguineous pediatric populations where standard genetic and metabolic testing may not provide answers. Our case further supports the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendation of WES as a first or second-tier test for patients with developmental delay, particularly in a population where the chances of dual diagnosis is high.
Copyright © 2022 Maha Saleh et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35663206      PMCID: PMC9159873          DOI: 10.1155/2022/9393042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Genet        ISSN: 2090-6552


1. Case Report

An eight-year-old female of Iraqi descent presented to the Department of Clinical Genetics with a history of global developmental delay, regression, microcephaly, spastic diplegia, and leukodystrophy confirmed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient was the fourth child born to double first cousins. She had two older healthy siblings and a brother who died at 12 days of age following an infection. The patient had an unremarkable perinatal course and was slowly meeting her developmental milestones. At four years, she developed fever, following which she lost the ability to walk independently and showed signs of developmental regression. At that time, she had her first episode of myoclonic seizures. At age six, the family emigrated to Canada. Within a year, the patient was wheelchair bound and had lost spontaneous speech. Ophthalmologic and hearing exams were normal. A neurological assessment identified microcephaly (<1 percentile), poor growth parameters (weight and height were at 5th percentile), and a pattern of spastic tetraparesis. MRI scan of the head showed generalized cerebral atrophy and ventriculomegaly with periventricular white matter volume loss (Figures 1 and 2). Electroencephalogram (EEG) confirmed frequent bitemporal epileptiform discharges.
Figure 1

Axial T2 sequences (a) showing extensive cortical atrophy and ventriculomegaly ex-vacuo (b) at the level of the pons, showing an enlarged fourth ventricle and cerebellar cortical atrophy.

Figure 2

Coronal FLAIR sequence showing periventricular increased FLAIR signal consistent with white matter change, ventriculomegaly, including enlargement of the temporal horns, hippocampal, and generalized cortical and cerebellar atrophy.

Chromosomal microarray analysis identified greater than 21% absence of heterozygosity (AOH) and no copy number variants (CNV). Rett gene (MECP2) testing was normal. Metabolic screening including plasma amino acids, acylcarnitine profile, total and free carnitine, plasma lactate, ammonia, urine organic acids, and urine mucopolysaccharide screen were negative. Negative results were received from genetic testing with a 201 leukodystrophy genes panel and mitochondrial DNA panel. At age nine, she was diagnosed with precocious puberty in addition to nonclassic, late-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Cortical blindness was confirmed by an ophthalmological assessment. There were difficult to control seizures and her symptoms worsened. A request for funding of whole exome sequencing (WES) was declined on the administrative basis of the previous negative panels ordered less than three years prior. At 12 years of age, approval for a clinical WES was granted and the results identified two diagnoses. There was a homozygous pathogenic partial HERC2 gene deletion of exons 43–45 responsible for autosomal recessive HERC2-related disorder, which is characterized by intellectual disability, gait disturbance, seizures, hypotonia, and brain anomalies. This was recently described as a cause of pediatric lethality in a consanguineous population [1, 2]. In addition, a homozygous ACMG class 1 mutation (c.836 C> T, p.A279 V) in the SUMF1 gene was identified, which is responsible for autosomal recessive multiple sulfatase deficiency (MSD). MSD is a lysosomal storage disorder that presents with developmental delay, regression, leukodystrophy, and coarse facial features [3, 4]. SUMF1 was not included in the initial leukodystrophy panel (Supplementary Material 1). The diagnosis of MSD was further confirmed biochemically by very low leukocyte arylsulfatase A activity (0.05 nmole/h/mg protein and low leukocyte arylsulfatase B activity 3 nmol//mg protein (same-day control 101 and 133). We were able to correlate the above changes to 21% AOH identified on her chromosomal microarray analysis. The AOH included 15q13.1, which harbors the HERC2 gene as well as the region 3p26.1 which carries the SUMF1 gene (Supplementary Material 2). Her parents were identified to be carriers for those two conditions. Both parents and caregivers now have a better understanding of the cause and overall prognosis. The parents have presently accepted a referral to the palliative care team. The older siblings have also been made aware of the genetic findings and advised to seek prenatal counseling.

2. Discussion

This case highlights the challenges in diagnosing genetic and metabolic conditions in the growing immigrant population in Canada [5]. A position statement reviewed by the Community Pediatrics Committee includes a stepwise guide to children with developmental delay which includes formal vision and hearing testing, chromosomal microarray, and first-tier testing for treatable inborn errors of the metabolism [6]. Our patient was provided testing following these guidelines. See 21% AOH on microarray pinpoints to a high likelihood of identifying homozygous mutations for recessive disorders [7]. In addition, dual diagnoses have been commonly reported in consanguineous populations suggesting that the threshold for offering WES should be lower in patients with complex presentations in those populations [8-10]. The dual diagnoses on WES helped explain our patient's acute presentation and severe developmental regression. Our patient's pathogenic variant (c.836 C > T, p. A279 V) in the SUMF1 gene has been previously described in the literature in patients with severe infantile multiple sulfatase deficiency with regression and loss of the majority of developmental milestones by age 5 years. Prasad et al. and Miskin et al., describe clinical findings of microcephaly, neurological regression without ichthyosis, coarse facies, or organomegaly, similar to our case. The MRI changes of leukodystrophy has been described as typical finding for patients with this SUMF1 variant [11, 12]. Our patient had severe seizures that were difficult to control and was later diagnosed with cortical blindness, none of which have been previously attributed to this SUMF1 variant. However, those features were well described by Elpidorou et al., in a cohort of pediatric patients who presented with developmental delay and HERC2-related disorder. Of interest, none of the children described in that cohort had leukodystrophy on brain MRI. This case further supports the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendation for ordering WES as a first or second-tier test for patients with developmental delay, particularly in a consanguineous population where the chances of dual diagnosis is high [13]. Despite having a unique phenotype (leukodystrophy) for which a targeted gene panel can be offered, consanguinity in a unique population can underlie other rare genetic causes not typically covered by these “extensive” and known panels. Not many pediatricians are aware that Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) will not fund WES if an extensive panel was ordered prior. Due to public health funding regulations in Canada, WES is not funded if an extensive, disease-specific panel (>100 genes) was ordered within the prior three years. Where possible, pediatric subspecialists should consider WES for such patients before coordinating extensive targeted panels to help shorten the diagnostic odyssey.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic implications of excessive homozygosity detected by SNP-based microarrays: consanguinity, uniparental disomy, and recessive single-gene mutations.

Authors:  Hutton M Kearney; Joseph B Kearney; Laura K Conlin
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 1.935

2.  Debunking Occam's razor: Diagnosing multiple genetic diseases in families by whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  T B Balci; T Hartley; Y Xi; D A Dyment; C L Beaulieu; F P Bernier; L Dupuis; G A Horvath; R Mendoza-Londono; C Prasad; J Richer; X-R Yang; C M Armour; E Bareke; B A Fernandez; H J McMillan; R E Lamont; J Majewski; J S Parboosingh; A N Prasad; C A Rupar; J Schwartzentruber; A C Smith; M Tétreault; A M Innes; K M Boycott
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  High diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing in Middle Eastern patients with Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Tarunashree Yavarna; Nader Al-Dewik; Mariam Al-Mureikhi; Rehab Ali; Fatma Al-Mesaifri; Laila Mahmoud; Noora Shahbeck; Shenela Lakhani; Mariam AlMulla; Zafar Nawaz; Patrik Vitazka; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Tawfeg Ben-Omran
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay and intellectual disability.

Authors:  Stacey A Bélanger; Joannie Caron
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Mutation of HERC2 causes developmental delay with Angelman-like features.

Authors:  Gaurav V Harlalka; Emma L Baple; Harold Cross; Simone Kühnle; Monica Cubillos-Rojas; Konstantin Matentzoglu; Michael A Patton; Karin Wagner; Roselyn Coblentz; Debra L Ford; Deborah J G Mackay; Barry A Chioza; Martin Scheffner; Jose Luis Rosa; Andrew H Crosby
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 6.  Approach to developmental disabilities in newcomer families.

Authors:  Anjali Bhayana; Bhooma Bhayana
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  A Patient With Atypical Multiple Sulfatase Deficiency.

Authors:  Chandrabhaga Miskin; Joseph J Melvin; Agustin Legido; David A Wenger; Sue Moyer Harasink; Divya S Khurana
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Kandamurugu Manickam; Monica R McClain; Laurie A Demmer; Sawona Biswas; Hutton M Kearney; Jennifer Malinowski; Lauren J Massingham; Danny Miller; Timothy W Yu; Fuki M Hisama
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Clinical exome sequencing in 509 Middle Eastern families with suspected Mendelian diseases: The Qatari experience.

Authors:  Nader Al-Dewik; Howaida Mohd; Mariam Al-Mureikhi; Rehab Ali; Fatma Al-Mesaifri; Laila Mahmoud; Noora Shahbeck; Karen El-Akouri; Mariam Almulla; Reem Al Sulaiman; Sara Musa; Ajayeb Al-Nabet Al-Marri; Gabriele Richard; Jane Juusola; Benjamin D Solomon; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Tawfeg Ben-Omran
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Novel loss-of-function mutation in HERC2 is associated with severe developmental delay and paediatric lethality.

Authors:  Marilena Elpidorou; Sunayna Best; James A Poulter; Verity Hartill; Emma Hobson; Eamonn Sheridan; Colin A Johnson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.