Literature DB >> 35663107

JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Andrew T Kuykendall1, Rami S Komrokji1.   

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by uncontrolled blood counts, constitutional symptoms, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are the most common treatment for MF due to their ability to reduce spleen size and improve disease-related symptoms; however, JAK inhibitors are not suitable for every patient and their impact on MF is limited in several respects. Novel JAK inhibitors and JAK inhibitor combinations are emerging that aim to enhance the treatment landscape, providing deeper responses to a broader population of patients with the continued hope of providing disease modification and improving long-term outcomes. In this review, we highlight several specific areas of unmet need within MF. Subsequently, we review agents that target those areas of unmet need, focusing specifically on the JAK inhibitors, momelotinib, pacritinib, itacitinib, and NS-018 as well as JAK inhibitor combination approaches using CPI-0610, navitoclax, parsaclisib, and luspatercept. © Innovative Healthcare Institute 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JAK inhibitor; myelofibrosis; myeloproliferative neoplasm; rare disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 35663107      PMCID: PMC9138443          DOI: 10.36401/JIPO-20-36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2590-017X


  78 in total

1.  Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have limited therapeutic activity in transfusion-dependent patients with primary myelofibrosis regardless of serum erythropoietin level.

Authors:  Jocelin Huang; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Clinico-biological characteristics of patients with myelofibrosis: an analysis of 1,000 cases from the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Irene Pastor-Galán; Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda; Juan-Gonzalo Correa; Alberto Alvarez-Larrán; Francisca Ferrer-Marín; José María Raya; Rosa Ayala; Patricia Velez; Manuel Pérez-Encinas; Natalia Estrada; Valentín García-Gutiérrez; María Laura Fox; Angel Payer; Ana Kerguelen; Beatriz Cuevas; María Antonia Durán; María José Ramírez; María Teresa Gómez-Casares; María Isabel Mata-Vázquez; Elvira Mora; Clara Martínez-Valverde; Elisa Arbelo; Anna Angona; Elena Magro; María Luisa Antelo; Nieves Somolinos; Francisco Cervantes
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Low-dose thalidomide in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Robert Weinkove; John T Reilly; Mary Frances McMullin; Natasha J Curtin; Deepti Radia; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Impact of Molecular Genetics on Outcome in Myelofibrosis Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Nicolaus Kröger; Victoria Panagiota; Anita Badbaran; Tatjana Zabelina; Ioanna Triviai; Michelle Maria Araujo Cruz; Rabia Shahswar; Francis Ayuk; Marten Gehlhaar; Christine Wolschke; Robin Bollin; Carolin Walter; Martin Dugas; Lutz Wiehlmann; Ulrich Lehmann; Christian Koenecke; Anuhar Chaturvedi; Haefaa Alchalby; Michael Stadler; Matthias Eder; Max Christopeit; Gudrun Göhring; Michael Koenigsmann; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Hans-Heinrich Kreipe; Arnold Ganser; Carol Stocking; Boris Fehse; Felicitas Thol; Michael Heuser
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Patient characteristics and outcomes after ruxolitinib discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  John Mascarenhas; Maneesha Mehra; Jianming He; Ravi Potluri; Christina Loefgren
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Bcl-xL represents a therapeutic target in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Jessica Petiti; Marco Lo Iacono; Valentina Rosso; Giacomo Andreani; Aleksandar Jovanovski; Marina Podestà; Dorela Lame; Marco De Gobbi; Carmen Fava; Giuseppe Saglio; Francesco Frassoni; Daniela Cilloni
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Use and Benefit of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Franco Castillo-Tokumori; Chetasi Talati; Najla Al Ali; David Sallman; Seongseok Yun; Kendra Sweet; Eric Padron; Jeffrey Lancet; Rami Komrokji; Andrew T Kuykendall
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-07-16

9.  A randomized study of pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence.

Authors:  A Tefferi; H K Al-Ali; G Barosi; T Devos; H Gisslinger; Q Jiang; J-J Kiladjian; R Mesa; F Passamonti; M F McMullin; V Ribrag; G Schiller; A M Vannucchi; D Zhou; D Reiser; J Zhong; R P Gale
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Anemia in myelofibrosis-prevalence, the U2AF1 connection, new treatments.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 11.037

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rare Blood Cancers in 2021: Importance of Continued Exchange of Ideas.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.