Literature DB >> 32159402

Patient characteristics and outcomes after ruxolitinib discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis.

John Mascarenhas1, Maneesha Mehra2, Jianming He3, Ravi Potluri4, Christina Loefgren5.   

Abstract

Background: This retrospective analysis evaluates morbidities, outcomes and associated risk factors in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) after ruxolitinib discontinuation, using Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (TR), Optum integrated virtual electronic health records and claims databases (OP), and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (SM).
Methods: A total of 290 patients with MF between 2006 and 2015 (using ICD-9 and ICD-O-3 codes), who were treated with and discontinued ruxolitinib were identified. Only patients with ≥90 days of medical history prior to index diagnosis (TR + OP) and Part A, B, and D enrollment at the time of index diagnosis (SM) were included. Morbidities were assessed during the 30-day period each following ruxolitinib initiation, prior to and post ruxolitinib discontinuation. Cumulative incidence of cytopenias and efficacy outcomes were evaluated from baseline.
Results: Median age of patients was 68 years, with equal proportion of either gender. Median time to ruxolitinib discontinuation was 284 days and median follow-up after discontinuation was 70.9 days. The majority of patients were diagnosed with anemia and >30% of the patients received RBC transfusions during 30-day period prior to and the 30-day period post ruxolitinib discontinuation. After ruxolitinib discontinuation, half of the patients developed cytopenias. The median treatment progression-free survival, and overall survival after ruxolitinib discontinuation were 6.0 (4.4, 8.3) months and 11.1 (8.4, 14.5) months, respectively. Age at ruxolitinib discontinuation (HR [95% CI] = 2.071 [1.320, 3.248]), Charlson Comorbidity Index score (HR [95% CI] = 1.172 [1.093, 1.257]) and gender (HR [95% CI] = 1.620 [1.108, 2.369]) increased the risk of treatment progression (start of the subsequent treatment regimen) or death.
Conclusion: Results from this large, retrospective, US population-based outcome analysis of MF patients show an increase in morbidity burden and identifies the risk factors of survival outcomes among real-world patients who have discontinued ruxolitinib.

Entities:  

Keywords:  I10; I18; Ruxolitinib; myelofibrosis; retrospective analysis; survival outcomes; treatment discontinuation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32159402     DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1741381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  13 in total

1.  Disease Modification in Myelofibrosis: An Elusive Goal?

Authors:  Pankit Vachhani; Srdan Verstovsek; Prithviraj Bose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Novel treatments for myelofibrosis: beyond JAK inhibitors.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; Ruben Mesa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Authors:  James England; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 4.  Novel Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Beyond JAK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Julian A Waksal; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.213

Review 5.  JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Andrew T Kuykendall; Rami S Komrokji
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 6.  Novel therapeutics in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Sangeetha Venugopal; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 7.  Next Generation Therapeutics for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia.

Authors:  Helen T Chifotides; Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 17.388

9.  Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Cost in Patients with Myelofibrosis in the United States.

Authors:  Ronda Copher; Arianna Kee; Aaron Gerds
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-03-11

10.  Association of frailty with clinical outcomes in myelofibrosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Aniket Bankar; Shabbir Alibhai; Elliot Smith; Dongyang Yang; Sarah Malik; Verna Cheung; Nancy Siddiq; Jaime Claudio; Andrea Arruda; Hubert Tsui; Jose-Mario Capo-Chichi; James A Kennedy; Caroline McNamara; Hassan Sibai; Dawn Maze; Wei Xu; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.