Literature DB >> 35662362

Optimal reaching trajectories based on feedforward control.

Yoshiaki Taniai1, Tomohide Naniwa2, Jun Nishii3.   

Abstract

In human upper-arm reaching movements, the variance of the hand position increases until the middle of the movement and then decreases toward the endpoint. Such decrease in positional variance has been suggested as an evidence to support the hypothesis that our nervous system uses feedback control, rather than feedforward control, for arm reaching tasks. In this study, we computed the optimal trajectories based on feedforward control under several criteria for a one-link two-muscle arm model with considering the stochastic property of muscle activities in order to reexamine the hypothesis. The results showed that the feedforward control also represents the decrease in positional variance in the latter half of the movement when the control signal is planned under the minimum energy cost and minimum variance models. Furthermore, the optimal trajectory that minimizes energy cost represents not only the decrease in positional variance but also many other characteristics of the human reaching movements, e.g., the three-phasic activity of antagonistic muscle, bell-shaped speed curve, N-shaped equilibrium trajectory, and bimodal profile of joint stiffness. These results suggest that minimum energy cost model well expresses the characteristics of hand reaching movements, and our central nervous system would make use of not only a feedback control but also feedforward control.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arm reaching movement; Energy cost; Joint stiffness; Optimal trajectory; Positional variance

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35662362     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-022-00939-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   3.072


  34 in total

1.  Modeling variability of force during isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Michael Grossman; Les G Carlton
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellum predicts the future motor state.

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Siavash Pasalar
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior.

Authors:  A Adam; C J De Luca; Z Erim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories.

Authors:  R M Alexander
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements.

Authors:  D J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Apparent and Actual Trajectory Control Depend on the Behavioral Context in Upper Limb Motor Tasks.

Authors:  Tyler Cluff; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.