| Literature DB >> 35661931 |
Riccardo Nucera1, Elia Ciancio2, Giuliano Maino3, Serena Barbera2, Emanuela Imbesi2, Angela Mirea Bellocchio2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of palatal miniscrew offers the possibility to improve the effectiveness of orthodontic expansion devices. Palatal expanders supported by miniscrew can be applied with different clinical protocols. Some authors proposed the use of four palatal miniscrews during miniscrew-supported palatal expansion to maximize skeletal effects in young adults' treatment. However, bone availability decreases in the posterior paramedian palatal regions, making the positioning of the two-posterior paramedian palatal miniscrews challenging, when it is performed avoiding nasal cavities invasion. Some authors proposed miniscrews insertion in a specific region located laterally to the palatal process of the maxillary bone, and apically relatively to the dento-alveolar process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone thickness, cortical bone thickness, and mucosae depth of this anatomical site that, in this study, was defined as palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site.Entities:
Keywords: CBCT; Cortical bone thickness; Orthodontic miniscrew; Palatal bone depth; Palatal expansion; Palatal miniscrew insertion site; Palatal mucosa; TADs
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35661931 PMCID: PMC9167746 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-022-00412-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Orthod ISSN: 1723-7785 Impact factor: 3.247
Fig. 1CBCT scan and maxillary digital model superimposition
Fig. 2Outcome evaluation was performed in coronal scans set at different antero-posterior level: interproximal contact point between the second premolar and the first molar (P2-M1), at the upper first molar furcation (M1F) and interproximal contact between the first and the second molar (M1-M2)
Fig. 3The following outcomes were evaluated: total bone depth (yellow segment), cortical bone thickness (green segment), and palatal mucosa thickness (red segment). Outcomes measurement was performed on three straight lines traced passing through the three landmarks identified on the palatal mucosa profile (− 2P, zeroP, and + 2P). Three sets of lines with different angulation to the occlusal plane were considered: 45° (a), 60° (b), and 75° (c). This evaluation procedure was repeated for the three considered coronal scans. Overall, for each patient 27 insertion sites were evaluated, and 81 outcomes were measured
Descriptive and inferential statistics with pooled groups of total bone depth (TBD), cortical bone thickness (CBT) and mucosa thickness (MT) outcomes
| TBD | CBT | MT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | Mean (SD) | Min–Max | |
| zeroP | 5.77(3.52) | 0.78–26.32 | 1.47(0.65) | 0.47–6.16 | 5.63(1.61) | 0.83–12.11 |
| + 2 mm | 6.43(3.51) | 1.04–17.66 | 1.67(0.70) | 0.55–5.10 | 5.26(1.70) | 1.66–11.59 |
| Multiple comparison test* | ||||||
| −2 mm Vs zeroP** | NS | |||||
| zeroP Vs + 2 mm** | ||||||
| 2 mm Vs −2 mm** | NS | |||||
Values are reported in millimeters (mm). *Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparison test and **Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for inferential statistics evaluating the following independent variables: corono-apical evaluation level, miniscrew axis of inclination, inter-radicular location, and mandibular divergency
Descriptive statistics of total bone depth outcomes
| Total bone depth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||
| P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | |
| − 2P(45°) | 7.1 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 15.5 | 11.1 | 11.6 |
| zeroP(45°) | 7.6 | 4.9 | 5.6 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 26.3 | 12.8 | 12.0 |
| + 2P(45°) | 8.0 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 17.7 | 12.2 | 13.6 |
| − 2P(60°) | 6.9 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 19.6 | 13.8 | 14.3 |
| zeroP(60°) | 7.5 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 19.0 | 14.9 | 11.6 |
| + 2P(60°) | 8.0 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 17.2 | 12.1 | 11.5 |
| − 2P(75°) | 5.0 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 11.9 | 8.7 | 10.0 |
| zeroP(75°) | 6.8 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 17.6 | 10.7 | 15.9 |
| + 2P(75°) | 8.3 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 17.2 | 12.4 | 11.2 |
Values are reported in millimeters (mm). Outcomes were evaluated between second premolar and the first molar (P2-M1), at the furcation of the first molar (M1F) and between the first molar and the second molar (M1-M2). Insertion axes were traced passing through 3 landmarks: zero point (zeroP), 2 mm cranial to zeroP (− 2P), and 2 mm caudal to zeroP (+ 2P). Insertion axes were also traced at three different angulations (45°, 60°, and 75°) compared to the occlusal plane
Descriptive statistics of cortical bone thickness outcomes
| Cortical bone thickness | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||
| P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | |
| − 2P(45°) | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 3.9 |
| zeroP(45°) | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| + 2P(45°) | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| − 2P(60°) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
| zeroP(60°) | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 4.3 |
| + 2P(60°) | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 3.9 |
| − 2P(75°) | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| zeroP(75°) | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 6.2 |
| + 2P(75°) | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 5.1 |
Values are reported in millimeters (mm). Outcomes were evaluated between second premolar and first molar (P2-M1), at the furcation of the first molar (M1F) and between the first molar and the second molar (M1-M2). Insertion axes were traced passing through 3 landmarks: zero point (zeroP), 2 mm cranial to zeroP (− 2P), and 2 mm caudal to zeroP (+ 2P). Insertion axes were also traced at three different angulations (45°, 60°, and 75°) compared to the occlusal plane
Descriptive statistics of mucosa thickness outcomes
| Mucosa thickness | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||
| P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | P2-M1 | M1F | M1-M2 | |
| − 2P(45°) | 4.9 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 14.1 |
| zeroP(45°) | 4.7 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 8.8 |
| + 2P(45°) | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 9.2 |
| − 2P(60°) | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 9.9 |
| zeroP(60°) | 5.3 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 8.4 | 10.7 | 10.4 |
| + 2P(60°) | 5.2 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 8.8 | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| − 2P(75°) | 5.7 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 8.7 |
| zeroP(75°) | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 12.1 | 9.7 | 12.0 |
| + 2P(75°) | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 11.6 |
Values are reported in millimeters (mm). Outcomes were evaluated between second premolar and the first molar (P2-M1), at the furcation of the first molar (M1F) and between the first molar and the second molar (M1-M2). Insertion axes were traced passing through 3 landmarks: zero point (zeroP), 2 mm cranial to zeroP (− 2P), and 2 mm caudal to zeroP (+ 2P). Insertion axes were also traced at three different angulations (45°, 60°, and 75°) compared to the occlusal plane
Fig. 4Ideal miniscrew position to reach tricorticalism stabilization. Light blue color shows ideal neck dimension extending to the transition zone between palatal mucosa and oral cavity. Gray color represents the miniscrew head interacting with the abutment of the palatal expander