Literature DB >> 35659905

Sustained effect of LACTIN-V (Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05) on genital immunology following standard bacterial vaginosis treatment: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Eric Armstrong1, Anke Hemmerling2, Steve Miller3, Kerianne E Burke4, Sara J Newmann2, Sheldon R Morris5, Hilary Reno6, Sanja Huibner7, Maria Kulikova8, Nico Nagelkerke9, Bryan Coburn10, Craig R Cohen2, Rupert Kaul11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis might increase HIV risk by eliciting genital inflammation and epithelial barrier disruption, whereas vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus is associated with immune quiescence and HIV protection. We investigated the effect of a live biotherapeutic containing L crispatus CTV-05 (LACTIN-V) on genital immunology and key vaginal bacteria.
METHODS: This substudy included women aged 18-45 years who participated in the randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial of LACTIN-V to reduce bacterial vaginosis recurrence, conducted at four universities and hospitals in the USA. Women with negative results for sexually transmitted infection, pregnancy, and urinary tract infection were provided a 5-day course of vaginal metronidazole 0·75% gel. Those who met at least three of four clinical Amsel criteria for bacterial vaginosis and had a Nugent score of 4-10 from Gram staining were eligible. Participants in the LACTIN-V trial were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either LACTIN-V or placebo, applied vaginally once per day for 5 days during the first week and then twice per week for 10 more weeks. Follow-up visits occurred 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after enrolment. Soluble immune factors and the absolute abundance of bacterial taxa were assayed by mutliplex ELISA and quantitative PCR. The primary outcomes were vaginal levels of IL-1α and soluble E-cadherin at 24 weeks (ie, 13 weeks after treatment cessation).
FINDINGS: Between Feb 21, 2020 and March 18, 2021, we characterised genital immune parameters and the vaginal microbiota in a subset of 66 highly adherent participants who were randomly selected, with no exclusion criteria, from those who had attended all study follow-up visits (n=166) in the larger LACTIN-V clinical trial (n=288). 32 (48%) participants received LACTIN-V and 34 (52%) received placebo. LACTIN-V treatment was significantly associated with lower concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1α (β coefficient 0·310, SE 0·149; p=0·042) and soluble E-cadherin (0·429, 0·199; p=0·035), a biomarker of epithelial barrier disruption.
INTERPRETATION: Vaginal administration of LACTIN-V following standard bacterial vaginosis therapy resulted in a sustained reduction in genital inflammation and a biomarker of epithelial integrity. The potential of LACTIN-V to reduce HIV susceptibility merits further investigation. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35659905      PMCID: PMC9188188          DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00043-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Microbe        ISSN: 2666-5247


Introduction

Bacterial vaginosis has been linked to adverse reproductive health outcomes among women and to increased risk of HIV acquisition.[1,2] Bacterial vaginosis is characterised by diverse anaerobic bacteria[3,4] and might elevate HIV risk by eliciting genital inflammation, which not only recruits HIV-susceptible CD4+ T cells to mucosal tissues but also causes epithelial barrier disruption with the cleavage of E-cadherin, a key component of epithelial cell-to-cell junctions,[5,6] thereby increasing viral access to these target cells.[7-9] Although standard antibiotic therapy for bacterial vaginosis rapidly reduces vaginal prototypic inflammatory cytokine IL-1α,[10] treatment has been shown to increase vaginal concentrations of some chemoattractant immune factors linked to HIV risk, such as IFN-γ-induced protein (IP)-10,[9,11] and so the immununological benefits of treatment remain uncertain. In the absence of bacterial vaginosis, one of several species of Lactobacillus is typically predominant in the vaginal microbiome and has been linked to protection against HIV acquisition.[3,12] For example, Lactobacillus crispatus predominance in the female genital tract has been linked to protection against HIV acquisition,[7,13] most likely due to direct anti-inflammatory effects[6,14] or the competitive exclusion of proinflammatory bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria, or both.[15] The standard of care for clinical bacterial vaginosis treatment involves oral or topical antibiotics targeting bacterial vaginosis-associated anaerobes, but recurrence rates are high[16] and treatment does not always result in predominance of the protective L crispatus species.[11] Although studies have investigated Lactobacillus spp-based probiotics or live biotherapeutics as alternative treatment strategies for bacterial vaginosis, none have linked probiotic use to reduced genital inflammation, which might be because of the use of probiotics containing Lactobacillus species that are not commonly predominant in the female genital tract.[17-19] A phase 2 trial investigating the vaginal administration of a live biotherapeutic containing the L crispatus strain CTV-05 (LACTIN-V) following standard antibiotic treatment for bacterial vaginosis found that participants receiving LACTIN-V had lower rates of bacterial vaginosis recurrence than those receiving placebo, and these benefits were sustained for at least 3 months after treatment cessation.[20] We investigated whether LACTIN-V administration has a sustained effect on genital immunology, and the associations between immune alterations and vaginal microbiota.

Methods

Study design and participants

This substudy included women aged 18–45 years who participated in the randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial[20] of LACTIN-V to reduce bacterial vaginosis recurrence, conducted at four universities and hospitals in the USA. The trial evaluated the ability of LACTIN-V to prevent bacterial vaginosis recurrence following standard antibiotic treatment. At entry screening, the participants’ medical history was obtained, and physical and pelvic examinations were performed. Women with negative results for sexually transmitted infection (STI), pregnancy, and urinary tract infection (appendix p 1) were provided a 5-day course of vaginal metronidazole 0·75% gel. Within 48 h of completing treatment, participants returned to the clinic and those who met at least three of four clinical Amsel criteria for bacterial vaginosis and had a Nugent score of 4–10 from Gram staining (done at screening before antibiotic treatment) were eligible for the trial. The LACTIN-V trial (NCT02766023) obtained written consent from all participants before enrolment. Study protocols for the larger trial were approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) at University of California, San Francisco General Hospital (San Francisco, CA, USA; IRB 15-18143), Stroger Hospital of Cook County (Chicago, IL, USA), University of California San Diego Antiviral Research Center (San Diego, CA, USA; IRB: 160023X), and Washington University Infectious Disease Clinical Research Unit (St Louis, MO, USA). Immunology and microbiology performed at the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada) were reviewed and approved by the University of Toronto HIV Research Ethics Board (protocol #36947).

Procedures

Participants in the LACTIN-V trial were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either LACTIN-V or placebo, which were applied vaginally once per day for 5 days during the first week and then twice per week for 10 more weeks. Participants returned for follow-up visits at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after enrolment. Vaginal swabs were collected at all visits (appendix p 1). For the soluble immune factor measurement, cervico-vaginal fluid obtained from vaginal swabs was thawed and centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 30 min. Supernatant was removed for immune factor analysis and the bacterial pellet was left intact for quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses. The soluble immune factors IL-1α, IFN-α2A, IL-17A, IL-6, IFN-γ, IP-10, IL-8, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1β, MIP-3α, monokine induced by IFN-γ (MIG), soluble E-cadherin, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 were measured in duplicate with mutliplex ELISA on the Meso Scale Discovery platform (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA).[21] At the University of Toronto, DNA was extracted from 175 μL of bacterial pellet using the Qiagen DNEasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Targeted qPCR was used to estimate the absolute abundance of key bacterial species. At the University of California, San Francisco, DNA was extracted from 200 μL of vaginal sample using the EZ1 DNA Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and eluted into 50 μL volume. The absolute abundance of L crispatus and L crispatus CTV-05 were estimated with qPCR. Details on microbiome analyses are provided in the appendix (p 1).

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were the vaginal IL-1α and soluble E-cadherin concentrations at 24 weeks (ie, 13 weeks after treatment cessation). Exploratory outcomes included vaginal concentrations of soluble immune factors IP-10, IL-6, IL-8, MIP-1b, MIP-3a, MIG, and MMP-9, and the absolute abundance of key vaginal bacteria taxa including L crispatus, L crispatus strain CTV-05, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus gasseri, Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Megasphaera species, and Prevotella species.

Statistical analysis

After visual inspection of distribution, soluble immune factor concentrations and bacteria copy numbers were normalised using log10 transformation. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between treatment group as an independent variable and both the concentrations of soluble immune factors and abundance of key vaginal bacteria taxa at 24 weeks as dependent variables. Soluble immune factors that were less than the lower limit of detection in more than 50% of participants were dichotomised as detectable and undetectable. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between treatment group and the detectability of soluble immune factors at 24 weeks. For all regression models that predicted concentrations and the detectability of soluble immune factors or abundance of vaginal bacteria taxa, baseline measurements of the dependent variable were included in the model to control for interindividual variability. To evaluate potential mediating effects of bacterial taxa on the relationship between LACTIN-V and soluble immune factors, we followed the framework by Baron and Kenny[22] outlined in the appendix (p 1). Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare the change in soluble immune factors from baseline to 24 weeks between women with vaginal predominance of non-CTV-05 L crispatus and those with predominance of L crispatus CTV-05. All statistical tests were performed with SPSS (version 270.0.0) or GraphPad Prism (version 9.0.2).

Role of the funding source

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Results

Between Feb 21, 2020 and March 18, 2021, we characterised genital immune parameters and the vaginal microbiota in a subset of 66 highly adherent participants who were randomly selected, with no exclusion criteria, from those who had attended all study follow-up visits (n=166) in the larger LACTIN-V clinical trial (n=288);[20] 32 (48%) participants received LACTIN-V and 34 (52%) received placebo. Baseline samples were missing from three participants who received placebo; immune and microbiota analyses (except for L crispatus CTV-05 quantitation, which had been performed earlier) were not performed on these samples. Baseline participant characteristics and sexual behaviours, including recent sex and hormonal contraceptive use did not substantially differ between groups (table 1). All participants were women, with a median age of 33 years (IQR 27–38). As per eligibility criteria, none of the women tested positive for HIV, syphilis, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis at baseline. All participants reported the application of at least 75% of LACTIN-V doses, which was confirmed with trypan blue staining of applicators.[20]
Table 1:

Participant characteristics

LACTIN-V (n=32)Placebo (n=34)
Sociodemographic factors

Median age, years32 (27–36)34 (27–38)
Ethnicity
 Asian  3 (9%)  2 (6%)
 Black or African American14 (44%)15 (44%)
 Multiracial  0  2 (6%)
 White14 (44%)12 (35%)
 Unknown  1 (3%)  3 (9%)

Sexual behaviours, intravaginal practices, and contraception

Vaginal sex within 30 days of enrolment24 (75%)30 (88%)
Vaginal sex between the 24-week visit and the previous visit21 (66%)27 (79%)
Douching or intravaginal practices at any time12 (38%)  8 (24%)
Douching or intravaginal practices between the 24-week visit and the previous visit  3 (9%)  2 (6%)
Hormonal contraception use  8 (25%)10 (29%)

Data are median (IQR), n (range), or n (%). Data on age, race, and hormonal contraceptive use were collected at baseline, and all the other data were collected at baseline and the 24-week visit.

LACTIN-V treatment was significantly associated with lower concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1α (β coefficient 0·310, SE 0·149; p=0·042) and soluble E-cadherin (0·429, 0·199; p=0·035), a biomarker of epithelial barrier disruption (figure 1). Among the six additional immune factors that were included as exploratory endpoints, LACTIN-V was associated with elevated concentrations of IP-10 at 24 weeks (−0·380, 0·185; p=0·044; figure 1). IFN-α2a and IL-17A were undetectable in more than 50% of samples, so were dichotomised as detectable or undetectable. Detectability of IFN-α2a or IL-17A was not significantly associated with the treatment group (appendix p 6).
Figure 1:

Association between LACTIN-V treatment and vaginal soluble immune factors at 24 weeks

Data are β coefficient. Error bars are 95% CIs.

We hypothesised that an altered abundance of specific vaginal bacteria were causing the sustained differences between treatment groups in genital immune parameters. LACTIN-V treatment was associated with a sustained increase in the abundance of L crispatus (β −2·085, SE 0·649; p=0·0021) and L gasseri 13 weeks after treatment cessation (−0·803, 0·346; p=0·024; table 2). LACTIN-V treatment was also associated with a sustained reduction in the abundance of the bacterial vaginosis-associated genus Prevotella spp (1·033, 0·509; p=0·047) and borderline significance of reduced Megasphaera spp abundance (1·452, 0·731, p=0·052). L crispatus was more likely to be detected 13 weeks after product cessation among participants who received LACTIN-V (68·8% vs placebo 31·2%; p=0·0002) and the L crispatus strain CTV-05 was also present in those who received LACTIN-V (53·1% vs 2·9%; p<0·0001; appendix p 2). Among participants with previous LACTIN-V treatment and a high abundance of L crispatus (>1×106 copies per mL) at 24 weeks, the L crispatus strains present were predominantly non-CTV-05 in seven (41%) of 17 participants and predominantly CTV-05 in ten (59%; appendix p 4).
Table 2:

Association between the treatment group and absolute abundance of key bacterial taxa at 24 weeks

β coefficientSEp value
Lactobacillus crispatus * −2·0850·6490·0021
Lactobacillus iners   0·3830·4490·397
Lactobacillus gasseri * −0·8030·3460·024
Lactobacillus jensenii −0·8940·5570·11
Prevotella spp*  1·0330·5090·047
Gardnerella vaginalis   0·9960·5430·072
Megasphaera spp*  1·4520·7310·052
Atopobium vaginae   0·6330·7270·39

Baseline measurements of bacteria absolute abundance (defined as log10 transformed copy numbers) were included in each model to control for interindividual variation.

Represents discrete models.

LACTIN-V administration was associated with the concentrations of soluble immune factors and abundances of multiple bacterial taxa. To explore potential causal pathways underpinning these relationships, we assessed the mediating effects of key bacterial taxa on the relationship between LACTIN-V treatment and concentrations of IL-1α, soluble E-cadherin, and IP-10 at 24 weeks. Change in IL-1α was positively associated with change in the abundance of Prevotella spp (β 0·179, SE 0·039; p<0·0001) and Megasphaera spp (0·085, 0·026; p=0·0016; table 3). Change in soluble E-cadherin was negatively associated with change in L crispatus (−0·128, 0·036; p=0·0007) and positively associated with change in Prevotella spp (0·338, 0·038; p<0·0001) and Megasphaera spp (0·157, 0·029; p<0·0001). Change in IP-10 was positively associated with change in L crispatus (0·108, 0·035; p=0·0029) and negatively associated with change in Prevotella spp (−0·161, 0·050, p=0·0022) and Megasphaera spp (−0·135, 0·029; p<0·0001).
Table 3:

Associations between the change in soluble immune factors and absolute abundance of key vaginal bacteria from baseline to 24 weeks

Change in IL-1αp valueChange in soluble E-cadherinp valueChange in IP-10p value
Univariable models

Change in Lactobacillus crispatus*−0·050 (0·031)  0·11−0·128 (0·036)  0·0007  0·108 (0·035)  0·0029
Change in Lactobacillus gasseri−0·011 (0·059)  0·85−0·106 (0·074)0·16  0·129 (0·069)  0·067
Change in Prevotella spp*  0·179 (0·039)<0·0001  0·338 (0·038)<0·0001−0·161 (0·050)  0·0022
Change in Megasphaera spp  0·085 (0·026)  0·0016  0·157 (0·029)<0·0001−0·135 0·029<0·0001

Multivariable models

Change in Lactobacillus crispatus*−0·033 (0·032)  0·30−0·114 (0·038)  0·0037  0·096 (0·037)  0·011
LACTIN-V treatment group*  0·333 (0·204)  0·11  0·271 (0·243)  0·27−0·235 (0·237)  0·32
Change in Prevotella spp  0·167 (0·039)<0·0001  0·327 (0·038)<0·0001−0·148 (0·051)  0·0051
LACTIN-V treatment group  0·254 (0·175)  0·15  0·218 (0·169)  0·20−0·307 (0·226)  0·18
Change in Megasphaera spp*  0·075 (0·026)  0·0058  0·148 (0·030)<0·0001−0·128 (0·029)<0·0001
LACTIN-V treatment group*  0·264 (0·189)  0·17  0·235 (0·215)  0·28−0·204 (0·213)  0·34

Data are unstandardised β coefficients (SE). Change in log10 transformed copy number for all bacterial taxa and log10 transformed concentrations of soluble immune factors. Bacterial taxa only included if significantly associated with the treatment group and at least one of the soluble immune factors: IL-1α, E-cadherin, and IP-10.

Represents discrete models.

Next, we assessed whether genital immune changes associated with LACTIN-V were mediated through treatment-elicited alterations in vaginal bacteria. When change in IL-1α was the dependent variable, there was a significant association with change in Prevotella spp (β 0·167, SE 0·039; p<0·0001; table 3) and Megasphaera spp (0·075, 0·026, p=0·0058), but not with LACTIN-V treatment. Using change in soluble E-cadherin as the dependent variable, there were associations with change in L crispatus (−0·114, 0·038, p=0·0037), Prevotella spp (0·327, 0·038; p<0·0001), and Megasphaera spp (0·148, 0·030; p<0·0001), but not with LACTIN-V treatment. Similarly, change in IP-10 was not significantly associated with the treatment group, but was positively associated with change in L crispatus (0·096, 0·037; p=0·011) and negatively associated with change in Prevotella spp (−0·148, 0·051, p=0·0051) and Megasphaera spp (−0·128, 0·029; p<0·0001). Finally, we investigated whether there was a differential immune effect of post-treatment vaginal colonisation with the CTV-05 strain of L crispatus. Of 21 selected participants with high vaginal abundance of L crispatus at 24 weeks, 14 (67%) showed CTV-05 strain predominance and seven (33%) showed non-CTV-05 strain predominance. Although predominance by CTV-05 or non-CTV-05 strains of L crispatus was non-significantly associated with similar reductions in IL-1α and soluble E-cadherin (p=0·74 for both), increases in vaginal IP-10 concentrations were significantly greater among participants with predominance of non-CTV-05 strains compared with predominance of the CTV-05 strain after LACTIN-V treatment (p=0·010; figure 2).
Figure 2:

Change in soluble immune factors from baseline to 24 weeks

Horizonal line indicates median. For participants with high Lactobacillus crispatus abundance (>1 × 106 copies per mL), the change in vaginal IL-1α (A), soluble E-cadherin (B), and IP-10 (C) was compared between groups with sustained predominance by the L crispatus non-CTV-05 strain versus the LACTIN-V L crispatus CTV-05 strain.

Discussion

Vaginal application of the novel L crispatus-based live biotherapeutic LACTIN-V after bacterial vaginosis treatment with topical metronidazole reduces recurrence, with effects sustained for 3 months after the last dose of LACTIN-V.[20] In this study, we show that LACTIN-V treatment was associated with similarly sustained reductions in genital mucosal inflammation and a biomarker of epithelial barrier disruption. Echoing findings from a study examining the immune effect of standard bacterial vaginosis therapy,[11] secondary analysis showed an increase in vaginal concentrations of IP-10 (a chemoattractant chemokine linked to increased risk of HIV acquisition in women) after successful bacterial vaginosis treatment.[9,23] These sustained genital immune effects were primarily mediated by a reduced abundance of bacterial vaginosis-associated taxa, particularly Prevotella spp and Megasphaera spp, and to a lesser extent by an elevated abundance of L crispatus. Increases in vaginal IP-10 were specifically linked to abundance of non-CTV-05 L crispatus strains, rather than to the therapeutic CTV-05 strain. Rapid bacterial vaginosis recurrence following standard antibiotic treatment has generated substantial interest in alternative treatment strategies and antibiotic adjuncts.[16] Among these strategies is the use of non-crispatus Lactobacillus probiotics or live biotherapeutics, either alone or in combination with standard antibiotics. However, not all probiotics have been shown to reduce rates of bacterial vaginosis recurrence,[24] and the three studies that have evaluated genital immunology showed little or no effect of Lactobacillus probiotics,[17,18] or an increase in proinflammatory cytokines following probiotic use.[19] The present study is the first to show that application of an L crispatus-based live biotherapeutic after standard topical metronidazole therapy reduces concentrations of a proinflammatory genital cytokine and a marker of epithelial disruption. An important distinction between the present study and previous studies was the use of a live biotherapeutic comprised entirely of L crispatus, a species of Lactobacillus known to naturally predominate in the vagina,[3] which has been associated with genital immune benefits and HIV protection among women.[7,14,25] In a longitudinal cohort study,[7] vaginal predominance by L crispatus, but not L iners, was associated with reduced risk of HIV acquisition compared with a bacterial vaginosis-type microbiota. Whether the HIV-protective effects of L crispatus are due to direct anti-inflammatory effects, the exclusion of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria, or other mechanisms is unclear. Vaginal predominance by L crispatus is associated with reduced vaginal concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1α,[14] and our group has linked an increased L crispatus proportional abundance to reduced concentrations of genital proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines.[25] Women with L crispatus predominance also exhibit fewer transitions to a bacterial vaginosis-type microbiota than women with L iners predominance, suggesting that L crispatus can competitively exclude inflammatory bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria,[26] mediated partly by the production of lactic acid and antimicrobial metabolites.[27] In vitro models show that L crispatus is a key producer of lactic acid in the female genital tract,[27] which might directly dampen the production of proinflammatory cytokines.[28,29] Furthermore, addition of supernatant with L crispatus or L crispatus alone, or both, to epithelial cells decreased the production of proinflammatory cytokines relative to bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria,[6,14] and protected against epithelial barrier disruption in response to proinflammatory stimuli.[6] Reduced genital inflammation following LACTIN-V could be mediated by the exclusion of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria, although our study showed that L crispatus might have direct but minor effects on concentrations of soluble E-cadherin and IP-10. Observational studies have linked bacterial vaginosis with reduced vaginal concentrations of IP-10,[10,25] suggesting that either the absence of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria or presence of Lactobacillus spp might elicit IP-10.[10] Joag and colleagues[11] showed that successful antibiotic bacterial vaginosis treatment resulting in an L iners predominant vaginal microbiome increased vaginal concentrations of several chemokines at 1 month, including IP-10 and MIG. In this study, we provide evidence that the reduced concentrations of soluble E-cadherin and elevated concentrations of IP-10 observed among participants receiving LACTIN-V were mediated partly by an elevated abundance of non-CTV-05 L crispatus strains. This finding suggests that L crispatus CTV-05 (LACTIN-V) might reduce genital inflammation and enhance epithelial barrier integrity in the same way as non-CTV-05 L crispatus, without eliciting an elevation in proinflammatory chemokines. Importantly, CTV-05 was detected in one participant who received placebo, probably because the CTV-05 strain found in LACTIN-V is derived from a naturally occurring vaginal strain of L crispatus. There are several limitations of our study. First, STIs were routinely assessed at screening, but afterwards were only tested if women presented with symptoms. Therefore, we were unable to control for the presence of asymptomatic STIs during the study, which might affect genital immunology at follow-up visits. However, we would expect a low incidence of STIs because all participants were negative for STIs at trial screening, diagnostics were performed in the context of any genital symptoms, and the overall 6-month incidence of STIs is low in sexually active women in the USA.[30] Second, the stage of the menstrual cycle was not recorded at each visit, except for menstruation. Although no study visits occurred during menstruation, this limitation reduced our ability to control for fluctuations in sex hormones, a potential determinant of genital immunology. Third, targeted qPCR rather than 16S rRNA gene sequencing or metagenomic sequencing was used to show the association of cervicovaginal IP-10 concentrations with non-CTV-05 L crispatus strains, limiting our ability to evaluate the vaginal microbiota and identify contributions by other microbes. Fourth, the study population consisted only of US American women, albeit a heterogeneous cohort in terms of ethnicity. Finally, the immunology analyses involved a subset of participants who had attended all trial visits in a larger clinical trial, which had strict eligibility criteria.[20] Therefore, although we believe that these results reflect a causal relationship between LACTIN-V and genital immunology, they should be viewed as hypothesis generating. To ensure generalisability and definitively show causation, future studies are needed. Strong links between the vaginal microbiota and HIV risk suggest that promoting vaginal predominance by L crispatus might reduce HIV risk. Treatment with LACTIN-V following standard antibiotics has been shown to reduce bacterial vaginosis recurrence compared with placebo, even at 3 months after the last dose.[20] In this study, we show that LACTIN-V treatment was also associated with sustained reductions in biomarkers of genital inflammation and epithelial barrier damage, through the promotion of increased L crispatus abundance and decreased abundance of Prevotella species and Megasphaera species. Additionally, LACTIN-V was associated with elevated concentrations of the proinflammatory chemokine IP-10, although this finding appeared to be driven by non-CTV-05 L crispatus rather than L crispatus CTV-05. Future work is needed to determine whether LACTIN-V administration following standard antibiotics can reduce HIV acquisition among women at high risk.
  29 in total

1.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Jacques Ravel; Pawel Gajer; Zaid Abdo; G Maria Schneider; Sara S K Koenig; Stacey L McCulle; Shara Karlebach; Reshma Gorle; Jennifer Russell; Carol O Tacket; Rebecca M Brotman; Catherine C Davis; Kevin Ault; Ligia Peralta; Larry J Forney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inflammation promotes a cytokine response and disrupts the cervical epithelial barrier: a possible mechanism of premature cervical remodeling and preterm birth.

Authors:  Christopher Nold; Lauren Anton; Amy Brown; Michal Elovitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Vaginal lactic acid elicits an anti-inflammatory response from human cervicovaginal epithelial cells and inhibits production of pro-inflammatory mediators associated with HIV acquisition.

Authors:  A C Hearps; D Tyssen; D Srbinovski; L Bayigga; D J D Diaz; M Aldunate; R A Cone; R Gugasyan; D J Anderson; G Tachedjian
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 7.313

4.  Genital inflammation and the risk of HIV acquisition in women.

Authors:  Lindi Masson; Jo-Ann S Passmore; Lenine J Liebenberg; Lise Werner; Cheryl Baxter; Kelly B Arnold; Carolyn Williamson; Francesca Little; Leila E Mansoor; Vivek Naranbhai; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Katharina Ronacher; Gerhard Walzl; Nigel J Garrett; Brent L Williams; Mara Couto-Rodriguez; Mady Hornig; W Ian Lipkin; Anneke Grobler; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the female reproductive tract are associated with altered expression of proteases, mucosal barrier proteins, and an influx of HIV-susceptible target cells.

Authors:  Kelly B Arnold; Adam Burgener; Kenzie Birse; Laura Romas; Laura J Dunphy; Kamnoosh Shahabi; Max Abou; Garrett R Westmacott; Stuart McCorrister; Jessie Kwatampora; Billy Nyanga; Joshua Kimani; Lindi Masson; Lenine J Liebenberg; Salim S Abdool Karim; Jo-Ann S Passmore; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Rupert Kaul; Lyle R McKinnon
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 7.313

6.  Evaluation of the association between the concentrations of key vaginal bacteria and the increased risk of HIV acquisition in African women from five cohorts: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  R Scott McClelland; Jairam R Lingappa; Sujatha Srinivasan; John Kinuthia; Grace C John-Stewart; Walter Jaoko; Barbra A Richardson; Krista Yuhas; Tina L Fiedler; Kishorchandra N Mandaliya; Matthew M Munch; Nelly R Mugo; Craig R Cohen; Jared M Baeten; Connie Celum; Julie Overbaugh; David N Fredricks
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  The impact of cervical cytobrush sampling on cervico-vaginal immune parameters and microbiota relevant to HIV susceptibility.

Authors:  A Mohammadi; S Bagherichimeh; M C Perry; A Fazel; E Tevlin; S Huibner; W Tharao; B Coburn; R Kaul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Distinct Immune Responses Elicited From Cervicovaginal Epithelial Cells by Lactic Acid and Short Chain Fatty Acids Associated With Optimal and Non-optimal Vaginal Microbiota.

Authors:  David J Delgado-Diaz; David Tyssen; Joshua A Hayward; Raffi Gugasyan; Anna C Hearps; Gilda Tachedjian
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  Probiotics for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ziyue Wang; Yining He; Yingjie Zheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Testing the regulatory framework in South Africa - a single-blind randomized pilot trial of commercial probiotic supplementation to standard therapy in women with bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Anna-Ursula Happel; Ravesh Singh; Nireshni Mitchev; Koleka Mlisana; Heather B Jaspan; Shaun L Barnabas; Jo-Ann S Passmore
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rongdan Chen; Rong Li; Wei Qing; Yingxuan Zhang; Zuyi Zhou; Yi Hou; Yiya Shi; Hongwei Zhou; Muxuan Chen
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.