Bacteria readily form resilient phenotypes to counter environmental and antibiotic stresses. Here, we demonstrate a class of small molecules that inhibit a wide range of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenotypes and enable antibiotics to kill previously tolerant bacteria, preventing the transition of tolerant bacteria into a persistent population. We identified two proteins, type IV pili and lectin LecA, as receptors for our molecules by methods including a new label-free assay based on bacterial motility sensing the chemicals in the environment, the chemical inhibition of bacteriophage adsorption on pili appendages of bacteria, and fluorescence polarization. Structure-activity relationship studies reveal a molecule that inhibits only pili appendage and a class of chimeric ligands that inhibit both LecA and pili. Important structural elements of the ligand are identified for each protein. This selective ligand binding identifies the phenotypes each protein receptor controls. Inhibiting LecA results in reducing biofilm formation, eliminating small colony variants, and is correlated with killing previously tolerant bacteria. Inhibiting pili appendages impedes swarming and twitching motilities and pyocyanin and elastase production. Because these phenotypes are controlled by a broad range of signaling pathways, this approach simultaneously controls the multiple signaling mechanisms preventing bacteria to elude antibiotic treatments.
Bacteria readily form resilient phenotypes to counter environmental and antibiotic stresses. Here, we demonstrate a class of small molecules that inhibit a wide range of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenotypes and enable antibiotics to kill previously tolerant bacteria, preventing the transition of tolerant bacteria into a persistent population. We identified two proteins, type IV pili and lectin LecA, as receptors for our molecules by methods including a new label-free assay based on bacterial motility sensing the chemicals in the environment, the chemical inhibition of bacteriophage adsorption on pili appendages of bacteria, and fluorescence polarization. Structure-activity relationship studies reveal a molecule that inhibits only pili appendage and a class of chimeric ligands that inhibit both LecA and pili. Important structural elements of the ligand are identified for each protein. This selective ligand binding identifies the phenotypes each protein receptor controls. Inhibiting LecA results in reducing biofilm formation, eliminating small colony variants, and is correlated with killing previously tolerant bacteria. Inhibiting pili appendages impedes swarming and twitching motilities and pyocyanin and elastase production. Because these phenotypes are controlled by a broad range of signaling pathways, this approach simultaneously controls the multiple signaling mechanisms preventing bacteria to elude antibiotic treatments.
Entities:
Keywords:
LecA; P. aeruginosa; elastase production; pili; pyocyanin
Bacteria
exhibit adaptive responses
to a wide range of stresses from environmental cues, including antibiotic
treatments. These responses result in the development of many resilient
phenotypes,[1−19] including augmented biofilm formation,[3−5] enhanced motilities,[8,9] surface attachment,[12−14] chemical-induced virulence,[7,15,20] and small colony variant (SCV) emergence.[16−18] These diverse phenotypes are often controlled by or correlated with
both high and low levels of the global small-molecule messenger, bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic
dimeric guanosine monophosphate (cdG).[21−24] For both in vitro and in vivo
conditions, antibiotic treatments or host immune defense can trigger
the increase in cdG levels in bacteria, leading to phenotypes that
exhibit high drug tolerance and persistence, including biofilms,[3,19] SCVs,[16−18] and overexpression of extracellular polymeric substance
(EPS).[25]Recent studies revealed
that low cdG phenotypes can also be highly
virulent.[11,15,24] Swarming bacteria,
a low cdG phenotype, requires rhamnolipids[26−28] and exhibit
antibiotic resistance.[9,10] Dispersing bacteria from biofilms
by nitric oxide donor[15] switches bacteria
to low cdG phenotypes and causes increased production of virulence
factors, including induction of type II and type III secretion systems,
which has been shown to kill even macrophages.[15] Surprisingly, under different conditions, the same antibiotic,
tobramycin, can promote Pseudomonas aeruginosa to form either high or low cdG phenotypes to counter stresses. Sublethal
doses of tobramycin promote the high cdG phenotypes, including increased
biofilms and increased exopolymer production,[3] and cause the formation of SCVs in vivo.[18] In contrast, on a hydrated agar surface, tobramycin promotes the
swarming motility of P. aeruginosa.[8] These findings indicate that while the two types
of protein domains, diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases, that
regulate the synthesis and hydrolysis of cdG are well established,[21,23] their response to external stresses is still unpredictably complex.
More importantly, these findings suggest that inhibiting high cdG
phenotypes alone, such as biofilm formation, would not be sufficient
to control drug tolerance and persistence as bacteria can readily
transition between high and low cdG phenotypes.In previous
studies, we showed a class of disugar-derivatized hydrocarbons
that inhibit both the biofilm formation and the swarming motility
of P. aeruginosa bacteria.[29,30] These dual inhibitors are intriguing as biofilm formation and swarming
motility are controlled by opposite signaling pathways mediated by
high and low cdG levels, respectively.[22] Because bacteria can readily transition between both high and low
cdG phenotypes, both of which can be virulent, this class of molecules
provide opportunities to control all signaling that leads to drug
tolerance, persistence, and resistance and also block bacterial signaling
that escapes drug treatments by transitioning between phenotypes.In this work, we demonstrate a specific class of molecules that
inhibit a wide range of phenotypes that are associated with both high
and low cdG levels. These phenotypes include the formation of biofilms,
SCVs, pellicles, swarming and twitching motilities, and the production
of virulence factors, including pyocyanin and elastase. Antibiotics
such as tobramycin promote these phenotypes,[3,17,20] which dwell in chronic and acute infections.[3] We also demonstrate that this class of molecules,
when combined with tobramycin, enable the killing of tolerant bacteria
and prevent the formation of nascent persistent bacteria in biofilms.To elucidate the mechanism behind this simultaneous control of
a wide range of phenotypes associated with opposite signaling pathways
(low and high cdG levels), we identify pili appendages and LecA as
two protein receptors targeted by the same small molecule (Figure ). We confirmed the
binding of a small molecule to pili by multiple methods, including
a novel bacterial motility-enabled binding assay, which is modified
from the swarming experiment without any chemical labeling, and the
small-molecule inhibition of pili-specific bacteriophage adsorption
of P. aeruginosa. The LecA binding
was characterized by the fluorescence polarization method and by the
bacterial motility-enabled binding assay without chemical modification.
Structure–activity studies identified the different structural
elements of the small-molecule ligands that are important for each
pilin and LecA protein, making this class of molecules a structural
chimera. The selective ligand–receptor bindings of two proteins
reveal the mapping between the proteins and the phenotypes they control.
Figure 1
Venn diagram
of chimeric ligand molecule structures for type IV
pili and lectin LecA proteins and ligand molecules for only pilin
and only LecA.
Venn diagram
of chimeric ligand molecule structures for type IV
pili and lectin LecA proteins and ligand molecules for only pilin
and only LecA.
Results and Discussion
Our previous
studies reveal that the two most active molecules
among these dual synthetic inhibitors are saturated farnesol-β-cellobioside
and saturated farnesol-β-maltoside (SFβC and SFβM, Figure ).[29] Early structural studies indicate that methyl substitution
in aliphatic chains is important; the linear C12-aliphatic chain does
not exhibit strong bioactivity, whereas the 3,7,11-trimethyl-substituted
aliphatic chain does.[29,30] Searching for more potent molecules
through the synthesis of structural variants, we explored new methyl
positions on the C12-alphatic chain, resulting in new molecules: 3,5-diMeDβM, 1a, and 3,5-diMeDβC, 1b (Figures and S16–S30).
Figure 2
Synthetic scheme for 3,5-diMeDβM (1a) and 3,5-diMeDβC
(1b).
Synthetic scheme for 3,5-diMeDβM (1a) and 3,5-diMeDβC
(1b).We synthesized the alcohol
precursor 3,5-dimethyldodecanol by alkylation
of cyclic ketone (3,5-dimethylcyclohexanone), followed by Baeyer–Villiger
oxidation. Ring opening was followed by mesylation and one-step ester
reduction ester and alcohol mesylation to generate the desired branched
alcohol. Glycosylation with protected maltoside and cellobioside followed
by basic deprotection generated the final products of 3,5-dimethyl-dodecyl
maltoside 3,5-diMeDβM, 1a, and 3,5-dimethyl dodecyl
cellobioside 3,5-diMeDβC, 1b (Figure ).We found that these
disugars tethered with the 3,5-dimethyl-substituted
dodecyl group exhibited stronger biofilm inhibition activities against P. aeruginosa with IC50 values of 29 and
36 μM, respectively, whereas SFβM/βC, 2a and 2b, from previous studies showed IC50 values of 73 and 52 μM, respectively (Table S1). Here, we explore the ability of these molecules
to control a wide range of bacterial activities induced by sub-MIC
of the antibiotic tobramycin.
Reversing Phenotypes of P.
aeruginosa Induced by Tobramycin
In general,
use of antibiotics can
promote biofilm formation,[3,5] along with many other
resilient phenotypes.[8,17] A subinhibitory concentration
of tobramycin causes a 2-fold increase in biofilm mass formed by wild-type P. aeruginosa (wt PAO1) on abiotic
surfaces[3] and induces the formation of
SCVs in cystic fibrosis patients.[17−19] It also increases the
production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)[31] that also give rise to a rugose/wrinkled colony
morphotype when stained with a red dye. More interestingly, tobramycin
can also promote the swarming motility of bacteria on hydrated gels.[8] This particular phenotype development caused
by the same antibiotic is intriguing because swarming motility and
biofilm formation are inversely regulated by the high and low levels
of small-molecule messengers, respectively, in P. aeruginosa.(22,23)These antibiotic-induced phenotypes all exhibit
a high level of tolerance and over time resistance to the antibiotics.
While vast research has been carried out for controlling biofilms,[7,20] it remains unclear whether all these antibiotic-induced phenotypes
can be inhibited by a common set of molecules. Here, we found that
the small molecules 3,5-diMeDβM and 3,5-diMeDβC, 1a and 1b, inhibit all these phenotypes under
tobramycin stress. The molecules, 1a and 1b, not only inhibited biofilm formation (Table S1) but also reduced 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilm mass by 80% by
a crystal violet (CV) staining assay. We validated the inhibition
of biofilms using P. aeruginosa (PAO1)
constituently expressing green fluorescent proteins (Figure S1), with a reduction of biofilm mass by ∼55%
(from 27.5 μm3/μm2 to ∼12.3
μm3/μm2). This assay demonstrated
that 0.3-Tob caused a 40% increase in biofilm mass (from 27.5 to 38.6
μm3/μm2) on polystyrene surfaces,
and when combined with 1a or 1b (85 μM),
it reduced the biofilm mass by 50% (Figure A).
Figure 3
(A) Fluorescent images of unstressed (0-Tob)
and 0.3 μg/mL
tobramycin (0.3-Tob)-stressed biofilms (24 h) of GFP-tagged PAO1 grown
in M63 medium on a polystyrene surface with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B)
Images of wt PAO1 colonies (37 °C, 3 days) on
Columbia blood agar plates. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) Colony morphology
of wt PAO1 inoculated on 1% agar plates containing
Congo red and Coomassie brilliant blue dyes. The colonies were grown
for 3 days at 37 °C. Scale bar = 1 cm. (D). Images of swarming
patterns of 3 μL of wt PAO1 inoculated for
24 h on soft gels (0.5% agar in LB). The agar plates for SCV, colony
morphology, and swarming motility contain 0-Tob and 0.3-Tob, with
and without 85 μM 1a or 1b.
(A) Fluorescent images of unstressed (0-Tob)
and 0.3 μg/mL
tobramycin (0.3-Tob)-stressed biofilms (24 h) of GFP-tagged PAO1 grown
in M63 medium on a polystyrene surface with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B)
Images of wt PAO1 colonies (37 °C, 3 days) on
Columbia blood agar plates. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) Colony morphology
of wt PAO1 inoculated on 1% agar plates containing
Congo red and Coomassie brilliant blue dyes. The colonies were grown
for 3 days at 37 °C. Scale bar = 1 cm. (D). Images of swarming
patterns of 3 μL of wt PAO1 inoculated for
24 h on soft gels (0.5% agar in LB). The agar plates for SCV, colony
morphology, and swarming motility contain 0-Tob and 0.3-Tob, with
and without 85 μM 1a or 1b.We discovered that subinhibitory amounts of tobramycin
also caused
SCV formation in vitro (Figure B). When wt PAO1 were cultured with 0.3-Tob
for 6 h, followed by growth on Columbia agar gel containing 0.3-Tob
for 24 h, 13-fold of SCVs (1 mm in diameter, 4.2 × 107 CFU/mL) was observed, compared with wild-type colonies (1 cm in
diameter, 3.2 × 106 CFU/mL). Under the same condition,
combining 85 μM 1a or 1b with 0.3-Tob
prevented the formation of SCVs entirely (Figure B).To examine the effect of 1a and 1b on
EPS promoted by tobramycin, the wt PAO1 culture (OD600 = 0.6) was inoculated on Congo red-containing hard agar
plates supplemented with 0.3-Tob for 3 days.[25] We found that 0.3-Tob caused rugose/wrinkled colony morphotype (diameter,
2 cm) development as revealed by Congo red binding to the exopolysaccharides.
In contrast, including 85 μM 1a or 1b with 0.3-Tob resulted in a large colony morphotype similar to a
normal wild-type morphotype in size (diameter, 3 cm) and smooth texture
(Figure C). For pellicle
formation,[31] which represents the PEL polysaccharide
among the three types of exopolysaccharides, the 0.3-Tob stress increased
pellicle formation by 60% at air–liquid interfaces after 3
days without shaking, whereas including 1a or 1b (85 μM) completely prevented the ability of 0.3-Tob to promote
pellicle formation (Figure S2).At
subinhibitory concentrations, 0.3-Tob in soft gel (0.5 wt %
of agar) caused the bacterial swarm area to increase from 24 to 30
cm2 (about 25%). When the gel was supplemented with 85
μM 1a or 1b, the swarming motility
was inhibited entirely in the presence of 0.3-Tob (Figure D). Together, these results
showed that 1a and 1b inhibit both high
and low cdG phenotypes that are promoted by tobramycin.
Inhibition
of Tobramycin-Induced Persistent Populations in Biofilms
High doses of antibiotics are often used to kill bacteria in biofilms,
which inevitably lead to antibiotic tolerance and persistence.[1,5] We first studied the effect of 1a and 1b on persistent and tolerant bacteria in unstressed and 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms. We used a reported method to isolate persistent population.[32] All biofilms were transferred and sonicated
for 15 min in saline to release the bacteria from the biofilms. The
saline solution was then treated with 20 μg/mL tobramycin to
isolate the persistent population, which was then counted on agar
plates without antibiotics. This procedure kills the viable biofilm
bacteria, including the tolerant population, resulting in the isolation
of the persistent bacteria developed during the drug/agent treatment
of biofilm, which revitalize in the absence of antibiotics.[32] We found that there were about 10 times more
persistent bacteria in 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms (1.2 × 105 CFU/mL) than in unstressed biofilms (1.7 × 104 CFU/mL) (Figure A).
Figure 4
Persistent bacterial count in (A) unstressed (0-Tob) and 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms (24-h) without 50-Tob treatment. Error bars indicate the
standard deviations of means of triplicates. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.001 vs 0-Tob biofilms.
(B) Unstressed and stressed PAO1 biofilms (24 h) that were further
treated with an additional 50-Tob in LB, with and without 1a and 1b for another 24 h. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs 0-Tob biofilms.
The types of biofilms are shown above the bars, and 50-Tob treatments
with and without agents are indicated below. (C) Confocal fluorescent
images of unstressed and stressed biofilms of GFP-tagged PAO1 (24
h), further treated with 50-Tob, and with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b for another 24 h. The biofilms
were stained with propidium iodide dye to show living (green) and
dead (yellow/red) bacteria. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Persistent bacterial count in (A) unstressed (0-Tob) and 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms (24-h) without 50-Tob treatment. Error bars indicate the
standard deviations of means of triplicates. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.001 vs 0-Tob biofilms.
(B) Unstressed and stressed PAO1 biofilms (24 h) that were further
treated with an additional 50-Tob in LB, with and without 1a and 1b for another 24 h. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs 0-Tob biofilms.
The types of biofilms are shown above the bars, and 50-Tob treatments
with and without agents are indicated below. (C) Confocal fluorescent
images of unstressed and stressed biofilms of GFP-tagged PAO1 (24
h), further treated with 50-Tob, and with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b for another 24 h. The biofilms
were stained with propidium iodide dye to show living (green) and
dead (yellow/red) bacteria. Scale bar = 20 μm.To evaluate the effect of high-dose tobramycin on increasing
persistent
bacteria in a biofilm, 50 μg/mL tobramycin (50-Tob) was applied
to bacteria in the already formed biofilms.[32,33] When unstressed and 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms were treated with
50-Tob for another 24 h, about 100 times more persistent bacteria
were observed in 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms (∼5.8 × 106 CFU/mL) than in unstressed biofilms (∼5.9 × 104 CFU/mL) (Figure B). These results indicate that high doses of tobramycin caused
certain precursor bacteria in biofilms to transition to persistent
populations. Without 50-Tob treatment, unstressed biofilms increased
the persistent population by approximately 3 times, but 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms increased about 48 times. These results show that stressing
biofilms with sub-MIC tobramycin (0.3-Tob) caused a considerable amount
of precursor bacteria to form, which can readily transition to persistent
populations.To evaluate the effect of our agents on the persistent
population,
the molecule 1a or 1b (85 μM) was
added with 50-Tob. In the presence of either 1a or 1b, 50-Tob did not cause an increase of persistent population
seen without the agent (Figure B), suggesting that 1a and 1b prevented
the development of a nascent persistent population caused by applying
a high dose of tobramycin on biofilms.To further validate the
above results, we grew unstressed and 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms of GFP-tagged PAO1on polystyrene chips (∼1 cm2) and treated the preformed biofilms with 50-Tob for another
24 h and monitored the development of live and dead subpopulations
by green and red fluorescence, respectively, by confocal image acquisition.
We found that treatment of 50-Tob caused about 8 times more dead bacteria
in unstressed biofilms than 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms. When 1a or 1b (85 μM) was added with 50-Tob,
there was a substantial decrease in live bacteria and about 10 times
increase in dead bacteria in 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms (Figure C).
Killing Tobramycin-Tolerant
Bacteria and Preventing Nascent
Persistent Bacteria in Biofilms
The kill rate of bacteria
revealed the population’s drug tolerance and persistence. We
believe the nascent persistent population transitioned from drug-tolerant
bacteria.[6,19,34] To explore
this transition and to examine the source of the nascent persistent
bacteria in 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms due to 50-Tob treatment, we
performed a time-kill study over 24 h and used the minimum duration
for killing 99.9% (MDK99.9) of total bacterial population
as a measure of bacterial tolerance.[19,34] Treating the
24 h old biofilms with 50-Tob over another 24 h showed a rapid decrease
of viable bacteria for the first 18 h, which plateaued for the remaining
6 h (Figure ). This
biphasic killing curve is consistent with a mixture of susceptible,
tolerant, and persistent population. We found MDK99.9 for
unstressed biofilms to be about 12 h and about 18 h for 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms (Figure ).
This result indicated that there was a higher population of tolerant
bacteria in 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms than in unstressed biofilms,
and the high-dose (50-Tob) treatment converts these tolerant bacteria
into persistent populations in biofilms.
Figure 5
Percentage of bacterial
survival (CFU during 50-Tob treatment/initial
CFU) of 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms and unstressed biofilms of wt PAO1 (24 h) further treated with 50 μg/mL tobramycin,
with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b, for
different time intervals at 37 °C. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of triplicates.
Percentage of bacterial
survival (CFU during 50-Tob treatment/initial
CFU) of 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms and unstressed biofilms of wt PAO1 (24 h) further treated with 50 μg/mL tobramycin,
with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b, for
different time intervals at 37 °C. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of triplicates.Combining 50-Tob with 85 μM 1a or 1b reduced the MDK99.9 value from ∼18 to ∼12
h (Figure ). This
kill rate is similar to that of unstressed biofilms and suggests that
the molecules enabled 50-Tob to kill the pre-existent tolerant bacteria
in the 0.3-Tob-stressed biofilms. Between 18 and 24 h, the number
of viable bacteria started to plateau for all biofilms. For 0.3-Tob-stressed
biofilms, the presence of 1a or 1b reduced
the bacterial count to ∼3.9 × 105 CFU/mL from
∼5.8 × 106 CFU/mL, further confirming that
our molecules prevented the formation of nascent persistent bacteria.
Overall, when added to a regiment of high-dose tobramycin, these molecules
caused a 100-fold reduction of persistent bacteria in tobramycin-stressed
biofilms.To understand the mode of action, we first confirmed
that these
molecules do not affect the planktonic growth of wt PAO1 (Figure S3), nor are they used as
a carbon source by wt PAO1 (Figure S4). Because of 1a and 1b′s
amphiphilic characteristic, we measured their critical aggregation
concentrations by a Nile red assay. We found that 1a self-aggregates
at 134 and 140 μM, respectively, in water (Figure S5). All bioactivities against wt PAO1
and their mutants are observed at concentrations lower than these
aggregation concentrations. Below these aggregation concentrations,
we also confirmed that the molecules do not cause hemolysis of human
red blood cells (Figure S6). Together with
our past study showing that small structural changes have a large
impact on inhibition of biofilm formation and swarming motility,[29] these results are consistent with specific binding
of our molecules’ protein receptors, resulting in controlling
both high and low cdG phenotypes.
Identification of Protein
Receptors That Control Opposite Signaling
Pathways
To identify potential proteins that are the receptors
to our molecule, we consider type IV pili and lectin A protein on
bacteria. We believe that inhibition of these receptors controls the
opposite cdG signaling, leading to different phenotypes. From a structural
point of view, both proteins bind sugar moieties,[35,36] and hydrophobic moieties are reported to be important pili,[35] and hydrophobic spacers between multivalent
sugar molecules are vital for LecA inhibition.[36] In addition, type IV pili are necessary for swarming and
twitching motility;[26,37,38] and our molecules inhibit both motilities.For signaling, P. aeruginosa utilize type IV pili proteins that
transduce environmental cues to signaling events leading to different
phenotypes[12−14,38−42] and facilitate horizontal gene transfer.[43] In contrast, for biofilm formation, pili appendages initiate surface
attachment that eventually triggers the transition into high cdG phenotypes,
which lead to antibiotic tolerance.[12,41] Interestingly,
before colonization and biofilm formation, pili-mediated surface sensing
increases the quorum sensing that promotes pyocyanin production and
induces the type II secretion system.[13] These virulent phenotypes are the same low cdG phenotype caused
by dispersing bacteria from the biofilms.[15] The SCVs of P. aeruginosa, which
exhibit high cdG levels, are also hyperpiliated.[18] Thus, pili appear to mediate transitions between low and
high cdG levels and are important for virulence production at both
ends of signaling. Inadvertently, type IV pili of P.
aeruginosa have been shown to assemble over a wide
range of cdG levels.[39,44]Another adhesin LecA, crucial
for biofilm formation,[36,45−48] is positively correlated with
the amount of formed biofilms.[46] The mutant
that overproduces LecA forms more
biofilms, whereas the mutant of lacking LecA has a low level of cdG
and forms a weak/loose biofilm.[46] Thus,
LecA mainly correlates high cdG phenotypes and has been considered
as a therapeutic target.[47] Chemical inhibition
of LecA has led to inhibition of biofilm formation.[36,47]
Direct Ligand–Pilin Interaction Reported by Bacterial
Motility-Enabled Binding Assay
As pili are necessary for
swarming and twitching[13,26,41] and bind to different carbohydrate moieties;[35] we propose that 3,5-diMeDβM/βC, 1a and 1b, bind to and inhibit pili appendages. We performed
four different experiments to test this hypothesis. First, we found
that 1a and 1b inhibited not only pili-mediated
swarming (Figures D and S7) but also pili-mediated twitching
motility (Figure S8) and had no effect
on swimming motility. These results are consistent with the molecule
binding to pili and inhibiting its function.Second, because
there are no strong synthetic inhibitors reported for type IV pili,
and no well-established binding assays for ligand binding to pili,
we created a new binding assay based on modifying the swarming motility
experiment that studied the direct binding interactions between pilin
proteins and proposed ligand candidates.[49] We spread a solution of pilin protein on the swarming gel surface
and examined if the ligand candidate in the gel will be sequestered
by the added protein, depleting the ligands availability on the gel
surface. The experimental scheme is that, as pili appendages on bacteria
detect the lack of ligand molecules on the gel surfaces, the swarming
motility changes. We demonstrated that spreading the pilin proteins
that are expressed and purified from a clinical P.
aeruginosa strain (Figure S9),[50] PA1244N3-pPAC46 (100 μL of
1 mg/mL, ∼616 nmol), on the gel surface (0.5% soft agar, 10
cm in diameter), inhibited the swarming motility of wt PAO1 (Figure A).
This result is consistent with the hypothesis that the externally
introduced pilin proteins on gel surfaces sequester the signaling
molecule, likely rhamnolipids secreted by the bacteria,[26,28] making them unavailable to the pili appendages on the bacterial
surface and abolished the bacteria's swarming motility. To test
if
the expressed pilin proteins bind and sequester our molecules, we
spread the pilin protein on swarming gels prepared with different
concentrations of 1a (0–30 μM) and examined
the swarming motility of wt PAO1 (Figures B and S10). We observed that, while pilin alone or just 1a inhibited the swarming motility, having both pilin on the gel surface
and the molecule in gel caused the reactivation of swarming motility
of PAO1 over a small range of concentration of 1a. With
626 nmol of pilin protein (100 μL of 1 mg/mL) spread on a gel
surface (10 cm in diameter), PAO1 started to swarm when the concentration
of 1a was increased to 12 μM in gel. The swarming
motility reached a maximum (as measured by the area of the swarming
pattern) around 15 μM 1a and decreased as the concentration
was increased further (Figure C). This reversal of swarming motility as a function of concentration
of the molecule is consistent with spread pilin proteins binding and
sequestering 1a from the gel surface. As the concentration
of 1a increases in the gel, binding with pilin proteins
abolishes each other’s ability to inhibit the pili appendages
on bacteria and thus permitting the swarming motility. When the concentration
of 1a was increased beyond the binding capacity of added
pilin proteins, the excess ligand molecules inhibit pili appendages
on the bacteria, resulting in reducing the swarming motility again.
The peak of around 15 μM 1a represents the optimal
inhibitory concentration against 7.8 nmol/cm2 pilin on
gel. The control protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) has no effect
on wt PAO1 swarming.
Figure 6
Images of swarming patterns of wt PAO1
(18 h) on the soft gel (0.5%
agar in LB) (A) with and without spreading 100 μL of 1 mg/mL
pilin or BSA on the gel surface and (B) with the gel containing 15,
20, and 30 μM 1a and having 100 μL of 1 mg/mL
pilin spread on the gel surface. (C) Plot of swarming area of wt PAO1 vs concentration of 1a in the gel,
with pilin spread on the surface. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of means of duplicates.
Images of swarming patterns of wt PAO1
(18 h) on the soft gel (0.5%
agar in LB) (A) with and without spreading 100 μL of 1 mg/mL
pilin or BSA on the gel surface and (B) with the gel containing 15,
20, and 30 μM 1a and having 100 μL of 1 mg/mL
pilin spread on the gel surface. (C) Plot of swarming area of wt PAO1 vs concentration of 1a in the gel,
with pilin spread on the surface. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of means of duplicates.Third, to directly evaluate the effect of this molecule on the
pili appendages of PAO1 surfaces, we examined the proteins sheared
from the bacterial surfaces (wt PAO1) on agar gel
(1.5% agar for growing bacteria),[51] prepared
with 85 μM 1a. The amount of pilin and other proteins
are characterized by using SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS–PAGE) with the same protein mass loaded (see the Methods
for details). Without the presence of molecules in the hard agar,
we observed a band with molecular weight around 16 kD, which is the
same as that of the expressed pilin protein from PA1244N3-pPAC46 (Figure S11). For agar gel containing 85 μM 1a, only a faint band of 16kD was observed, whereas other
proteins showed intense bands (Figure S11). This result indicated that the presence of 1a reduced
the amount of pili on bacterial surfaces.As pili can retract
in response to chemotaxis,[12,13] we examined the effect
of our molecules on a nonretracting transposon
mutant of pilin assembly protein, pilT(pilT::Tn).[52] We observed that the pilin bands were equally
intense for bacteria grown with and without 1a on agar
surfaces (Figure S11). Because our molecules
showed no effect on nonretracting pili, we believe that 1a binding to pili likely caused pilT-mediated retraction.
Chemical Inhibition
of Phage Adsorption on Type IV Pili
Last, pili appendages
are the key receptor proteins for direct binding
and adsorption of bacteriophages, which facilitate the injection of
DNA into bacteria. The lytic bacteriophage ϕKMV targets specifically
the type IV pili of P. aeruginosa for
adsorption on pili and subsequent lysis of bacteria.[46,47] The nonpiliated strain ΔpilA[53] or the retraction mutant pilT(pilT::Tn) is resistant to lysis by bacteriophages.[52] Here, we studied the effect of 1a and 1b on the bacteriophage ϕKMV adsorption in
three P. aeruginosa strains: PAO1k,
the phage-sensitive strain wt PAO1; the pili-deficient
mutant ΔpilA;[53] and
the nonretracting mutant pilT.[52] We found that by mixing ϕKMV (5.8 × 106 PFU/mL) with excess of PAO1k (2.8 × 107 CFU/mL)
for 10 min, the phage titer in the supernatant culture was reduced
to 6.8 × 105 PFU/mL, indicating that ∼86% of
the phage was adsorbed on PAO1k (Figure A). In contrast, upon culturing bacteria
in the presence of 1a (85 μM), the phage count
in solution was 4.2 × 106 PFU/mL, indicating only
∼16% of phage adsorption on PAO1k. For the pili-deficient mutant,
ΔpilA, under the same condition, a low level
of adsorption of the added phage (∼4.5%) was observed (Figure A). The presence
of our agent did not exhibit a noticeable effect on phage adsorption
on ΔpilA. Because of the lack of pili on ΔpilA, we consider this ∼4.5% as a non-pili-mediated
phage adsorption. Thus, for PAO1k, the pili-mediated phage adsorption
is about 86–4.5 = 81.5% without the agents and about 16–4.5
= 11.5% with the presence of agents. This result suggests that our
agents cause about (81.5–11.5)/81.5 = 86% reduction in bacteriophage
adsorption on the pili of PAO1.
Figure 7
(A) Percentage of ϕKMV phage adsorbed
on PAO1k (wt PAO1 strain that is sensitive to ϕKMV)
and ΔpilA, pilT::Tn mutants
over 10 min in LB
containing 85 μM 1a. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of means of triplicates. *P < 0.01;
**P < 0.01 vs control without 1a,
Student’s t-test. (B) ϕKMV phage killing
rate against PAO1k (OD600 = 0.6) cultured with and without
85 μM 1a for 8 h. The optical density (OD600) of the cultures was measured over time. Error bars indicate the
standard deviations of means of triplicates.
(A) Percentage of ϕKMV phage adsorbed
on PAO1k (wt PAO1 strain that is sensitive to ϕKMV)
and ΔpilA, pilT::Tn mutants
over 10 min in LB
containing 85 μM 1a. Error bars indicate the standard
deviations of means of triplicates. *P < 0.01;
**P < 0.01 vs control without 1a,
Student’s t-test. (B) ϕKMV phage killing
rate against PAO1k (OD600 = 0.6) cultured with and without
85 μM 1a for 8 h. The optical density (OD600) of the cultures was measured over time. Error bars indicate the
standard deviations of means of triplicates.In the presence of another saturated farnesol derivative SFEG4OH, 3 (Figure ), which inhibits swarming motility, but not biofilm
formation,[29] phage adsorption on pili was
also inhibited by ∼72% (Figure S12). To explore the mechanism of the inhibition of phage adsorption,
we observed high levels of phage adsorption (∼87%) on the nonretracting
mutant pilT::Tn (Figure A). The presence of 1a did not
exhibit a noticeable effect on phage adsorption on pilT::Tn. These results further support that our molecules bind and retract
pili appendages of PAO1—likely by the pilT retraction mechanism.[52]While the pili-deficient mutant ΔpilA was
resistant (Figure S13), PAO1k was killed
by phage ϕKMV in 8 h (Figure B). The presence of 1a, however, caused
a delay of killing of PAO1k by 4 h and an increase in residual live
bacteria after 8 h (Figure B). This result is consistent with the previous finding that
the anti-pilin antibody can delay the killing of bacteria by another
predator strain through pili binding.[54] The control molecule SDS has no effect on either phage adsorption
or phage-mediated killing. These four different experiments support
that our molecules bind to pilin proteins and inhibit the function
of pili appendages on bacteria.
Ligand Binding and Inhibition
of LecA
The molecule
SFEG4OH 3, a pili ligand, inhibited swarming
motility but not biofilm formation. While pili are important, for
bacterial adherence and thus for biofilm formation, to understand
the reasons for disugar molecules with substituted alkyl chains 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b at
inhibiting both biofilm formation and swarming motility, we explore
another protein, LecA, that is known to bind to sugars[36,45−48,55] and is important for biofilm
formation.[45,47,48] While LecA of P. aeruginosa was initially
discovered to have an affinity for galactose, examples of having glucose
as part a galactose–glucose disugar have actually been shown
to increase its binding to LecA protein as compared to other galactose–galactose
disugar.[55] More notably, the diglucose
linked by oligo(ethylene glycol) without any galactose groups exhibited
considerably strong binding to LecA.[56] Varrot
and co-workers have demonstrated crystal structures with a secondary
sugar binding site for glucose.[55] It is
important to note that galactose and glucose binding to LecA is enhanced
by multivalent presentation,[45,47,55,57] and the space between the binding
sites on LecA plays a significant role. Evidently, tethering aromatic
groups to single sugar galactose greatly enhance its binding to LecA.[47] These findings provide an important background
for exploring 1a and 1b for LecA binding
as these molecules consist of glucose units in the form of maltoside
and cellobioside.We used the fluorescence polarization-based
competitive binding assay that has been shown to identify ligands
for LecA protein.[58] For this assay, we
designed and synthesized a Dansyl fluorophore-tagged galactose ligand
(βGal-aryl-Dansyl, Figure ) for the LecA protein. The fluorescent polarization
of the fluorophore-tagged ligand will increase when bound to a protein
receptor because of the reduction in dynamic and will decrease when
the fluorophore ligand is displaced from the protein by another ligand.
The βGal-aryl-Dansyl (200 nM) showed an increase in its fluorescence
polarization with increasing concentrations of LecA (0–100
μM), with a transition indicative of a Kd ∼10.7 μM, whereas for the control protein, BSA,
no significant increase in fluorescence polarization was observed
(Figure A).
Figure 8
Fluorescence
polarization of (A) 200 nM βGal-Dansyl vs concentrations
of LecA and BSA proteins and (B) of 100 μL of LecA (20 μM)
and βGal-Dansyl (200 nM) vs concentration of candidate ligands, 1a and 1b, SFEG4OH (3), and rhamnolipid mixtures. Error bars indicate the standard deviations
of means of triplicates.
Fluorescence
polarization of (A) 200 nM βGal-Dansyl vs concentrations
of LecA and BSA proteins and (B) of 100 μL of LecA (20 μM)
and βGal-Dansyl (200 nM) vs concentration of candidate ligands, 1a and 1b, SFEG4OH (3), and rhamnolipid mixtures. Error bars indicate the standard deviations
of means of triplicates.To estimate the binding
strength of the potential ligands, 1a and 1b, to LecA protein, the molecules were
titrated against the complex of βGal-aryl-Dansyl (200 nM) and
LecA (20 μM) to displace βGal-aryl-Dansyl from LecA. We
found that 1a and 1b caused a decrease of
fluorescence polarization indicative of displacement of βGal-aryl-Dansyl
with an IC50 value of 15 and 13 μM, respectively
(Figure B). Interestingly,
rhamnolipids and SFEG4OH did not cause a decrease of fluorescence
polarization. These results are consistent with the knowledge that
glucose-containing disugars are capable of binding to LecA.[55,56]Binding does not necessarily impact the activities of a protein.
Inhibition of biofilms by single galactose derivatives or sugar without
attaching groups is often not reported. For our case, β-Gal-Dansyl
exhibited a weak biofilm inhibition, IC50 120 μM.
Imberty, Romer, and Winssinger and co-workers have shown that the
space between the two sugar binding sites has the potential to interact
with the group attaching the sugar.[47,57] We believe
that the branch hydrocarbon chain tethering the cellobioside or maltoside
plays an enhancing role for binding that space and for controlling
the activity of LecA. In this case of having a hydrophobic chain,
glucose has an indispensable advantage of having better water solubility
over galactose. This binding effect is an ongoing subject of our research.To further corroborate for these LecA binding studies, we performed
a bacterial motility-enabled binding assay.[49] In this assay, we spread LecA on the soft agar gel containing 1a that inhibited swarming motility. We observed that while
the swarming motility of PAO1 was inhibited completely on gels containing
20 μM 1a, spreading LecA (100 μL of 1 mg/mL,
780 nmol) on the gel surfaces reactivated the swarming motility (Figure S14). This result is consistent with LecA
binding and sequestering 1a on the gel surface, depleting
their availability for pili appendages on bacteria and thus abolishing
their swarming inhibition activities. For pilin binding, in contrast,
branched aliphatic chains having different water-soluble groups, SFEG4OH of 3, or disugar of 1a or 1b, supported binding to pili and inhibition of pili-mediated
motilities. These results indicate that 1a and 1b are chimeric ligands for LecA and pili, whereas 3 is a ligand for pili alone.
Chemical Control and Correlation
of Receptor Proteins with Their
Phenotypes
The chimeric ligands inhibited biofilms—and
associated tolerance and persistence, SCVs, rugose colony, and pellicles
formation, as well as swarming and twitching motility for wild-type P. aeruginosa. Because the two motilities are associated
with low cdG levels,[23,39,40] the other phenotypes are of high cdG levels. We also evaluated other
low cdG-controlled virulence factors of P. aeruginosa, including the pyocyanin,[24] proteolytic
enzyme-elastase (Figures S15). Pyocyanin
production is augmented in low cdG mutants.[24] Elastase production increases during pili sensing of a surface,[14] We found that the pili inhibitor alone, SFEG4OH, reduced type PAO1’s pyocyanin and elastase levels
by 50 and 49%, respectively (Figure S15). This result makes the correlation of inhibiting pilin proteins
to inhibit pili-associated activities that also associated with low
cdG levels.[39] The chimeric ligand for both
LecA and pili (1a or 1b) also reduced wild-type
pyocyanin production by 60% and elastase activity by 45%.Overall,
the chimeric ligands for LecA and pili proteins inhibited all the
eight phenotypes (biofilms, SCVs, rugose colonies, pellicles, twitching,
swarming motilities, elastase, and pyocyanin production). In contrast,
the pili ligand alone, SFEG4OH, has no effect on biofilms,
SCVs, rugosa, and pellicles but inhibited swarming, twitching motilities,
and elastase and pyocyanin production. These results show that the
chimeric ligands (for LecA and pili) inhibit the phenotypes for both
high and low cdG levels, whereas the pili ligand inhibit only low
cdG levels (Table S2). This selective inhibition
of LecA and pili enables the correlation between the phenotypes and
the receptor proteins. Because inhibiting pili alone by SFEG4OH has no effect on biofilms, SCVs and EPS, and pellicle formation,
these high cdG phenotypes[45] are primarily
controlled by inhibition of LecA. In contrast, the low cdG phenotypes,
overproduction of pyocyanin and elastase, as well as swarming and
twitching motilities can be controlled by pili inhibition alone.Pili retraction resulted from sensing a surface activates virulence
factor regulator (vfr) gene and type III secretion
system, which promotes pyocyanin and elastase, respectively.[12,13] This important knowledge suggests that pili sensing can feedback
to signal to the production of virulence factors correlated with low
cdG levels. Our results show that chemical inhibition of pili not
only inhibits activities directly controlled by pili (swarming and
twitching motility) but also virulence factors (pyocyanin and elastase)
that are signaled by pili sensing the environment.We also evaluated
the production of rhamnolipids in the presence
of chimeric ligands for LecA and pili and pili ligands alone. Rhamnolipids
are a special case in the signaling context because they are needed
for a structured biofilm,[27] which is of
high cdG phenotype, but are also necessary for swarming motility,[28] which is of low cdG phenotype.[24,28] Interestingly, both SFEG4OH and the chimeric ligands
cause about a 5-fold increase in rhamnolipid production, to ∼107
μM (Figure S15c), which is close
to rhamnolipid’s critical micelle concentration (130 μM).[59] Because pyocyanin and rhamnolipids are inversely
regulated in P. aeruginosa,[7] and our result shows that pili inhibition leads
to pyocyanin reduction, it is consistent that pili inhibition also
leads to an increase in rhamnolipid production. Furthermore, lowering
the cdG level leads to rhl quorum sensing that increases
rhamnolipid production,[13,15] and lecA inhibition
has been shown to correlate with low cdG;[45] thus, inhibiting LecA can also promote rhamnolipid production. Together,
these results provide a signaling map identifying the phenotypes of
pili and LecA proteins and the effects from chemical inhibition of
the two proteins (Figure and Table S2). Overall, inhibiting
LecA inhibits high cdG phenotypes, whereas inhibiting pili suppresses
low cdG phenotypes. We note that pili appendages also relates to drug
tolerance as increasing swarming motility is also known to lead to
antibiotic tolerance.[9,10]
Figure 9
Mapping of chemical inhibition of pili
and LecA and the correlation
with their controlling phenotypes.
Mapping of chemical inhibition of pili
and LecA and the correlation
with their controlling phenotypes.Compared to a previous set of molecules, 2a and 2b (Figure ) exhibited stronger swarming inhibition but weaker biofilm inhibition
than 1a and 1b. The molecules 2a and 2b also inhibited both high and low cdG activities,
including biofilms, SCV and pellicle formation, swarming and twitching
motilities, and pyocyanin and elastase A levels, and promoted rhamnolipid
production (results not shown). These results indicate that both classes
of molecules likely target the same receptors and share a common mode
of action. As both pili and LecA are known to recognize and bind sugar
moieties modified with derivatives, the results of the molecules 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b show
the important impacts of the branched aliphatic chains on the two
proteins.It is important to note that there are many signaling
pathways
and conditions that can lead to biofilm formation and increase in
cdG levels, including quorum sensing, starvation, and importantly
conventional antibiotic use.[4,60] LecA is likely not
the only protein that controls biofilm formation but our results,
and literature,[45,47,48] suggest that LecA likely is a dominating one.
Conclusions
In this work, we showed a class of molecules that bind and inhibit
both lectin A and pili appendages and another that inhibit pili alone.
We showed the selective chemical inhibition of bacteriophage’s
adsorption on pili appendages and a label-free assay that identifies
direct binding between pilin proteins and chemical ligands. The chemical
inhibition of pili appendages likely causes retraction of pili appendages
and inhibits phenotypes that are associated with low cdG levels. Chimeric
ligands inhibit both LecA protein and pili appendages and phenotypes
associated with both high and low levels of cdG. The chimeric ligands
also inhibit all the known tobramycin-induced phenotypes, including
enabling the killing of tolerant population and the prevention of
nascent persistent population in biofilms and the SCVs that are specific
to tobramycin stress. Being able to selectively inhibit only pili
and inhibit both pili and LecA, these chemical tools delineate that
pili appendages are important for low cdG phenotypes, whereas LecA
is important for high cdG phenotypes. Overall, these results suggest
an adjuvant approach for existing antibiotics by inhibiting the virulent
phenotypes and a structural consideration for new drug development.
The ligands for pili also present opportunities for inhibiting horizontal
gene transfer and related drug resistance. Finally, the label-free
bacterial motility-enabled binding assays can be explored for identification
and studying new ligand–receptor interactions.
Methods
Here, we describe experiments in this work that are new or modified
from the literature.
In Vitro Small Colony Variant
Assay[18]
Overnight cultures (100
μL) of wt PAO1 were diluted in 10 mL of LB
containing 0.3 μg/mL
tobramycin with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b and incubated at 37 °C without shaking for 6 h. These cultures
were serially diluted (105–107) in LB
medium, spread on Columbia blood agar plates (Thermo Scientific Oxoid
Columbia Blood Agar Base (Dehydrated) supplemented with 5% sheep blood)
containing 85 μM 1a or 1b, and incubated
at 37 °C for 1 day.
Bacterial Swarming Assay[28]
The soft gels for swarming motility were prepared
by autoclaving
0.5 wt % Bacto Agar in M8 medium (0.6% Na2HPO4, 0.3% KH2PO4, and 0.05% NaCl). The gel solution
was cooled to ∼60 °C supplemented with filtered 0.2% glucose,
0.5% casamino acid, and 1 mM MgSO4 (0.22 μ filter).
The gel solutions were poured into a Falcon tube for 20 mL portions,
followed by adding aliquots of (1–20 μL) of 1a or 1b stock solutions to achieve the desired concentrations.
The falcon tubes were closed, and the agar solution was mixed by gently
rocking and then poured into polystyrene Petri dishes (10 cm diameter).
The agar solution was solidified by cooling and air-drying in a laminar
hood for 1 h. The bacterial culture of wild-type PAO1 (3 μL)
with an OD600 value between ∼0.4 and 0.6 was inoculated
on the center of the surface of the soft agar gel. These “swarm
plates” were incubated at 37 °C for 12 h and then incubated
for an additional 12 h at room temperature. After a total of 24 h,
pictures of the swarming plates were taken.
Bacterial Motility-Enabled
Binding Assay
For soft gel
prepared for swarming motility (see above), 100 μL of 1 mg/mL
pilin, LecA, or BSA protein was introduced onto the center of the
agar gel and immediately spread over the surface of the gel using
a sterile cell spreader. The proteins were prepared in NaPB (4 mM,
pH 7.2), Tris–HCl (0.1 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and 6 μM
CaCl2), and Tris buffer (2 mM Tris, 7 mM NaCl, and pH 7.5).
The agar gel spread with the protein solution was dried for an additional
30 min. A bacterial subculture (3 μL, 0.6 OD600)
was inoculated on the center of the soft gel (10 cm diameter plate).
The bacteria on the soft gel were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C
and for an additional 12 h at room temperature.
Persistent
Population Isolation Assay[32,33]
An overnight
culture (100 μL) of bacteria in LB was
diluted in 10 mL of M63 and incubated to reach an OD600 value of ∼0.1. Aliquots (150 μL) of the subculture
were added into the wells of a 96-well MBEC microtiter plate with
and without 0.3 μg/mL tobramycin, 85 μM 1a or 1b. MBEC pegs were immersed in the bacterial culture
and further incubated at 37 °C without shaking for 24 h to form
biofilms. The MBEC peg lid was then removed, and pegs were washed
with 0.9% saline to remove unattached or loosely attached bacteria
and antibiotics. The biofilm mass was quantified by CV dye assay for
six pegs. The 10 unstained pegs were cut with sterile pliers and suspended
in saline water. The saline solution with pegs was sonicated for 15
min at 30 kHz (Symphony VWR Internationals Ltd.). Pegs were removed,
and the solutions were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min to collect
the bacteria. The collected pellets were resuspended and supplemented
with 20 μg/mL tobramycin (20× MIC) in MHB medium and incubated
at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm for 8 h to isolate persistent
population. The sample was then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min
at room temperature to collect the persister pellet. The supernatant
was discarded, and the bacterial pellet was washed twice with 0.9%
saline. The number of persistent bacteria was then quantified by counting
CFU on an MHB agar plate.
Chemical Inhibition of Bacteriophage Adsorption
ϕKMV on P. aeruginosa Strains[52,53]
The
bacteriophage adsorption assay was adopted as described previously,[53] with the addition of our agents. An overnight
culture (100 μL) of wtP. aeruginosa strain PAO1k that is ϕKMV sensitive, knockout mutant ΔpilA, and transposon mutant pilT (pilT::Tn) were diluted with 10 mL of LB supplemented
with 10 mM MgSO4 (LB-Mg2+) and subcultured to
an OD600 value of around 0.6 at 37 °C with shaking
at 250 rpm with and without 85 μM 1a or 1b or 60 μM SFEG4OH. The bacteria subculture (100
μL) was mixed with 900 μL of LB-Mg2+/mL ϕKMV
phage. The titer of the added phage was individually determined for
every experiment from the phage stock solution. Following incubation
for 10 min at 37 °C with shaking at 100 rpm, bacteria were removed
by centrifugation (10,000g, 5 min at 4 °C),
and 900 μL of the supernatant was transferred to an Eppendorf
tube. The plaque-forming units (PFU) in the supernatant with and without
the added agents were determined by the top agar overlay method with
PAO1k. The percentage of phage bound to bacteria was calculated as
[(titer of the added phage – titer in the supernatant)/(titer
of the added phage)] × 100.
Authors: Hanjeong Harvey; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Hélène Marquis; Kristina M Sztanko; Alan R Davidson; Lori L Burrows Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Lucas R Hoffman; David A D'Argenio; Michael J MacCoss; Zhaoying Zhang; Roger A Jones; Samuel I Miller Journal: Nature Date: 2005-08-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nathalie Q Balaban; Sophie Helaine; Kim Lewis; Martin Ackermann; Bree Aldridge; Dan I Andersson; Mark P Brynildsen; Dirk Bumann; Andrew Camilli; James J Collins; Christoph Dehio; Sarah Fortune; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt; Alexander Harms; Matthias Heinemann; Deborah T Hung; Urs Jenal; Bruce R Levin; Jan Michiels; Gisela Storz; Man-Wah Tan; Tanel Tenson; Laurence Van Melderen; Annelies Zinkernagel Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Vincent T Lee; Jody M Matewish; Jennifer L Kessler; Mamoru Hyodo; Yoshihiro Hayakawa; Stephen Lory Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.501