Literature DB >> 11698361

Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials.

A L Spoering1, K Lewis.   

Abstract

Biofilms are considered to be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Strictly speaking, this is not the case-biofilms do not grow in the presence of antimicrobials any better than do planktonic cells. Biofilms are indeed highly resistant to killing by bactericidal antimicrobials, compared to logarithmic-phase planktonic cells, and therefore exhibit tolerance. It is assumed that biofilms are also significantly more tolerant than stationary-phase planktonic cells. A detailed comparative examination of tolerance of biofilms versus stationary- and logarithmic-phase planktonic cells with four different antimicrobial agents was performed in this study. Carbenicillin appeared to be completely ineffective against both stationary-phase cells and biofilms. Killing by this beta-lactam antibiotic depends on rapid growth, and this result confirms the notion of slow-growing biofilms resembling the stationary state. Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that kills nongrowing cells, and biofilms and stationary-phase cells were comparably tolerant to this antibiotic. The majority of cells in both populations were eradicated at low levels of ofloxacin, leaving a fraction of essentially invulnerable persisters. The bulk of the population in both biofilm and stationary-phase cultures was tolerant to tobramycin. At very high tobramycin concentrations, a fraction of persister cells became apparent in stationary-phase culture. Stationary-phase cells were more tolerant to the biocide peracetic acid than were biofilms. In general, stationary-phase cells were somewhat more tolerant than biofilms in all of the cases examined. We concluded that, at least for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, one of the model organisms for biofilm studies, the notion that biofilms have greater resistance than do planktonic cells is unwarranted. We further suggest that tolerance to antibiotics in stationary-phase or biofilm cultures is largely dependent on the presence of persister cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11698361      PMCID: PMC95513          DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.23.6746-6751.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  36 in total

1.  Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm.

Authors:  P I Watnick; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 2.  New aspects in the molecular basis of polymer-associated infections due to staphylococci.

Authors:  C von Eiff; C Heilmann; G Peters
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  An evaluation of the potential of the multiple antibiotic resistance operon (mar) and the multidrug efflux pump acrAB to moderate resistance towards ciprofloxacin in Escherichia coli biofilms.

Authors:  T Maira-Litrán; D G Allison; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  H Ceri; M E Olson; C Stremick; R R Read; D Morck; A Buret
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  A dose-response study of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  A Brooun; S Liu; K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  J N Anderl; M J Franklin; P S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Programmed death in bacteria.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili.

Authors:  L A Pratt; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development.

Authors:  G A O'Toole; R Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  275 in total

1.  Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Gail M Teitzel; Matthew R Parsek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Heterogeneous bacterial persisters and engineering approaches to eliminate them.

Authors:  Kyle R Allison; Mark P Brynildsen; James J Collins
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 3.  Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  José L Martínez; Fernando Baquero
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene that suppresses tolerance to carbapenems.

Authors:  Kazuko Taniguchi; Tsuneko Ono; Keiji Murakami; Darija Viducic; Sizuo Kayama; Katsuhiko Hirota; Ken Nemoto; Yoichiro Miyake
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Biofilms 2003: emerging themes and challenges in studies of surface-associated microbial life.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Killing by ampicillin and ofloxacin induces overlapping changes in Escherichia coli transcription profile.

Authors:  Niilo Kaldalu; Rui Mei; Kim Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Small molecule control of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Roberta J Worthington; Justin J Richards; Christian Melander
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  The MerR-like transcriptional regulator BrlR contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm tolerance.

Authors:  Julie Liao; Karin Sauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Effects of an autoinducer analogue on antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Takashi Amoh; Keiji Murakami; Reiko Kariyama; Kenji Hori; Darija Viducic; Katsuhiko Hirota; Jun Igarashi; Hiroaki Suga; Matthew R Parsek; Hiromi Kumon; Yoichiro Miyake
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Candida albicans Amphotericin B-Tolerant Persister Formation is Closely Related to Surface Adhesion.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Zhigang Li; Haoyue Chu; Jing Guo; Guangshui Jiang; Qingguo Qi
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.