| Literature DB >> 35656319 |
Bruno G N Andrade1,2, Flavia A Bressani1, Rafael R C Cuadrat3, Tainã F Cardoso1, Jessica M Malheiros1, Priscila S N de Oliveira4, Juliana Petrini5, Gerson B Mourão5, Luiz L Coutinho5, James M Reecy6, James E Koltes6, Adhemar Z Neto7, Sérgio R de Medeiros1, Alexandre Berndt1, Julio C P Palhares1, Haithem Afli2, Luciana C A Regitano1.
Abstract
Background: The impact of extreme changes in weather patterns on the economy and human welfare is one of the biggest challenges our civilization faces. From anthropogenic contributions to climate change, reducing the impact of farming activities is a priority since it is responsible for up to 18% of global greenhouse gas emissions. To this end, we tested whether ruminal and stool microbiome components could be used as biomarkers for methane emission and feed efficiency in bovine by studying 52 Brazilian Nelore bulls belonging to two feed intervention treatment groups, that is, conventional and by-product-based diets.Entities:
Keywords: Bos indicus; archaea; association; bacteria; biomarkers; feed efficiency; methane emission
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656319 PMCID: PMC9152269 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.812828
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1(A) Comparison between observed ASV (amplicon sequence variants) metric between treatment groups showed no significant difference in the bacterial population of animals submitted to different diets in both rumen (green line) and stool (yellow line). (B) Shannon index comparisons showing a significant difference (p < 0.01) in the richness of bacteria from the rumen microbiome. (C) PCoA using the rumen microbiome unweighted UniFrac distance showing a tendency of clustering of samples from conventional group (blue) and B (orange). (D) PCoA using the stool microbiome unweighted UniFrac distance showing an almost linear separation of samples from animals fed conventional diet (blue) and by-product diet (orange).
FIGURE 2(A) Comparison between observed ASV (amplicon sequence variants) metric between treatment groups showed no significant difference in archaea populations of animals submitted to different diets in both rumen (green line) and stool (yellow line). (B) Shannon index comparisons showing a significant difference (p < 0.01) in the richness of archaea in the rumen microbiome. (C) PCoA using the rumen microbiome unweighted UniFrac distance showing no significant difference between groups (p > 0.1). (D) PCoA using the stool microbiome unweighted UniFrac distance showing a tendency of clustering of samples from animals fed conventional diet (blue) and by-product diet (orange).
FIGURE 3Standardized beta coefficient for the RCH4 trait versus the module abundance (CLR) variation of amplicon sequence variants (ASV) in (A) rumen; (B) stool. Both the phenotypic variation and ASV abundance variation were retrieved from the beta coefficients of mixed models and Maaslin2 GLM regressions. Taxonomic information generated by QIIME 2 was included.
FIGURE 4Standardized beta coefficient for the RFI trait vs. the module abundance (CLR) variation of amplicon sequence Vvriants (ASV) in (A) rumen; (B) stool. Both the phenotypic and ASV abundance variations were retrieved from the beta coefficients of mixed models and Maaslin2 GLM regressions. Taxonomic information generated by QIIME 2 was included in the legend.