| Literature DB >> 35655721 |
Fei Wang1,2, Juan Bi3, Chunxia Yi4, Yuan Zhang5, Yu Zhang1, Qingfang Yue5.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (UCEC) is very common in gynecological diseases and ranks second in the death cause of gynecological cancer in developed countries. The connection between the overall survival of UCEC patients and immune invasion of the tumor microenvironment is positive. The PARVG gene has not been given notice in cancer, and its mechanism is unknown. The research utilized TCGA data to test the function of PARVG in UCEC. The manifestation of PARVG in UCEC was studied by GEPIA. By assessing the survival module, the authors learned the impact of PARVG on the survival of people with UCEC and then obtained UCEC information from TCGA. This study uses logistic regression to prove the possible relationship between PARVG expression and clinical information. From the research of Cox regression, clinicopathological characteristics of people with TCGA were connected with overall survival. Furthermore, the "correlation" module of GEPIA and CIBERSORT was used to study the association between cancer immune invasion and PARVG. Using univariate logistic regression analysis with PARVG expression as a categorical variable (median expression value of 2.5), the result suggested that raised PARVG expression was considerably connected with tumor status, pathological stage, and lymph nodes. Multiple factor studies have shown that upregulation of PARVG, distant metastasis, and negative pathological stage are absolute elements of excellent prognosis. In addition, CIBERSORT analysis was utilized to determine that raised PARVG expression has a positive connection with immune infiltration by T cells, mast cells, neutrophils, and B cells. This is recognized in GEPIA's "correlation" module. The above outcomes show us that the raised expression of PARVG is associated with a good prognosis and it raises the proportion of immune cells (such as T cells, mast cells, neutrophils, and B cells) in UCEC. These outcomes tell us that PARVG can be utilized as a possible biomarker to evaluate UCEC's immune infiltration levels and prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35655721 PMCID: PMC9135557 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7376588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Workflow of our study.
Figure 2Survival outcome and expression difference analyzed by GEPIA. (a) Increased PARVG expression is associated with a favorable outcome. (b) Differential expression of PARVG in different disease states (tumor or normal). (c) Differential expression of PARVG in the different pathological stages.
The results of Cox regression analysis.
| Clinicopathologic variable | HR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| AGE ≤64 | ||
| Age | 1.02 (0.97–1.08) | 0.42 |
| Stage | 2.32 (1.49–3.19) | <0.00 |
| Grade | 3.48 (1.74–6.95) | <0.00 |
| PARVG | 0.44 (0.20–0.95) | 0.04 |
| AGE >64 | ||
| Age | 1.04 (1.00–1.09) | 0.07 |
| Stage | 1.81 (1.41–2.33) | <0.00 |
| Grade | 1.86 (1.12–3.11) | 0.02 |
| PARVG | 0.56 (0.31–1.01) | 0.05 |
Univariate analysis using Cox regression revealed that some factors, including patient age (HR = 1.02, p value = 0.42), pathological stage (HR = 2.32, p value <0.001), and pathological grade (HR = 3.48, p value <0.001) along with the expression of PARVG (HR = 0.794, p value <0.046) are significantly associated with overall survival. The upregulated PARVG expression, lower patient age, lower pathological stage, and lower pathological grade are independent prognostic factors of favorable prognosis.
Figure 3Multivariate Cox analysis of PARVG expression and other clinicopathological factors.
Association between PARVG expression and clinicopathologic variables using logistic regression.
| Clinical characteristic | Total (N) | The odds ratio in PARVG expression |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (continuous) | 509 | 0.888 (0.628–1.258) | 0.505 |
| Stage (III vs IV) | 139 | 0.351 (0.130–0.949) | 0.039 |
| Stage (I vs IV) | 343 | 0.296 (0.114–0.765) | 0.012 |
| Stage (II vs IV) | 75 | 0.321 (0.109–0.939) | 0.038 |
| Stage (I–III vs IV) | 509 | 0.311 (0.121–0.796) | 0.015 |
Figure 4PARVG-related immune infiltration alteration. (a) T cells CD8 (P = 0.049), NK cells activated (P = 0.008), T cells CD8 (P = 0.002), T cells follicular helper (P = 0.005), T cells regulatory (Tregs) (P = 0.005), NK cells activated (P = 0.252), macrophages M1 (P = 0.001), and macrophages M2 (P = 0.217) share a higher proportion in high expression group compared with low expression group. In contrast, the proportions of B cells native (P = 0.135), T cells CD8 (P = 0.002), and macrophages M0 (P = 0.251) are apparently lower. (b) The proportions of different TIICs subpopulations were weakly to moderately correlated.
Correlation analysis between PARVG expression and gene markers of B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, T-helper 1 (Th1) cells, T-helper 2 (Th2) cells, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, exhausted T cells and mast cells via “correlation” module of GEPIA.
| Description | Gene markers | UCEC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor | Normal | ||||
| R |
| R |
| ||
| B cell | CD79A | 0.254∗∗ | <0.000 | 0.435∗∗ | 0.009 |
|
| |||||
| Natural killer cell | KIR2DL1 | 0.08 | 0.059 | 0.491∗∗ | 0.003 |
| KIR2DL3 | 0.075 | 0.078 | 0.390∗ | 0.021 | |
| KIR2DL4 | 0.292∗∗ | <0.000 | 0.754∗∗ | <0.000 | |
| KIR3DL1 | 0.102∗ | 0.016 | 0.534∗∗ | 0.001 | |
| KIR3DL2 | 0.099∗ | 0.02 | 0.515∗∗ | 0.002 | |
∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.