| Literature DB >> 35652020 |
Juan Manuel Yañez Arauz1,2, Nicolás Raimondi1, Andrés Eksarho1, Diego Lauritto1, Maria Eugenia Yañez Arauz1, Juan Martin Yañez Arauz2.
Abstract
Objective The purpose of the present study is to compare the radiological results of angular correction and its maintenance in the medium term between two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of hallux valgus (minimally invasive chevron surgery vs. Bosch technique). Methods A comparative prospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic hallux valgus deformity was performed. We compared two minimally invasive techniques in homogeneous groups of population. Two groups of 62 and 63 feet respectively, were constituted. We compared first ray angular corrections and consolidation as well as the correction power of both osteotomies and their maintenance over time. The postoperative complications and surgical time in both study groups were also evaluated. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results There were differences between both groups in the intermetatarsal angle at 24 months postsurgery. There were no differences between both groups regarding metatarsophalangeal angle, and distal metatarsal articular angle. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The surgical time between both groups had statistically significant differences. Conclusions Both screw-stabilized, Bosch surgery and minimally invasive chevron (hybrid when associated with percutaneous Akin osteotomy) present adequate correction of moderate hallux valgus. However, patients treated with Bosch percutaneous surgery had a greater correction power of the intermetatarsal angle in the medium term, as well as a shorter surgical time, when compared with those who were treated with chevron osteotomy. Both techniques had a similar evolution over time regarding loss of correction and postoperative complications. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: hallux valgus; hallux valgus/diagnostic imaging; hallux valgus/surgery; minimally invasive surgical procedures; osteotomy
Year: 2021 PMID: 35652020 PMCID: PMC9142267 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 0102-3616
Characteristics of both groups
| Technique | Chevron MIS | Bosch |
|---|---|---|
|
| 48 | 48 |
|
| 47 | 51 |
|
| 45 female | 44 female |
|
| 30 left | 28 left |
|
| 63 moderate | 62 moderate |
|
| 15 | 14 |
|
| 63 | 62 |
Abbreviations: MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MPA, metatarsophalangeal angle.
Fig. 1Percutaneous release of the adductor hallucis tendon.
Fig. 2Bosch technique.
Average correction in degrees of the angles in both groups at 3 and 24 months
| Average correction | Bosch | Chevron | Bosch | Chevron |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20.19 | 20.49 | 19.62 | 19.47 |
|
| 8.66 | 6.47 | 8.14 | 5.9 |
|
| 9.03 | 10.63 | 9.66 | 9.5 |
Abbreviations: DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; IMA, intermetatarsal angle; MPA, metatarsophalangeal angle.
Distribution of preoperative joint congruence in both groups
| no congruence | congruence | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bosch | 20 | 42 | 62 |
| Chevron | 8 | 55 | 63 |
| Total | 28 | 97 | 125 |
Comparison of both groups. Average angle values and statistical significance
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Mean (1) | Mean (2) | SD (1) | SD (2) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 29.94 | 29.52 | 6.69 | 7.51 | 0.7686 |
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 12.71 | 11.65 | 3.15 | 2.63 |
|
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 16.94 | 18.08 | 4.75 | 7.98 | 0.9171 |
Abbreviations: DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; IMA, intermetatarsal angle; MPA, metatarsophalangeal angle.
Comparison of the potential correction in both groups between 1 month preoperative and 24 months postoperative
| Variable | Group 1 | Group 2 | Mean (1) | Mean (2) | SD (1) | SD (2) | Med (1) | Med (2) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR MP 24m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0,5651 |
| RR IM 24m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.59 | 0.46 |
|
| RR DMAA 24m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0,4693 |
Abbreviations: DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; IMA, intermetatarsal angle; MPA, metatarsophalangeal angle; RR, recovery rate; SD, standard deviation.
Característica de ambos os grupos
| Técnica | Chevron CMI | Bosch |
|---|---|---|
|
| 48 | 48 |
|
| 47 | 51 |
|
| 45 mulheres | 44 mulheres |
|
| 30 esquerda | 28 esquerda |
|
| 63 moderados | 62 moderados |
|
| 15 | 14 |
|
| 63 | 62 |
Abreviaturas: CMI, cirurgia minimamente invasiva; AMF, ângulo metatarsofalângico.
Fig. 1Liberação percutânea do tendão da adutora.
Fig. 2Técnica Bosch.
Correção média em graus dos ângulos em ambos os grupos em 3 e 24 meses
| Correção média | Bosch | Chevron | Bosch | Chevron |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20,19 | 20,49 | 19,62 | 19,47 |
|
| 8,66 | 6,47 | 8,14 | 5,9 |
|
| 9,03 | 10,63 | 9,66 | 9,5 |
Abreviaturas: AAMD, ângulo articular metatarsodistal; AIM, ângulo intermetatarsal; AMP, ângulo metatarsofalângico.
Distribuição da congruência conjunta pré-operatória em ambos os grupos
| Nenhuma congruência | Congruência | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bosch | 20 | 42 | 62 |
| Chevron | 8 | 55 | 63 |
| Total | 28 | 97 | 125 |
Comparação de ambos os grupos. Valores médios dos ângulos e significância estatística
| Grupo 1 | Grupo 2 | Média (1) | Média (2) | DP (1) | DP (2) |
Valor de
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 29,94 | 29,52 | 6,69 | 7,51 | 0,7686 |
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 12,71 | 11,65 | 3,15 | 2,63 |
|
|
| Bosch | Chevron | 16,94 | 18,08 | 4,75 | 7,98 | 0,9171 |
Abreviaturas: AAMD, ângulo articular metatarsodistal; AIM, ângulo intermetatarsal; AMP, ângulo metatarsofalângico; DP, desvio padrão.
Comparação da correção potencial em ambos os grupos entre 1 mês pré-operatório e 24 meses pós-operatório
| Variável | Grupo 1 | Grupo 2 | Média | Média | DP (1) | DP (2) | Med | Med |
Valor de
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR AMF 24 m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0,66 | 0,64 | 0,19 | 0,19 | 0,69 | 0,68 | 0,5651 |
| TR AIM 24 m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0,58 | 0,49 | 0,27 | 0,24 | 0,59 | 0,46 |
|
| TR AAMD 24 m | Bosch (n = 62) | Chevron (n = 63) | 0,47 | 0,44 | 0,34 | 0,31 | 0,56 | 0,50 | 0,4693 |
Abreviaturas: AAMD, ângulo articular metatarsodistal; AIM, ângulo intermetatarsal; AMP, ângulo metatarsofalângico; DP, desvio padrão; TR, taxa de recuperação.