Literature DB >> 22735320

Distal linear osteotomy compared to oblique diaphyseal osteotomy in moderate to severe hallux valgus.

Chao-Ching Chiang1, Chien-Fu Jeff Lin, Yun-Hsuan Tzeng, Ching-Kuei Huang, Wei-Ming Chen, Chien-Lin Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no comparative studies of proximal and distal osteotomy for treatment of moderate to severe hallux valgus. Our purpose was to compare the surgical outcomes of modified proximal Ludloff (oblique diaphyseal) osteotomy with modified distal Bösch (distal linear) osteotomy by a single surgeon in moderate to severe hallux valgus.
METHODS: This retrospective study included feet with a hallux valgus angle greater than 30 degrees. A total of 30 feet (average age, 64.5 years) underwent Ludloff and 32 feet (average age, 61.1 years) underwent Bösch osteotomy. Both osteotomies were combined with distal soft tissue procedure. Clinical outcomes including AOFAS score and satisfaction rate were compared and radiographic parameters analyzed at 2~years of followup.
RESULTS: AOFAS scores were equivalent (p=0.483), with comparable satisfaction rates in both groups (p=0.418). The radiographic results including hallux valgus angle (p=0.026), intermetatarsal angle 1-2 (p<0.001), sesamoid position (p=0.008), correction of intermetatarsal angle 1-2 (p<0.001), and change of sesamoid position (p<0.001) were significantly better in the Bösch group. Correction of hallux valgus angle (p=0.308) and shortening of the first metatarsal (p=0.086) were insignificant with the numbers available. Recurrence developed in eight feet of the Ludloff group and two of the Bösch group (p=0.040). Dorsiflexion malunion occurred in four feet in the Bösch group, as compared with one in the Ludloff group.
CONCLUSION: Our study found that distal linear osteotomy was a more reliable reconstruction with equivalent function outcomes than an oblique diaphyseal osteotomy. Additional fixation may be necessary to decrease sagittal malunion in distal Bösch osteotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735320     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  Proximal versus distal metatarsal osteotomies for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Periklis Papaioannou; Dimitrios Kitridis; Dimitris Mavridis; Dimitrios Georgiannos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Ana Torres-Costoso; Sara Reina-Gutiérrez; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Angular correction and complications of proximal first metatarsal osteotomies for hallux valgus deformity.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Madeleine Willegger; Johannes Holinka; Robin Ristl; Reinhard Windhager; Axel H Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally Invasive Chevron Surgery and Bosch Percutaneous Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Treatment. Midterm Results. Comparative Radiological Study.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Yañez Arauz; Nicolás Raimondi; Andrés Eksarho; Diego Lauritto; Maria Eugenia Yañez Arauz; Juan Martin Yañez Arauz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-11-11

5.  Geometric analysis of indications for minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus.

Authors:  Blaž Mavčič
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery for Hallux Valgus: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linfeng Ji; Ketao Wang; Shenglong Ding; Chengyi Sun; Songmin Sun; Mingzhu Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.