| Literature DB >> 35651643 |
Aqilah Sakinah Badrulisham1,2, Muhammad Abdul-Latiff Abu Bakar3, Badrul-Munir Md Zain2, Shukor Md-Nor2, Mohd-Ridwan Abd Rahman2,4, Nur Syafika Mohd-Yusof2, Madihah Halim1,2, Salmah Yaakop1,2.
Abstract
Microbiome studies of the parasitoid wasp, Dolichogenidea metesae (Nixon) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) are important because D. metesae has potential as a biological control agent to suppress the pest, Metisa plana Walker (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Three field populations of parasitic wasps with different Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices to control M. plana collected from Perak state (Tapah) and Johor state (Yong Peng and Batu Pahat districts) in Peninsular Malaysia were studied. Bacterial community composition and structure were analysed using α and β diversity metrics. Proteobacteria (83.31%) and Bacteroidetes (6.80%) were the most dominant phyla, whereas unknown family from order Rhizobiales was the most abundant family found in all populations followed by Pseudomonadaceae. Family Micrococcaceae was absent in Tapah. Rhizobiales gen. sp. and Pseudomonas sp. were abundant in all populations. Pearson's correlation analysis showed the strongest correlation between individuals of Batu Pahat and Yong Peng (r = 0.89827, p < 0.05), followed by Tapah and Yong Peng with r = 0.75358, p < 0.05 and Batu Pahat and Tapah (r = 0.69552, p < 0.05). We hypothesise that low diversity and richness in Tapah might be due to direct and indirect effect of insecticides application. This preliminary data was the first study to do inventory of the microbiomes in the gut of the D. metesae. © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Endoparasitoid; Endoparasitoids; Endosimbion; Endosymbiont; Malaysia; Microbiome; Mikrobiom; Parasitic Wasp; Penyengat Parasitoid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35651643 PMCID: PMC9128653 DOI: 10.21315/tlsr2022.33.1.2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Life Sci Res ISSN: 1985-3718
List of samples used for microbiome analysis.
| Sample code | Species | Locality | Practices |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 |
| Batu Pahat, Johor | – |
| 42 |
| Yong Peng, Johor | Biopesticide, |
| 71 |
| Tapah, Perak | Chemical (Cypermethrin and monocrothopos) |
Figure 1Egrams showing 16S peaks for samples from Batu Pahat (C1), Yong Peng (C3) and Tapah (C6), respectively.
Numbers of effective 16S rRNA gene sequences, numbers of observed OTUs, alpha diversity indices (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson) and evenness for the gut bacterial community from three different localities.
| Localities | No. of sequences | OTUs | Chao1 | Shannon (H) | Simpson (1-D) | Evenness (e) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batu Pahat | 25,976 | 107 | 107.30 | 2.844 | 0.885 | 0.1606 |
| Tapah | 1,835 | 41 | 41.86 | 1.764 | 0.618 | 0.1424 |
| Yong Peng | 11387 | 120 | 121.80 | 3.17 | 0.922 | 0.1984 |
| Overall | 39198 | 170 |
Note:
The operational taxonomical units (OTUs) were defined at the 97% similarity level.
Figure 2The rarefaction curve of the 16S rRNA gene sequences for different populations of D. metesae calculated for OTUs at 97% similarity.
Relative abundance at the phylum level of microbiome communities in D. metesae from different localities.
| No. | Phylum | Batu Pahat (%) | Tapah (%) | Yong Peng (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proteobacteria | 84.72 | 89.10 | 79.16 |
| 2 | Bacteroidetes | 4.29 | 1.58 | 13.36 |
| 3 | Actinobacteria | 4.69 | 6.54 | 2.48 |
| 4 | Acidobacteria | 3.63 | 2.34 | 3.74 |
| 5 | Firmicutes | 2.67 | 0.11 | 1.18 |
| 6 | Chlorobi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| 7 | Thermi | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 8 | GN02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
Figure 3Relative abundances at the phylum level in parasitoid wasp, D. metesae.
Relative abundance at the family level of microbiome communities of D. metesae.
| No. | Family | Batu Pahat (%) | Tapah (%) | Yong Peng (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {Unknown Family} Rhizobiales | 23.46 | 61.81 | 20.59 |
| 2 | Pseudomonadaceae | 26.44 | 6.43 | 17.80 |
| 3 | Rhodobacteraceae | 9.73 | 8.59 | 17.14 |
| 4 | Halomonadaceae | 11.31 | 2.49 | 7.48 |
| 5 | Flavobacteriaceae | 4.56 | 1.50 | 14.27 |
| 6 | Bradyrhizobiaceae | 5.26 | 5.88 | 3.95 |
| 7 | {Unknown Family} Solibacterales | 3.90 | 2.38 | 4.02 |
| 8 | Comamonadaceae | 4.76 | 1.16 | 1.79 |
| 9 | Alteromonadaceae | 2.55 | 0.33 | 5.10 |
| 10 | Nocardiaceae | 1.96 | 5.93 | 0.39 |
| 11 | Xanthobacteraceae | 1.40 | 1.22 | 1.76 |
| 12 | Enterobacteriaceae | 1.69 | 1.16 | 0.86 |
| 13 | Pseudoalteromonadaceae | 0.59 | 0.50 | 2.86 |
| 14 | Micrococcaceae | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| 15 | Propionibacteriaceae | 0.82 | 0.61 | 1.59 |
Note:
Absence of Micrococcaceae in Tapah, Perak.
Figure 4Relative abundances at the family level in parasitoid wasp, D. metesae.
Figure 5Heatmap with dendrogram at the genus level using a gradient heatmap (over 1% of the microbiome). The 30 most abundant genera were used in hierarchical clustering to evaluate the relationships between three samples of population of D. metesae using weighted pair clustering based on Bray-Curtis measurements. The darker colour indicate the more dominant the genus.
Figure 6The Venn diagram illustrated the number of shared OTUs at the 97% similarity.
Figure 7Phylogenetic tree dendrogram based on 16S rRNA using Bray-Curtis distance (at genus level).
Figure 8A three-dimensional plot of weighted UniFrac based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Plot was created using the pairwise weighted UniFrac distances (where PC1 is variability at 79%, PC2 is variability at 21%, and PC3 is variability at 0%).
The correlation coefficient values (Pearson r) and p-values (bold) of bacterial community (genera) among D. metesae of different localities.
| Batu Pahat | Tapah | Yong Peng | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batu Pahat | 6.66E-26 | 6.97E-62 | |
| Tapah |
| 1.99E-32 | |
| Yong Peng |
|
|
Figure 9The cold-hot plot shows the correlation between the bacterial community (genera) between three population of D. metesae.