| Literature DB >> 35650313 |
Fabiana de Almeida Araújo Santos1, Edson Campos Valadares Junior2, Luiz Ricardo Goulart1, Pedro Lucas Figueiredo Nunes2, Eliane Pereira Mendonça2, Lúcio Vilela Carneiro Girão2, Aline Santana da Hora2, Thatiana Bragine Ferreira3, Luciana Machado Bastos1, Alessandra Aparecida Medeiros-Ronchi2, Belchiolina Beatriz Fonseca4,5.
Abstract
Phage display (PD) is a tool for developing new molecules to control pathogens. Peptides selected by PD are commonly synthesised and tested, but the use of phage M13 displaying the selected peptides as a direct biding in the intestinal tract has not yet been tested. This study evaluated whether phage M13 can remain viable in the chicken gastrointestinal tract and whether it causes injury or humoral immune response. We inoculated phage M13 or E. coli ER2738 (ECR) infected with M13 into birds at different ages. We found the virus in faeces at 5 or 13 days after inoculation, just when it infected the ECR. The presence of phage M13 or ECR did not result in gut injuries and had no impacts on weight gain and bird health. Furthermore, the levels of IgY were similar in all treatments, which indicates that the virus can be used in chicken until 42 days without being recognised by the immune system. This work provides a scientific basis for the use of PD as a tool in numerous applications to control different pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Chicken gastrointestinal tract; Chickens; Control; ELISA; Peptides
Year: 2022 PMID: 35650313 PMCID: PMC9160166 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01407-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 4.126
Mean values of M13 phages per gram of bird faeces (log PFU/g) in different groups and at different ages
| Age/Groups | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 | G5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 4.84 (± 0.82)b | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a |
| 14 | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 5.27 (± 0.25)b | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a |
| 21 | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 5.77 (± 0.57)b | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a |
| 28 | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 4.6 (± 0.60)b | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a | 0.00 (± 0.00)a |
Values represent mean and standard deviation. G1: group inoculated with phage M13. G2: Group inoculated with E. coli ER2738 infected by the phage M13; G3: Group infected with E. coli ER2738; G4: Group inoculated with PEG; G5: Group inoculated with PBS. The birds of G1 were inoculated at all ages (10 PFUs/bird). The birds of G3 were inoculated at 2 days (5.04 log CFU/animal), 8 days (6.64 log CFU/animal) and 15 days of age (6.69 log CFU/animal). Different letters represent statistical difference (P > 0.05) by grouped ANOVA
Mean daily weight gain of birds (MDWG), mean daily feed consumption (MDFC) and feed conversion (FA) of bords of the line Hy-line W-36® at 1–7 days, 8–35 days and 36–42 days of age
| Tratament1 | 1–7 days old (g/day) | 8–35 days old (g/day) | 36–42 days old (g/day) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDWG | MDFC2 | FA2 | MDWG | MDFC2 | FA2 | MDWG | MDFC2 | FA2 | |
| G 1 | 14.29 | 19.80 | 1.39 | 31.76 | 46.20 | 1.45 | 57.37 | 139.46 | 2.43 |
| G 2 | 15.59 | 19.83 | 1.27 | 30.64 | 46.16 | 1.51 | 59.78 | 132.89 | 2.22 |
| G 3 | 15.61 | 19.58 | 1.25 | 30.00 | 50.74 | 1.69 | 47.87 | 132.43 | 2.77 |
| G 4 | 14.97 | 20.42 | 1.36 | 27.88 | 41.10 | 1.47 | 68.09 | 117.17 | 1.72 |
| G 5 | 15.86 | 18.89 | 1.19 | 31.16 | 45.04 | 1.45 | 61.99 | 135.17 | 2.18 |
| Mean | 15.26 | 19.70 | 1.29 | 30.29 | 45.85 | 1.51 | 59.02 | 131.42 | 2.26 |
| CV (%)3 | 9.37 | – | – | 9.69 | – | – | 7.66 | – | – |
| 0.21 | – | – | 0.64 | – | – | 0.51 | – | – | |
G1: group inoculated with phage M13. G2: Group inoculated with E. coli ER2738 infected by the phage M13; G3: Group infected by E. coli ER2738; G4: Group inoculated with PEG; G5: Group inoculated with PBS. The birds of G1 were inoculated at all ages (10 PFUs/bird). The birds of G3 were inoculated at 2 days (5.04 log CFU/animal), 8 days (6.64 log CFU/animal) and 15 days of age (6.69 log CFU/animal). 1Means corresponding to the experimental treatments; 2MDFC and FA data are descriptive only; 3CV (%) corresponds to the coefficient of variation; 4Statistical probability; no differences were found for the MDWG variable (P > 0.05) by the Tukey test
Fig. 1Ileum villi height and ileum and cecum crypt depth (um) in 42-day-old birds inoculated with M13-infected ECR. G2: Group inoculated with E. coli ER2738 infected by phage M13; G5: Group inoculated with PBS. DIC: depth of the ileum crypts, IVH: ileum villi height, CCD: cecum crypt depth. T tests were performed between G2 and G5 to DIC or IVH or CCD (p ≤ 0.05). There was no difference in the DIC, IVH or CCD between G2 and G5
Fig. 2Levels of antibody (measured by absorbance) anti-M13 in birds of the different treatment groups. G1: Group inoculated with phage M13; G2: Group inoculated with E. coli ER2738 infected with phage M13; G3: Group infected by E. coli ER2738; G4: Group inoculated with PEG; G5: Group inoculated with PBS. Control: plate sensitised with phage without serum. No differences were found (P > 0.05) by Tukey’s test