Penghui Hu1,2, Kaman So1, Hongjie Chen3, Qimou Lin4, Meng Xu1, Yiguang Lin3,5,6. 1. Department of Oncology, 162698The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Oncology, 71537Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China. 3. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 144991Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Surgery, 71537Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China. 5. School of Life Sciences, 1994University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6. Centre Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the underlying mechanisms of how the basic fibroblast growth factor monoclonal antibody (bFGFmAb) attenuates cisplatin (DDP) resistance in lung cancer using A549 cells and cisplatin-resistant A549 cells (A549/DDP). Methods: Cancer cell proliferation, cell viability, and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of cisplatin were assessed. Transwell assays were utilized to evaluate the invasion activity of tumor cells in response to treatment. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers and drug resistance proteins were analysed using Western blots. Results: We demonstrate that the bFGFmAb inhibits the proliferation and invasion of both A549 and A549/DDP cells. The bFGFmAb increases cisplatin sensitivity of both A549 and A549/DDP cells as evidenced by an increase in the IC50 of cisplatin in A549 and A549/DDP cells. Furthermore, bFGFmAb significantly increases the expression of E-cadherin, whilst decreasing the expression of N-cadherin and bFGF in both cell lines, thereby showing inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In addition, we demonstrate that bFGFmAb significantly reduces the expression of the lung resistance protein. Conclusions: Our data suggests that the humanized bFGFmAb is a promising agent to attenuate cisplatin resistance in NSCLC. The underlying mechanism for this effect of bFGFmAb may be associated with the inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reduced expression of lung resistance protein.
Objectives: To investigate the underlying mechanisms of how the basic fibroblast growth factor monoclonal antibody (bFGFmAb) attenuates cisplatin (DDP) resistance in lung cancer using A549 cells and cisplatin-resistant A549 cells (A549/DDP). Methods: Cancer cell proliferation, cell viability, and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of cisplatin were assessed. Transwell assays were utilized to evaluate the invasion activity of tumor cells in response to treatment. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers and drug resistance proteins were analysed using Western blots. Results: We demonstrate that the bFGFmAb inhibits the proliferation and invasion of both A549 and A549/DDP cells. The bFGFmAb increases cisplatin sensitivity of both A549 and A549/DDP cells as evidenced by an increase in the IC50 of cisplatin in A549 and A549/DDP cells. Furthermore, bFGFmAb significantly increases the expression of E-cadherin, whilst decreasing the expression of N-cadherin and bFGF in both cell lines, thereby showing inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In addition, we demonstrate that bFGFmAb significantly reduces the expression of the lung resistance protein. Conclusions: Our data suggests that the humanized bFGFmAb is a promising agent to attenuate cisplatin resistance in NSCLC. The underlying mechanism for this effect of bFGFmAb may be associated with the inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reduced expression of lung resistance protein.
Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related
deaths worldwide, responsible for 19.4% of total cancer deaths.[1,2] Among the different histological types of
lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung
cancer.[3,4] Despite great advancement
in cancer treatment, platinum-based chemotherapy, like cisplatin, remains the first-line
therapy for advanced NSCLC patients that lack targetable mutations.
For patients with high expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1), 50% or
greater, pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has recently replaced
cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. However, ICI treatment is not
suitable for patients that lack PDL-1 expression,
therefore the cisplatin-based doublet regimen remains the foundation of treatment for
the majority of patients with advanced NSCLC.
Intrinsic and acquired drug resistance remains problematic. To enhance the efficacy
and to minimize the development of drug resistance, the chemotherapeutic management of NSCLC
patients usually involves combining the use of platinum-derived salts (such as cisplatin)
with a second or third generation drug such as gemcitabine, pemetrexed, or taxanes.
One of the most challenging issues in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients is
acquired drug resistance, leading to morbidity and mortality of NSCLC patients, despite
advancement in chemotherapy and targeted therapy.[7-9] Thus, strategies to counter drug resistance and to increase therapeutic
efficacy are urgently needed.The molecular mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance in cancer treatment are not fully
understood. The main mechanisms are believed to be associated with a number of factors
including induction of anti-apoptotic signals, the active efflux of cisplatin from the cell,
tolerance to DNA lesion, epigenetic regulation by microRNAs.[10,11] Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
(EMT), a process involving in the transformation of static epithelial cells into mobile
mesenchymal cells, is also considered to be a significant factor in chemoresistance related
to the use cisplatin.
In recent years, increasing studies have shown that EMT plays a key role in the drug
resistance of lung cancer. EMT reduced the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to antitumor
drugs and produced drug resistance through the regulation of multiple signal pathways.
Report by Shintani et al. demonstrated that EMT resulted in increased malignant potential
and reduced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel in NSCLC cells.
Resistance of NSCLC to EGFR TKIs is accompanied by the activation of EMT and
downstream PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways, suggesting that reversing EMT is
expected to reverse the acquired resistance of EGFR TKIs.
Fuchs et al. also demonstrated EMT mediate sensitivity to epidermal growth factor
receptor inhibition in human hepatoma cells.
Since bFGF is one of the important factors inducing EMT,
and bFGF protein is highly expressed in patients with malignant tumors.[17,18] Therefore, targeting bFGF involving in
EMT process may become a new strategy for tumor treatment. However, research examining EMT
change following bFGF blocking in resistant lung cancer has not been conducted.The basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) belongs to the family of heparin-binding growth
factors, which mediates a series of cellular responses in embryonic development,
haematopoiesis, wound healing, tumor growth, and tumor angiogenesis.
It utilizes heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) as binding partners to bind to
specific tyrosine kinase transmembrane receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptors
(FGFRs), to form a ternary bFGF-FGFR-HSPG complex.[20,21] Increased expression of bFGF has been
frequently observed in several types of human malignancies, such as hepatocellular
carcinoma, and melanoma.[19-21] The blockade of the bFGF pathway has been
shown to impede tumor progression and bFGF-targeting peptides and vaccinations have
demonstrated inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth in melanoma xenografts.[22-24] Previously, our group demonstrated that a bFGFmAb combined with chemotherapy
or/and radiotherapy[26,27]
inhibited the growth of transplanted cancers by reducing bFGF expression, resulting in a
decrease in tumor angiogenesis and an increase in cell apoptosis. Moreover, this bFGFmAb
played a critical role in the inhibition of MCF-7/ADM (doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 breast
cancer cells) proliferation. Furthermore, this bFGFmAb reversed doxorubicin resistance in
breast cancer cells by reducing the drug efflux through downregulation of P-glycoprotein.
All these studies demonstrate that bFGFmAb plays a role in inhibiting the development
of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. However, no studies have been performed to identify
the underlying mechanism of bFGFmAb as an agent to prevent chemotherapy resistance.In the present study, utilizing the NSCLC cell line A549 and cisplatin-resistant cell line
A549/DDP, we investigated the effects of an in-house developed humanized bFGFmAb on
cisplatin resistance and their underlying mechanisms involving the suppression of EMT and
reduction in lung-resistant protein (LRP) expression. Findings from this study may provide
new treatment targets and novel insights to overcome chemotherapy drug resistance.
Materials and methods
The study described here was to investigate the antitumor property and associated molecular
mechanism of a humanized bFGFmAb that was developed from our laboratory. The details of how
the study was performed were described in the following seven sections.
Cell lines and cell culture
The A549 cell line (CRM-CCL-185) was obtained from the Guangdong Provincial Key
Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and Antibody Engineering (GPKLMIAE) at Jinan
University, and the cisplatin-resistant A549/DDP cell line, a derivative of A549 cells
(CRM-CCL-185), was purchased from Yinzijing Biological Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd
(Beijing, China). Cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, USA)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) and incubated at 37°C in a
humidified incubator (Thermo, Japan) with 5% CO2. Only cells in the exponential
growth phase were used for all experiments. The bFGF used in this study was purchased from
PeproTech Co., Ltd (New Jersey, USA). The bFGFmAb was obtained from the GPKLMIAE at Jinan
University. The purity of the bFGFmAb stock solution was determined by the sodium dodecyl
sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) method. Titers and concentrations of
purified bFGFmAb stock solutions were assayed using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) tests and the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) standard assay kits (Pierce, USA),
respectively. Finally, the purified bFGFmAb stock solution was stored at -20°C for further
experiments. Experimental groups were treated with bFGF or/and bFGFmAb or/and DDP, while
only phosphate buffer (PBS) was added to the control group.
Cell proliferation and toxicity tests
The cell-counting kit-8 (CCK-8) colorimetric assays (Dojindo Laboratories, Japan) were
performed to determine the effects of bFGF and bFGFmAb on lung cancer cells according to
the manufacturer’s protocol. The experiments were divided into four groups (A549+bFGF,
A549+bFGFmAb, A549/DDP+bFGF, and A549/DDP+bFGFmAb). The bFGF concentration was adjusted to
10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 ng/mL, whereas the concentration of the bFGFmAb was set as 3.125,
6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL. A549 and A549/DDP cells were first seeded into 96-well
plates (3 × 104 cells/well) and treated with different concentrations of bFGF
or bFGFmAb. Cells were cultured 37°C with 5% CO2 for 48 h, the medium removed
and replaced with 90 mL of RPMI 1640 medium and 10 mL of CCK-8 solution. Following
incubation for 2 h, the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using a
microplate reader (Thermo, Japan). Each sample was plated in triplicate wells, and the
experiment was repeated at least three times. Finally, the proliferation and inhibition
rates of tumor cells were calculated.
Cisplatin resistance test
CCK-8 colorimetric assays were used to examine the effects of bFGF and bFGFmAb on
cisplatin sensitivity of NSCLC cells. The experiments were divided into six groups
including A549+PBS+DDP, A549+bFGF+DDP, A549+bFGFmAb +DDP, A549/DDP+PBS+DDP,
A549/DDP+bFGF+DDP, and A549/DDP+bFGFmAb +DDP. The concentration of bFGF and bFGFmAb were
80 ng/mL and 100µg/mL, respectively, while cisplatin concentrations were set to a
different gradient (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 µg/mL). The CCK-8 assays were performed
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Firstly, tumor cells (3 × 104
cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates treated with bFGF or bFGFmAb or PBS and DDP.
Secondly, after culturing for 48 h, the cultured medium was removed and replaced with
90 mL RPMI 1640 medium and 10 mL CCK-8 solution. Thirdly, following incubation for 2 h,
the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. Each sample was plated in
triplicate wells, and experiments were repeated at least three times. Finally, the IC50 of
cisplatin in each group was calculated.
Assessment of the cell morphology
The NSCLC cell lines, A549 and A549/DDP, were seeded into six-well plates (2.5 ×
105/well). After being cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS
for 24 h, the cells were treated with bFGF (80 ng/mL) or/and bFGFmAb (100µg/mL) or PBS by
directly adding them into the cell culture medium. Twenty-fourhours later, the cells were
photographed under a microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Transwell invasion assay
Transwell assays were used to evaluate the invasiveness of tumor cells (A549 and
A549/DDP) in response to treatments (bFGF and bFGFmAb). The assays were performed
according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Logarithmic growth phase cells (1 ×
105) were seeded into the upper compartment of a Transwell chamber (354480;
BD Biosciences) with 0.1mL of serum-free medium, followed by addition of bFGF (80 ng/mL)
and/or bFGFmAb (100 ug/mL) or PBS. Complete RPMI 1640 medium (0.6 mL) containing 10% FBS
was added to the lower chamber as the chemical attractant. After incubation for 12 h,
non-invasive cells were swabbed from the upper chamber, the cells attached to the lower
filter surface were fixed with methanol then stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Finally,
the number of cells was calculated under a light microscope (Olympus, Japan) in five
randomly selected views (original magnification 200×).
Western blot analysis
Tumor cells (A549, or A549/DDP) were seeded into six-well plates (2.5 ×
105/well). After 24 h culture, the cells were treated with bFGFmAb 100µg/mL or
PBS by adding them directly into the culture medium. On the next day, the cells were lysed
with RIPA lysis buffer for 30 min at 4°C and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min. A pierce
BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to determine protein
concentrations following the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein was separated by 10%
SDSPAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA,
USA). After blocking with 5% blotto (skimmed milk) in Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20
for 1 h, the primary antibodies rabbit monoclonal anti-bFGF (CST, USA; 1:1000 dilution),
mouse monoclonal anti-E-cadherin (CST, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit polyclonal anti-N-cadherin
(Abcam, UK; 1:1000 dilution), rabbit polyclonal anti-LRP (Santa Cruz, USA, 1:200
dilution), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (CST, USA, 1:1000 dilution) were added and
incubated at 4°C overnight. After incubation with the secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit
IgG-HRP (GE Healthcare, 1:1000 dilution), the bound antibodies were detected using the ECL
Plus Western Blotting Detection system (Life Technologies, USA). Finally, the intensities
of the bands were analyzed using the Bandscan Software.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was independently repeated at least three times. All statistical analyses
were performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, USA). Descriptive data are presented as the mean ±
standard deviation. The two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to perform comparisons
between experimental groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered to
indicate statistical significance.
Results
Characteristics of the bFGFmAb
As shown in Figure 1(a), only
two bFGFmAb chains are presented with no additional nonspecific chains, confirming the
high purity of the bFGFmAb used. The upper band represents the heavy chain of the antibody
with a molecular weight of about 50kDa, and the lower band shows the light chain with a
molecular weight of about 26kDa. To determine the antibody concentration, a BCA standard
curve with the optical density value at 570 nm as the y-value and the BCA concentration as
the x-value was generated. The resulting formula was y = 1.2231 x + 0.2476
(R2 = 0.9901). Thus, the concentration of the bFGFmAb was
determined as 15 mg/mL (Figure
1(b)). The bFGFmAb titer assessed using indirect ELISA was approximately
1:500,000 (Figure 1(c)).
Figure 1.
The bFGFmAb and its characteristics. (a) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis of the purified bFGFmAb (H, heavy chain; L, light chain). (b)
Concentration of the purified bFGFmAb stock solution determined by bicinchoninic
acid (BCA) standard assays. (c) Titer of the purified bFGFmAb stock solution tested
by indirect ELISA. (d) The bFGFmAb inhibits the proliferation of A549 and A549/DDP
cells. (e) Treatment with bFGF increases the proliferation in A549 and A549/DDP
cells. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay; mAb, monoclonal antibody; OD, optical density.
The bFGFmAb and its characteristics. (a) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis of the purified bFGFmAb (H, heavy chain; L, light chain). (b)
Concentration of the purified bFGFmAb stock solution determined by bicinchoninic
acid (BCA) standard assays. (c) Titer of the purified bFGFmAb stock solution tested
by indirect ELISA. (d) The bFGFmAb inhibits the proliferation of A549 and A549/DDP
cells. (e) Treatment with bFGF increases the proliferation in A549 and A549/DDP
cells. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay; mAb, monoclonal antibody; OD, optical density.
bFGFmAb inhibits the proliferation of NSCLC cells
To study the influence of bFGF and bFGFmAb on the proliferation of NSCLC cells, we
performed CCK-8 assays using the A549 and A549/DDP cell lines. As shown in Figure 1(d), with the increase of
bFGFmAb, the inhibition rate of both cells increases gradually. When the bFGFmAb
concentration was higher than 12.5 µg/mL, the inhibition rate of A549/DDP cells became
more efficient, which reached the maximum value (58%) at 100 µg/ml. In contrast, bFGF
promotes tumor cell proliferation (Figure 1(e)). When bFGF concentration >40ng/mL, the increase of proliferation
rate in A549 cells was the most significant. However, there was little change in the
proliferation of the A549/DDP cells, A549/DDP cells were not sensitive to exogenous
bFGF.
bFGFmAb reverses cisplatin resistance in NSCLC cells
CCK-8 assays were used to investigate the effect of bFGF and bFGFmAb on NSCLC cisplatin
resistance in A549 cells and A549/DDP cell lines. The results are summarized in Table 1. We observed that
A549/DDP cells exhibit more resistance to cisplatin compared to A549 cells
(p < 0.05). Administration of bFGF increases the resistance to
cisplatin in both cell lines, especially in A549 cells (p < 0.05). By
contrast, bFGFmAb decreases the cisplatin resistance in both examined cell lines. This is
most apparent in A549/DDP cells; the average IC50 value of 6.15 μg/mL significantly
decreased to 3.78 μg/mL in the presence of the bFGFmAb (p < 0.05).
These results suggest that bFGF significantly increases the cisplatin resistance in NSCLC,
whereas the bFGFmAb was able to reverse this.
Table 1.
Effects of bFGF and bFGFmAb on cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung
cancer.
Group
IC50 (μg/mL)
A549
3.04 ± 1.2
A549 + bFGF
4.31 ± 2.0*
A549 + bFGFmAb
2.10 ± 0.8*
A549/DDP
6.15 ± 1.7*
A549/DDP + bFGF
6.28 ± 1.2
A549/DDP + bFGFmAb
3.78 ± 0.5*
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Treatment with bFGFmAb led
to increased sensitivities of cisplatin in both A549 and A549/DDP cells when
compared with the nontreated group (p < 0.05).
*p < 0.05. A549, lung adenocarcinoma cell; A549/DDP,
cisplatin resistance cell; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin;
IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; mAb, monoclonal antibody.
Effects of bFGF and bFGFmAb on cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung
cancer.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Treatment with bFGFmAb led
to increased sensitivities of cisplatin in both A549 and A549/DDP cells when
compared with the nontreated group (p < 0.05).
*p < 0.05. A549, lung adenocarcinoma cell; A549/DDP,
cisplatin resistance cell; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin;
IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; mAb, monoclonal antibody.
bFGFmAb inhibits morphological changes associated with EMT
To explore the association between bFGFmAb treatment and EMT in lung cancer cells, the
effects of the bFGFmAb on morphological changes in A549 and A549/DDP cells were observed.
After treatment with bFGF, both A549 and A549/DDP cells show morphological features of an
EMT phenotype (Figure 2). As
shown in Figure 2, A549 cells
morphology change from a long fusiform and spindle shaped phenotype, whereby the
pseudopods become slender and numerous. A549/DDP cells transform to a long, thin and more
irregular shape, in addition, there is an increase in the number of pseudopods and
dendrites present. Moreover, intercellular connections are less frequently observed. In
the presence of the bFGFmAb, these morphological changes consistent with EMT are inhibited
or reversed indicating that bFGF plays a key role in EMT, and bFGFmAb effectively blocks
the process. This suggests that the bFGFmAb may have therapeutic potential.
Figure 2.
Effects of the bFGFmAb on the morphology of non-small cell lung cancer cells. EMT
cell morphology is evident in both A549 and A549/DDP cells after treatment with
bFGF. A549 cells become a long fusiform and spindle shaped phenotype, while A549/DDP
cells transform to a long, thin and more irregular shape. Treatment of the cells
with bFGFmAb attenuates/reverses the bFGF-induced EMT transformation. bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
Effects of the bFGFmAb on the morphology of non-small cell lung cancer cells. EMT
cell morphology is evident in both A549 and A549/DDP cells after treatment with
bFGF. A549 cells become a long fusiform and spindle shaped phenotype, while A549/DDP
cells transform to a long, thin and more irregular shape. Treatment of the cells
with bFGFmAb attenuates/reverses the bFGF-induced EMT transformation. bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
bFGFmAb inhibits the invasiveness of lung cancer cells
Transwell assays were utilized to examine the effects of bFGF and bFGFmAb on lung cancer
cell invasion. As shown in Figure
3, bFGF treatment significantly enhances cell invasion, whereas the bFGFmAb
exhibits the opposite effect by reducing the number of invading cells (p
< 0.05). When both bFGF and bFGFmAb were simultaneously added to the cultured cells,
their effects on cell invasion cancelled each other out. This suggests that bFGF plays an
important role in cancer cell invasion leading to a deterioration in lung cancer, and
bFGFmAb is a potential candidate drug that may slow down the proliferation and metastasis
processes in NSCLC.
Figure 3.
bFGFmAb suppresses cell invasiveness in both A549 and A549/DDP cells. Cell invasion
was detected using transwell assays. Treatment of the cells with bFGF significantly
enhances cell invasion in both A549 and A549/DDP cells, whereas the bFGFmAb exhibits
the opposite effect by reducing the number of invading cells. Their effects on cell
invasion are cancelled out each other when both bFGF and bFGFmAb are added
immutanously to the cultured cells. *p < 0.05. bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; mAb, monoclonal antibody.
bFGFmAb suppresses cell invasiveness in both A549 and A549/DDP cells. Cell invasion
was detected using transwell assays. Treatment of the cells with bFGF significantly
enhances cell invasion in both A549 and A549/DDP cells, whereas the bFGFmAb exhibits
the opposite effect by reducing the number of invading cells. Their effects on cell
invasion are cancelled out each other when both bFGF and bFGFmAb are added
immutanously to the cultured cells. *p < 0.05. bFGF, basic
fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; mAb, monoclonal antibody.
bFGFmAb inhibits EMT and decreases drug resistance markers
To determine whether the bFGFmAb plays a role in EMT and drug resistance and to clarify
whether it activates the corresponding signaling proteins, western blotting was performed
to measure the levels of bFGF, N-cadherin, E-cadherin, and LRP in the A549 and A549/DDP
cell models (Figure 4). As shown
in Figure 4, after bFGFmAb
treatment, the expression of E-cadherin significantly increases while bFGF, N-cadherin,
and LRP expression levels significantly decrease in both A549 and A549/DDP cells (all
p < 0.05). These results suggest that the bFGFmAb can inhibit EMT
and reduce drug resistance in NSCLC.
Figure 4.
The bFGFmAb regulates markers for EMT and suppresses LRP expression. Treatment with
bFGFmAb leads a significantly decrease in expression of bFGF, N-cadherin, and LRP,
and a significantly increases in the expression of E-cadherin in both A549 and
A549/DDP cells. N-cadherin and E-cadherin are EMT markers. *p <
0.05. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; EMT,
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; LRP, lung resistance protein; mAb, monoclonal
antibody.
The bFGFmAb regulates markers for EMT and suppresses LRP expression. Treatment with
bFGFmAb leads a significantly decrease in expression of bFGF, N-cadherin, and LRP,
and a significantly increases in the expression of E-cadherin in both A549 and
A549/DDP cells. N-cadherin and E-cadherin are EMT markers. *p <
0.05. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DDP, cisplatin; EMT,
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; LRP, lung resistance protein; mAb, monoclonal
antibody.
Discussion
Resistance to chemotherapy is a major problem in chemotherapy leading to failure of
long-term effective treatment, and is the most challenging issue in the treatment of
advanced NSCLC patients. Here we report a novel strategy using bFGFmAb to effectively
reverse cisplatin resistance in lung cancer cells. Utilising an in-house humanized bFGFmAb
and human NSCLC cell lines A549 and the A549/DDP, we demonstrate that bFGFmAb effectively
inhibits the proliferation and invasion of both NSCLC cancer cells and cisplatin resistance
cancer cells. Here we demonstrate the specific bFGF antibody significantly enhances
cisplatin sensitivity (IC50) in both A549 and A549/DDP cells. Further, we demonstrate that
EMT suppression and LRP downregulation appear to be the mechanism of action for bFGFmAb as
anti-cisplatin resistance agent. These findings pave the way for a new antibody-based
treatment strategy targeting chemotherapy resistance.The platinum-based regimen is one of the most important therapeutic methods for NCSLC
patients. However, inherent and acquired resistance of tumor cells to cisplatin has led to
the failure of treatment in patients with NSCLC. Thus, new strategies to enhance the
sensitivity of NSCLC cells to current therapeutic drugs are required.The bFGF (FGF-2) is an oncogenic factor, an important secreted cytokine and encodes
heparin-binding proteins with growth, proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenic activity.
Deregulation of bFGF/FGFR signaling in cancer cells is correlated with pathogenesis,
lymph node metastasis, and prognosis.
Moreover, fibroblasts can mediate resistance to treatment via bFGF secretion in
advanced stages of cancer.
It has been reported that bFGF is one of the epigenetic mechanisms underlying
multidrug resistance of tumors.
Indeed, bFGF confers chemoresistance by inducing apoptosis in small cell lung cancer
and breast cancer.[33-35] Thus, targeting bFGF/FGFR signaling may
provide an opportunity to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy. It has been reported that
various molecules can inhibit bFGF (ligand) activity, binding, or expression in endothelial
and tumor cells.
For instance, FP-1039, a type of bFGF ligand trap, inhibits bFGF-mediated cell
proliferation and angiogenesis in lung and endometrial cancer models.
Also, small molecules, such as sm27, pentosan, and pentraxin-3 inhibit bFGF binding
to FGFRs.The bFGFmAb used in the current study is a humanized monoclonal antibody developed and
produced by our group.
Previously, we produced a murine bFGFmAb, that effectively suppresses tumor growth
through the inhibition of angiogenesis and the induction of apoptosis in melanoma.
Furthermore, we have demonstrated that bFGFmAb combined with gimeracil and oteracil
potassium (S-1) exerts a synergistic inhibitory effect on the growth and angiogenesis of
Lewis-transplanted lung cancers.
Moreover, combination of bFGFmAb and radiotherapy synergistically inhibits
proliferation of B16-transplanted melanoma tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma.
The bFGFmAb also inhibits the proliferation and reverses multidrug resistance in
MCF-7/ADM breast cancer cells via downregulation of P-glycoprotein.
In the present study, the humanized bFGFmAb demonstrates an enhancement of cisplatin
sensitivity in both A549 cells and A549/DDP cells (cisplatin-resistant lung cancer). This
antibody decreases the invasiveness of A549 and A549/DDP cells, suggesting that the bFGFmAb
can efficiently suppress invasion in cisplatin-resistant NSCLC. Thus, these findings support
that bFGFmAb has potential as an effective drug to increase cisplatin sensitivity in
cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells.EMT is a process involved in cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastatic dissemination.
During EMT, epithelial traits, including E-cadherin, plakoglobin, and cytokeratins, as well
as the dismantling of adherent junctions and desmosomes, are lost, whereas mesenchymal
characteristics, such as N-cadherin, vimentin, and fibronectin are acquired.[40,41] This phenomenon is considered to be an
important event during malignant tumor metastasis and drug resistant development.[42-44] Our results clearly show that the humanized antibody bFGFmAb possesses
potent EMT suppressing activity as evidenced by the suppression of key molecules and
pathways involved in EMT, such as N-cadherin, and the increase in E-cadherin levels in
bFGFmAb -treated A549 cells and A549/DDP cells (Figure 4). We also demonstrate that, compared to the
control group, the expression of LRP significantly decreases (p < 0.05)
after bFGFmAb treatment. These data suggest that EMT suppression and LRP downregulation are
involved in the mechanism of action, leading to reduced cisplatin resistance following
bFGFmAb treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that a
bFGFmAb attenuates cisplatin resistance in lung cancer through suppression of EMT and
downregulation of LRP, representing a novel mechanism of overcoming drug resistance. Our
data derived from in vitro experiments compliments and supports previous reports where bFGF
is an important target for drug resistant in NCSLC.Limitations of our study included that the data was from in vitro experiments only.
Further, in vivo study certainly is needed for moving to translational stage. Additionally,
limited number of cell lines, A549 cells and cisplatin-resistant A549 cells, was used in the
experiments, limiting the generalization of the findings. Furthermore, the study is limited
to NCSLC cell lines and no other cancer type is involved. Therefore, interpretation of the
findings should be done with cautions. Although promising, further in vivo study,
translational work and pharmacokinetic and toxicological assessments are necessary before
moving to clinical trials. We believe that the limitations are outweighed by the notable
strengths and a promising future outlook of potential new treatment strategy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, building on our previous work on humanized bFGFmAb, in this study, we
demonstrated that bFGFmAb significantly inhibits the proliferation and invasion of both
NSCLC cells and cisplatin-resistant NSCLC cells. The sensitivity, as measured by IC50, of
the resistance of the cells to the therapeutic drug cisplatin was successfully reversed by
bFGFmAb treatment. The underlying mechanism appears to involve the suppression of EMT and
reduction in LRP expression. Our data supports that the bFGFmAb may serve as a potential
targeted adjunct therapy for NSCLC patients who are resistant to cisplatin.
Authors: Bryan C Fuchs; Tsutomu Fujii; Jon D Dorfman; Jonathan M Goodwin; Andrew X Zhu; Michael Lanuti; Kenneth K Tanabe Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kari R Fischer; Anna Durrans; Sharrell Lee; Jianting Sheng; Fuhai Li; Stephen T C Wong; Hyejin Choi; Tina El Rayes; Seongho Ryu; Juliane Troeger; Robert F Schwabe; Linda T Vahdat; Nasser K Altorki; Vivek Mittal; Dingcheng Gao Journal: Nature Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 49.962