Literature DB >> 35648750

Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice.

Ichiro Matsuo1,2, Naoya Kawamura1,2, Yoshiki Ohnuki1, Kenji Suita1, Misao Ishikawa3, Takehiro Matsubara4, Yasumasa Mototani1, Aiko Ito5, Yoshio Hayakawa1,6, Megumi Nariyama7, Akinaka Morii1,2, Kenichi Kiyomoto1,2, Michinori Tsunoda1,2, Kazuhiro Gomi2, Satoshi Okumura1.   

Abstract

Oral infections, particularly periodontitis, are a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, although the molecular mechanisms involved remain elusive. The aims of the present study were to investigate the effects of lipopolysaccharide derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG-LPS) on cardiac function in mice, and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Mice (C57BL/6) were injected with PG-LPS (0.8 mg/kg/day) with or without an inhibitor of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling (TAK-242, 0.8 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks. Left ventricular ejection function was significantly decreased at 1 week (from 67 ± 0.5 to 58 ± 1.2%) and remained low at 4 weeks (57 ± 1.0%). The number of apoptotic myocytes was increased (approximately 7.4-fold), the area of fibrosis was increased (approximately 3.3-fold) and the number of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine-positive myocytes, a sensitive indicator of oxidative DNA damage, was increased (approximately 7.6-fold) at 4 weeks in the heart of PG-LPS treated mice. However, levels of various serum pro-inflammatory cytokines in PG-LPS-treated mice were similar to those in control mice. The impairment of cardiac function in PG-LPS-treated mice appears to involve activation of TLR4-NADPH oxidase (NOX) 4 signaling, leading to abundant production of reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ leakage from sarcoplastic reticulumn induced by calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII)-mediated phosphorylation of phospholamban (at Thr-17) and ryanodine receptor 2 (at Ser-2448). Pharmacological inhibition of TLR4 with TAK-242 attenuated the changes in cardiac function in PG-LPS-treated mice. Our results indicate that TLR4-NOX4 signaling may be a new therapeutic target for treatment of cardiovascular diseases in patients with periodontitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35648750      PMCID: PMC9159598          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Periodontitis (PD) is a bacterial infection in the tissue that supports the teeth, leading to chronic local inflammation, destruction of connective tissue and alveolar bone, and eventually loss of teeth. It is also associated with an increase of myocardial cell damage and heart failure [1,2]. Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG) is a gram-negative bacterial pathogen often identified in adult PD, and systemic exposure to pro-inflammatory factors from PG, including lipopolysaccharide, may contribute to CVD [3]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria, plays a major role in the inflammatory response following bacterial infection [4], as well as in the myocardial depression seen in adult patients with sepsis or severe gram-negative bacterial infection [5]. But, even though PG-LPS is widely accepted as a contributor to PD-induced systemic inflammation, and patients with high anti-PG antibody levels were reported to exhibit a high rate of heart failure compared to the low antibody group [6], little is known about the precise relationship between PG-LPS and cardiac dysfunction. Although PG-LPS and Escherichia coli LPS are both derived from gram-negative bacteria, they differ in structure and function. The two types of LPS differentially modulate expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, TLR4, and cell surface receptor and differentiation marker (CD) 14, as well as primary and secondary cytokine responses [7]. Escherichia coli LPS targets TLR4 and activates the NF-κB signaling pathway, leading to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), and chemokines, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [8]. The receptor of PG-LPS was initially reported to be TLR2, in contrast with the well-established role of TLR4 as the receptor for Escherichia coli LPS [9]. However, this proved controversial, because synthetic PG lipid A activates TLR4 but not TLR2 [10,11]. More recently, PG-LPS was shown to mediate pro-inflammatory signaling exclusively through TLR4, while activation of the TLR2-dependent pathway was related to be the presence of contaminants in the LPS preparation [8]. Persistently elevated LPS levels are found in chronic diseases, including PD, and thus cardiac cells expressing TLR4 may be a target for PG-LPS [12]. Activation of the innate immune system in the heart by TLR4 has diverse effects, which may be cardioprotective in the short-term, whereas sustained activation may be maladaptive [13]. More importantly, to our knowledge there has been no mechanistic study of the myocardial effects of persistent subclinical exposure to PG-LPS, even though subclinical endotoxemia was previously reported to induce myocardial cell damage and heart failure [14]. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate cardiac dysfunction in mice treated with PG-LPS at a dose equivalent to the circulating levels in PD patients to examine the effects of a TLR4 antagonist (6R)-6-[N-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)sulfamoyl] cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate (TAK-242) [15,16] on the changes of cardiac function, and to clarify the mechanisms involved.

Materials and methods

Mice and experimental protocols

All experiments were performed on male 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). Mice were group-housed at 23°C under a 12–12 light/dark cycle with lights on at 8:00 AM in accordance with standard conditions for mouse studies by our group [17-20]. Both food and water were available ad libitum. PG-LPS (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was dissolved in saline to prepare a 0.6 mg/ml stock solution [15] and TAK-242 (ChemScene, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) was formulated with 1% dimethyl sulfate and double-distilled water to prepare a 0.4 mg/ml stock solution. The appropriate volumes of these solutions to provide the desired dose (PG-LPS: 0.8 mg/kg and/or TAK-242: 3 mg/kg) was added to 0.2 ml of saline to prepare the solution for intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (once daily for 4 weeks); control mice received an identical volume of saline only [21] (. In addition, BW and intake of food and water were monitored for all mice throughout the 4-week experimental period. The dose of PG-LPS used in this study is consistent with the circulating levels in PD patients, indicating that this model is not a sepsis model, and no mortality was observed [15]. After the completion of treatment, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. The heart, lungs and liver were excised, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. The ratio of organ mass (mg) to tibia length (TL; mm) were used as indexes of organ volume. After tissue extraction, the mice were anesthetized via a mask with isoflurane (1.0–1.5% v/v) and killed by cervical dislocation [22].

Experimental procedure and consumption of food and water during chronic PG-LPS infusion in mice.

(A) Lipopolysaccharide derived from Porphylomonas gingivalis (PG-LPS) was administered once daily for 4 weeks via intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg, dissolved in saline. Age-matched control mice (Control) received an identical volume of saline only. (B) The Control, PG-LPS, TAK and LPS + TAK groups showed similar body weight at 4 weeks after the PG-LPS infusion. NS, not significantly different from the Control (P > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (C-D) Consumed amounts of food (C) and water (D) were similar among the four groups. P = NS vs. Control). NS, not significantly different from the Control (P > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments complied with the ARRIVE guidelines [23] and were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals [24] and institutional guidelines. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tsurumi University (No. 29A041).

Physiological experiments

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane vapor (1.0–1.5% v/v) titrated to maintain the lightest anesthesia possible and echocardiographic measurements were performed by using ultrasonography (TUS-A300, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) as described previously [25].

Evaluation of fibrosis

Among several quantitative methods available to determine interstitial fibrotic regions [18,26,27], we employed Masson-trichrome staining using the Accustatin Trichrome Statin Kit (#HT15-1KT; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, as described previously. We quantified interstitial fibrotic regions using freely available image analysis software (Image J 1.45; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/download.html) to evaluate the percentage of blue area in the Masson-trichrome sections [18].

Evaluation of apoptosis

Apoptosis was determined by TUNEL staining using an Apoptosis in situ Detection Kit (#293–71501; Wako, Osaka, Japan). TUNEL-positive nuclei per field of view were manually counted in six sections of each of the four groups (Control, PG-LPS, TAK-242, PG-LPS + TAK-242) over a microscopic field of 20 x, averaged and expressed as the ratio of TUNEL-positive nuclei (%) [25,28]. Limiting the counting of total nuclei and TUNEL-positive nuclei to areas with true cross sections of myocytes made it possible to selectively count only those nuclei that were clearly located within myocytes.

Bio-Plex measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines, PDGF-BB and VEGF

Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, MCP-1 and TNF-α, as well as biomarkers of endothelial function, PDGF-BB and VEGF, were measured using a multiplex suspension array (Bio-Plex, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) [29].

Western blotting

The cardiac muscle excised from the mice ( was homogenized in a Polytron (Kinematica AG, Lucerne, Switzerland) in ice-cold RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA: 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) without addition of inhibitors [30], and the homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was measured using a DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Equal amounts of protein (5 μg) were subjected to 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto 0.2 mm PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Western blotting was conducted with commercially available antibodies [25,28,31]. The primary antibodies against TLR4 (1:1000, #14358), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (1:1000, 19245), Akt (1:1000, #9272), phospho-Akt (Ser-473, 1:1000, #9721), CaMKII (1:1000, #3362), phospho-CaMKII (1:1000, Thr-286, #3361), ERK (1:1000, #4695), phospho-ERK (1:2000, Thr-202/Tyr-204, #4370), BCL-2 (1:1000, #3498), LC3 (1:1000, #12741) and phospho- mTOR (1:1000, Ser-2448, #5536), mTOR (1:1000, #2972), p70S6K (1:1000, #9202), phospho-p70S6K (1:1000, Thr-389), RIP3 (1:1000, #95702), phospho-RIP3 (1:1000, Thr231/Ser232, #91702), AMPK (1:1000, #2532) and phospho-AMPK (1:1000, Thr-172, #2535) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA), anti-ox-CaMKII was purchased from Millipore (1:1000, #07–1387, Billerica, MA, USA), the primary antibodies against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogemase (GAPDH) (1:200, sc-25778) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and the primary antibodies against phospho-PLN (1:5000, Thr-17, #A010-13), PLN (1:5000, #A010-14), phospho- RyR2 (1:2000, Ser-2808, #A010-30) and phospho-RyR2 (Ser-2814, #A010-31) were purchased from Badrilla (Leeds, UK), while RyR2 (1:1000, #MA3-916) was purchased from Thermo Fisher (Rockland, IL, USA). The primary antibodies against p62 (1:1000, #PM045) and phospho-p62 (1:500, Ser-351) (#PM074MS) were purchased from MBL (Nagoya, Japan) and the primary antibodies against NOX4, 1:1000, #ab133303) and NOX2 (1:1000, #ab80508) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Horseradish peroxide-conjugated anti-rabbit (1:5000, #NA934) or anti-mouse IgG (1:5000, #NA931) purchased from GB Healthcare was used as a secondary antibody. The primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.6) with 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% bovine serum albumin. The blots were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence solution (ECL:Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and scanned with a densitometer (LAS-1000, Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunostaining

Oxidative DNA damage in the myocardium was evaluated by immunostaining for 8-OHdG using the Vector M.O.M Immunodetection system (#PK-2200, Vector Laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA, USA) [19,20,32,33]. Cross sections were cut with a cryostat at -20°C at 10 μm, air-dried and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (v/v) in TBS-T for 5 min at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was achieved with 0.1% citrate plus 1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature, then the sections were washed with TBS-T, incubated with 0.3% horse serum in TBS-T for 1 h at room temperature, and blocked with M.O.M. blocking reagents (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. For the positive control, sections were incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in TBS-T before the anti-8-OHdG antibody treatment. The sections were incubated with anti-8-OHdG antibody (8.3 μg/ml in M.O.M. Dilute; clone N45.1 monoclonal antibody; Japan Institute for the Control of Aging, Shizuoka, Japan) overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber, and then incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in 0.3% horse serum for 1 h at room temperature to inactivate endogenous peroxidase, rinsed with TBS-T, incubated with anti-mouse IgG in M.O.M. Diluent, and processed with an ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA, USA). We calculated the ratio of 8-OHdG nuclei with oxidative DNA damage (stained dark blown) per total cell numbers.

Statistical analysis

Data show means ± standard deviation (SD). Comparison of data was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Body weight, daily consumption of food and water

The Control, PG-LPS, TAK-242, PG-LPS + TAK-242 groups all showed similar body weight (BW) at 4 weeks after the PG-LPS infusion (PG-LPS [n = 7]: 27.4 ± 0.6, TAK-242 [n = 7]: 27.2 ± 0.7, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 26.7 ± 0.4 g, all not significantly different [NS; P > 0.05] vs. Control [n = 7; 25.8 ± 0.4 g]) (, and the consumed amounts of both food ( and water ( were also similar among the four groups (food: PG-LPS [n = 7]: 3.6 ± 0.1, TAK [n = 7]: 3.4 ± 0.1, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 3.6 ± 0.1 g, all NS [P > 0.05] vs. Control [3.6 ± 0.1 g]; water: PG-LPS [n = 6]: 6.4 ± 0.2, TAK-242 [n = 7]: 6.5 ± 0.1, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 6.5 ± 0.2 ml/day, all NS [P > 0.05] vs. Control [n = 6; 6.4 ± 0.2 ml/day] each). Thus, chronic PG-LPS treatment with or without TAK-242 under the experimental conditions used in this study did not appear to affect growth, or food and water consumption.

Effects of PG-LPS on heart, lung and liver weight

Mice in the four groups were sacrificed at 4 weeks, and the cardiac muscle (CA) was weighed to evaluate cardiac hypertrophy, and the lungs and liver were weighed to estimate the pulmonary and liver congestion. Heart weight in terms of the ratio of CA weight per tibia length (TL) was not significantly different among the four groups (CA/TL: PG-LPS [n = 7]: 7.5 ± 0.3, TAK [n = 7]: 7.2 ± 0.5, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 7.7 ± 0.3, all NS [P > 0.05] vs. Control [n = 7; 7.5 ± 0.4 g] each) (S1 Fig of . The lung weight in terms of the ratio of lung weight per TL (S1B Fig of , and liver weight in terms of the ratio of liver weight per TL (S1C Fig of were also similar among the four groups (lung weight/TL: PG-LPS [n = 7]: 8.9 ± 0.4, TAK [n = 7]: 9.2 ± 0.3, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 9.0 ± 0.2 mg/mm, all NS [P > 0.05] vs. Control [n = 7; 8.6 ± 0.3 mg/mm]; liver weight/TL: PG-LPS [n = 7]: 85.1 ± 3.1, TAK [n = 7]: 73.1 ± 2.9, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 73.2 ± 3.6 mg/mm, all NS [P > 0.05] vs. Control [n = 7; 80.3 ± 2.9 mg/mm]). Thus, neither PG-LPS nor TAK-242 at the dose used in this experiment appeared to influence the weight of the heart, liver or lungs during the 4-week experimental period.

Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, PDGF-BB and VEGF

We examined the effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on serum levels of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), MCP-1, TNF-α, as well as platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The serum levels of these molecules were similar among the four groups (, indicating that chronic PG-LPS infusion had no effect on them.

Changes of cardiac function during the chronic PG-LPS infusion

Echocardiography was performed at 1 week ( and 4 weeks ( after the start of chronic PG-LPS treatment with or without TAK-242. EF (%): Ejection fraction. LVEDV (mL): Left ventricular end-diastolic volume. LVESV (mL): Left ventricular end-systolic volume. FS (%): Fractional shortening. LVDd (mm): Left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole. LVDs (mm): Left ventricular internal dimension at end-systole. HR (bpm): Heart rate. SV (mL): Stroke volume. CO (mL/min): Cardiac output. IVSTd (mm): Interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole. IVSTd (mm): Interventricular septum thickness at end-systole. PWTd (mm): Posterior wall thickness at end-diastole. PWTs (mm): Posterior wall thickness at end-systole. **P < 0.01 vs. Control. #P < 0.05 vs. LPS. Cardiac function in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and %fractional shortening (FS) was significantly decreased at 1 week after chronic PG-LPS injection (EF: Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 67 ± 0.5 vs. 58 ± 1.2%, P < 0.01; FS: Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 32 ± 0.3 vs. 26 ± 0.7%, P < 0.01, S6A and S7B Figs of ) with an increase of left ventricular internal dimension at end-systole (LVDs: Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 2.9 ± 0.07 vs. 3.3 ± 0.06, P < 0.01, S8B Fig of ). Cardiac function remained depressed at 4 weeks after chronic PG-LPS injection (EF: Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 66 ± 0.5 vs. 57 ± 0.1%, P < 0.01; FS: Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 32 ± 0.3 vs. 26 ± 0.7%, P < 0.01, S13A and S14B Figs of ). Importantly, PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction was attenuated by pharmacological inhibition of TLR4 with TAK-242 at 4 weeks (EF: PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 57 ± 1.0 vs. 61 ± 0.6%, P < 0.05; FS: PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 26 ± 0.7 vs. 28 ± 0.4%, P < 0.05, S13A and S14B Figs of ). These data indicate that chronic PG-LPS infusion at a physiologically realistic dose level induces cardiac dysfunction through the activation of TLR4.

Effects of PG-LPS on the cardiac fibrosis

We next examined cardiac remodeling, which we evaluated in terms of fibrosis and myocyte apoptosis, because it might lead to progressive heart failure [25,28]. We first evaluated fibrosis by means of Masson-trichrome staining (. Chronic PG-LPS infusion significantly increased the area of fibrosis, compared to the control (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 0.9 ± 0.2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.4%, P < 0.01). This PG-LPS-mediated increase of cardiac fibrosis was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 2.9 ± 0.4 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1%, P < 0.01).

Effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on fibrosis in cardiac muscle.

(A) Representative images of Masson-trichrome-stained sections of cardiac muscle in the Control ( PG-LPS (LPS) ( TAK-242 (TAK) ( and PG-LPS + TAK-242 (LPS + TAK) ( groups. Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) The area of fibrosis was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group (P < 0.01 vs. Control), and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (C) Expression of phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr-202/Tyr-204) (C) and α-SMA (D) was significantly increased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS-treated mice, and these increases were significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control, #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S3 and S4 Figs of . Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data. We also evaluated cardiac fibrosis by measuring the levels of p44/42MAPK (ERK) phosphorylation ( and α-SMA expression ( at 4 weeks after the start of PG-LPS, because they are closely associated with cardiac fibrosis [18,34]. Expression levels of phospho-ERK (Thr-202/Tyr-204) and α-SMA were significantly increased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS-treated mice (ERK: Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 8.8 vs. 170 ± 13%, P < 0.05; α-SMA: Control [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS [n = 4]: 100 ± 13 vs. 167 ± 24%, P < 0.05), and these increases were significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (ERK: PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 6]: 170 ± 13 vs. 108 ± 5.9%, P < 0.05; α-SMA: Control [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS [n = 4]: 167 ± 24 vs. 59 ± 10%, P < 0.01). These data suggest that cardiac fibrosis induced by chronic PG-LPS infusion might be mediated, at least in part, through the activation of TLR4.

Effects of PG-LPS on myocyte apoptosis

We next evaluated cardiac myocyte apoptosis by means of terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated biotin-16-deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining at 4 weeks after the start of PG-LPS (. Chronic PG-LPS infusion increased myocyte apoptosis, compared to the control (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 6.6 ± 1.3%, P < 0.01). This PG-LPS-mediated increase of cardiac myocyte apoptosis was attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 6.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5%, P < 0.01).

Effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on cardiac myocyte apoptosis.

(A) Representative images of TUNEL-stained sections of cardiac muscle in the Control ( PG-LPS (LPS) ( TAK-242 (TAK) ( and PG-LPS + TAK-242 (LPS + TAK) ( groups. Scale bars: 2 μm. Black arrows: TUNEL-positive myocytes. (B) The number of TUNEL-positive myocyte was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group (P < 0.01 vs. Control), and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (C) Expression of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 protein was significantly decreased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS-treated mice, and this change was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S5 Fig of . Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data. We also evaluated cardiac myocyte apoptosis by measuring the change of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 protein in the heart (. B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) expression was significantly decreased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS-treated mice (Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 6.2 vs. 75 ± 2.9%, P < 0.05) and the increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 75 ± 2.9 vs. 108 ± 4.0%, P < 0.01). These data suggest that the induction of cardiac myocyte apoptosis induced by chronic PG-LPS infusion might be mediated, at least in part, through the activation of TLR4.

Oxidative stress was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

TLR4 signaling activates various downstream signal transduction pathways, including oxidative stress, by increasing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [35]. We thus examined in-situ expression of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a DNA modification product generated by ROS, as a marker for oxidative DNA damage in the four groups (. We examined the validity of the 8-OHdG immunostaining used in this study by incubation in TBS-T with (positive control) or without (negative control) 0.3% H2O2 at room temperature for 1 h prior to anti-8-OHdG antibody treatment. The results demonstrate that the 8-OHdG staining procedure clearly distinguished 8-OHdG-positive from non-positive nuclei (S2 Fig of .

Effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on oxidative stress.

(A) Representative images of 8-OHdG-immunostained sections of cardiac muscle in the Control ( PG-LPS (LPS) ( TAK-242 (TAK) ( and PG-LPS + TAK-242 (LPS + TAK) ( groups. Scale bars: 2 μm. Black arrows: TUNEL-positive myocytes. (B) The number of 8-OHdG-positive myocytes was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (C) TLR4 expression was similar among the four groups. NS, not significantly different from the Control (P > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S6 Fig of . (D) NOX4 expression was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S7 Fig of . (E) NOX2 expression was similar among the four groups. NS, not significantly different from the Control (P > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S8 Fig of . Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data. The number of 8-OHdG-positive cardiac myocytes was significantly increased at 4 weeks after PG-LPS treatment (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 2.5 ± 0.3 vs. 19.0 ± 1.4%, P < 0.01), but this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 7]: 19.0 ± 1.4 vs. 9.2 ± 0.5%, P < 0.01) (. These data suggest that oxidative stress might also play an important role, at least in part, in the development of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction via TLR4.

NOX4 expression was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase-4 (NOX4) is the only known enzymes, whose physiological function is to produce ROS in cardiac myocytes [36]. NOX2 and NOX4 are abundantly expressed in cardiac myocytes, and their activity is controlled by their expression level [35]. We thus examined NOX2 and NOX4 expression in the heart in the four groups. TLR4 expression was similar among the four groups (. However, NOX4 expression was significantly increased (Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 18 vs. 169 ± 19%, P < 0.05). This increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 169 ± 19 vs. 92 ± 10%, P < 0.01) (. In contrast, NOX2 expression was similar among the four groups (. These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS infusion increased the generation of ROS via activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway.

Necroptosis was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

ROS derived from NOX4 was recently demonstrated to cause apoptosis and necroptosis via activation of receptor-interacting protein 3 (RIP3), a key determinant of programmed necrosis (necroptosis), in endothelial cells [37]. We thus examined the amount of phospho-RIP3 (Thr-231/Ser-232) and found that it was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice (Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 4]: 100 ± 6.8 vs. 177 ± 15%, P < 0.05). Again, this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 177 ± 15 vs. 86 ± 21%, P < 0.01, n = 5) (.

Effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on RIP3, CaMKII, PLN, RyR2 in the heart.

(A) RIP3 phosphorylation (Thr-231/Ser-232) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S9 Fig of CaMKII phosphorylation (Thr-286) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S10 Fig of CaMKII oxidation was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S11 Fig of PLN phosphorylation (Thr-17) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.05 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S12 Fig of RyR2 phosphorylation (Ser-2814) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S13 Fig of Data show means ± SD and representative immunoblotting are shown. These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS infusion might increase RIP3 phosphorylation, leading to apoptosis and necroptosis, via ROS production derived from TLR4-NOX4 signaling in cardiac muscle.

Phosphorylation and oxidation of CaMKII was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

Calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) was recently demonstrated to be one of the targets of RIP3, which activates CaMKII via phosphorylation and oxidation [38]. We thus examined the amounts of phospho-CaMKII (Thr-286) ( and oxidized methionine-281/282 CaMKII (ox-CaMKII) ( in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice and found that they were significantly increased at 4 weeks after the PG-LPS treatment (CaMKII (Thr-286): Control [n = 6] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 12.1 vs. 213 ± 25%, P < 0.05; ox-CaMKII: Control [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS [n = 4]: 100 ± 20 vs. 412 ± 72%, P < 0.01). These changes were significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (CaMKII [Thr-286]: PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 4]: 213 ± 25 vs. 103 ± 31%, P < 0.05; ox-CaMKII: PG-LPS [n = 4] vs, PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 4]: 412 ± 72 vs. 186 ± 19%, P < 0.05). These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS infusion might activate TLR4/RIP3/CaMKII signaling in cardiac myocytes.

Phosphorylation of PLN and RyR2 was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

ROS derived from NOX4 was recently demonstrated to induce Ca2+-mishandling via altered phosphorylation of phospholamban (PLN) on Thr-17 and ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) on Ser-2814, mediated by CaMKII as well as ox-CaMKII, leading to cardiac remodeling and dysfunction [39]. We thus examined the effects of chronic PG-LPS on phosphorylation of PLN, focusing on Thr-17, which is phosphorylated by CaMKII (. Phospho-PLN (Thr-17) was significantly increased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS- treated mice (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 100 ± 34 vs. 824 ± 279%, P < 0.05 vs. Control) ( and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 4]: 824 ± 279 vs. 320 ± 123%, P < 0.05). Like PLN, phospho-RyR2 (Ser-2814), which is phosphorylated by CaMKII, was also significantly increased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS- treated mice (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 6]: 100 ± 9.6 vs. 161 ± 14.2%, P < 0.05 vs. Control) ( and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 6] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 6]: 161 ± 14.2 vs. 107 ± 15%, P < 0.05). These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS infusion might increase phosphorylation of PLN and RyR2 via TLR4-NOX4 signaling, leading to Ca2+-mishandling in cardiac myocytes.

Akt-mTOR-p70S6K signaling was activated by chronic PG-LPS infusion

NOX4 activation was recently demonstrated to cause cardiac remodeling through activation of Akt- mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)-p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K) signaling [40]. Phospho-Akt (Ser-473) was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice at 4 weeks (Control [n = 6] vs. PG-LPS [n = 6]: 100 ± 5.6 vs. 132 ± 3.1%, P < 0.01), and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 6] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 132 ± 3.1 vs. 105 ± 3.1, P < 0.01) (.

Effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on Akt, mTOR, p70S6K, LC3, p62 in the heart.

(A) Akt phosphorylation (Ser-473) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S14 Fig of mTORC1 phosphorylation (Ser-2448) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S15 Fig of p70S6K phosphorylation (Ser-389) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S16 Fig of Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data. Phospho-mTORC1 (Ser-2448) and phospho-p70S6K (Thr-389) were similarly significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice at 4 weeks (mTORC1: Control [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS [n = 4]: 100 ± 17.3 vs. 264 ± 58.4%, P < 0.05; p70S6K: Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 4.7 vs. 160 ± 11%, P < 0.01). These increases were significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (mTORC1: PG-LPS [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 264 ± 58.4 vs. 164 ± 28.3%, P < 0.05; p70S6K: PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 160 ± 11 vs. 119 ± 8.4%, P < 0.01) (. These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS infusion might increase the activation of Akt-mTOR-p70S6K signaling, thereby contributing to cardiac remodeling and cardiac dysfunction.

Autophagic activity was increased by chronic PG-LPS infusion

We next investigated the effects of PG-LPS on autophagy in the cardiac muscle (, because TLR4-NOX4 signaling is known to promote cell death through autophagy in rats with heart failure induced by aortic banding [41]. (A) Representative immunoblotting of LC3-I, LC3-II, phospho-p62 (Ser-351), p62, AMPK and GAPDH are shown. Full-size images of immunoblots are presented in S17-S21 Figs of . (B) LC3-II/LC3-I was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (C) LC3-II expression was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (D) p62 phosphorylation (Ser-351) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. **P < 0.01 vs. Control or #P < 0.05 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (E) p62 expression was similar among the four groups. NS, not significantly different from the Control (P > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. (F) AMPK (Thr-172) was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group, and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242. *P < 0.05 vs. Control or ##P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS group by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test. Data are means ± SD and representative immunoblots are shown. Data shows means ± SD and scattered dots show individual data. The amount of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3)-II was measured in terms of LC3-II/LC3-I, which correlates with the number of autophagosomes and provides a good index of autophagy induction [42]. LC3-II/LC3-I was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice for 4 weeks (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 100 ± 11.7 vs. 254 ± 49%, P < 0.01). This increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 6]: 254 ± 49 vs. 123 ± 15%, P < 0.05) (. We also examined LC3-II expression and found that it was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice at 4 weeks (Control [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS [n = 7]: 100 ± 12 vs. 240 ± 29%, P < 0.01). The increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 7] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 4]: 240 ± 29 vs. 73 ± 7%, P < 0.01) (. Increased LC-3-II could reflect either increased autophagosome formation due to autophagy induction, or a blockage in the downstream steps from autophagy, such as insufficient fusion or decreased autophagosome degradation [43]. Increased p62 phosphorylation on serine 351 is known to be necessary for autophagic degradation of polyubiqutinated proteins and for recruiting autophagy machinery proteins [44]. Furthermore, mTOR phosphorylation (Ser-2448) was recently demonstrated to increase the phosphorylation of serine 351 of p62 [45]. We thus examined the level of p62 expression as well as phosphorylation on serine 351, and found that p62 phosphorylation was significantly increased in the PG-LPS group (Control [n = 4] vs. PG-LPS [n = 6]: 100 ± 11 vs. 154 ± 11%, P < 0.01). This increase was suppressed by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 6] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 6]: 154 ± 11 vs. 106 ± 5, P < 0.01 vs. PG-LPS) (. However, p62 expression was similar among all four groups (. These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS treatment might increase autophagic activity via TLR4 activation, leading to an increase of autophagosome number as well as autophagy flux.

AMPK signaling was activated by chronic PG-LPS infusion

Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling is impaired by enhancing sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ leakage through TLR4-ROS signaling via CaMKII phosphorylation and oxidization [46]. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which might lie downstream of CaMKII and can be phosphorylated on Thr-172 in response to an increased intracellular Ca2+ level, was recently demonstrated to regulate a variety of metabolic processes including autophagy [47,48]. We thus examined the effects of chronic PG-LPS activation on phosphorylation of AMPK. Phospho-AMPK (Thr-172) was significantly increased in cardiac muscle of PG-LPS-treated mice at 4 weeks (Control [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS [n = 5]: 100 ± 19 vs. 243 ± 45%, P < 0.05) and this increase was significantly attenuated by TAK-242 (PG-LPS [n = 5] vs. PG-LPS + TAK-242 [n = 5]: 243 ± 45 vs. 79 ± 17%, P < 0.01) (. These data suggest that chronic PG-LPS treatment might increase autophagic activity though activation of CaMKII-AMPK signaling via TLR4.

Discussion

Our findings here indicate that cardiac function was significantly impaired in mice treated with PG-LPS at a dose consistent with circulating levels in PD patients, and myocyte apoptosis, fibrosis and oxidative stress were significantly increased. Importantly, these changes were blunted by pharmacological inhibition of TLR4 with TAK-242. We then investigated the mechanism of these changes. The pro-inflammatory effect of PG-LPS on macrophages is controversial. Martin et al. reported that 1 ng/ml E. Coli LPS and 10.000 ng/ml PG-LPS induced similar levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in a human macrophage cell line, THP-1 cells [49], and another group also found that PG-LPS is a less potent inducer of pro-inflammatory cytokines than E. Coli LPS [50]. On the other hand, Jones et al reported that PG-LPS induced a strong pro-inflammatory cytokine response, particularly for IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1, in a mouse alveolar macrophage cell line AMJ2-C8, compared to the E.coli LPS [7]. Therefore, we examined the effects of chronic PG-LPS infusion on serum levels of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, MCP-1 and TNF-α, in addition to endothelial biomarkers PDGF-BB and VEGF, in order to exclude the possibility that the cardiac dysfunction observed here might be simply a consequence of inflammation caused by chronic PG-LPS infusion [51,52]. However, we found no significant differences among the four groups in this study. VEGF and PDGF can cause endothelial dysfunction, which might induce matrix remodeling and cardiac dysfunction [53]. However, in the present model, the serum levels of VEGF and PDGF-BB were similar among the four groups, suggesting that PG-LPS does not induce endothelial dysfunction at the dose used in this study. We thus focused on the TLR4 and its downstream signaling to clarify the mechanism of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction, and hypothesized that ROS production and oxidative stress, via activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway, might play a key role. NOX2 and NOX4 are the predominant isoforms expressed in cardiac myocytes [54]. These enzymes exhibit high sequence homology, but have distinct characteristics. NOX2 is localized primarily in the plasma membrane, and its activation contributes to cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis and heart failure via increased oxidative stress [55]. In addition, ROS derived from TLR4-NOX2 signaling is known to be involved in killing and degrading microorganisms, contributing to host defense function in patients with infectious diseases [56,57]. Therefore, we anticipated that NOX2 expression might be increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice, but in fact we found NOX2 expression was similar among the four groups, as shown in . We do not know why NOX2 expression was not increased in the heart after PG-LPS infusion. PG was recently reported to circumvent the NOX2-mediated antimicrobial defense system, potentially enabling persistence in the tissue that supports the teeth [58], and so it is possible that PG-mediated circumvention of the host defense system via NOX2 might occur in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice. NOX4 is found in intracellular membranes, such as mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear and sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes [59]. NOX4 is constitutively active and is regulated primarily at the level of its expression [59]. In this study, we found that NOX4 expression was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice. Notably, this increase of NOX4 expression was effectively alleviated by pharmacological inhibition of TLR4 with TAK-242. These results suggest that PG-LPS activates TLR4-NOX4 signaling in the heart. Little is known regarding the isoform-specific role of NOX in the development of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac remodeling. Emerging data are conflicting, with considerable debate as to whether NOX4 is protective [60] or deleterious [40] for the development of cardiac remodeling. In this study, the impairment of cardiac function in PG-LPS-treated mice was associated with activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway, because cardiac fibrosis, cardiac myocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress and autophagy were all significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice, and these changes were attenuated by the TRL4 receptor antagonist TAK-242. In addition, we could not exclude the involvement of ROS derived from NOX1, a minor NOX subtype in the heart, in the development of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction, because NOX1 might play a role in cardiac myocyte apoptosis after exposure to Escherichia coli LPS [61,62]. Also, Helicobacter pylori LPS induces ROS through the activation of TLR4-NOX1 signaling, leading to apoptosis of guinea pig gastric mucosal cells and gastric ulcer formation [63]. These data might suggest that NOX1 is involved in the process of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction. However, we think this is unlikely, because NOX1-mediated cardiac myocyte apoptosis is induced through decreased Akt phosphorylation in the heart of Escherichia coli LPS treated mice [62], which is in contrast to the increased Akt phosphorylation in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice (. We found that CaMKII-mediated PLN phosphorylation (Thr-17) and RyR2 phosphorylation (Ser-2448) were significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice, and TAK-242 ameliorated these changes. It has been reported that NOX4 in the sarcoplasmic reticulum regulates RyR1 phosphorylation and intracellular Ca2+ leakage in skeletal muscle [64]. Our data, together with the previous findings, suggest that local ROS production derived from NOX4 in the sarcoplasmic reticulum might be associated with the increased PLN and RyR2 phosphorylation via activation of CaMKII. It has been reported that ROS derived from NOX4 in the mitochondrial membrane might cause mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiac myocyte apoptosis during aging and heart failure [65]. In this study, we found that cardiac myocyte apoptosis was significantly increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice and this increase was attenuated by TAK-242. Our current findings, together with the previous studies, suggested that local ROS production via NOX4 in the mitochondrial membrane might be involved, at least in part, in the induction of cardiac apoptosis by chronic PG-LPS infusion. The TLR4-NOX4 pathway was demonstrated to cause cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy by enhancing Akt-mTOR signaling [40]. mTOR has been found at various locations, including lysosomes, nuclei, mitochondria and plasma membrane [66]. Although it remains unclear which localization of NOX4 within cardiac myocytes might be involved in activating the Akt-mTOR-p70S6K pathway, we confirmed that Akt-mTOR-p70S6K signaling was activated in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice, and this might contribute to cardiac remodeling. Activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway is closely related to autophagy, and ROS generated via NOX4 within the endoplasmic reticulum plays an important role in this process [59]. Activation of TLR4-NOX4 pathway was also reported to promote cell death through autophagy during the progression of heart failure [41]. We thus examined the autophagic activity in terms of the LC3-II/LC3-I, which correlate with the number of autophagosomes [42], and p62 phosphorylation on serine 351, an indicator of autophagy flux [44]. Both the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio and the level of p62 phosphorylation on serine 351 were increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice at 4 weeks, and these increases were blocked by TAK-242. These findings, together with the previous studies, suggest that increased autophagic activity due to activation of the TLR4-NOX pathway might contribute to PG-LPS-mediated cardiac remodeling.

Conclusion

Immune system activation induced by chronic PG-LPS infusion contributes to the development of myocardial remodeling and cardiac dysfunction via activation of TLR4 signaling. Furthermore, activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway, which was previously reported to induce heart failure [67,68], might play a role in PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction. Consequently, pharmacological inhibition of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway might be a promising strategy to decrease ROS production in patients with periodontitis. (PDF) Click here for additional data file. (PDF) Click here for additional data file. 8 Mar 2022
PONE-D-21-32097
Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Okumura, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Your paper was reviewed by two experts in the field. Both reviewers support your conclusion, but some minor modifications are necessary. Please read the comments and address the issues accordingly. Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 22 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section. 3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide. 4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions. 5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: In this paper, the authors have focused on NOX2 and NOX4, which are expressed in cardiac myocytes among several NOX subunits. This choice makes sense. In particular, the authors focused on NOX4, which is highly responsive to LPS stimulation and provides an excellent research data and discussion of TLR4-NOX4 signalling in cardiac myocytes . 1) However, in cardiomyocytes, not only NOX4 but also NOX1 / NADPH oxidase is strongly involved in endotoxin-induced cardiac myocytes apoptosis. Therefore, in the Discussion section, I recommend you to make some inferences about the relationship between NOX1 and NOX4. 2) Similarly, please mention briefly here that no LPS-TLR4-NOX2 signalling was observed in cardiac myocytes as shown in Figure 4E. Since NOX2-derived ROS kills and degrades bacteria, there may be a reason why NOX2 is not responsive to LPS-TLR4 stimulation in cardiac myocytes. P.S. In the description of Trichrome Statin Kit (#HT15-1KT; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); USA is required after MO in parentheses. Reviewer #2: Thank you for submitting to PLOS ONE. I’m very interested in your article “Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice”. I recognize that the main points of this paper are the following two. Immune system activation induced by Lipopolysaccharide on gram-negative bacterial pathogen known to be the cause of periodontitis, induce cardiac dysfunction and myocardial remodeling via the TLR4 signal. Furthermore, it was suggested that the TLR4-NOX4 pathway previously reported in the heart failure model may play an important role. I sound that this paper is suitable for publication in PLOS ONE However, one major revisions and some minor revisions are required. Major revisions: The target of your study is myocardial cell damage and cardiac dysfunction. However, cardiovascular events mediated by arteriosclerosis are discussed in introduction. Originally, if you would consider cardiovascular events related to atherosclerosis, coronary artery or vessels must be also investigated. I think introduction should focus on myocardial cell damage. For example, how about changing the reference 1) 12) to other paper such as heart failure model related to myocardial cell damage and discussing it? Minor revisions: 1) You should write P-value at every item in all tables, even if there is no significant difference. 2) The order and abbereviation of the items in the Table2 A&B have to be changed as follows, Order 1 EF 2 LVEDV 3 ESV → LVESV 4 FS 5 LVIDd →LVDd 6 LVIDs →LVDs 7 HR 8 SV 9 CO 10 IVSDd 11 LVPWTd →PWTd Moreover, except LVSTs&LVPWTs, and change Abbereviation details below. EF (%): ejection fraction LVEDV (mL): left ventricular end-diastolic volume LVESV (mL): left ventricular end-systolic volume FS (%): fractional shortening LVDd (mm): left ventricular dimension at end-diastole LVDs (mm): left ventricular dimension at end-systole HR:heart rate SV (mL): strole volume CO (mL/min): cardiac output IVSTd (mm): interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole PWTd (mm): posterior wall thickness at end-diastole 3) The purpose of this study you wrote is twofold. On the other hand, only one is shown in the conclusion. Make sure that the purpose and the conclusion are matched as there is no discrepancy. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Michiaki Higashitani [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
Submitted filename: Review Plos one.docx Click here for additional data file. 5 Apr 2022 Reviewer#1: In this paper, the authors have focused on NOX2 and NOX4, which are expressed in cardiac myocytes among several NOX subunits. This choice makes sense. In particular, the authors focused on NOX4, which is highly responsive to LPS stimulation and provides an excellent research data and discussion of TLR4-NOX4 signaling in cardiac myocytes. 1) However, in cardiac myocytes, not only NOX4 but also NOX1/NADPH oxidase is strongly involved in endotoxin-induced cardiac myocytes apoptosis. Therefore, in the Discussion section, I recommend you to make some inferences about the relationship between NOX1 and NOX4. Response: We could not exclude the involvement of ROS derived from NOX1, a minor NOX subtype in the heart, in the development of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction, because NOX1 might play a role in cardiac myocyte apoptosis after exposure to Escherichia coli LPS [1, 2]. Also, Helicobacter pylori LPS induces ROS through the activation of TLR4-NOX1 signaling, leading to apoptosis of guinea pig gastric mucosal cells and gastric ulcer formation [3]. These data might suggest that NOX1 is involved in the process of PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction. However, we think this is unlikely, because NOX1-mediated cardiac myocyte apoptosis is induced through decreased Akt phosphorylation in the heart of Escherichia coli LPS-treated mice [2], which is in contrast to the increased Akt phosphorylation in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice (Fig 6A). We incorporated the above sentences in the discussion with new references (Page 34, Lines 6-16). 2) Similarly, please mention briefly here that no LPS-TLR4-NOX2 signaling was observed in cardiac myocytes as shown in Figure 4E. Since NOX2-derived ROS kills and degrades bacteria, there may be a reason why NOX2 is not responsive to LPS-TLR4 stimulation in cardiac myocytes. Response: ROS derived from TLR4-NOX2 signaling is known to be involved in killing and degrading microorganisms, contributing to host defense function in patients with infectious diseases [4, 5]. Therefore, we anticipated that NOX2 expression might be increased in the heart of PG-LPS-treated mice, but in fact we found NOX2 expression was similar among the four groups, as shown in Fig 4E. We do not know why NOX2 expression was not increased in the heart after PG-LPS infusion. PG was recently reported to circumvent the NOX2-mediated antimicrobial defense system, potentially enabling persistence in the tissue that supports the teeth [6], and so it is possible that PG-mediated circumvention of the host defense system via NOX2 might occur in the heart of PG-LPS treated mice. We incorporated the above sentences in the portion of discussion with new references (Page 32, Line 15-Page 33, Line 7). P.S. In the description of Trichrome Statin Kit (#HT15-1KY; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); USA is required after MO in parenthesis. Response: Done as requested (Page 10, Line 7). Reviewer#2: Thank you for submitting to PLOS ONE. I’m very interested in your article “Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice”. I recognize that the main points of this paper are the following two. Immune system activation induced by Lipopolysaccharide on gram-negative bacterial pathogen known to be the cause of periodontitis, induce cardiac dysfunction and myocardial remodeling via the TLR4 signal. Furthermore, it was suggested that the TLR4-NOX4 pathway previously reported in the heart failure model may play an important role. I sound that this paper is suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. However, one major revision and some minor revision are required. Major revisions: The target of your study is myocardial cell damage and cardiac dysfunction. However, cardiovascular events mediated by arteriosclerosis are discussed in introduction. Originally, if you would consider cardiovascular events related to atherosclerosis, coronary artery or vessels must be also investigated. I think introduction should focus on myocardial cell damage. For example, how about changing the reference 1) 12) to other paper such as heart failure model related to myocardial cell damage and discussing it? Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We replaced references #1 and #12 with new references and modified the text as shown below to focus the introduction on myocardial cell damage in mice after chronic PG-LPS infusion. Page 5, Lines 4-5 It is also associated with an increase of myocardial cell damage and heart failure [7, 8]. Page 6, Line 15-Page 7, Line 2 More importantly, to our knowledge there has been no mechanistic study of the myocardial effects of persistent subclinical exposure to PG-LPS, even though subclinical endotoxemia was previously reported to induce myocardial cell damage and heart failure [9].. In addition, we replaced reference #4 with a new reference and modified the following sentences. Page 5, Lines 11-15 . But, even though PG-LPS is widely accepted as a contributor to PD-induced systemic inflammation, and patients with high anti-PG antibody levels were reported to exhibit a high rate of heart failure compared to the low antibody group [10], little is known about the precise relationship between PG-LPS and cardiac dysfunction. Minor revision: 1) You should write P-value at every item in all tables, even if there is no significant difference. Response: We incorporated the required data in S2 data in the revised manuscript. We also found miscalculations in the original Table 1, and have corrected them. The changes do not affect the results or conclusions of this manuscript. 2) The order and abbreviation of the items in the Table 2 A&B have to be changed as follows, Order 1 EF 2 LVEDV 3 ESV → LVESV 4 FS 5 LVIDd → LVDd 6 LVIDs → LVDs 7 HR 8 SV 9 CO 10 IVSDd 11 LVPWTd → PWTd Moreover, except LVSTs&LVPWT, and change Abbreviation details below. WE(%): ejection fraction LVEDV (mL): left ventricular end-diastolic volume LVESV(mL): left ventricular end-systolic volume FS(%): fractional shortening LVDd (mm): left ventricular dimension at end-diastole LVDs (mm): left ventricular dimension at end-systole HR: heart rate SV (mL): stroke volume CO (mL/min): cardiac output IVST (mm): interventricular septum thickness at end-systole PWTd (mm): posterior wall thickness at end-diastole Response: Thank you. We have modified the table as you indicated. 3) The purpose of this study you wrote is twofold. On the other hand, only one is shown in the conclusion. Make sure that the purpose and the conclusion are matched as there is no discrepancy. Response: We modified the conclusion as follows (Page 37, Lines 2-7). Immune system activation induced by chronic PG-LPS infusion contributes to the development of myocardial remodeling and cardiac dysfunction via activation of TLR4 signaling. Furthermore, activation of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway, which was previously reported to induce heart failure [11, 12], might play a role in PG-LPS-mediated cardiac dysfunction. Consequently, pharmacological inhibition of the TLR4-NOX4 pathway might be a promising strategy to decrease ROS production in patients with periodontitis. References 1. Byrne JA, Grieve DJ, Bendall JK, Li JM, Gove C, Lambeth JD, et al. Contrasting roles of NADPH oxidase isoforms in pressure-overload versus angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2003;93(9):802-805. https://doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000099504.30207.f5. PMID: 14551238. 2. Matsuno K, Iwata K, Matsumoto M, Katsuyama M, Cui W, Murata A, et al. NOX1/NADPH oxidase is involved in endotoxin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(9):1718-1728. https://doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.590. PMID: 22982050. 3. Kusumoto K, Kawahara T, Kuwano Y, Teshima-Kondo S, Morita K, Kishi K, et al. Ecabet sodium inhibits Helicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of NADPH oxidase 1 or apoptosis of guinea pig gastric mucosal cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;288(2):G300-G307. https://doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00274.2004. PMID: 15458921. 4. Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(1):245-313. https://doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2005. PMID: 17237347. 5. Lv J, He X, Wang H, Wang Z, Kelly GT, Wang X, et al. TLR4-NOX2 axis regulates the phagocytosis and killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by macrophages. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2017;17(1):194. https://doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0517-0. PMID: 29233104. 6. Roberts JS, Atanasova KR, Lee J, Diamond G, Deguzman J, Hee Choi C, et al. Opportunistic pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis modulates danger signal ATP-mediated antibacterial NOX2 pathways in primary epithelial cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:291. https://doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00291. PMID: 28725637. 7. Chen TS, Battsengel S, Kuo CH, Pan LF, Lin YM, Yao CH, et al. Stem cells rescue cardiomyopathy induced by P. gingivalis-LPS via miR-181b. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;233(8):5869-76. https://doi:10.1002/jcp.26386. PMID: 29226955. 8. Matsuo I, Ohnuki Y, Suita K, Ishikawa M, Mototani Y, Ito A, et al. Effects of chronic Porphylomonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide infusion on cardiac dysfunction in mice. J Oral Biosci. 2021;63(4):394-400. https://doi:10.1016/j.job.2021.10.001. PMID: 34757204. 9. Lew WY, Bayna E, Molle ED, Dalton ND, Lai NC, Bhargava V, et al. Recurrent exposure to subclinical lipopolysaccharide increases mortality and induces cardiac fibrosis in mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61057. https://doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061057. PMID: 23585870. 10. Aoyama N, Kure K, Minabe M, Izumi Y. Increased heart failure prevalence in patients with a high antibody level against periodontal pathogen. Int Heart J. 2019;60(5):1142-6. https://doi:10.1536/ihj.19-010. PubMed PMID: 31447467. 11. Kuroda J, Ago T, Matsushima S, Zhai P, Schneider MD, Sadoshima J. NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) is a major source of oxidative stress in the failing heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(35):15565-15570. https://doi:10.1073/pnas.1002178107. PMID: 20713697. 12. Kuroda J, Sadoshima J. NADPH oxidase and cardiac failure. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010;3(4):314-320. https://doi:10.1007/s12265-010-9184-8. PMID: 20559780. Submitted filename: Response-05-add RS corrections-04.docx Click here for additional data file. 16 May 2022 Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice PONE-D-21-32097R1 Dear Dr. Okumura, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: I have determined that your response meets the acceptance criteria and your paper is well worth publishing in PLOS ONE. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: No 23 May 2022 PONE-D-21-32097R1 Role of TLR4 signaling on Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice Dear Dr. Okumura: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Tomohiko Ai Academic Editor PLOS ONE
Table 1

Serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, PDGF-BB and VEGF.

pg/mlControlLPSTAKLPS+TAK
n7777
TNF-α 1343 ± 361 1079 ± 300 1335 ± 698 772 ± 400
IL-1β 44 ± 11 43 ± 8 51 ± 18 45 ± 20
IL-6 26 ± 6 22 ± 6 27 ± 5 21 ± 9
IL-10 170 ± 33 146 ± 12 192 ± 22 146 ± 45
IL-17 243 ± 144 250 ± 54 187 ± 77 161 ± 103
IFN-γ 152 ± 33 143 ± 26 243 ± 210 128 ± 44
MCP-1 415 ± 87 420 ± 56 420 ± 94 410 ± 116
VEGF-A 86 ± 10 85 ± 9 95 ± 15 85 ± 26
PDGF-BB 8648 ± 6188 9476 ± 7982 7491 ± 5604 10238 ± 9420
Table 2

Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography.

A. One week after PG-LPS
  Control LPS TAK LPS+TAK
n 7 7 7 7
EF 67 ± 0.5 58 ± 1.2 ** 62 ± 0.7 60 ± 0.8
LVEDV 0.20 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.009 0.23 ± 0.01
LVESV 0.066 ± 0.005 0.090 ± 0.005 0.078 ± 0.003 0.091 ± 0.006
FS 32 ± 0.3 26 ± 0.7 ** 29 ± 0.5 27 ± 0.5
LVDd 4.3 ± 0.09 4.4 ± 0.09 4.4 ± 0.07 4.5 ± 0.08
LVDs 2.9 ± 0.07 3.3 ± 0.06 ** 3.1 ± 0.05 3.3 ± 0.08
HR 368 ± 27.6 366 ± 19.6 355 ± 17.3 337 ± 13.0
SV 0.13 ± 0.008 0.12 ± 0.009 0.13 ± 0.006 0.14 ± 0.006
CO 50 ± 5.2 45 ± 4.5 46 ± 3.1 46 ± 3.0
IVSDd 0.55 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.01 0.56 ± 0.017
IVSDs 0.96 ± 0.03 0.89 ± 0.02 0.89 ± 0.03 0.90 ± 0.03
PWTd 0.53 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.002 0.53 ± 0.019 0.54 ± 0.011
PWTs 0.83 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.015 0.83 ± 0.02 0.82 ± 0.02
B. Four weeks after PG-LPS
EF 66 ± 0.5 57 ± 1.0 ** 60 ± 1.3 61 ± 0.6 #
LVEDV 0.22 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.017 0.24 ± 0.02
LVESV 0.073 ± 0.003 0.097 ± 0.007 0.096 ± 0.010 0.092 ± 0.006
FS 32 ± 0.3 26 ± 0.7 ** 27 ± 0.8 28 ± 0.4 #
LVDd 4.4 ± 0.06 4.5 ± 0.11 4.6 ± 0.11 4.6 ± 0.11
LVDs 3.0 ± 0.05 3.3 ± 0.09 3.3 ± 0.12 3.3 ± 0.07
HR 409 ± 15.0 412 ± 22.7 377 ± 24.4 396 ± 18.4
SV 0.14 ± 0.005 0.13 ± 0.010 0.14 ± 0.008 0.14 ± 0.01
CO 59 ± 4.3 53 ± 4.3 54 ± 5.0 57 ± 3.8
IVSTd 0.50 ± 0.02 0.49 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.017
IVSTs 0.91 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.03 0.84 ± 0.04 0.85 ± 0.02
PWTd 0.49 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.013 0.53 ± 0.018
PWTs 0.86 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.03 0.84 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.03

EF (%): Ejection fraction.

LVEDV (mL): Left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

LVESV (mL): Left ventricular end-systolic volume.

FS (%): Fractional shortening.

LVDd (mm): Left ventricular internal dimension at end-diastole.

LVDs (mm): Left ventricular internal dimension at end-systole.

HR (bpm): Heart rate.

SV (mL): Stroke volume.

CO (mL/min): Cardiac output.

IVSTd (mm): Interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole.

IVSTd (mm): Interventricular septum thickness at end-systole.

PWTd (mm): Posterior wall thickness at end-diastole.

PWTs (mm): Posterior wall thickness at end-systole.

**P < 0.01 vs. Control.

#P < 0.05 vs. LPS.

  67 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin by the innate immune system.

Authors:  R J Ulevitch; P S Tobias
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.486

2.  The role of skeletal muscle mTOR in the regulation of mechanical load-induced growth.

Authors:  Craig A Goodman; John W Frey; Danielle M Mabrey; Brittany L Jacobs; Hannah C Lincoln; Jae-Sung You; Troy A Hornberger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cardiac overexpression of Epac1 in transgenic mice rescues lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction and inhibits Jak-STAT pathway.

Authors:  Huiling Jin; Takayuki Fujita; Meihua Jin; Reiko Kurotani; Iyuki Namekata; Shogo Hamaguchi; Yuko Hidaka; Wenqian Cai; Kenji Suita; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Yasumasa Mototani; Kouichi Shiozawa; Rajesh Prajapati; Chen Liang; Masanari Umemura; Utako Yokoyama; Motohiko Sato; Hikaru Tanaka; Satoshi Okumura; Yoshihiro Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.000

4.  Cinnamaldehyde ameliorates LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction via TLR4-NOX4 pathway: The regulation of autophagy and ROS production.

Authors:  Hang Zhao; Meng Zhang; Fuxing Zhou; Wei Cao; Linlin Bi; Yanhua Xie; Qian Yang; Siwang Wang
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 5.  The emerging role of innate immunity in the heart and vascular system: for whom the cell tolls.

Authors:  Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide contains multiple lipid A species that functionally interact with both toll-like receptors 2 and 4.

Authors:  Richard P Darveau; Thu-Thao T Pham; Kayde Lemley; Robert A Reife; Brian W Bainbridge; Stephen R Coats; William N Howald; Sing Sing Way; Adeline M Hajjar
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Inhibition of p38 MAPK decreases myocardial TNF-alpha expression and improves myocardial function and survival in endotoxemia.

Authors:  Tianqing Peng; Xiangru Lu; Ming Lei; Gordon W Moe; Qingping Feng
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 8.  Targeting interleukin-1 in heart failure and inflammatory heart disease.

Authors:  Benjamin W Van Tassell; Juan M Valle Raleigh; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 9.  NADPH oxidases in heart failure: poachers or gamekeepers?

Authors:  Min Zhang; Alessia Perino; Alessandra Ghigo; Emilio Hirsch; Ajay M Shah
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 8.401

10.  Effects of occlusal disharmony on susceptibility to atrial fibrillation in mice.

Authors:  Kenji Suita; Yuka Yagisawa; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Daisuke Umeki; Megumi Nariyama; Aiko Ito; Yoshio Hayakawa; Ichiro Matsuo; Yasumasa Mototani; Yasutake Saeki; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.